[Editorial] Sensitive trade issue
Lifting US beef import restrictions could awaken anxiety about health
The Trump administration is likely to put pressure on South Korea to further open its import market to US beef.
The National Cattlemen's Beef Association is said to have recently submitted an opinion letter on unfair trade practices by US trading partners to the Office of the US Trade Representative. In the letter, the US livestock lobby proposed that South Korea should start importing US beef regardless of what age the cattle were at the time of slaughter.
The association identified South Korea's ban on importing US beef from cattle aged 30 months or older as an unfair trade practice. It pointed out that countries such as China, Japan and Taiwan have already removed similar restrictions and argued that Korea should follow suit.
The association urged the US government to engage in discussions with Korea to eliminate the age limit.
The USTR has published the National Trade Estimate report on significant foreign trade barriers each year since 1985. Its 2025 report due later this month is expected to be significant in establishing grounds for reciprocal tariffs Trump has vowed to impose.
The Trump administration said it would impose reciprocal tariffs for nontariff barriers. Considering this position, it is expected to lean on Seoul to further open its imports of US goods.
Restricting the cattle age for US beef is not a new notion. This issue was mentioned in the 2024 NTE report as one of the trade barriers between South Korea and the US, but the previous Joe Biden administration did not raise the issue formally.
The Trump administration is different. It seeks countermeasures on US trading partners for their nontariff barriers. South Korea's restriction on cattle age could be a pretext for levying new tariffs.
When it comes to importing beef, cattle age at the time of slaughter is an explosive issue. It was the subject of massive protests against the Lee Myung-bak administration in 2008 over its decision to resume the import of US beef from cattle of all ages.
South Korea had suspended US beef imports after bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as 'mad cow disease,' was identified in the US in 2003.
Startled by large-scale protests, the Lee administration renegotiated and agreed to import US beef only from cattle aged under 30 months, among which no case of the disease had been detected.
South Korea has become one of the two largest importers of US beef.
Korean cattle ranchers remain wary. In a statement, the Hanwoo Association said that scrapping the 30-month age restriction could lead to the spread of mad cow disease. They pointed out that the US has reported seven cases, the most recent being in May 2023. The association vowed to take actions if the government and National Assembly move to import US beef from cattle aged 30 months and over.
Opening the agricultural market of a country is directly linked not only to the livelihoods of farmers, but also to public health.
Food safety is a highly sensitive issue that cannot be easily conceded on.
When it comes to importing items directly related to people's health, South Korea must err on the side of caution. Public concerns are still great over beef from cattle slaughtered at 30 months of age or older.
As seen in the rough time that Korea has had due to concerns over mad cow disease, pressure to import food that people feel uneasy about could even stoke anti-American sentiment.
Korea currently imports more beef from the US than anywhere else. Were the US to demand that Korea import US beef from cattle aged 30 months or older, it would appear to be excessive.
Importing US beef is a sensitive issue. It could invite strong backlash and lead to an acute division of public opinion. Disinformation about mad cow disease must not grow rampant again, but there should also be no place for rash negotiations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
K-beauty's US crown under tariff strain in 2 minutes
Korean beauty, born from local culture, is now soaring on a global scale. Its triumph is most vividly illustrated in the US, where it became the top cosmetics exporter in 2024, surpassing former leader France for the first time. Despite this meteoric rise, however, a question remains: How far can K-beauty go at this pivotal juncture, now clouded by looming tariffs? Success formula • Global K-content wave meets lab-developed innovation, popularized through e-commerce • Localized, high-quality products with clean formulations tailored for US consumers • Strong foothold on Amazon, with competitive pricing fueling demand • Viral marketing on TikTok and Instagram, opening new channels like TikTok Shop • Expansion into major US retailers: Sephora, Ulta Beauty, Walmart and Target Navigating US regulations • Compliance with the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act rules for Food and Drug Administration registration, product listing and labeling • Dedicated compliance teams at beauty giants and major original design manufacturers • Successful product testing and certification for over-the-counter sunscreens Tariff headwinds • Delayed 25 percent tariff set for July 9 alongside existing 10 percent tariffs • Growing concerns over won-dollar exchange rate and its impact on import prices • Expansion of US-based production by companies such as Kolmar Korea and Cosmax • Increased US investments by Amorepacific and LG H&H, including LG's $130 million capital infusion and Amorepacific's US facility plan What's next? • Long-term strategy emphasizing technological leadership, product innovation • Shift in innovation focus to AI-powered devices and next-generation beauty technology
![[Yoo Choon-sik] President Lee should look beyond market cheers](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F08%2Fnews-p.v1.20250608.c3de5fa082994a0b9703c29f42d6141a_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
6 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Yoo Choon-sik] President Lee should look beyond market cheers
The South Korean stock market soared on each of the first two trading days following President Lee Jae-myung's official inauguration after securing a decisive victory in the early election held on June 3, winning by a substantial margin over his opponents. The peaceful transition of power and the political clarity it brings have been met with visible enthusiasm. Undoubtedly, Lee and his party, together with the people of South Korea, have every reason to relish the celebratory honeymoon phase of their administration. The stock market's benchmark Kospi posted a remarkable combined gain of 4.2 percent over those two days to end at 2,812.05 points on Friday, representing the highest closing level in nearly a year since July 18 last year. During the same period, foreign investors made net purchases totaling 2.07 trillion won ($1.52 billion) on the main board, marking the most net inflow from overseas investors in a year. This sharp uptick in buying activity reflected renewed confidence in the Korean market under the new leadership. The rise in stock prices is widely interpreted as a reflection of relief across the investor community, stemming from the peaceful resolution of the monthslong political impasse, triggered by the former president's controversial declaration of martial law last December. With stability now restored, there is cautious hope that Lee's administration will introduce pragmatic, market-friendly reforms. Contributing to the rally are also favorable external factors: a persistent weakening of the US dollar against major global currencies and the announcement that the US and China intend to resume trade negotiations —developments that typically benefit emerging markets like South Korea. Historically, traditional markets served as informal forums where policymakers could gather sentiment from the people, as citizens exchanged views and insights while trading goods. In our current era, financial markets serve a parallel — yet far more complex and consequential — role. They function as barometers of public and investor sentiment, allowing market participants around the globe to continuously evaluate a nation's economic performance, policy direction and future outlook. From that perspective, the recent rally in the stock market, alongside the strengthening of the Korean won, can be read as a strong initial endorsement of the promises and rhetoric offered by President Lee during the campaign. His campaign period, however, was notably brief, offering limited time for his team to flesh out fully detailed policy plans. Nonetheless, the messaging struck a chord, especially among investors and market observers eager for reform and modernization. One of Lee's key campaign priorities is addressing the "Korea Discount" — a persistent and well-documented phenomenon that refers to the comparatively low valuation of Korean-listed companies relative to their international peers. It is largely attributed to weaknesses in corporate governance, low shareholder returns and systemic inefficiencies in South Korea's regulatory and economic framework. To address this issue, Lee has pledged to revise Article 382-3 of the Commercial Act. The proposed amendment would obligate directors of listed companies to act not just in good faith but specifically in the interest of both the company and all its shareholders. The current version of the act requires directors to act for the benefit of the company, but lacks explicit emphasis on shareholder interests. Lee has also vowed to introduce the cumulative voting system. Many view this as a powerful tool for enhancing minority shareholder rights, as it allows shareholders to pool votes to elect at least one representative to a board, in contrast to the traditional system of one vote per share per director. Deliberative policymaking In addition, he supports other measures aimed at prompting companies to return a greater portion of earnings to shareholders and limiting the negative effects of corporate spinoffs that often disadvantage minority investors. While these governance-focused reforms are grabbing headlines, Lee has also promised fiscal stimulus on a massive scale. Though not explicitly intended to push stock prices higher, a major supplementary budget is expected to provide a strong economic stimulus to offset faltering domestic demand. This comes at a time when South Korea, an export-driven economy, is grappling with declining overseas sales due mainly to the US government's imposition of steep tariffs on most of its trading partners. It is worth noting that the previous administration had already introduced a 13.8 trillion won supplementary budget back in May, aimed to assist those affected by weak consumer spending, fund recovery in wildfire-stricken regions and support the development of national artificial intelligence infrastructure. The new extra budget being considered under Lee's administration is reportedly about three times the size of the previous one, signaling a bold fiscal approach. Taken together, these initiatives have offered a strong psychological boost to the stock market. They enhance the growth outlook for shares in a wide range of South Korean companies, many of which have long underperformed relative to their counterparts in other advanced economies. The anticipation of pro-growth reforms, combined with short-term liquidity injections, has widened the upside potential for equities. Yet, such optimism must be tempered with realism. The market lift resulting from policy announcements and fiscal measures may not be sustainable unless underpinned by genuine improvements in economic fundamentals. Corporate earnings, gross domestic product growth and export competitiveness — particularly in light of evolving global trade dynamics and tariff uncertainties — remain the true drivers of long-term performance. Furthermore, the risk of unintended consequences looms large. Even the best-intentioned policy can yield adverse results. Business leaders and major corporations have already voiced concerns that overly aggressive changes to the Commercial Act might deter boards from making bold, strategic investments, out of fear of legal entanglements or shareholder activism. Similarly, the large supplementary budget, if not crafted with precision and expertise, risks missing its mark. Without broad consultation and careful planning, the spending could end up inefficiently allocated, raising government debt while failing to generate meaningful economic uplift. That would not only disappoint voters but also strain public finances further. These concerns are especially pertinent in today's political landscape, where the Democratic Party of Korea holds a commanding majority across both the executive and legislative branches. This political dominance could enable the administration to push forward its agenda swiftly, but also tempt it to bypass the kind of open, deliberative policymaking that democracy requires. President Lee must remain aware that while voters handed him a clear mandate, they did not grant him unchecked authority. The people expect reform, yes — but they also expect balance, consultation and accountability. As the proposed revision of the Commercial Act implicitly acknowledges, those in power have a duty to act not just in their party's interest, but in the collective interest of the entire nation. Yoo Choon-sik worked for nearly 30 years at Reuters, including as the chief Korea economics correspondent, and briefly worked as a business strategy consultant. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
![[Kishore Mahbubani] Trump vs. a United ASEAN](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F08%2Fnews-p.v1.20250608.f1f8fb0be2f54df48a25a8bd40c9d7d7_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
6 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Kishore Mahbubani] Trump vs. a United ASEAN
US President Donald Trump's tariffs -- especially the ultra-high 'reciprocal" tariffs that he says will be reintroduced on July 9 for any country that has not struck a trade deal with his administration -- have sent countries around the world scrambling to respond, adapt, and limit the fallout. ASEAN's ten members -- Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam -- have been among the most proactive. Their leaders quickly recognized that, after decades of spectacular gross domestic product growth, ASEAN is an economic force that the Trump administration would have to reckon with in a serious way. In 2000, Japan was the world's second-largest economy by GDP, some eight times larger than ASEAN; today, it is only 1.1 times larger, and by 2030, ASEAN's economy will overtake it. In 2010-20, ASEAN contributed more to global economic growth than the European Union did. ASEAN owes much of this progress to open trade. Between 2003 and 2023, its trade with the rest of the world exploded, from $618 billion to $2.8 trillion. ASEAN's leaders have upheld relative peace and stability in their countries, while cultivating a culture of consultation and consensus in guiding regional relations. This stands in stark contrast to the experiences of many other developing countries and regions. Just a few weeks ago, neighboring India and Pakistan narrowly avoided full-scale war. The Middle East remains gripped by instability and violence, with Israel winning wars and losing the peace. The leaders of Latin America's two largest economies, Brazil and Argentina, are barely on speaking terms. After 48 years of regular ASEAN meetings -- with over 1,000 ministerial and lower-level meetings taking place annually -- constructive engagement is a deeply ingrained habit in the region. To be sure, ASEAN is often accused of lowest-common-denominator cooperation. But without such a measured approach, one guided by pragmatism, consensus-building, and compromise, ASEAN's member countries would not have managed to remain united through multiple shocks, including the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 and the global financial crisis a decade later. ASEAN is now bringing these strengths to bear in its response to Trump's tariffs. To be sure, the individualized nature of the tariffs -- which vary widely within ASEAN, from 49 percent on Cambodia to 10 percent on Singapore -- limits countries' prospects for true collective bargaining. But ASEAN's member states are well aware that they are stronger together. That is why, at the just-concluded ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, hosted by Anwar Ibrahim, the group proposed a summit attended by Trump and ASEAN's ten national leaders. This builds on ASEAN's April declaration that it would develop 'an enhanced, robust, and forward-looking ASEAN-US economic cooperation framework,' which strengthens 'constructive engagement' and drives 'innovative initiatives' to deliver a 'mutually beneficial economic relationship,' with 'particular focus on high-value sectors.' The statement reflects ASEAN's awareness of its value to the US, which runs a significant trade surplus in services with the region. It is no coincidence that the US invests heavily there -- nearly $500 million in 2023. ASEAN's value is set only to grow, owing not least to its efforts to deepen its ties with other regional organizations and economic powers. Its just-concluded summit with China and the Gulf Cooperation Council -- the first of its kind -- sent a clear message: ASEAN is not pinning its future on its relationship with the US, but it is not turning its back on open trade. ASEAN also seeks to boost internal resilience by strengthening trade among its member countries. While intra-ASEAN trade has been declining as a share of total trade, from 25 percent in 2003 to 21.5 percent in 2023, this is only because trade with the rest of the world grew so rapidly. In any case, the group is now seeking to dismantle non-tariff barriers -- more than 99 percent of goods already flow through ASEAN tariff-free -- and exploring other measures to boost trade within the bloc. The US economy is formidable, and Trump's tariffs may well undermine ASEAN's growth in the short term. But, by spurring the ASEAN countries to deepen cooperation with one another and with others, US tariffs could bring about an even more prosperous -- and, crucially, resilient -- grouping. This is especially likely if ASEAN makes the most of existing arrangements -- for example, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which could seek to negotiate a new partnership with the EU. Fortunately, ASEAN has the kinds of leaders who can spearhead such an effort, beginning with the bloc's current leader, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. Kishore Mahbubani is a distinguished fellow at the Asia Research Institute of the National University of Singapore. The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.
