No charges for driver in downtown Houston crosswalk death
Harris County grand jurors have declined to indict a pickup driver who fatally struck a 64-year-old woman in a downtown Houston crosswalk last year, leaving her family in "total shock."
Catch up quick: Patricia Martin was crossing at the intersection of Milam and Walker streets in January 2024 when the pickup driver turned and hit her, police said.
The driver, Emmanuel Megrelis, failed to yield right of way to Martin as he rounded the corner, police determined. Martin's family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against him last year as prosecutors mulled criminal charges.
Driving the news: Harris County prosecutors presented the case to a grand jury Jan. 30 seeking a state-jail felony charge against Megrelis under the Lisa Torry Smith Act, a 2021 Texas law named after a woman killed in a crosswalk that created a criminal offense for drivers in such instances.
The panel issued a no bill — meaning it declined to press charges — under the statue, according to Harris County court records.
Prosecutors the next day asked a different grand jury to indict Megrelis on a state-jail felony charge of criminally negligent homicide, but that panel also declined.
Friction point: The results left Martin's family doubting District Attorney Sean Teare's office.
Other Texas prosecutors, including in neighboring Fort Bend County and Austin's Travis County, have successfully secured indictments under the Lisa Torry Smith Act.
What they're saying:"We're not actually sure what the district attorney's office presented to the grand jury," Zach Martin, the victim's son, told Axios.
"We really doubt their ability to prosecute cases involving other victims if they're not able to achieve even an indictment in this case."
The other side: Teare's office did not comment on the grand juries' decisions, citing the secrecy of the proceedings.
But spokesperson Courtney Fischer said "prosecutors inform grand juries of all applicable laws when presenting a case."
Flashback: Victim's families and advocates have pressured Harris County prosecutors to pursue charges under the relatively new law.
In January, Axios reported that Teare said he would not pursue charges under the Lisa Torry Smith Act in crosswalk crashes involving death, opting to pursue other charges.
He also told Houston Chronicle subscribers in a Q&A last month that while the law is a "tool in the toolbelt," he wanted "more Court of Criminal Appeals opinions" on the statute "before we go forward with it."
Martin's family met with prosecutors last week but left without many answers, Martin said.
The bottom line:"We feel defeated," Martin said. "(With) all the effort we put in it in the past year and everything, we really thought it would lead to at least an indictment. We just don't know what to do."
What's next: The wrongful death lawsuit against Megrelis is still ongoing, records show, and a trial date has not yet been set.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
In NCLA Amicus Win, Supreme Court Revives Innocent Family's Suit over FBI's Wrong-House Raid
Curtrina Martin, et al. v. United States of America, et al. Washington, DC, June 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' dismissal of Martin v. United States, an Atlanta family's Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit against the government for a wrong-house raid in 2017. FBI agents invaded the home of Trina Martin and her family, shackling her partner on the floor and holding a half-naked Ms. Martin at gunpoint, while she expressed concern for her seven-year-old son's safety elsewhere in the house. One big problem: the FBI SWAT team had knocked down the door of the wrong home, on the wrong street, because the agent in charge had failed to verify its clearly marked address. The Justices remanded the case to the Eleventh Circuit for reconsideration. As NCLA's amicus curiae brief urged, the Eleventh Circuit should ultimately rule on remand that the FTCA does not shield the government from liability when federal law enforcement officers raid the wrong house. Ms. Martin and her family filed FTCA claims against the government for assault, battery, and false imprisonment, as well as Fourth Amendment claims against the individual FBI agents. The Eleventh Circuit below upheld the district court's dismissal of the case, concluding that the agents' actions violated no 'clearly established' law. It ruled that the family suffered harm resulting from an agent's 'discretionary act' (i.e., failing to check the house address), warranting total governmental immunity and no path to relief for the Martin family. The Eleventh Circuit also determined that the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution could shield the FBI and its agents from FTCA suits. NCLA's amicus brief forcefully argued that the Eleventh Circuit's mode of inquiry—which departed from the analytical process employed by all sister circuits—was inconsistent with the language and intent of the FTCA. Congress amended the FTCA in 1974 expressly to ensure that innocent people subjected to wrong-house raids and similar abuses by federal law enforcement officers would have a cause of action to sue. By expanding the FTCA's discretionary-function exception to encompass wrong-house raids such as this one, the Eleventh Circuit's decision effectively nullified the 1974 law. As Justice Sotomayor underscored in her concurrence (joined by Justice Jackson), 'Courts … should not ignore the existence of the [1974 amendment], or the factual context that inspired its passage, when construing the discretionary-function exception. … [A]ny interpretation should allow for liability in the very cases Congress amended the FTCA to remedy.' Today's Supreme Court ruling does not decide whether the 'discretionary function' exception applies in this case, an issue that the Court ordered the Eleventh Circuit to resolve, but the Justices found that the Supremacy Clause is not a defense the government may invoke in FTCA lawsuits. Justice Gorsuch explained in his opinion for the Court: 'The FTCA is the 'supreme' federal law addressing the United States' liability for torts committed by its agents. It supplies the 'exclusive remedy' for damages claims arising out of federal employees' official conduct.' NCLA released the following statements: 'The Supreme Court rightly held that innocent civilians should not be stripped of any meaningful remedy when they suffer abuse at the hands of federal law enforcement. The Martin family deserves their day in court. On remand, NCLA trusts that the Eleventh Circuit will carefully evaluate what qualifies as 'reasonable' law enforcement—and recognize that a trained FBI agent who fails to check a clearly marked house number before commencing a raid because 'it was dark outside' does not qualify.'— Casey Norman, Litigation Counsel, NCLA 'Law enforcement officers should not be able to evade accountability for entering the wrong house and terrorizing an innocent family in the middle of the night when Congress intentionally provided for redress in cases against the federal government in such circumstances. Thankfully, the Supreme Court's decision reaffirms that the Eleventh Circuit was wrong to preclude relief in this case and others like it.'— Jenin Younes, Litigation Counsel, NCLA 'All too often, court-created doctrines are used to reduce the government's liability to people whose civil liberties it has violated. Congratulations to our friends at the Institute for Justice for convincing the Supreme Court to clip the wings of such a doctrine in this case—at least where Congress had explicitly created a cause of action to sue.'— Mark Chenoweth, President, NCLA For more information visit the page here. ABOUT NCLA NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA's public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans' fundamental rights. ### CONTACT: Joe Martyak New Civil Liberties Alliance 703-403-1111 in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Victim attacked near Poindexter Park in Jackson, suspect wanted
JACKSON, Miss. (WJTV) – Capitol police are investigating after one person was attacked near a Jackson park. Officers responded to the area of Poindexter Park around 10:15 a.m. on Friday, June 13. Man turns himself in, accused of shooting repo man in Horn Lake Bailey Martin, press secretary for the Mississippi Department of Public Safety (DPS), said officers located the victim, who had sustained injuries from being beat with a firearm. The victim was transported to a nearby hospital. Martin said no arrests have been made. The suspect was described as a light-skinned Black male wearing a white shirt and blue pants. He was last seen traveling on a blue bicycle toward Rose Street. Anyone with information about the incident can contact Capitol police at 601-359-3125. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
San Francisco Chronicle
19 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: S.F. drug treatment programs offer help, but to overcome addiction, this needs to happen
Regarding 'He overdosed after being turned away by S.F. drug treatment center. Mother seeks answers' (Letters to the Editor, June 10): Carolyn Stueve-Martin must realize no mental health or drug treatment service could help her son Jonathan's addiction unless he truly desired to stop and had adequate support to commit to permanent change. This means having a reason to live, a place to live and wanting an alternative lifestyle. It is not a third or fourth party's responsibility to prevent his death. It must be his support system, his capability to do so and his desire for such difficult change. There are multiple services available in San Francisco that are compassionate to this need, much more so than most other cities (perhaps like Stueve-Martin's hometown of Tulsa, Okla.). Where were family or hometown friends or many other potential opportunities for Jonathan to seek and receive addiction treatment and support? I understand how grief-stricken a mother must be over the useless death of her son, but pointing the finger at San Francisco and looking for answers will not return her child nor change the fact that he was an addict who didn't seek, desire or find help sooner. This major factor about addiction is so rarely discussed. ME Harrington, San Francisco Charge for parking Regarding 'There will be consequences for S.F. Mayor Lurie if free parking in Golden Gate Park ends' (Letters to the Editor, June 9): I didn't vote for San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie, but I might now if he makes a tough economic decision that also helps the environment. The most disgusting thing in the park is when cars choke its roads. It's insane when drivers come to the park looking for parking that just isn't there. The letter writer calls paid parking a tax, but the real tax is the gas guzzling and idling done by motor vehicles. The economic impact of climate change will negatively hit us in a myriad of ways. Why should cars be allowed to negatively affect the park? We need it as a bucolic retreat away from traffic jams. More taxes won't help Regarding 'Why can't anyone figure out how to save the San Francisco Centre? They're thinking too small' (Open Forum, June 5): William Fulton calls for yet another 'tax-increment zone,' yes, another city tax, to pay for transforming the San Francisco Centre into an urban gathering place. A better idea might be rezoning it for housing and retail. The mall is a multistory building where luxury condos would bring in permanent residents who would patronize retail shops, restaurants and entertainment venues. Instead of adding a new tax, give a tax exemption to the investor who converts the space. This might even bring some workers back to empty downtown San Francisco offices. James Sandler, Pleasanton Show their humanity I read a story about federal immigration arrests in the Chronicle, but I didn't see anything about the poor souls who were grabbed. President Donald Trump demonizes immigrants as 'murderers' and 'rapists' to obscure their humanity. Immigrants are members of our communities, doing essential and often hard jobs like working in the fields, in restaurants, as child-care providers and as maids. Many have lived here for years, if not decades. They are people who care for us and whom we care about. There is a counter to dehumanization. I encourage the Chronicle and other news media to tell these people's stories. David Fairley, San Francisco Great Valkyries coverage As a reader who has complained in the past about the Chronicle's imbalanced focus on men's sports ('Cover women's sports,' Letters to the Editor, Oct. 21, 2021), I want to applaud the coverage of the Bay Area's new WNBA team, the Valkyries. Marisa Ingemi's game reports, in particular, provide clear, technical overviews while her behind-the-scenes stories offer the kinds of insight that bring readers into the building process of this exciting young team.
