MQA ensures standards, not course decisions, says Higher Education Minister
Zambry said universities have been granted autonomy, with the Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) only tasked with ensuring that any course offered meets the established standards.
'I have not been informed that all public or private universities must follow the mould set by the Higher Education Ministry (KPT) or the Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA). It is not the role of MQA to decide whether a course can be offered.
'MQA is only responsible for ensuring that any course to be offered by a university meets the required quality and standards, but it is not the final decision-maker,' he said.
He said this after officiating the closing ceremony of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia's (UTM) TechnoXplorer 2025 programme at SMK Ahmad Boestamam here today.
Earlier, former higher education deputy minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Abdullah had called for public universities to be given greater autonomy and for bureaucratic barriers to be reduced to enable Malaysia's higher education institutions to thrive.
Saifuddin reportedly said that while the MQA played an important role in maintaining academic standards and course accreditation, the agency's slow processes and bureaucratic red tape had caused the country's academic sector to lag globally.
Meanwhile, Zambry said there was no issue of universities not being given autonomy as alleged, because it was the universities themselves that determined their courses before submitting them to the MQA.
'Each course must be discussed at the MQA level for approval because quality control is important. However, MQA only acts as a guide for universities to ensure that new courses offered are not hastily or poorly developed,' he said.
He added that regulatory oversight regarding implementation and curriculum was a normal process to ensure that public universities remain important institutions for educating Malaysians at the highest level. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
11 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Where were you when…?
THERE'S a question that often arises when something big happens — a historic moment, a national milestone, a collective high. It usually begins like this: 'Where were you when…?' Most of the time, it's not about geography. It's about memory. About anchoring ourselves to something larger. About remembering not just what happened, but how it made us feel. For me, one such moment was the night of the 1992 Thomas Cup finals. Malaysia versus Indonesia. Badminton, of course. It was a Saturday, and I was a 17-year-old schoolboy at the Malay College Kuala Kangsar. I watched it from the common room of our hostel, surrounded by boys in kain pelikat, clutching pillows, Milo mugs and SPM notes, all eyes fixed on a grainy television screen that struggled to keep up with the speed of the shuttle. We won. We brought the cup home after 25 years. And for a few beautiful hours, everything else faded—prep class, homesickness, SPM trial stress—replaced by a kind of joy that felt bigger than sport. Bigger than school. Something national, something shared. That moment, and others like it, become personal chapters in a larger story: the story of how we remember Malaysia. Another such chapter came in May 2018, when Malaysians went to the polls in what would become one of the most significant general elections in our history. For the first time, the ruling coalition was changed. Not through force, not through upheaval, but through the quiet, determined power of the vote. People queued in the heat, some for hours. Some travelled across borders, taking buses and flights home just to mark an X on a ballot. There was tension, yes. But there was also something else: hope. Hope that this country belonged to its people. That we were no longer just passengers, but co-pilots. That power could change hands peacefully. That we, the rakyat, are the ones responsible in deciding the direction of this country moving forward. You didn't need to be in Putrajaya or Dataran Merdeka to feel it. You could have been watching from a living room in Penang, or a mamak in Johor Bahru, or a hostel room in Sarawak. It didn't matter where you were; because the moment definitely reached you. That's what makes these memories powerful. They become shared reference points in the timeline of our lives. Of course, not every Merdeka memory is tied to politics or spectacle. Sometimes, it's quieter. A flag being raised in your neighbourhood. A conversation over teh tarik about what independence really means. A late-night drive on empty roads, with patriotic songs playing softly on the radio. These small moments matter too. Because nationhood is built not just on events, but on experience. It's not just the milestones we remember; it's the way they made us feel connected. Even when we were far apart. And that's the thread I keep coming back to: our shared experiences. You and I may have grown up in different towns, spoken different dialects, attended different schools. But the moment the Sidek brothers stepped onto the court, or when the results rolled in after GE14; we were there, in spirit, together. And yet, these memories, whether personal or collective, are slowly fading. We live in a time of fast timelines and short attention spans. Moments come and go, swallowed by algorithm and speed. The things that once glued us together are being replaced by smaller, more personalised stories. Of course they are important, yes, but they are also often disconnected from the whole. That's why I believe now, more than ever, we need to start recording our stories. Not for history books, but for each other. For the generations who didn't grow up with the Thomas Cup, or the Reformasi years, or who never saw a transfer of power that felt truly earned. It doesn't have to be big. Just honest. Write about where you were when something mattered. Tell your children what Merdeka meant to your parents. Share with a friend that memory you've always carried but never voiced. Because if we don't pass these stories on, who will? So this Merdeka, ask someone: 'Where were you when…?' and listen carefully. Then share your own. Memory, like nationhood, lives best when it is passed from hand to hand. ‒ Aug 14, 2025 Ir Dr Nahrizul Adib Kadri is a professor of biomedical engineering at the Faculty of Engineering, and the Principal of Ibnu Sina Residential College, Universiti Malaya. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: NST
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
Umno Youth chief leads group of over 200 in march on barricaded shop lots
KEPALA BATAS: Umno Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh led a group of over 200 people in a march towards barricaded shop lots here, saying the group came in peace. Chanting "Merdeka", "Sayang Malaysia" and "Pertahan Jalur Merdeka", the group marched about 1.4km to the location with many waving the Jalur Gemilang. "We are not here to bully anyone. We are here to make it clear that there cannot be such incidents as our flag is sacred. "We are here to send a clear message that we cannot accept any form of mistake like this. "It cannot be hung upside down," he said at the gathering along Jalan Datuk Haji Ahmad Badawi here on Thursday (Aug 14). The planned gathering followed a recent controversy, linked to an upside-down Jalur Gemilang incident at a hardware store here. Dr Akmal said the group represented Malaysians and not any political party. "It is not a question of politics or race but it about respect for our country, Malaysia," he said. The group of over 200 people, including representatives from Bersatu and PAS, then sang the national anthem. Just before the gathering ended, there was a war of words between the Umno representatives and Lawyers For Liberty (LFL) director Zaid Malek, who turned up with placards saying "Jangan Membuli" and "Jangan Bersikap Zionis". The group then needed to be calmed down and were told to disperse after Zaid's group put down their placards. Zaid said it was only fair that he was allowed freedom of speech like the Umno representatives. He said the fact that the group had turned despite the flag placement being an honest mistake was an act of intimidation. "His (Dr Akmal's) call to have the hardware shop owner charged amounts to bullying and harassment. 'They hurled all sorts of accusations at the hardware store owner about the upside-down flag incident. "Of course, the owner would be scared," he said. Zaid also asked why they did not gather in Terengganu where there was also an issue with the Jalur Gemilang. 'No one is free from committing mistakes. The store owner has apologised and had no intention to commit the mistake. 'We are here to defend him from any form of harassment,' he said. There was strong police presence throughout to control the crowd and the road leading to the store were also barricaded. Businesses were also forced to close early as a safety precaution. Meanwhile, local DAP leaders handed out Jalur Gemilang as they waited for Dr Akmal and his group to turn up. Penang DAP vice-chairman Datuk Yeoh Soon Hin, Penang DAP assistant secretary H'ng Mooi Lye and Penang Chief Minister's Special Coordinator Lay Hock Peng, among others, turned up early to distribute food and Jalur Gemilang to passers-by. On Saturday (Aug 9), hardware shop owner Pang Chin Tian, 59, was arrested by police following accusations that he had improperly displayed the flag in front of his shop. He has been released on police bail. Pang said he would accept any punishment over the case, which he described as unintentional and regretful. On Thursday, Bukit Aman advised all parties to cancel the planned gathering in Bertam, Kepala Batas to avoid conflicts and ensure safety. Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail said the police viewed seriously any issue that could threaten public safety and well-being. "In the interest of preserving community safety and preventing confrontations between groups, we advise that the gathering on Thursday be called off," he said. The gathering is believed to be linked to a recent controversy over an upside-down display of the Jalur Gemilang that went viral on social media. The IGP said investigations are ongoing, with 38 reports lodged nationwide, 17 in Penang and 21 in other states. "The probe also covers action against individuals who recorded and shared the footage under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. "The investigation paper was submitted to the Deputy Public Prosecutor on Monday (Aug 11) and is now under review," he said.
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
Brazen attack on Rafizi's family an alarming escalation, says civil society group
PETALING JAYA: The attack on former economy minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli's family is not merely an attack on an individual but an alarming escalation in political intimidation, says Projeck Sama. In a statement Thursday (Aug 14), the civil society group categorically condemned the brazen assault. "Targeting the family of a public figure, particularly a child, is a toxic departure from acceptable, democratic political conduct. "It signals that some actors are willing to cross every boundary, even at the expense of innocent children. This is intolerable," the statement read. Projek Sama also urged the police to act swiftly, professionally and transparently in probing the incident, adding that the perpetrators must be located, arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. The group also called on all stakeholders, including the Prime Minister, political leaders, civil society and Malaysians at large to stand firmly in solidarity with Rafizi and his family. "We recognise that political rivalry is intrinsic to democracy but rivalry must never devolve into hatred, malice, or violence," it said. Projek Sama also said institutional reforms should be put in place to ensure no one, including powerful political figures, could evade accountability for politically-motivated violence. "Let the attack on Rafizi's son be a wake-up call and may it unite rather than divide us. "May it catalyse reforms rather than breed fear. And let it reaffirm our collective commitment to a democracy where differences are resolved through ideas, not intimidation," it said.
