Call for rich Edinburgh residents to fund city projects
Donors would have their names on a plaque on a statue or entrance to a park they had helped fund.Introducing his motion to members of the finance and resources committee on Tuesday, Mr Younie said: "I think we have a very generously minded citizenry, we have people who would want to contribute to making the city a better place to live."Conservative councillor Phil Doggart took issue with the proposal, suggesting it could be seen as an attempt by councillors to avoid taking "hard decisions" around which projects to fund."I was surprised when I read this motion," he said. "It looks like the Lib Dems will do anything to avoid hard decisions."If I was a philanthropist looking to do something for the good of the city I would just go ahead and do it, rather than handing over my money to an organisation which could be seen as not massively efficient."There are plenty of philanthropists already around the city and it's quite strange that we would go to try and get them to give money to this organisation, where they would then lose control of the project."This motion is unnecessary, it is abdicating our responsibility on this committee, and that is why we are opposing it."
Crowd funding
The proposal was backed by Green councillor Alex Staniforth, who said: "Very often you have a number of people who have a little bit of money to spare who would like to put it towards their community."This idea would allow us to facilitate people who want to collectively put their money towards the benefit of the city. Crowd funding rather than a single philanthropist."I think this would allow people to invest in their communities and is worth supporting."Mandy Watt, committee convenor, said she felt there was "no harm in asking" for a report on the proposal.After a vote councillors agreed to pass the motion 9 votes to 2.A report on the possibility of a fundraising team is now set to be prepared for a future meeting of the committee.Reporting by local democracy journalist Joe Sullivan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ed Davey calls for review of terrorism legislation after Palestine Action arrests
Update: Date: 2025-08-19T09:43:58.000Z Title: Davey is also calling for a review of the law which has seen Palestine Action supporters arrested at demonstrations across Britain in recent weeks. Content: The Lib Dem leader is seeking a review of the laws to prevent the 'en masse' arrests Tom Ambrose Tue 19 Aug 2025 10.43 BST First published on Tue 19 Aug 2025 08.52 BST From 9.06am BST 09:06 He said that, while Palestine Action have committed criminal acts and 'are a very worrying organisation', people are being arrested 'en masse'. The Lib Dems have written to the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation 'to try to see if there are changes that can be made … so that it doesn't happen again'. He told BBC Breakfast: In the House of Commons, we abstained [from the decision to make Palestine Action a proscribed organisation] because we didn't think the government had made that case. We absolutely accept that criminal acts have happened against British military assets and that is deeply worrying. Updated at 10.13am BST 10.43am BST 10:43 Keir Starmer has returned to Scotland after his family holiday was interrupted by crunch talks on Ukraine in Washington DC. The prime minister's plane flew from the US to Glasgow overnight following the White House discussions, landing on Tuesday morning, PA reported. The bloke just can't catch a break when it comes to getting away for a bit of sun – or 'light cloud', as per today's forecast for Scotland. This is the second summer in a row that his holiday plans have been disrupted after he cancelled a European trip last August when rioting broke out in the UK and tensions escalated in the Middle East. The prime minister also delayed his departure for a trip last Christmas following the death of his brother aged 60 who had been suffering from cancer. 10.29am BST 10:29 Keir Starmer is a 'patriot' who supports the public displaying of the England flag, his official spokesperson claimed amid an apparent row over councils removing flags from lamp-posts. Downing Street said that the prime minister sees national pride as 'an important thing,' in response to controversy over recent decisions by two councils to remove English and British flags, The Telegraph reported. In the past two weeks, local authorities in Tower Hamlets, east London, and Birmingham have announced plans to take down Union and St George's flags from lamp-posts. Meanwhile, Worcestershire county council – notably led by (checks notes) Reform UK – claimed on Monday that hanging such flags from lamp-posts could pose a risk to life. The No 10 spokesman said: I haven't asked him about specific cases of specific councils. But what the prime minister has always talked about is pride in being British, his patriotism in that – not least with the Lionesses in the Euros – and patriotism will always be an important thing to him. Asked whether Starmer thought people should put up English and British flags, he said: Absolutely. Patriotism, putting up English flags … we put up English flags all around Downing Street every time the English football team, the women's and men's, are around. Worcestershire became the third council to express opposition to the flags when a spokesman said St George and Union flags hung from lamp-posts in Wythall risked endangering pedestrians and motorists. Karl Perks, Worcestershire's Reform UK cabinet member for highways, said the flags could be 'dangerous', adding: 'Climbing up lamp-posts and attaching flags to them may not be the best thing to do, mostly because it's dangerous and could cause damage. There are no specific plans to remove the flags.' He advised that people would be better off displaying their flags 'in your own front and back gardens, on your cars, in your windows and on community buildings where agreed by the whole community'. 10.16am BST 10:16 Sally Weale Parents in England are skipping meals and turning to buy-now-pay-later services such as Klarna in order to afford school uniforms before the autumn term, according to a survey. Almost half (47%) of the 2,000 parents who took part in the poll said they were worried about uniform costs, which can run into hundreds of pounds due to expensive branded items, while more than a quarter (29%) said they had forgone food or heating to pay for uniforms. The survey by the parenting charity Parentkind showed struggling parents being forced into debt. Nearly half (45%) of those polled planned to use credit cards to pay for their children's school uniform and a third (34%) said they would rely on Klarna-style delayed payment services. The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, urged schools to help struggling parents by reducing the number of branded items of uniform that pupils are required to wear as a matter of urgency, before a forthcoming change in the law. A limit of three branded items, plus a branded tie for secondary and middle schools, will be enforced from September 2026 after the government's children's wellbeing and schools bill becomes law, but Phillipson wants schools to act sooner on a voluntary basis. 'School uniform matters but it shouldn't break the bank. No family should have to choose between putting food on the table and buying a new blazer,' she said. 'Parents have told us they want fewer costly branded items – and that's exactly what we're delivering. Schools can help ease the pressure on families right now by reducing the number of branded items they require.' Currently, schools can require parents to buy multiple items branded with a school logo, often from specialist suppliers, with many asking for more than five and in some cases 10 items, pushing total uniform costs up to £400 including PE kit. Under the new legislation, parents will be able to buy cheaper uniform staples such as shirts or trousers from general retailers including Aldi and Marks & Spencer. 10.09am BST 10:09 David Cameron's 'bonfire of the quangos' decision to abolish England's council spending watchdog has left a broken system that is costing taxpayers more money than it was promised to save. In a highly critical report, academics at the University of Sheffield said the coalition government of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats had promised savings of £100m a year by abolishing the Audit Commission. However, replacing the public body with a private-sector model had resulted in 'chaos' and soaring costs to audit councils amid the financial crisis hitting England's town halls. Several councils have declared effective bankruptcy linked to years of austerity, soaring costs amid pressure on services, as well as local missteps. They include Birmingham, Nottingham and Woking. The Audit Reform Lab at Sheffield said the average cost of external auditors checking a local authority's finances was now at least £50,000 higher in cash terms than when the Audit Commission was disbanded in 2015. Private-sector accountancy firms took over the job of auditing local government accounts in England after the agency was abolished, in an austerity-driven push by Tory and Lib Dem ministers to find savings and efficiencies. 'Ten years on, however, it now seems clear that these reform ambitions have failed,' the authors of the report wrote. 'Only 1% of audits were delivered on time in 2022-23, with many audits delayed by several years. Audit costs have risen dramatically in response. An unwieldy, but ultimately operational centralised bureaucracy was replaced by market chaos. The £100m per annum savings heralded by the UK government in 2014 are now a distant memory.' 9.54am BST 09:54 Keir Starmer will co-chair a call of the so-called 'coalition of the willing' on Tuesday morning. The prime minister and French president Emmanuel Macron have been leading the talks between nations looking to assist Ukraine. Starmer and several European leaders travelled to Washington for talks with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Donald Trump on Monday. Updated at 9.56am BST 9.48am BST 09:48 The UK has climbed down from its controversial demand that Apple provide access to encrypted customer data, following pressure from the Trump administration, according to US officials. The reversal ends a diplomatic standoff between London and Washington, after it was reported last month that the former was likely to withdraw its request following pressure from US vice-president JD Vance. Tulsi Gabbard, director of national intelligence under President Trump, told the Financial Times that the UK had 'agreed to drop' its request for Apple to unlock encrypted data belonging to American citizens – an action Trump had previously compared to surveillance practices in China. She said: I'm happy to share that the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties. Although the UK has agreed to rescind the request, it has not yet been officially withdrawn, according to a source familiar with the situation, the FT reported. 'Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside president Trump and vice-president Vance, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected,' Gabbard added. Updated at 9.50am BST 9.32am BST 09:32 Ben Quinn Robert Jenrick has been severely criticised by Labour after the shadow justice secretary was pictured at an anti-asylum rally in Essex attended by a veteran far-right activist. Jenrick posted photos on X showing himself visiting the protest outside the Bell hotel in Epping, where police have been attacked and police vehicles vandalised by groups of men taking part in the demonstration. The MP met protesters including a woman with a T-shirt bearing the message: 'Send them home.' Eddy Butler, a well-known figure in far-right circles who was a key strategist in the rise of the British National party, can be seen wearing sunglasses in the background of one of the photos Jenrick shared after the visit. It is not clear whether Jenrick met Butler, but the photo was seized on by far-right figures eager to exploit the protest, which they have heavily promoted. Butler boasted to friends about Jenrick's appearance in a post on his Facebook account: 'At the Bell Hotel, riding shotgun for Robert Jenrick, pretender to the Tory leadership.' A Labour party spokesperson described Jenrick as 'a disgrace' for attending a protest 'organised by a far-right party', which was also attended by someone with 'a long history of involvement with neo-Nazi groups'. 'Jenrick once proudly boasted about ramping up the procurement of asylum hotels when he was immigration minister. It shows, at best, a staggering lack of judgment,' the spokesperson said. 'Kemi Badenoch must show some leadership, explain what action she's going to take against her shadow justice secretary, and demonstrate that she is strong enough to stand up against this challenge to her authority and to basic decency.' A source close to Jenrick insisted that the MP had 'no idea' who the former BNP strategist was and did not speak to him at the protest rally. 9.20am BST 09:20 Here's some reaction to our scoop yesterday that the UK Treasury is considering a new tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000 as a step towards a radical overhaul of stamp duty and council tax. Read the full story here: Meanwhile, David Fell from Hamptons told the Times: Who is better off will come down to how closely the government chooses to follow any recommendations. But I think in response to the general principle, the shift would probably cut the cost of buying the most expensive homes, but add to the annual cost of ownership, particularly given the artificially low levels of council tax charged by many places that have the most expensive house prices. The impact of a change to the system would probably depend on the level at which the rates were set, and the length of time it takes for the higher ownership charges to outweigh existing stamp duty and council tax bills. Head over to my colleague Julia Kollewe's business live blog for more reaction on this story throughout the day: 9.14am BST 09:14 It is 'absolutely essential' for the US to be part of European security guarantees for a potential Ukrainian peace deal, but there is 'lots more work to be done' on what they will entail, a minister has said. 'The really important progress yesterday was on the security guarantees, these issues that the prime minister and president Macron have been leading on within Europe, with 30 countries involved in planning with a coalition of the willing to make sure we can provide those guarantees. 'And the important news yesterday is that the United States will be part of those guarantees. That's absolutely essential, because the people of Ukraine can't be expected to rely on the word of president Putin,' pensions minister Torsten Bell told ITV's Good Morning Britain. He added: Those guarantees are really important. You're right to say that there's now lots more work to be done on the nature of those guarantees. That's what is now under way. You've seen that happening immediately. It was already under way, as I say, across 30 countries, and now the United States is going to be involved in that. He said it was 'premature' to talk about whether British troops could be on the ground as part of a Nato force to guarantee security. 9.06am BST 09:06 He said that, while Palestine Action have committed criminal acts and 'are a very worrying organisation', people are being arrested 'en masse'. The Lib Dems have written to the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation 'to try to see if there are changes that can be made … so that it doesn't happen again'. He told BBC Breakfast: In the House of Commons, we abstained [from the decision to make Palestine Action a proscribed organisation] because we didn't think the government had made that case. We absolutely accept that criminal acts have happened against British military assets and that is deeply worrying. Updated at 10.13am BST 9.02am BST 09:02 The prime minister has 'done a good job' to help keep Europe united in its support for Ukraine, according to the Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey. Speaking on BBC Breakfast this morning, Davey praised Keir Starmer's approach along with fellow European leaders but said the UK needs to do more to strengthen Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy's negotiating position, ahead of a potential one-to-one meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. He said: We need to make sure that European alliance is holding and, to be fair to the prime minister, he has done a good job in keeping that coalition of the willing together with European allies. But … we are not doing enough to help Ukraine and strengthen its negotiating hand. Further support would be providing British Typhoon jet fighters and for frozen Russian assets to be seized and used to 'support the Ukrainian defence effort'. He also said US president Donald Trump's reversal on calling for a ceasefire is a major concession to the Kremlin. Asked whether last night's White House meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy could be considered a success, he said: We have this idea of some sort of security guarantee with American involvement, it's a little bit vague but I fear with what they are talking about with land deal is a price that we cannot let Ukraine pay. Ukraine won't want to pay it. I think if you appease an aggressor like Vladimir Putin, we know in history that it ends in a bad way. I just hope the media, here in the UK and internationally, don't fall for any of the spin coming out of the Trump White House and really analyse what actually has been achieved or not achieved. Readers will recall that this is not the first time Davey has pleaded for better media scrutiny of right-wing politicians on the BBC. Last month, he told the same show: 'The BBC needs to do a better job, needs to hold Nigel Farage to account and if I have to come on your programme to do that, I'll do just that … you cover the tittle tattle around Reform, you don't cover their policies.' Updated at 9.17am BST 8.52am BST 08:52 Good morning and welcome to the UK politics live blog. My name is Tom Ambrose and I'll be bringing you all the latest news from Westminster (and beyond) throughout the day. We start with news that environment secretary Steve Reed has ordered direct oversight of major transport, energy and housing schemes, enabling the government to intervene early to prevent projects being set back by environmental concerns. Ministers plan to step in earlier on developments, such as the expansion of Heathrow airport in London, to resolve issues earlier and avoid spiralling costs, according to a report this morning in The Times. Reed will set up a new board to track more than 50 major infrastructure projects, 'covering roads, railways, airports and power stations', a nod to the fact that the likes of Hinkley Point C and the Lower Thames Crossing are two schemes which have been blighted by years of delay. The move is likely to concern environmental campaigners, with the board aiming to spot potential challenges such as the £100m HS2 'bat tunnel', developed to protect wildlife and nature, but criticised by senior government figures including the prime minister and chancellor Rachel Reeves as an example of over-regulation. Senior Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) officials will meet with civil servant colleagues from the transport and energy departments on a monthly basis to discuss various infrastructure projects, flagging potential roadblocks to ministers at an earlier stage. Reed told The Times that 'complex planning rules' had blocked the development of new homes and businesses, while direct ministerial oversight would 'cut through the delays and get development moving faster'. In other developments: Sadiq Khan said Labour supporters would be 'delusional' if they did not recognise the difficulties the party had had since winning power in July 2024, as he admitted its first year in office has been difficult. The London mayor told an audience at the Edinburgh festival fringe that Labour needs to 'really pick things up'. Keir Starmer has been urged to recall parliament to 'impose immediate sanctions' on Israel in a joint letter signed by politicians in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The letter urges the prime minister to 'act now' to exert pressure on Israel to end its war in Gaza and for an end to arms sales to Israel. Downing Street has suggested that Keir Starmer would back a Ukraine peace deal without a ceasefire as a precondition as the UK's prime minister and other European leaders join Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington for Ukraine talks with Donald Trump. The watchdog that monitors government ministers' professional appointments after leaving office has been criticised for clearing Grant Shapps, a former Conservative defence secretary, to join Cambridge Aerospace as long as he promises not to work on defence matters. Alex Salmond's niece has accused Nicola Sturgeon of tarnishing her uncle's reputation when he is no longer able to defend himself in order to promote her memoir. More than £300m given to English councils to help Ukrainian refugees into accommodation has not been spent, while thousands of them face homelessness. Patients in England now have greater access to important tests such as MRI scans and endoscopies in the evenings and weekends, the government has said, after increasing the number of community diagnostic centres (CDCs) offering out of hours services.
BBC News
20 hours ago
- BBC News
Petition opposes new homes on 'valued green space' in Bridgwater
Hundreds of residents have signed a petition to prevent a green space from being turned into new Homes submitted initial plans for 225 houses between Rhode Lane and the Hamp Brook in Bridgwater, Somerset, last month. The proposed site provides a green buffer between the town and the Quantock Shaw-Young, who lives near the proposed site, created the online petition which describes the site as being "a valued green space for the community". It calls for the plans to be rejected and has already surpassed 1,000 signatures.A spokesperson for Bloor Homes said it will "carefully consider all feedback received during the public consultation process". Mr Shaw-Young said the proposals are "absolutely ridiculous", the Local Democracy Reporting Service said."Our major concern is infrastructure. If you look at Wills Road and Rhode Lane now, they're not going to be take the traffic from another 225 homes," Mr Shaw-Young said."Building of new homes is important. However, developing on this greenfield site is not the answer. There are much better alternatives, such as brownfield sites." Access to the development site will be from Rhode Lane, with a new T-junction being constructed to give priority to traffic from the new site, which includes a public right of way across the Meads towards St. Matthew's field, is a popular area for dog Sharkey, who has lived in the town for 42 years, said she will consider moving away if the development is approved."How many fields are going to be taken away? If this goes ahead, I don't want to live here any more," she said. Bloor Homes, which is expected to submit a formal planning application to Somerset Council before Christmas, is already delivering 237 homes on King's Drive in the also intends to begin work shortly on the Staplegrove urban extension in Taunton which will provide 713 homes and commercial developer declined to comment on the petition, but a spokesperson said: "Any future proposals for the site will include detailed plans to demonstrate safe access and egress."Somerset Council's planning committee is expected to make a decision by the late spring of 2026.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Fury among environmental groups as Rachel Reeves 'looks to strip back protections for bats and newts' in Labour's scramble for growth
is facing a backlash among green groups following claims she is ready to strip back environmental protections in a bid to speed up infrastructure projects. The Chancellor is said to be considering further planning reforms that would make it harder for concerns about nature to stop development. She has previously outlined action to reduce requirements on developers by saying they should 'focus on getting things built, and stop worrying about bats and newts'. According to The Times, the Treasury has begun preparing for another planning reform bill and is considering tearing up key parts of EU-derived environmental rules. It comes amid Ms Reeves' scramble to fire up the sluggish UK economy, with recent official figures having shown growth slowed in the second quarter of this year. The plans being considered by the Treasury are reported to include a smaller UK-only list of protected species. This would place less weight on wildlife, including types of newt, that is rare elsewhere in Europe but more common in Britain. Developers would also no longer have to prove that projects would have no impact on protected natural sites through the scrapping of the 'precautionary principle'. A new test would instead look at risks and benefits of potential projects, the newspaper reported. Ms Reeves is also said to be considering further curbs to judicial review in order to stop key projects being delayed by legal challenges from environmentalists. Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, who stood down as a Government minister in May, suggested Labur's Planning and Infrastructure Bill - which is currently going through Parliament - was 'insufficient' for speeding up major infrastructure projects. 'While I think the planning bill will work for housing, I don't think it is sufficiently focused on the major infrastructure projects,' the Labour peer said. 'So it is encouraging that the Treasury is going to have another look at whether we've really got this right. 'The Government has to face up to the tensions in the Habitat Regulations which are making it hard to build essential infrastructure and the reality is that at some point someone needs to make a hard decision and say 'on some things, you just have to press ahead'.' But Paul Miner, of the countryside charity CPRE, said watering down environmental rules would 'take us backwards rather than forwards on nature recovery'. 'We urge the Government to drop the worn-out 'builders versus blockers' narrative which wrongly frames climate and nature as being in conflict with economic growth,' he added. Becky Pullinger, of the Wildlife Trusts, said maintaining environmental standards was 'essential if we are to achieve targets to protect and restore the natural world which is suffering huge declines'. John Flesher, deputy director of the Conservative Environment Network, said: 'The planning system in the UK is currently failing to restore nature and to build the housing and infrastructure that we desperately need. 'Poorly designed and implemented regulations are holding back our economic potential, delaying major infrastructure projects and costing taxpayers, without protecting nature as intended. 'We don't need to choose between building more housing and infrastructure and restoring nature - we must do both. 'But this will require more fundamental reforms of legacy EU red tape than the government has pursued so far. 'Labour's approach so far will fail nature and growth. The government needs to stop tinkering around the edges and end its reliance on top-down solutions. 'We must harness our Brexit freedoms to deliver a new system, which empowers farmers and the private sector, gets Britain building, and properly protects our green and pleasant land.' Downing Street said the Government was focused on delivering the current 'radical' planning reforms. But the Prime Minister's official spokesman added: 'We'll always keep under review the measures needed to deliver our housing pledges and deliver on the infrastructure this country needs.'
