DMK's general council meeting dynastic drama, diversion tactic: Union Minister Murugan
Chennai: Union Minister of State for Information & Broadcasting and Parliamentary Affairs L. Murugan launched a scathing attack on the DMK following its general council meeting in Madurai, accusing the party of engaging in dynastic theatrics and diversionary tactics to mask its failures.
Calling the meeting a 'coronation event', Murugan alleged that the DMK had convened it primarily to reaffirm that Chief Minister M.K. Stalin's son would inherit party leadership.
The DMK held its general council meeting on Sunday, where it adopted 27 resolutions.
'It was a political drama to promote the 'prince' and pacify second-tier leaders who act like local feudal lords,' he said.
The minister condemned the resolutions passed by the DMK, especially those criticising the Central government, calling them attempts to distract the public from the state government's poor performance and deep-rooted corruption.
'This is classic boogeyman politics -- when there's nothing real to show, invent an enemy,' he said.
He accused the DMK of lacking moral standing to speak on caste-based census, education policy, or federalism. 'What did they do when they were part of the UPA government? Nothing. Today, they raise hollow slogans while clinging to Congress, the very party that removed education from the state list,' he added.
Murugan also dismissed the DMK's rhetoric on issues like the Waqf Act, Hindi imposition, and Katchatheevu, saying the party was using these topics to deflect attention from corruption investigations.
'If you're innocent, why fear probes by the ED or IT? The law will take its course,' he said.
He questioned the credibility of the resolution to declare Karunanidhi's birthday as Classical Tamil Day, arguing it reduced Tamil pride to a family legacy.
'To the DMK, Tamil Nadu is Karunanidhi Nadu,' he remarked.
Slamming the party for selective outrage, Murugan noted the DMK's silence on sexual abuse cases in state institutions was selective. He concluded with a strong political message: 'The people of Tamil Nadu are ready for change. In 2026, the AIADMK-BJP alliance will secure a historic victory and end this era of corrupt, dynastic rule.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kamal Haasan, and the Tamil vs Kannada over-reaction
The cacophony of outrage over Kamal Haasan's remark that Kannada was 'born out of Tamil' has reached an unseemly but not unexpected crescendo — it follows a pattern seen whenever the politics of language and the language of hurt sentiments are invoked. It has gone all the way to the Karnataka High Court, which advised Haasan to apologise and questioned his credentials to make such a statement, asking, 'Are you a historian, linguist?' But there are other pertinent questions, which the Court didn't ask: Is such escalation over a misinformed comment proportionate or justified? Does one need to be an expert, or even correct, to exercise the right to free speech? Is this an appropriate use of the state's time and resources? The fallout of Haasan's remark saw apologies demanded, protests held, effigies burnt, a police complaint filed, a state minister calling for a ban on screening the actor-politician's film Thug Life in Karnataka and the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce promptly obliging him. There is a history and a context to this mobilisation of linguistic grievance: In the present, it is exacerbated by growing resentment over the presence of people from other states, particularly Hindi speakers. Alongside this is an older anxiety over the dominance of Tamil speakers in Bengaluru, in the backdrop of the regional rivalry between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. Looming over it all, but sometimes unmentioned in the context of North-South and South-South tussles, is the shadow of English. All this — with parallels across multiple states, for instance in neighbouring Maharashtra — creates fertile ground for a politics of relentless prickliness that makes mountains out of molehills. It can lead to violence, and often has. Haasan is wrong about Kannada and Tamil, and appears to be ill-informed about the history of the Dravidian languages. One did not come from the other — the two are better characterised as sisters. He has refused to apologise. The question is not whether or not he's been wise. What's questionable is the clamour for an apology — it comes from a place of parochialism. What is needed, instead, is an imagination that is broad enough to accommodate the aspirations of regional and linguistic subnationalism and address people's legitimate concerns about the future of their mother tongues. Also needed is a self-confidence to engage fruitfully with an increasingly cosmopolitan reality. Political leaders could do worse than take a leaf out of Karnataka Deputy CM D K Shivakumar's book. In one of the most sensible responses to this controversy, he said, 'We are not enemies; we are all friends. I don't want to comment on it because I don't know the history of that issue.'
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
June 4, 1985, Forty Years Ago: Assam talks
The month-long talks between the Centre and the Assam agitation leaders on resolving the vexed foreign nationals issue seem to have reached a crucial stage. Both Governor, Bhishma Narain Singh and Chief Minister, Hiteshwar Saikia are now in the capital to be available for consultations. However, according to informed sources, there are still some differences on the cut-off year as well as the question of disenfranchisement. Mob teargassed Police lobbed teargas shells in the ancient town of Patan when a violent mob stoned a police chowki there, while violence continued in the central parts of Gujarat. Arsonists set ablaze a post office and a policeman was injured in stone-pelting. Four people were arrested in this connection. Joint statement India and Sri Lanka have agreed to take early steps to defuse and cease the ethnic violence so that conditions are created for finding a durable political settlement acceptable to all concerned. In a joint press statement issued at the conclusion of the visit of the Sri Lankan President, J R Jayewardene, both sides have also agreed for speedy restoration of normalcy in the northern and eastern provinces of Sri Lanka, conducive to the return of the Sri Lankan Tamil refugees in India. Technology import Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi's forthcoming visit to the US is likely to open new vistas of cooperation in the field of 'high technology', flow of investment in infrastructure sectors of the Indian economy and diversification of trade between the two 'the vibrant democracies'. During his direct talks with Ronald Reagan, Gandhi will also try to personally get to know and understand the US President.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Blake Lively WITHDRAWS 'emotional distress' claims against Justin Baldoni in 'It Ends With Us' legal battle
Blake Lively has formally withdrawn two claims against actor and director Justin Baldoni in their ongoing legal battle following their collaboration on the 2024 romantic drama It Ends With Us. The withdrawn claims specifically related to allegations of "emotional distress", in the actress' lawsuit against her director filed in December 2024. According to Variety, Judge Lewis Liman, who is overseeing the case in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, confirmed that Lively's claims for emotional distress would be thrown out. The judge noted that the withdrawal was based on 'the plaintiff's representation that the relevant claims will be withdrawn,' and as a result, the director's motion to compel Lively to release her medical and therapy records was denied. Lively initially filed a lawsuit, accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment and orchestrating a public smear campaign. In response, Baldoni's team moved to access Lively's mental health records, arguing that such evidence was essential to counter her claims of 'severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, embarrassment, belittlement, frustration and mental anguish'. However, the court noted that without the emotional distress claims, those records were no longer relevant. Judge Liman instructed both parties to decide whether the dismissal of these claims would be permanent (with prejudice) or temporary (without prejudice), and offered the actress the opportunity to choose to try to reach an agreement with Baldoni. If no formal dismissal is made, Lively will be barred from introducing any related evidence. Lively's attorneys, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, criticised Baldoni's legal team for their approach which they claim is 'a press stunt'. In a statement to the media, her lawyers said, 'Ms. Lively has offered to dismiss those claims because they are no longer necessary and she will continue to pursue emotional distress damages through other active claims in her lawsuit, including sexual harassment and retaliation. ' Meanwhile, Baldoni is suing both Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds for $400 million. He alleges the actress attempted to extort him and later defamed him through statements published in The New York Times. The legal battle now involves six separate lawsuits in various courts. Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .
