Draft EU proposal hints at major rollback of Green Deal farm rules
Months of dreary EU jargon will have to be endured, as the Commission, Parliament, and member states start their summer squabble over seven-year EU budgeting, and the funding for the next common agricultural policy (CAP) is slowly hatched.
But the latest Brussels leak brings a little welcome relief from the tedium, as the Euractiv media network which specialises in EU affairs says it has seen a draft regulation in which the Commission proposes to cut links between the Green Deal and the CAP.
Euractiv says this could be "the most significant blow yet" to the green pro-environment legislation that dominated the previous EU administration.
Going back much further, since about the year 2000, EU farmers had to prove they meet ecological conditions in order to access the full farm income support offered by the CAP. But that bargain with Brussels began to wear very thin, especially after the Green Deal took hold since 2020.
The Green Deal headline commitment is to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. To play their major role in this, farmers were set some very ambitious tasks up to 2030.
They would have to reduce by 50% the use and risk of chemical pesticides; reduce by 50% the use of more hazardous pesticides; reduce fertiliser nutrient losses by at least 50%, while ensuring no deterioration on soil fertility; reduce all fertiliser use by at least 20%; reduce by 50% the sales of antimicrobials for farmed animals and in aquaculture; and achieve organic farming on 25% of EU farmland.
Some of these asks were shot down along the way, but it all became too much for farmers, on top of the existing CAP and national rules and bureaucracy, and they exploded onto the streets and roads of Europe in February 2024, protesting in their thousands.
So the alleged leak of a commission proposal to cut links between the Green Deal and the CAP is welcome news for many farmers. And not such a huge surprise, because many member states and MEPs have called for continued simplification of CAP administration, and relaxation of environmental measures, a process which the Commission began after the farmer protests.
But the Commission's "vision" roadmap in February for the EU farming and agri-food sector gave no inkling of wider scrapping of Green Deal commitments. In fact, it said transition to a low-carbon economy was to continue, and rigorous enforcement and controls of food safety standards remained non-negotiable.
Among the only concessions were that the Commission would "carefully consider any further ban on the use of pesticides, if alternatives are not available". The "vision" document promised comprehensive simplification, as part of its effort to make farming an attractive sector for young people to enter.
But the latest leak hints at greater concessions, when agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen presents his proposals, expected this week. However, that might just be reading too much into a few leaked words, with an environmentalist slant.
There was plenty of that recently, after the European State of the Climate 2024 report said 2024 had a record 335 climate-related deaths due to storms and flooding, at least 413,000 people affected by storms and floods, and an additional 42,000 affected by wildfires.
Realpolitik
The European Greens warned that, instead of strengthening climate protections, political forces on the right were actively dismantling the Green Deal.
Instead of these paranoid left versus right suspicions which now dominate EU politics, there may be a more realpolitik explanation for giving farmers a break from over-ambitious green regulations.
The fact is that the CAP money pot has been shrinking for decades, diluted by inflation and by EU enlargement.
A huge cut in CAP funding may be inevitable, and perhaps the only way to sweeten it for farmers will be to remove demanding 'money-for-green' terms and conditions.
In other words, what used to be the single payment, and is now made up of the BISS and other direct payments, might reduce, but an easing of environmental requirements (and possibly of inspections) might be the quid pro quo.
There is speculation that two legal provisions that currently require EU member states to adapt their CAP strategic plans in line with new climate and environmental legislation will be completely removed in proposals by Agriculture Commissioner Christophe Hansen.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Listening is an important precursor to change
There was much proverbial gnashing of teeth and rending of raiment by environmental lobbyists when it was recently suggested that Ireland will miss its climate targets. Ireland, as with many other states, has committed itself legally to transition to net zero by 2050. Financial penalties — to be paid to the EU — are put variously between €8bn and €26bn in an admonitory report from the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council and the Climate Change Advisory Council. Future historians and legal students will no doubt debate the wisdom of committing to onerous and binding financial punishment on targets which are 25 years away. The list of missed goals, cost over-runs, and deadline failures, even of the last decade, is far too long to be catalogued here. As we noted the 81st anniversary of D-Day, the largest collaborative operation in human history, on Friday it is worth recalling the words of its commander general (later US president) Dwight D Eisenhower. He was fond of saying: 'Plans are useless but planning is indispensable.' It is in that context that we must recognise a court judgement which applies some constraints to corporate rights over those of individuals irrespective of the size, and urgency, of the environmental challenges we face. A judgement handed down by Mr Justice Oisín Quinn sent something of a chilly breeze through an industry which has lately been basking in the sunshine of progress after Irish windfarms provided 38% of the country's electricity over the first three months of 2025. But in this case operators of a windfarm in Co Wexford have been ordered to shut down three of their turbines and pay €360,000 damages to a couple over their commercial response to noise and nuisance complaints covering a dozen years. ABO Energy Ireland Ltd and ABO Energy O&M Ireland Ltd, operators of the wind farm at Gibbet Hill, near Bunclody, along with its owner, Wexwind Ltd, also face a potential legal costs bill of €2.3m incurred by Raymond Byrne and Lorna Moorhead in their case. In a 100-page judgement, Mr Justice Quinn, who refused to permit a stay to allow three turbines closest to the couple's home to partially operate in fixed hours, said the defendants failed to engage 'in any meaningful way' with the 'genuine and substantive' complaints made by the couple since the turbines became operational in 2013. The judge added that the defendants' 'seriously unimpressive' approach represented a threat to the goal of developing wind farms and wind energy here. Addressing wind turbine noise in a substantial way was seen as 'critical' to the future success of wind as a major source of renewable energy. This was 'one of the worst cases of wind farm noise impact', he added. While the Bunclody case may be, as was suggested, 'an outlier' it is an important reminder of the need for consensus and agreement on changes which may have major and unforeseen impacts on people's lives. To that end, it would be prudent to extend the consultation period over the proposed route for Cork's Luas line from Ballincollig to Mahon Point which is destined to radically reshape the city's transport options for the next 100 years. Following what was described as a 'lively' public meeting, Transport Infrastructure Ireland has been asked to give people affected longer to study the 75-page technical report and feasibility study. A deadline was originally set for Monday for consultation. While flow charts, and pinch points, and traffic management schemes may be the meat and drink of civil engineers, logistical experts, surveyors, and the like, they can take a little longer for the ordinary citizen to digest. The opportunity to ask questions and receive answers is an important part of this process. Spending time on it now is a critical investment in the future. Tracking the sad history of rail death As we recently pointed out, railways can be dangerous places. There has always been a risk around trains, and one which long predated the establishment of Iarnród Éireann 38 years ago. The perils involved in working within the industry is dramatically illustrated in an ambitious data project initiated by Britain's National Archive — which has analysed, and made freely available online, records of railway worker accidents from 1900 to 1915 and from 1921 to 1939. It's a Microsoft Excel-based treasure trove for the amateur genealogist and one which will be expanded over the years as part of the Railway Work, Life & Death project, run by the University of Portsmouth, the National Railway Museum, and the Modern Records Centre. Irish connections can be filtered. In a time before health and safety legislation, there are many sad tales. The goods porter who was struck on the head by the hook of a steam crane; the Dublin shunter crushed when coupling some wagons; and to give the dangers a contemporary feel, the guard killed while crossing the line with parcels at Birdhill Station in Tipperary. It's an impressive piece of voluntary work and the researchers would like to hear from anyone who has a story to tell or some artefacts to contribute. To be or not to be. What is the question? The secondary school principal who has pointed out that an increasing number of students no longer see college as a guaranteed route to a job, house, and financial stability may be something of a voice in the wilderness. However, we are often wise to listen to such opinions. Áine Moran, of Sancta Maria College in Louisburgh, Co Mayo, said the Leaving Cert class of 2025 is no longer focused solely on Central Applications Office points. While education has great merits, it is no longer true that it protects a young person from poverty; and it may never pertain again. 'A lot of the traditional roles education brought people to today mean they still can't afford a house' says Ms Moran. 'The young people this Leaving Cert year are very savvy. Many feel they don't want to risk going to college to do a course and spend years learning a function for a job that can be done by AI in four years.' Second guessing where AI is taking us can be a debilitating experience but it is no surprise that so many believe that the route to riches, if not exactly security, lies through the computer screen. Many young people, says Ms Moran, are interested in building online businesses and being profitable 'influencers' on YouTube and TikTok. 'Some are making a lot of money,' she adds. At this age, it is a bad idea to rain on anyone's parade and there is perhaps a subliminal recognition of the modes of modern communication in some of this year's test papers. Particularly controversial has been the inclusion within Junior Cycle English of a short story question. It asked the examinee to comment on how the use of a setting had a vital influence on a short story they had studied. Although there has been an explosive resurgence in the popularity of short stories in recent years, some academic critics view them largely as a stepping stone to more detailed novels requiring deeper analysis. Other criticisms were applied to a question that asked students to imagine they are a contributor to a podcast. We must deal in the creative lexicon of our times and there is no doubt that podcasts, and audiobooks, have stimulated interest in literature in general. The examiners strived to keep matters topical by including a speech from Margaret Attwood and an extract from the 2024 Booker Prize winner Orbital. It's easy to imagine that the Shakespearean text King Lear — which asked students to construct a discussion between two characters — could easily be set as a Black Mirror encounter between Goneril and Regan. Is there a showrunner in the house? Ms Moran says her main advice to students is to get their Leaving Cert in their back pocket. Many more people are pursuing trade-focused courses such as architecture, construction, and engineering. There has been a 25% increase in nursing applications and a 41% rise in people choosing dentistry. In the future, nearly everyone will have more than one career. We need you all. That's what education should give you ... the ability to choose. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cameras could contribute to road safety
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Arts' dropped from department's title after series of renamings following Coalition shake-up
Arts has been dropped from the name of a Government department as part of series name changes in recent days to reflect a shake-up of their responsibilities following the formation of the new Coalition. The old Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media is now known as the Department of Culture, Communications and Sport. The Tourism and Gaeltacht responsibilities now come under the remit of the, now renamed, Department of Enterprise, Tourism and Employment and the Department of Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht. Those functions officially transferred on June 1st. READ MORE Asked about the dropping of the word 'Arts' from the Department's name – and whether this signalled any downgrading of priorities in this area – a spokeswoman said: 'The title Department of Culture, Communications and Sport more succinctly captures the full remit of the Department. 'The word Culture includes the Arts and is a common term used in the title of equivalent Ministries in the EU, noting also that EU Ministers meet at the Education, Youth, Culture and Sports Council.' She also said: 'It should be noted that a previous format of the Department was the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht.' The old Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications is now known as the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment. The Department of Justice is now called the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, reflecting a significant change in function with the responsibility for housing asylum seekers transferring from the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth . It is now known as the Department of Children, Disability and Equality. A Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration spokesman said the order changing its title took effect on Thursday. The transfer of functions from the Department of Children took effect on May 1st and 'this included responsibility for all aspects of international protection accommodation, Ukraine accommodation and integration'.
Agriland
8 hours ago
- Agriland
ICMSA: 50c/L base price ‘fully justified' for May milk
The Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers' Association (ICMSA) has said that a base price of 50c/L is 'fully justified' for May milk supplies. The chair of the association's dairy committee, Noel Murphy, made the comments ahead of milk price announcements for last month from co-ops. He said that co-op boards 'should resist any attempt for milk price reductions for May given the current conditions in the marketplace'. Noel Murphy, ICMSA Dairy Committee chair. Image: Domnick Walsh Eye Focus Murphy said that 'milk supplies globally and in particular in the EU remain constrained'. 'There is no evidence to suggest that milk supplies will increase to any great extent in the foreseeable future while demand for dairy products is strengthening in advance of the holiday period and dairy demand is looking strong in the medium term. 'The Global Dairy Trade (GDT) is higher today than it was at the start of 2025, the average milk price across the EU is at 53c/kg while the Dutch quotations have shown improvements in the order of 2c/L over the course of May,' he said. 'It would be simply unacceptable for milk processors, some of whom are conditioning farmers for a reduction, to cut milk prices to boost their own profits for 2025. 'The reality is that no one else in the milk processor supply chain will be taking or expected to take a cut,' he added. 'Co-op boards are fully justified in insisting that milk price is set at least at 50c/L for May milk and provide dairy farmers with the confidence to invest in their business and for the next generation to reconsider dairying as an attractive option for their future career. 'It is clear at this stage that dairy markets are relatively stable and dairy farmers expect at a minimum that their milk will remain stable or else move up to 50c/L if currently below that level,' Murphy said.
