logo
"Saw Bodies, Blasts": Indian Students Return From Iran, Future Uncertain

"Saw Bodies, Blasts": Indian Students Return From Iran, Future Uncertain

NDTVa day ago

New Delhi:
With an Indian flag clutched tightly in one hand and a dazed look in her eyes, Mizban stepped out of the airport visibly anxious and overwhelmed. "We saw dead bodies. Heard blasts. Saw airstrikes," she muttered, avoiding eye contact as she tried to make sense of the safety around her. "From Tehran to Qom to Mashhad, we were always on the move since the Iran-Israel conflict escalated. I'm just grateful to be home. If we're called back by my university, we'll have to decide carefully."
Not far from her stood Zubeda, a single mother from Srinagar, holding a faded photograph of her son, a medical student in Tehran. "I only spoke to him once or twice during the crisis. He hid his fear to keep me strong. I want him to become a doctor, but not at the cost of living through war," she said, while scanning every face stepping through the arrival gate at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport on Saturday evening, as Mahan Air flight IRM071A touched down with 256 Indian students, most of them from the Kashmir Valley, who had been stranded in Iran since the country began trading missile strikes with Israel on June 13.
This marks the third chartered evacuation flight under India's ongoing mission Operation Sindhu, launched to bring back citizens caught in the crossfire of escalating tensions in Iran, particularly around Tehran after Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Operation Rising Lion.
As part of Operation Sindhu, a total of three charter flights - two from Iran's Mashhad and one from Turkmenistan's Ashgabat - have successfully brought back 827 Indian nationals so far, including over 300 students, though the final count is still being verified. A fourth evacuation flight is scheduled to arrive in Delhi at 11:30 pm on Saturday, expected to push the total number of returnees past the 1,000 mark.
Junaid, whose younger brother and sister were among the evacuees, recalled, "She called from random numbers when she could. We were extremely worried as there was an internet shutdown and so we lost communication. The university buildings were close to bombed zones. My brother made it home yesterday, but we were terrified for my sister. She's just in her third semester at college."
Sumarah Rahman, another Kashmiri student, said, "We were terrified. Nights were filled with sirens and blasts. But now we're home. God willing, we'll go back when it's safe to finish our studies."
Ahabashi, a final-year student from Shasherf Bishti University, added, "Tehran changed overnight. The fear was real. If death had come, it would have come so far from home. But the Indian government stood by us, every detail was handled with care."
From Tehran to Qom to Mashhad: A Risky Escape
The rescued students had first been moved from Tehran to Qom, 150 kilometers to the south, before being taken to Mashhad, from where chartered flights began the homeward journey. Despite its closed airspace due to ongoing conflict with Israel, Iran made a rare exception to allow India's emergency evacuations.
India's Deputy Chief of Mission in Tehran, Mohammad Javad Hosseini, confirmed, "Iran has been aiding evacuations despite its own crisis. It's a gesture of goodwill." He noted that the evacuation has included pilgrims and medical students, many of whom were spread across universities and seminaries in the region.
The Jammu and Kashmir Students' Association issued a statement expressing gratitude. "We thank the Government of India for their relentless efforts and timely coordination with Iranian authorities. We remain committed to the safe evacuation of all remaining students, especially those from vulnerable and remote regions," the statement read.
While the relief was palpable, a sense of uncertainty lingered. Many students had traveled to Iran in pursuit of affordable medical education, a path often unavailable in India's highly competitive academic system. Their futures now hang in limbo. "I want my son to follow his dream," Zubeda said as she waited, "but I never want to feel this fear again."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When America joins Israel's war with Iran
When America joins Israel's war with Iran

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

When America joins Israel's war with Iran

The US bombing of key Iranian nuclear facilities Sunday will have significant geopolitical implications for regional stability, global geopolitics, and India's immediate and medium-term interests. However, for now, it doesn't appear that the US-Israeli attack on Iran is likely to go all the way, making it improbable that Iran will be completely denuclearised or that the Islamic regime in Tehran will fall. A severely weakened Iranian regime is likely to respond with military and grey-zone tactics, increasing political and economic instability in the region. Moreover, neither Israel nor the US appear to have an endgame in mind in this war. The US-Israel attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines (REUTERS) There are at least six key implications of this ongoing war. First, West Asia is likely to revert to a period of chaos, conflict, and uncertainty, at least for some time. Despite Iran's strained relations with many of its neighbours, the US decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities and join Israel's military campaign will make it difficult for other regional powers to resume efforts to normalise relations with Tel Aviv. Iran and its regime may not be popular in the Sunni strongholds of West Asia, but neither is Israel, especially given its actions in Gaza and the ongoing humanitarian tragedy there. Russia and China are likely to increase their geopolitical influence in the region, and neither will miss opportunities to challenge Israel and the US, making the regional balance even more complex and unpredictable. Second, the attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines. While the US and Israel may achieve immediate military gains, many others will be dissatisfied: With their geopolitical standing threatened, they might seek to undermine the dominance established by the US-Israel alliance in the region. Many in the Global South are likely to condemn the unilateral actions and violations of international law by the US and Israel. Meanwhile, China will look to exploit the emerging regional fractures, while Moscow will seek to recover the influence it lost in West Asia — due to the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and now, through the attack on Iran — and spot an opportunity in the post-war scene. Interestingly, Europe has maintained a curious silence. However, it will inevitably ask why the US, which wanted its Nato partners to pay for their defence and abandoned Ukraine thus increasing Europe's insecurity, would resort to force in a distant country. Clearly, Trump has prioritised Israel over Nato allies; that rude reality won't be lost on Europe. Third, the American and Israeli attacks on Iran lack legitimacy under international law, and as a result, these will further undermine the credibility of the United Nations and weaken the influence of international law worldwide. For America's western partners, this presents several dilemmas. It will test their commitment to international legal frameworks as condemning the attack risks alienating Trump further, and not condemning it risks being seen as tacit support for an illegal action. Moreover, if they do not condemn the US action, the moral ground to criticise Russia will be considerably weakened. It also undermines the geopolitical standing of key western States, which were actively engaged in negotiations with the Iranian foreign minister in Geneva to end the conflict. They face the risk of losing credibility considering how Trump went ahead and bombed Iran ignoring the talks. Fourth, American engagement in the West Asian conflict could divert attention from Ukraine's ongoing war with Russia. The Iran war would be disastrous for Ukraine, especially as the US has been unable to bring Russia to the negotiating table. Meanwhile, Russia's gains on the battlefield are growing and Moscow shows no enthusiasm to negotiate a ceasefire with Kyiv. Fifth, the attempted denuclearisation of Iran will likely have the opposite effect internationally, prompting several other countries to consider developing their own nuclear weapons for after all those who possess nuclear weapons have little to fear. Rather than strengthening the global nuclear order, the US and Israel's military action to denuclearise Iran will end up weakening it, encouraging more States to pursue nuclear arms as insurance against potential threats. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal, while Iran failed to reach the finish line; both faced significant consequences. Israel developed its nuclear programme secretly, North Korea built its nuclear weapons at great domestic cost, and India and Pakistan developed theirs despite sanctions and US pressure. The lessons are many, and will not be lost on nuclear aspirants around the world. Finally, for India, the war in West Asia will likely unsettle the country's grand plans for broader engagement with the region. Energy prices are likely to spike, while heightened geopolitical divides will challenge India's ability to manage regional fault lines. If the war spreads or persists, it could also impact Indian nationals in the region and the remittances they send home. Moreover, the Iran conflict will, at least for the moment, stall India's regional plans for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and the Chabahar port in Iran, projected as India's gateway to central Asia. Happymon Jacob teaches India's foreign policy at Jawaharlal Nehru University and is the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal

J&K leaders lash out at US over strike in Iran
J&K leaders lash out at US over strike in Iran

Hindustan Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

J&K leaders lash out at US over strike in Iran

By Ashiq Hussain , Srinagar Jun 22, 2025 08:20 PM IST J&K political leaders Farooq Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti on Sunday lashed out at the US for its strikes on Iran calling it a dangerous escalation which can trigger Third World War. Former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Farooq Abdullah (File) National Conference (NC) president Farooq Abdullah said that the US and Israel have always been against the nuclear ambitions of Iran. 'This is not the first time. America and Israel always have this view to not allow Iran to make nuclear weapons. Today it proved that it is their only motive,' Abdullah said. US bombers made strikes on Iran's three nuclear facilities during the previous night amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Abdullah also castigated US president Trump for not sticking to his word. 'He had talked about waiting two weeks to see if negotiations would work. They want a regime change. Will there be anything good after regime change,' he said. 'The person or country whom we had expected to intervene, themselves, joined the war. This is their second war -one they are already fighting-- Russia in Ukraine. This means this is moving towards Third World War,' he cautioned. Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti castigated Indian government's response to the strikes on Iran by US and Israel, while also lashing out at the neighbouring country for its advocacy of Nobel Peace Prize for Trump. 'The OIC, as expected, has once again limited its response to mere lip service in the wake of the attack on Iran. Meanwhile the country that rushed to recommend Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize now finds itself with egg on its face after he attacked Iran. By launching this attack on Iran, Trump has dangerously escalated tensions plunging the region into a new wave of violence and edging the world closer to the brink of a global conflict,' Mufti said on X. 'Regrettably India long seen as a nation with a historic and principled role in international affairs is not only remaining silent but appears to be aligning itself with the aggressor,' she said.

Did Steve Bannon know about Operation Midnight Hammer? His 'party is on' dropped the first clue
Did Steve Bannon know about Operation Midnight Hammer? His 'party is on' dropped the first clue

Time of India

time21 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Did Steve Bannon know about Operation Midnight Hammer? His 'party is on' dropped the first clue

Steve Bannon dropped the first clue of a possible US attack on Iran when he said this was going to be a big weekend. Donald Trump's former advisor Steve Bannon dropped the first clue of something big happening this weekend in his podcast Saturday when he said 'the party is on'. 'I'm just reporting what I'm hearing from pretty good sources. The party is on," Steve Bannon said when Trump officially bought two weeks time to decide on joining Israel in its attack on Iran. 'So another big weekend in this unfolding aspect of the Third World War, and no, anyone that's telling you that the Third World War is not here absolutely does not understand the development and evolution of kinetic energy," Steve Bannon who earlier urged the president to not get involved in the Israel-Iran war said. Bannon visited the White House earlier this week, just hours before the president announced the two-week deadline for himself to make a decision on his next steps in Iran. It was, however, after Trump apparently approved the attack plan, going by the report of the Wall Street Journal. Reports said Bannon arrived at the White House armed with specific talking points, including that Israeli intelligence was unreliable, that the bunker-buster bomb might not work as planned, and the risk an attack posed to American troops stationed in the Middle East. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Get Matched with a Licensed Therapist Today Affordable Online Counseling | Search Ads Learn More Undo Pentagon Sunday announced that Operation Midnight Hammer was very classified and only a few people had the knowledge about it. Top Republicans were briefed about the operation According to multiple GOP sources, the top two Republicans in Congress who were briefed about the US strikes on three Iran nuclear plans ahead of time were House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries received notifications shortly before the public announcement. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Mike Johnson wrote on X, defending Trump's decision. 'The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and tonight's necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties. '

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store