logo
Federal Court upholds IRB's RM1.8 billion tax claim against TNB

Federal Court upholds IRB's RM1.8 billion tax claim against TNB

The Sun4 days ago
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has ruled in favour of the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) in a RM1.8 billion tax dispute with Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) for the 2018 assessment year.
A five-member bench, led by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, unanimously overturned previous High Court and Court of Appeal decisions that had sided with TNB.
The court found that TNB had wrongly claimed reinvestment allowance (RA) under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA), which is intended for manufacturing companies. Justice Rhodzariah Bujang stated that TNB, as a service provider, should have applied for investment allowance under Schedule 7B instead.
The dispute arose after TNB filed a judicial review in 2020 challenging IRB's rejection of its RM1.81 billion RA claim.
The High Court and Court of Appeal initially ruled in TNB's favour, but the Federal Court reversed those decisions, stating that TNB's operations fall under the services sector, not manufacturing.
Despite the legal battle, TNB has already paid the assessed tax amount. The IRB was represented by Datuk Dr Cyrus Das and senior revenue counsel Ashrina Ramzan Ali, while TNB's legal team included Datuk D. P. Naban and S. Saravana Kumar.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

E-invoicing Phase 3 begins for businesses earning RM5mil–RM25mil [BTTV]
E-invoicing Phase 3 begins for businesses earning RM5mil–RM25mil [BTTV]

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

E-invoicing Phase 3 begins for businesses earning RM5mil–RM25mil [BTTV]

CYBERJAYA: The Inland Revenue Board (IRB) is accelerating its digital tax compliance drive with the rollout of Phase 3 of e-invoicing today, a move set to impact around 55,000 businesses earning between RM5 million and RM25 million annually. IRB Deputy Chief Executive Officer (Tax Operations) Shaharrudy Othman said the agency is committed to providing continuous support to taxpayers, particularly micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), through various promotional and educational programmes. "IRB is actively stepping up efforts to educate and raise awareness among target groups to ensure that the e-Invoice implementation is comprehensive and effective," he said at the launch ceremony and media conference on the implementation of e-Invoice for Phase 3 held here today. Shaharrudy said a total of 352 million e-invoices have been submitted via the MyInvois system to date. "This involves over 37,800 taxpayers, including about 5,400 taxpayers from Phase 1 and more than 13,000 taxpayers from Phase 2. "Furthermore, over 19,000 taxpayers have voluntarily adopted e-invoicing ahead of their scheduled implementation dates," he said. Last month, IRB announced that Phase 4 of the e-invoice implementation for taxpayers with annual income or sales between RM1 million and RM5 million has been postponed to Jan 1, 2026. Phase 5, involving the income group of up to RM1 million, will commence on July 1, 2026. Meanwhile, taxpayers with an annual income or sales below RM500,000 are exempted from the initiative. Shaharrudy added that the grace period for the implementation of e-invoicing for Phase 2, involving businesses with an annual revenue between RM25 million and RM100 million, had ended on June 3, and taxpayers must now fully comply with the guidelines. "To ensure ongoing support for MSMEs who are starting their e-invoicing implementation from today, IRB has increased the number of briefing sessions and expanded the use of the MyInvois Portal nationwide. "IRB has also created a dedicated e-invoicing microsite on the agency's official portal and is using various communication channels to disseminate relevant information," he said. Shaharrudy said the agency will continue to enhance communication across businesses, tax practitioners, professional bodies and stakeholders to raise awareness and improve their understanding of the benefits of e-invoicing implementation. "To facilitate a smooth implementation, we have also set up dedicated service counters nationwide to assist taxpayers in understanding the use of the MyInvois Portal, MyInvois application and the free-to-use MyInvois e-Pos system," he said. IRB also launched the MyInvois e-Pos system, which is designed for MSMEs with annual income or sales of under RM750,000. Shaharrudy said the system simplifies the implementation of e-invoicing by integrating core business functions such as sales recording, inventory management, financial reporting and e-invoice support. He added that the system also aims to help MSMEs enhance business operational efficiency while facilitating the smooth implementation of e-invoicing.

Prosecution argues Court of Appeal wrong to acquit ex-Felda chair
Prosecution argues Court of Appeal wrong to acquit ex-Felda chair

Malaysiakini

time16 hours ago

  • Malaysiakini

Prosecution argues Court of Appeal wrong to acquit ex-Felda chair

The prosecution has listed 24 grounds in its petition of appeal on why the Court of Appeal erred in acquitting former Felda chairperson Isa Abdul Samad of nine corruption charges. In the petition filed at the Federal Court on June 26, the prosecution sought to reinstate the High Court's 2012 decision, which found Isa guilty and sentenced him to six years' imprisonment and a fine of RM15.45 million, in default 18 years in prison. A check on the court's e-filing system showed that...

Court grants Thomas' bid to disqualify Justice Roz Mawar
Court grants Thomas' bid to disqualify Justice Roz Mawar

The Star

time20 hours ago

  • The Star

Court grants Thomas' bid to disqualify Justice Roz Mawar

PUTRAJAYA: Former attorney general Tan Sri Tommy Thomas has succeeded in disqualifying a High Court judge from hearing a defamation suit filed against him by Umno veteran Tan Sri Shahrir Ab. Samad. A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal allowed Thomas' appeal to disqualify Justice Roz Mawar Rozain from hearing the case in its future proceedings. In the unanimous decision, read out by Justice Faizah Jamaludin, the panel ruled that the findings of the High Court judge were neither based on the book written by Thomas nor the pleadings filed by Shahrir. The panel chaired by Justice Supang Lian, found that the statement made by the judge when dismissing Thomas' striking out application of the main suit was based on an opinion that she formed rather than by merits of the case. 'As an informed and fair-minded bystander, given the facts and circumstances of the case, we perceive that these findings and observations do give rise to a risk of real danger of bias by the learned judge even though the bias may be unintentional. 'We allow this appeal and set aside the decision of the High Court judge dated Jan 14 with order that the learned High Court judge recuse herself from all future proceedings in the trial,' Justice Faizah said. Justice Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin is the third judge of the panel. Thomas filed the recusal application on Aug 26 last year, claiming that Justice Roz Mawar had made numerous baseless findings and contradictory statements to the claims in the lawsuit and the evidence presented in court. On Jan 14, Justice Roz Mawar dismissed Thomas's application, saying that an unhealthy trend had emerged of litigants seeking to disqualify judges from hearing their cases which is capable of eroding public confidence in the judicial arm of the state. Thomas then filed an appeal at the appellate court. The application stemmed from Shahrir's lawsuit against Thomas over what the former claimed was a malicious prosecution. Shahrir was charged at the Sessions Court on Oct 21, 2020, for allegedly failing to declare a RM1mil cheque he received from former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) for restoration work on the Puri Langkasuka housing project in Larkin, Johor. On Jan 5, 2023, High Court judge Justice Muhammad Jamil Hussin acquitted the former Johor Baru MP of the charge. In December the same year, Shahrir filed the lawsuit and named Thomas, former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner Latheefa Koya, the MACC, and the government as defendants, for alleged malicious prosecution against him. Thomas, who served as AG from June 4, 2018, to Feb 28, 2020, refuted Shahrir's allegations of abuse of power, describing them as 'unsustainable'. He stated that the discretion to charge could only be exercised after the AG receives the investigation papers from agencies like the MACC. Thomas said he resigned on Feb 28, 2020, and that Shahrir's criminal trial for the charges began on July 26, 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store