This South-Asian country had over 10 million foreign visitors in Q1 2025, witnessing 22% increase compared to last year
Malaysia has beaten Thailand to emerge as the most-visited South-Asian country. Thailand is facing a tourism crisis after safety concerns rose.
In January, Chinese actor Xing Xing was kidnapped in Thailand. Recently, an Indian tourist in Thailand was attacked by a tiger while taking a selfie at a Thai wildlife spot.
For Malaysia, most tourists came from Singapore (4.9 million), followed by China (1.12 million), Indonesia (1.08 million), Thailand and Brunei. For the first time, China passed Indonesia as the second largest source of visitors, mainly due to easier visa rules, VN Express reported.
Malaysia, recently voted Asia's most loved country by Insider Monkey, introduced a 30-day visa-free entry for Chinese and Indian citizens in December 2023, according to Bernama. It has now extended this rule until 2026.
The country also announced that Chinese tourists will be able to enter visa-free for five more years, possibly continuing until 2036.
In 2024, Malaysia saw 3.29 million visitors from China, more than the previous year. The increase in tourism shows Malaysia's growing popularity as a travel destination in Asia, helped by friendly policies and better international ties.
The Ministry of Tourism has yet to release the full tourist arrival data for January to March 2025. However, a summary report from January 2025 reveals the numbers for the month.
In January 2025, India received 9.57 lakh foreign tourists, 13.9% lower than the number of arrivals in the same month of 2019.
The United States was the top source of tourists, making up 20.6% of the total arrivals. It was followed by the UK (11.8%), Canada (7.1%), Australia (6.4%) and Malaysia (4.7%).
Nearly half of the visitors (45.4%) came for leisure while 31.5% were part of the Indian diaspora visiting family and friends. About 9.7% arrived for business, 3.4% for medical reasons and the rest for other purposes.
Delhi welcomed the highest number of tourists (33.9%), followed by Mumbai (19.6%), Chennai (8.8%), Bangalore (7.8%) and Cochin (4.7%).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
Modi speaks with Macron on Ukraine conflict
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday said he had a 'very good conversation' with French President Emmanuel Macron, during which the two leaders exchanged views on efforts for a peaceful resolution of conflicts in Ukraine and West Asia. Modi said the talks focused on strengthening the India–France strategic partnership. In a post on X, the Prime Minister wrote, 'Had a very good conversation with my friend President Macron. Exchanged views on efforts for peaceful resolution of conflicts in Ukraine and in West Asia. Reaffirmed our commitment to further strengthen the India-France strategic partnership.' Giving details of the conversation, Emmanuel Macron said the two leaders coordinated their positions on the conflict in Ukraine. 'On trade issues, we agreed to strengthen economic exchanges and strategic partnerships,' he added. His remarks come amid mounting US pressure on India over its continued purchase of Russian oil. Washington has responded with additional tariffs — as high as 50% — on a range of Indian goods. 'I have just spoken with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. We coordinated our positions on the war in Ukraine in order to move towards a just and lasting peace, with strong guarantees for Ukraine and Europe's security,' Macron said in a post on X. He added, 'On trade issues, we agreed to strengthen our economic exchanges and our strategic partnership in all areas — this is the key to our sovereignty and independence. Following up on the AI Action Summit held in Paris last February, we are working towards the success of the AI Impact Summit to be held in New Delhi in 2026.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Celebi withdraws petition in Bombay HC challenging revocation of security clearance
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Thursday allowed Turkish ground handling firm Celebi Aviation's subsidiary to withdraw its petition challenging the revocation of its security clearance in May, which led to the termination of its contract at the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (CSMIA). Mumbai, India - May 28, 2020: Planes parked at The Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. A media tour was conducted witness the preparedness at CSMIA post resuming its domestic air service operation in Mumbai, India, on Thursday, May 28, 2020. (Photo by Satyabrata Tripathy/Hindustan Times) (Satyabrata Tripathy/HT Photo) A division bench of justices BP Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla disposed of the plea after senior advocate Chetan Kapadia, representing Celebi, sought to withdraw it 'without prejudice to its rights and contention in law.' The Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) had revoked the security clearance for Celebi Airport Services India Pvt Ltd on May 15, citing 'national security' concerns. This effectively barred the ground handling company from operating at Indian airports. The decision was taken amid mounting tensions between India and Turkey over the latter's diplomatic and arms support to Pakistan during the four-day military clash with India post the Pahalgam terror attack in April. CSMIA was among several airports across the country that terminated their agreements with Celebi after its security clearance was revoked. The company then filed three separate lawsuits, two of which challenged Mumbai International Airport Limited's (MIAL's) decision to terminate its contract at CSMIA. It also sought to restrain MIAL from selecting a new ground handling agency, for which tenders were issued on May 17. The third plea was filed against BCAS, stating that the civil aviation security regulator's move to revoke its security clearance was 'arbitrary and illegal'. Merely citing national security, without specific justification, was 'vague' and 'unsustainable in law,' the petition said. However, the Bombay High Court had been deferring the hearing of the petition, awaiting the verdict on a similar plea in the Delhi High Court, which was eventually dismissed last month. During the hearing, solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for the central government, had defended the revocation of Celebi's security clearance. Mehta pointed to 'intelligence inputs' that indicated potential risks connected to Celebi's operations, especially in managing both passenger and cargo aircraft. He also cited concerns regarding a lack of transparency, claiming that revealing confidential security details to the Turkish company could harm 'national interests'. Following this, a single-judge Delhi High Court bench of justice Sachin Datta dismissed Celebi's petition on July 7, ruling that the Centre had taken the decision based on compelling national security and geopolitical considerations. On Thursday, Celebi told the Bombay High Court bench that the firm wanted to withdraw its plea, which the court accepted. Last month, the high court also vacated its earlier interim order restraining MIAL from finalising new tenders for ground and bridge handling services after Celebi's contract was terminated. Celebi Aviation had a significant presence in India's aviation sector. Since entering the Indian market via CSMIA, the company expanded to nine airports across the country. These include major hubs such as Delhi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Cochin, Kannur, Goa, and Ahmedabad. The firm's Indian operations covered a wide range of services, including passenger assistance, flight operations, cargo handling, warehouse management and bridge operation services.
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Best of Both Sides: Reset with China is not a possibility
There is little doubt that the Donald Trump factor has complicated the geopolitical context in which India pursues its complex relations with China. Serious questions have surfaced about India's strategic relationship with the US as Trump has underplayed Delhi's geopolitical relevance and sent out negative signals on issues ranging from tariffs to Pakistan to sourcing of oil from Russia. Compared to the first Trump term, when the US shifted to defining China as a 'strategic competitor,' the second Trump administration's strategy is far less coherent. The Chinese believe that they have stared down the US in their tussle on trade, tariff and export controls. Trump's pursuit of a 'beautiful deal' with China prioritises short-term economic gains over strategic clarity. The two countries are engaged in a serious dialogue, which could culminate in Trump's visit to China later this year. Yet, China remains convinced that the US is seeking to slow down its rise. In this environment, India and China are seeking more space with a relative thaw in their fraught relations. Yet, the India-China relationship has its own drivers and dynamics that will largely determine its future trajectory. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's visit to India offers guarded optimism but no reset. The Wang Yi visit produced a 10-point understanding, including resuming direct flights and reopening three border trade points. Steps have been taken to reboot discussions on border-related differences, along with progress towards rebuilding a damaged relationship, a process that commenced at PM Narendra Modi's meeting with President Xi Jinping at Kazan in October last year. To what extent this two-track approach will yield substantive outcomes will depend largely on how serious China is about addressing India's concerns. The evidence so far suggests a tactical outreach by China without accommodating India's interests and sensitivities. After Chinese transgressions in eastern Ladakh, the border issue has returned to the centre-stage. The business of disengagement is still unfinished as there are continuing restrictions on patrolling by Indian troops and the grazing activities of Indian herdsmen in areas they traditionally visited in 'buffer zones'. The de-escalation process has not made much headway, but now the two sides have agreed to 'discuss de-escalation, beginning with the principles and modalities thereof.' While structural challenges in the relationship remain unresolved, some of the old concerns have acquired more ominous overtones. The most alarming development is the recent China-Pakistan battlefield collusion, vividly demonstrated during Operation Sindoor in May 2025. China's support went well beyond diplomatic support and deployment of advanced weaponry provided by it. There was close operational support with credible reports about the provision of real-time intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), integrating command-and-control systems and advisory inputs, creating an extended theatre with China's involvement without its explicit military engagement. We do not know whether this matter was broached with Wang Yi. China has started construction of a massive hydropower project, thrice the size of the largest hydropower project in the world (Three Gorges), without considering the interests of the lower riparian, India. This issue was raised forcefully by the Indian side without getting much satisfaction. In recent months, we have seen China denying supplies of rare-earth magnets, specialised fertilisers and tunnel boring machines, and Foxconn being asked to withdraw several hundred Chinese technicians from factories in India. This issue was also taken up with the Chinese FM, and while there might be some easing of supplies, the weaponisation of India's dependencies on China will not change. As the PM told Wang Yi, India seeks stable, predictable and constructive relations with China. However, this objective will have to be pursued in a realistic manner, without overlooking unpalatable facts in engagements with China. China will have to do more to persuade India that its overtures are substantive and not merely cosmetic. Comments in the Chinese media suggest deep scepticism about India's China policy. The perceived softening of India's stance is seen as a sign of weakness, stemming from turbulence in its relations with the US. China sees its own pressure points here. Thus, Chinese readouts on Wang Yi's meetings with the Minister of External Affairs and National Security Adviser cited them as giving assurances on Taiwan being part of China and on the 'One-China Policy'. The Ministry of External Affairs was constrained to clarify that there was no change in India's position. In another effort to exploit India's predicament vis-à-vis the US, the Chinese readout on Wang Yi's meeting with the Prime Minister claimed India joined China in opposing 'unilateral bullying', a barely disguised reference to America. The bottom line is that the answer to India's anxieties with the US does not lie in making common cause with China, which remains its primary strategic challenge with a serious deficit of convergent interests. Unless the facts on the ground change, the process of normalisation with China should be carefully calibrated and a reset in ties is not a realistic proposition at present. Expectations from the PM's forthcoming visit to Tianjin, China should be moderated accordingly. The author is a former ambassador of India to China
