Walters requests AG opinion on impact of Trump immigration order on Oklahoma schools
Walters announced his request in a press release issued Monday afternoon. As an elected state official, Walters does have the authority to make such a request, 'and we will respond in due course,' said Phil Bacharach, a spokesman for Drummond.
'I am fully committed to ensuring that Oklahoma is a strong partner in advancing President Trump's agenda for public education,' Walters said in a statement. 'Taxpayer dollars should be used to support the education of American students, not to subsidize or create a magnet for illegal immigration. We must ensure compliance with the President's executive order and take the necessary steps to uphold the rule of law in our schools.'
Walters cites an executive order issued on Feb. 19, which he said directs federal agencies 'to identify and correct programs' that might allow undocumented residents to receive public benefits.'
Walters said some Oklahoma public-school services, including those funded with federal Title I money, school nutrition programs and English language proficiency programs, receive federal funding and thus could fall under Trump's order.
The superintendent asks two questions to Drummond in his request for an official opinion – does the order affect federally funded school programs in Oklahoma, and if it does, what steps should the Oklahoma State Department of Education take to comply with it?
Walters' request asks Drummond to opine on matters of federal law, while state attorneys general usually focus more on state law. In Oklahoma, an attorney general's formal opinion holds the force of law, absent a court ruling.
The request also comes against a complicated political backdrop between the two Republicans. Drummond already has declared his candidacy to become governor and Walters is mentioned as a potential rival for that job, even though Walters hasn't announced his candidacy for the 2026 election. The two often have been at odds, including over potential violations of the Oklahoma Open Meetings Act during state Board of Education meetings led by Walters.
Walters is pressing for legislative approval of an agency administrative rule that would allow the agency he leads, the Oklahoma State Department of Education, not just to ask for the immigration status of students, but of their parents, as well
In a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Plyler v. Doe, the court said all students had the right to enroll in public schools without regard to the immigration status of themselves or their parents or guardians. Walters has told cable network NewsNation that the Supreme Court 'got it wrong' in that decision.
Walters has also publicly said he would support federal immigration raids on Oklahoma schools. He has sidestepped answering questions about the emotional and mental affect those raids might have on Oklahoma schoolchildren.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Walters asks Drummond for official opinion on Trump immigration order
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
26 minutes ago
- CNBC
European renewable stocks to watch as Trump's megabill hangs in the balance
Among the myriad details stuffed within U.S. President Donald Trump's bumper "big beautiful bill," European investors have been keeping an eye on one in particular — renewable energy policy. Shares of the region's wind power firms gained on Wednesday after Senate lawmarkers narrowly approved a heavily amended version of the package . The move higher continued Thursday as the U.S. House began a final debate on the megabill — after a dramatic night of voting that was nearly derailed by Republican defections. Turbine manufacturer Vestas was 3.4% higher in early trade Thursday after gaining more than 10% in the previous session. Windfarm operator Orsted and turbine maker Nordex , meanwhile, built on Wednesday's gains to both trade over 2% higher early Thursday. The bill's current revisions are a relief to a sector already grappling with funding challenges, competition from China and tariff uncertainty. Among the key amendments to the bill is the removal of a tax on wind and solar projects that use components from "foreign entities of concern" — understood to primarily mean China — which analysts said could have a chilling effect on new orders in the sector more broadly. Another major revisions relevant to European renewables firms is the removal of a controversial cliff-edge deadline that would have required all projects benefiting from tax credits to be in service by the end of 2027. Now, all projects commencing before mid-2026 will be eligible, which analysts at Citi said was likely to spur a flurry of near-term activity, as all a project must do to "start" is spend 5% of capital. U.S. clean energy shares also rose on this news this week. If the bill is voted through in its current form, the change "will lay the foundation for a solid American onshore wind turbine market in the years after 2027 — and not an 'almost complete stop' in 2028, which the previous text has a high inherent risk of. This seems like a gigantic relief for the onshore wind market in the U.S.," Sydbank analysts said. U.S. importance Tancrede Fulop, senior equity analyst and renewables expert at Morningstar, said the bill amendments, along with a resumption of construction work on Equinor's Empire Wind project off the New York coast, "suggests that the worst-case scenario for the renewables sector under the Trump administration may not materialize." The U.S. market plays a pivotal role for Europe's largest renewable developers such as RWE , EDPR and Iberdrola , according to Morningstar's Fulop. It accounts for around 50% of the installed renewable capacity of the former two, and around 40% of the latter. However, while wind developers could potentially offset any phase out of tax credits by selling power at higher prices or pressuring manufacturers to cut their prices, manufacturers such as Vestas — which has 35% of its onshore wind backlog in the U.S. — and Siemens Energy are more vulnerable, Fulop said. Pierre-Alexandre Ramondenc, equity research analyst for utilities and renewables at AlphaValue, told CNBC that the positive market reaction reflected the fact that the Senate's amendments were broadly good news for the sector. But overall, Trump's bill "largely dismantles the core mechanisms supporting clean energy" under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, he said. Rather than fully repealing provisions that have been established and generated business activity under the IRA, the new megabill puts fresh constraints on the sector. The primary blow is to the U.S.' efforts to modernize its grid infrastructure and lead in decarbonization efforts, he continued. In Europe, the market has already been revising down its expectations for U.S. renewables since Trump's election, Ramondenc noted, with the main risk now being the cancellation of projects already under construction. European utilities also have "flexibility in deploying capex across different technologies and geographies," he added. — CNBC's Erin Doherty contributed to this report.
CNBC
37 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's megabill advances in the House after GOP divisions nearly derail it
The U.S. House on Thursday began a final debate on President Donald Trump's megabill, after a dramatic night of voting that was nearly derailed by Republican defections. The House voted 219-213 to move the bill forward, according to NBC News reporting. The vote to begin final debate marks a win for Republican leadership seeking to deliver on Trump's second term policy agenda. After hours of stalemates and maneuvering, they finally managed to corral their razor-thin majorities and quash enough of the opposition from within their own ranks to move forward. The vote to begin debate in the divided House was not without drama, rife with back-room deals, evolving alliances and negotiations until the very end. Ultimately, House Speaker Mike Johnson was able to push the bill forward, losing just a handful of members in a vote that fell along party lines. The debate will be followed by a vote on the final bill, which extends the 2017 tax cuts and commits more money for border security while slashing health insurance and nutrition programs for the poor. Once the bill passes the House one more time, it goes to Trump's desk, where he has long wanted to sign the package into law. The House received the revised bill from the Senate late Tuesday, after the package just squeaked by in the upper chamber with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The Senate implemented substantial changes to its version of the megabill, including deeper cuts to Medicaid and a $5 trillion debt limit hike, much higher than the $4 trillion increase the House proposed in its version of the bill. These changes were among the provisions that made many House Republicans wary. But leadership refused to introduce new tweaks to the megabill and stretch its timeline out further.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Pundit Asks Most Sycophantic Question About Donald Trump. It Does Not Go Well.
Fox News pundit Jason Chaffetz drew online mockery after delivering an impassioned — and at times unhinged — pitch for House Republicans to back President Donald Trump's so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Chaffetz, a former GOP congressman, all but campaigned for the bill's passage during appearances on the conservative network on Wednesday. He predicted it would ultimately clear Congress and land on Trump's desk by the July 4 holiday, the artificial deadline imposed by the president. 'He's been there less than six months in this term,' Chaffetz said at one point of Trump. Then he sycophantically asked prime time host Sean Hannity: 'Has he been wrong on anything? He hasn't been wrong on anything.' Chaffetz: Trump has been there less six months. Has he been wrong on anything?!?! — Acyn (@Acyn) July 3, 2025 The over-the-top praise didn't end there. Chaffetz also issued a warning to any Republican lawmakers considering a no vote on Trump's signature spending and tax legisltation, saying: 'I dare you — dare you — to vote against the president on this, because your political career will be bye-bye.' Chaffetz: I dare you to vote against the president on this! Because your political career will just be bye bye. Thom Tillis, bye bye. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 3, 2025 Critics online ridiculed the comments and responded to Chaffetz's 'wrong on anything' question with withering replies. Other posts suggested Chaffetz was 'really going through some things' and that he'd said the quiet part out loud with his challenge to lawmakers. Chaffetz is really going through some things — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) July 3, 2025 Jason Chaffetz saying the quiet part out loud: "I dare you, DARE YOU, to vote against the president on this, 'cause your political career will be bye-bye." — Blue Georgia (@BlueATLGeorgia) July 3, 2025 He's damaged the economy, we're heading into recession. He's destroyed our reputation internationally, again. Implemented tariffs, which are an added tax on the American people. He's got goons in masks terrorizing our streets in an immigrant witch hunt. What's he gotten right? — J.C.'s Thought Dump (@jcsthoughtdump) July 3, 2025 Brother where do we begin — drew logan (@DrewFromNJ) July 3, 2025 Top Trump Official's POTUS Praise Goes Viral For Cringiest Reasons Trump Asks DeSantis The Weirdest Question About Marjorie Taylor Greene, In Front Of Her BF Michael Steele Issues Ominous Alert For ALL Republicans: 'Trust Me, Baby'
