logo
Donald Trump Stimulus Check 2025: What Musk Exit Means for DOGE Dividend

Donald Trump Stimulus Check 2025: What Musk Exit Means for DOGE Dividend

Newsweek2 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The future of the proposed $5,000 "DOGE Dividend" stimulus check faces uncertainty following Elon Musk's departure from the Trump administration and the end of his tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Musk announced his exit in late May, as the 130-day legal limit on special government employees approaches and concerns continue to mount over the impact of his government role on his business ventures.
President Donald Trump has confirmed that his administration will continue DOGE's central mission to root out "waste, fraud and abuse" from federal spending.
What Is the DOGE Dividend?
The "DOGE Dividend" was initially proposed as a one-time payment of $5,000 for eligible taxpayers. This "tax refund check," the brainchild of Azoria CEO James Fishback, was to be funded with 20 percent of the $2 trillion in federal budget cuts Musk said could be achieved back in October, meaning around $400 billion split between 79 million taxpaying households.
Fishback's idea received support from Musk and the tacit endorsement of Trump, who told attendees at an investment conference in February: "We're thinking about giving 20 percent back to the American citizens."
Elon Musk, wearing a DOGE hat, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025.
Elon Musk, wearing a DOGE hat, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025.Surveys revealed strong cross-party support for the idea, with 79 percent of Republicans and 60 percent of Democrats in favor.
Additionally, 24 percent of Democrats and 29 percent of independents said receiving the check would make them more likely to vote for a Republican congressional candidate.
However, in an interview with Newsweek, Fishback acknowledged that the eventual payments would depend on the actual level of savings achieved by DOGE and could be under the initially proposed figure. According to the calculations laid out by Fishback in February, the $175 billion in savings DOGE claims to have achieved would result in checks of just $2,200 per household if these were sent out today.
Newsweek reached out to Fishback and the White House via email for comment.
Savings Fall Short of Targets
As of Musk's departure, DOGE has reported $175 billion in savings through contract cancellations, the identification of fraud and improper payments, as well as workforce reductions. This represents a fraction of the $2 trillion goal originally envisioned by Musk, a figure that the Tesla CEO has walked back several times.
Numerous questions have been raised about the accuracy of the "wall of receipts" posted on DOGE's website and whether these cuts will result in savings. Analysis from the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service recently found that the actions of DOGE could result in expenditures of $135 billion this fiscal year, due to the costs of lost productivity, rehirings and putting certain employees on paid leave.
Legislative and Economic Hurdles
There has been little information available on the status of the stimulus checks, including whether and when Americans can expect to receive them this year.
In addition to the question of whether DOGE can generate enough savings to fund the checks, congressional authorization would be required for the disbursement of any government funds. However, no formal legislation has been introduced.
"There's no appropriation for this," Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former official in the Clinton White House, told CNBC in February.
"You cannot spend money without Congress telling you that you can spend money," Kamarck said. "That is illegal."
Musk himself said that it was "up to Congress and maybe the president too" as to whether any checks would be distributed. However, the DOGE dividend has so far failed to receive sufficient backing from Republicans in Congress.
"Politically that would be great for us," House Speaker Mike Johnson said of the checks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in February. He added, though, that the GOP's focus should remain on managing America's $36 trillion deficit—"pay down the credit card"—before considering giving savings back to taxpayers.
Barring a significant upswing in legislative support, which is increasingly unlikely as Republicans grapple with the deficit-boosting implications of the One Big Beautiful Bill currently making its way through Congress, the future of DOGE stimulus is doubtful.
Economists have also warned that stimulus of this kind could worsen inflation, similar to the impact of the checks distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"If inflation is already a concern, these checks could add fuel to the fire," financial planner Sarah Maitre told GoBankingRates in early May.
What Happens Next
With Musk's departure, the already weakened momentum behind the DOGE stimulus checks has waned. While Trump has not officially shelved the plan, the lack of action on Capitol Hill, combined with the gap between promised and achieved savings, leaves the future of the payment in question.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rangers appoint former Southampton boss Martin as new head coach
Rangers appoint former Southampton boss Martin as new head coach

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rangers appoint former Southampton boss Martin as new head coach

Former Southampton boss Russell Martin is the new man in charge at Rangers (Glyn KIRK) Scottish Premiership club Rangers on Thursday confirmed the appointment of former Southampton boss Russell Martin as their new head coach on a three-year deal. The 39-year-old guided Southampton to promotion to the Premier League last year but was sacked in December following one win from their first 16 games. The club were subsequently relegated. Advertisement Rangers finished last season under the caretaker management of former captain Barry Ferguson, having dismissed Philippe Clement in February. Ex-Scotland defender Martin, who had a short loan spell as a player at Rangers in 2018, faces the daunting task of challenging Celtic, who have just won a 13th Scottish title in 14 seasons. "From my time here, I had a taste of how special this club is, the expectation, the passion and the history," he told the club's website. "Now, as I return, I'm determined to bring success back, for the supporters, the players, and everyone inside this club. Advertisement "There's a lot to be done, but the goal is clear -- win matches, win trophies and give Rangers fans a team that they can be proud of." Martin's arrival is the latest in a series of major changes at the club. An American consortium led by Andrew Cavenagh and 49ers Enterprises secured a majority shareholding on Friday, while new sporting director Kevin Thelwell officially began work on Monday. Rangers chief executive Patrick Stewart, who led the recruitment process alongside Thelwell, said: "Our criteria for our next coach were clear: we wanted a coach who will excel in terms of how we want to play, improve our culture, develop our squad, and ultimately win matches. Russell was the standout candidate." jw/lp

Well-known Trump critic David Jolly enters race for Florida governor
Well-known Trump critic David Jolly enters race for Florida governor

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Well-known Trump critic David Jolly enters race for Florida governor

Former Rep. David Jolly has officially filed to run for governor of Florida in a race that still favors Republicans but remains wide open in the Democratic primary. Winning as a Democrat will be a long shot. Jolly, a former GOP, one-term representative from Pinellas County near Tampa, enters the race at a time when Florida has shifted decidedly right after years of topping the list of swing states. Making Jolly's candidacy especially difficult is that — even this early in the game — the governor's race is expected to be a three-way battle with both Republican and independent candidates. Jolly will additionally have to fend off perceptions that he's similar to Democrat Charlie Crist, another ex-Republican and independent who Gov. Ron DeSantis crushed in 2022. But he could also have a clear path to the nomination. So far, no Democrat aside from Jolly is clamoring to replace term-limited DeSantis. Other Democrats who openly expressed interest in running for governor a year ago have since petered out, underscoring just how dismal the political landscape is for Democrats after Trump won Florida by 13 points in 2024. Former Democratic state Sen. Jason Pizzo has also said he wants to run for governor. But he ended his time as leader of his chamber a month ago while declaring the party 'dead' in a dramatic exit at the Capitol in Tallahassee. He now plans to mount a run as an independent, a move numerous Democrats say will only serve as a spoiler to hand the race to Republicans. But Jolly is more optimistic about Democrats' chances, especially if the 2026 cycle is poised to be what he calls a 'change election.' His announcement Thursday came roughly five weeks after he revealed he was switching his no-party affiliation to Democrat and started a state political committee. He first expressed public interest in running in March, about a month after President Donald Trump endorsed Republican Rep. Byron Donalds for governor. Jolly has since traveled the state to do more than a dozen town halls and told POLITICO in an interview he would be foregoing a formal campaign kickoff event in favor of continuing the listening tour. 'They're making me a stronger, smarter advocate for change, and we're just going to keep doing that,' he said. 'This is a campaign that's going to look and feel different on the inside and out.' He said Florida's affordability crisis was his reason for running and blamed Republicans in Tallahassee for the fact that so many people at his town halls say they're anxious about how they'll afford to live in Florida. Democrats have an opportunity to show they'll fight for an economy that helps people, he said, predicting that Donalds or any other Republican would 'have a hard time defending the affordability crisis.' 'Republicans have created it,' he said. 'They're not doing anything about it, and we will. And that message in every corner of the state, in every conversation, is what resonates.' If elected governor, Jolly plans to push to expand Medicaid, a government health coverage program, to low-income Floridians and to 'dramatically reinvest' in public education. He also said he would push to reverse laws signed by DeSantis that shield the governor's travel and visitors' log from the public. One area where he does agree with DeSantis is that property tax laws need reform, though he dismissed the all-out tax repeal the governor is calling for, which would apply only to people's primary homes, saying the math still has to work to pay for safety and education services. He'd want to study it and bring in experts, he said. Jolly declined to share how much he has fundraised up to this point, but his committee will soon have to regularly publish donations publicly under state law. It's possible that he'll be able to tap into a national network of donors given that he frequently appeared on cable television, including formerly contributing regularly to MSNBC. In Florida, candidates are allowed to be directly involved in the operation and decision-making of political committees — which isn't the case for federal campaign committees. Jolly already has plans for the dollars that do come in, saying he thought it was up to statewide candidates like himself to 'bear responsibility for raising resources and deploying them towards voter registration.' The party is currently facing a 1.3 million active voter deficit compared with Republicans — one Democrats argue has been disproportionately affected by marking voters as inactive if they've abstained from voting in the last two election cycles. Donalds remains the only major candidate who has filed to run on the Republican side and has already raised $12 million into the first month of his campaign, though Florida first lady Casey DeSantis is also considering a bid. Donalds also has put together a team of officials who successfully helped Trump take back the White House, including pollster Tony Fabrizio and senior adviser Danielle Alvarez. In the coming months, Jolly plans to go to towns where 'Democrats haven't gone before,' including talking to agriculture communities about how they're being affected by Florida's strict immigration laws and to faith communities 'to talk about how Republican politicians have perverted policy issues around issues of faith and how I believe Democratic values better reflect the teachings of faith.' One of the biggest doubts Jolly will face is to make the case that he'll have a different outcome from Crist, the same politician who defeated him in his 2016 House race. Jolly admits he has changed his positions on issues like abortion, climate change and firearms, and said he doesn't try to argue — like Crist — that the party changed, but said he has changed his mind and thinks a lot of other voters have, too. His goal, he said, would be to create a wide coalition of supporters that appeal to independents and some Republicans because 'there are not enough Democratic votes to win the governorship.' 'We need a campaign, a candidate and a party that can win hearts and minds back,' he said. 'And that's our job.'

Commentary: Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced
Commentary: Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Commentary: Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced

Electric car subsidies are heading for the chopping block. A tax bill recently passed by House Republicans is set to stop billions in taxpayer cash from being spent on electric vehicle purchases. If embraced by the Senate and signed into law by President Donald Trump, the bill would gut long-standing government handouts for going electric. The move comes on the heels of another climate policy embraced by Republicans. Earlier this year, Trump announced plans to roll back burdensome rules that effectively force American consumers to buy electric, rather than gas-fueled, cars. The Environmental Protection Agency has called that move the 'biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history.' Not everyone sees it that way. Jason Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, assailed Trump's efforts, noting that his 'administration's ignorance is trumped only by its malice toward the planet.' Other similarly aligned groups have voiced similar sentiments arguing that ending these rules would 'cost consumers more, because clean energy and cleaner cars are cheaper than sticking with the fossil fuels status quo.' Backtracking on EV purchasing mandates seems to have hit Trump haters particularly hard. That mandate — established by President Joe Biden — would have pushed U.S. automakers to sell more EVs. Millions more. Electric cars currently account for 8% of new auto sales. Biden ordered— by presidential fiat — that figure to climb to 35% by 2032. If you believe the hype, the result would be an electric nirvana, one defined by cleaner air and rampant job creation. I'm not convinced. For one thing, cleaner air courtesy of electrification requires that EVs replace gas-powered autos. They're not. In fact, study after study suggests that the purchase of EVs adds to the number of cars in a household. And two-thirds of households with an EV have another non-EV that is driven more — hardly a recipe for climate success given that EVs must be driven (a lot) to deliver climate benefits. Fewer miles driven in an EV also challenges the economic efficiency of the billions Washington spends annually to subsidize their purchase. Claims of job creation thanks to EVs are even more questionable. These claims are predicated around notions of aggressive consumer demand that drives increased EV manufacturing. This in turn creates jobs. A recent Princeton University study noted, 'Announced manufacturing capacity additions and expansions would nearly double U.S. capacity to produce electric vehicles by 2030 and are well sized to meet expected demand for made-in-USA vehicles.' Jobs would be created if there were demand for EVs. Except that's not what's happening. Rather, consumer interest in EVs has effectively cratered. In 2024, 1.3 million EVs were sold in the United States, up from 1.2 million in 2023. This paltry increase is even more worrying given drastic price cuts seen in the EV market in 2024. Tesla knocked thousands of dollars off its best-selling Model 3 and Model Y. Ford followed suit by cutting prices on its Mach-e. So did Volkswagen and Hyundai. Despite deep discounts, consumer interest in electrification remains — to put it mildly — tepid at best. So, when people equate electrification with robust job creation, I'm left wondering what they are going on about. Even if jobs were created, EV advocates are coy about how many of those jobs would benefit existing autoworkers. Would all these workers — currently spread across large swaths of the Midwest — be guaranteed jobs on an EV assembly line? If not, how many workers should expect to receive pink slips? For those who do, will they be able to find new jobs that pay as much as their old ones? Touting job creation for political expediency is one thing. Fully recognizing its impact on hardworking American families today, another. Some Americans may decry Trump's actions on climate, but they have only themselves to blame. Many of the pro-climate policies enacted, particularly during the Biden era, deliver little in the way of climate benefits (or any benefit for that matter) while making a mockery of the real economic concerns businesses and consumers have about climate action. No more. In justifying climate rollbacks, the president says many of his predecessor's policies have hurt rather than helped the American people. He's right and should be commended for doing something about it. ____ Ashley Nunes is a senior research associate at Harvard Law School. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store