logo
New law to lift ban on Catholics in Church of Scotland role

New law to lift ban on Catholics in Church of Scotland role

BBC News13-02-2025
A new bill lifting the ban on Catholics becoming the King's representative at the Church of Scotland's annual assembly has been introduced at the House of Commons.Lady Eilish Angiolini KC has been given the post of lord high commissioner of the church's 2025 general assembly.However, the former lord advocate is a practicing Catholic and legally prohibited from holding the position under laws written in the 19th century.The Church of Scotland (Lord High Commissioner) Act 2025 would revoke that legislation and "make provision for persons of the Roman Catholic faith" to hold the role.
The general assembly has met almost every year since the protestant reformation of 1560.It meets to make laws and set agendas for the Kirk.The lord high commissioner acts as the sovereign's representative at the event, and delivers the opening and closing speeches.The role is usually held by a prominent member of Scottish society, including King Charles himself in 2000.However, a provision in the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829 meant those of the Catholic faith were still barred from the position.The act allowed Catholics in the United Kingdom to retain their faith while serving in parliament and higher office.But it made an omission for the position of lord high commissioner.
'Goodwill and collaboration'
The new Bill, proposed by Labour MP Pat McFadden, will remove that provision in time for Lady Angiolini to take up the job in May.The cabinet office described her appointment as a "significant gesture of unity, goodwill and collaboration" between the Kirk and the Catholic Church in Scotland.Lady Angiolini, who was born in Glasgow's Govan to a family of Irish catholic descent, served as solicitor general under Jack McConnell between 2001 and 2006.She was later lord advocate from 2007 until 2011, when she was succeeded by Lord Mulholland.She described accepting the position as lord high commissioner as "a great honour" after being appointed to the role in December.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JK Rowling divides gender critics - but is it permanent?
JK Rowling divides gender critics - but is it permanent?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

JK Rowling divides gender critics - but is it permanent?

Ms Rowling has been a vocal critic of the constitutional divide for more than a decade, voting No in the 2014 referendum and donation £1 million to the Better Together campaign. Equally though, she has always maintained friendships with people on both sides of the debate. Ms Rowling and the transgender exclusionary movement share a common dislike for the former first minister, given that she spearheaded the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill that set fire to the debate. It is surprising, then, that Ms Rowling's review of Ms Sturgeon's memoir caused such a schism in the movement. Ms Rowling took particular issue with the former first minister's argument that the independence debate was not "unpleasant and divisive". She wrote in her review that No voters were "being threatened with violence and to f*** off out of Scotland, quizzed on the amount of Scottish blood that ran in their veins, accused of treachery and treason". It immediately caused a divide. Pro-independence blogger Wings Over Scotland stated it had "ripped open an old wound between a bunch of gender-critical people who were getting along just fine". And getting along just fine they were. Arguably, the gender critical movement was at an all-time harmonious high. When the Supreme Court ruling linked the terms "woman" and "man" to biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, the triumph from campaigners was inescapable. And the employment tribunal between Sandie Peggie and NHS Fife reinvigorated the gender critical community with 10 days of non-stop news of their cause. After Ms Rowling's review, social media was awash with conflicting views: those urging pro-independence voters not to conflate the constitutional issue with the campaign for women's rights. Read more: But others felt that it was only right to call out the Harry Potter author. High profile figures joined in to contradict her version of events. Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry said she felt Ms Rowling's take may have exaggerated the bad behaviour during the referendum. The author's review omits "any reference to bad behaviour by Better Together supporters which also occurred," according to the former SNP MP. The KC said she experienced a "determined attempt" to "traduce" her professional reputation after she set up Lawyers for Yes. The author referenced the concerns, writing on X: "Did pro-union people behave badly, as well as nationalists? Yes, without a doubt. In any binary contest you will look around and find a lot of people standing in your camp you don't have a single thing in common with except on a single yes/no question. "There's a reason, though, that far more nationalists than unionists look back fondly on the run up to the referendum time. "Pro-independence politicians were happy to impugn remainers' motives in very ugly ways, and plenty elected MPs and MSPs contributed enthusiastically to online toxicity." Both Scottish independence and the gender debate have become two of the most divisive debates in the country's history. Ms Rowling's self-published review has reignited questions about how movements with shared values can fracture when broader identities and loyalties clash. Much like the debate around self-ID, the constitutional question continues to stir deep emotion and division. The Scottish independence movement has never overcome that division. The challenge now for the gender critical side, is whether it can overcome the deep differences for the benefit of its greater cause - and only time will tell.

Do not enforce Palestine Action terror ban in Scotland
Do not enforce Palestine Action terror ban in Scotland

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Do not enforce Palestine Action terror ban in Scotland

A motion on the provisional agenda for the conference – which will take place in Aberdeen from October 11-13 – says designation of Palestine Action as a terrorist group should 'not be implemented or enforced in Scotland'. It further calls on the SNP leadership at Holyrood and Westminster to 'work with progressive allies to oppose the proscription and support its repeal'. Keir Starmer's Government designated Palestine Action a terrorist organisation in July, leading the UN human rights chief Volker Turk to intervene and warn that Labour had put the UK 'at odds' with international law. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper speaking in the Commons (Image: PA) However, Labour have stood by the proscription, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claiming over the weekend that 'important details' about the decision cannot be made public due to court proceedings. In Scotland, policing of Palestine protests in the wake of the terror legislation has sparked high-level concerns about breaches of human rights to freedom of expression and assembly. The motion proposed for the SNP conference, put forward by the party's BAME (Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic) network, calls on the Scottish Government to 'defend the right to protest within Scotland's jurisdiction'. It reads: 'Conference condemns the UK Government's decision to ban Palestine Action, a non-violent group protesting against the UK Government's complicity in Israeli military actions in Gaza and the Occupied Territories. READ MORE: Leaked document 'leaves Government's Palestine Action case in tatters' 'Conference also criticises the UK Government's decision to bundle Palestine Action with two unrelated extremist groups – the Murder Maniac Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement – in a single parliamentary vote, denying MPs the opportunity to assess each case on its own merits. 'In response, conference commends SNP Glasgow city councillors for defending Palestine Action's right to peaceful protest, at a constituted meeting, and further opposing Keir Starmer's attempts to criminalise direct action through misuse of terrorism legislation. 'Conference believes this attack on democratic rights is intended to deflect attention from the Israeli military's mass killing of over 60,000 Palestinian civilians.' The motion will need to be accepted for the finalised agenda and voted on by SNP delegates before becoming official party policy. However, that would not necessarily mean it will also be taken on by the SNP-run Scottish Government. Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain is head of prosecutions in Scotland (Image: (Andrew Milligan/PA)) Policing and law enforcement are devolved in Scotland. As such, although the Lord Advocate – Scotland's top legal officer – cannot change the law, she has discretion in how it is enforced. This has been demonstrated in the safe consumption space in Glasgow, set up to help people with drug addiction issues. Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain publicly said she had 'concluded that it would not be in the public interest to prosecute people for simple possession offences when they are already in a place where help with their issues can be offered'. READ MORE: Police Scotland respond as officers detain 'pro-plasticine' activist in viral video Bain leads the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), which in recent weeks has been cancelling court dates and lifting bail conditions for Scottish activists charged under terror laws following the proscription of Palestine Action. The COPFS decisions came after the Scottish Human Rights Commission warned of a risk to human rights in the way pro-Palestine protesters were being policed. On Monday, Bain said in a public reply to the commission: 'Cases involving 'Palestine Action' reported to the Procurator Fiscal will be considered by a specialist prosecutor, overseen by senior prosecutors. The prosecutor will carefully examine whether there is sufficient evidence and determine what action, if any, should be taken in the public interest.'

John Swinney has 'not read' explosive Nicola Sturgeon memoir that opens up SNP divisions
John Swinney has 'not read' explosive Nicola Sturgeon memoir that opens up SNP divisions

Daily Record

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Record

John Swinney has 'not read' explosive Nicola Sturgeon memoir that opens up SNP divisions

The First Minister was brief in his answers when quizzed about Sturgeon's controversial book. John Swinney has 'not read' a memoir by Nicola Sturgeon that opened up bitter divisions within the SNP. ‌ But the First Minister admitted he has a copy of a book which reflects on a 'fascinating' time in Scottish political history. ‌ Swinney became SNP leader in 2024 after years of fueding and rows relating to when Sturgeon and her successor Humza Yousaf were in charge. ‌ When Swinney took over, he said he wanted to restore trust with the voters and look to the future. But Sturgeon's memoir, Frankly, has stirred up tensions from the past, most notably on her fallout with former SNP leader Alex Salmond. Their relationship disintegrated after the Sturgeon Government launched an unlawful probe into claims of sexual harassment against Salmond. In her book, she suggested Salmond may have leaked details of the probe himself as part of a dark arts operation. She also said her former mentor had opposed gay marriage and did not read the independence white paper ahead of the 2014 referendum. In an interview with STV, Swinney, who was Sturgeon's loyal deputy in Government, gave a series of short answers when quizzed about the book. ‌ On whether he had read the book, he replied: 'I've not read it yet, no.' He added: 'I have got a copy, yes, but I've not read it yet." Asked whether he had read extracts published in newspapers, he said: 'Of course, I have.' ‌ He added: 'It's a reflection of a fascinating time in Scottish political history.' It was also put to Swinney that Sturgeon had been critical of his general election strategy of not focusing on independence more. He said: 'I'd kind of come in the door by about two weeks when the election was called, and the crucial point for me was that I had to persuade the people of Scotland that the SNP were on their wavelength, that we were addressing their core priorities. 'That's what my biggest task was when I became SNP leader, because the people of Scotland had stopped listening to the SNP at that time. They're listening to us again. We're back in the lead in the polls. We've got much better prospects and I intend to deliver on our expectations.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store