
Despite this deal, EU is moving forward and UK risks being left behind
And the UK is not far behind.
Across the country, factory closures have devastated entire communities, particularly in vulnerable areas of Scotland and Wales, the former of which is currently reeling from the closing of Grangemouth oil refinery.
Read more
New partnerships are needed but the Westminster has yet to face the facts. Donald Trump's return has added another spanner to the works. His tariff flip-flopping, enmity with China, and repeated accusations of European 'freeloading' serve as constant reminders that the familiar trans-Atlantic alliance is nearing a rock bottom.
And despite recent polls suggesting that almost 50% of British voters fear that Trump will worsen the UK economy and threaten national security, Prime Minister Starmer dove straight into negotiations - emerging last week with a trade deal so weak, famed American economist Joseph Stiglitz said 'it isn't worth the paper it's written on.'
But the UK is playing in both ways.
Starmer welcomed European leaders to a historic Brexit reset summit in London, aiming to strengthen relations after years of chaos. He is claiming triumph as the UK government and the EU have reached a new deal setting out post-Brexit relations on areas including fishing rights, trade and defence.
The deal, as far as it goes, is welcome and the foundation for a strong partnership with the EU is already there. After all, the UK imports over 50% of goods from Europe versus a meagre 10% from the US.
But the EU, with its strong vision, will not be bullied into entering a partnership, even peripheral, with the deregulation, fossil fuel extraction, chlorinated chicken, or any of the other host of things that a deal with Trump precludes. Nor should it.
After all, the EU doesn't need the US – especially not when budding economic regions are becoming strategically more aligned with Brussels on critical vectors like climate change, energy, AI and defence.
Just a few months ago, Dassault Aviation delivered the first batch of its superior Rafale fighter jets to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The French defense company was contracted as part of a broader €17 billion security agreement between the two countries. Not only has Dassault made a profit, but the deal is also supporting an estimated 7,000 French jobs until at least 2031.
Read more
Even Germany has tasted the potential. One of Europe's leading chemicals corporations is close to acquiring the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) for almost €15 billion. Covestro, which specialises in innovative plastic materials and advanced recycling technologies, had once contributed roughly 5% of Germany's GDP before finding itself in the grip of Germany's fiscal crisis. However, with ADNOC's cash injection – which is part of a larger plan to inject 150bn in capital through 2027 - it has accelerated its ambitious growth strategy allowing it to invest in the sustainable solutions of tomorrow.
At the same time, the Covestro acquisition has supported ADNOC's strategic decision to diversify beyond oil and gas, futureproofing its business through the choppy waters of the global energy transition. And the firm is playing a key role in achieving its country's climate ambitions underscored by the UAE Consensus, which are far more similar to those of the EU than they are to Trump's 'drill, baby, drill'.
These developments should serve as a wake-up call for the UK. Like the EU, Britain must refine its priorities, reduce wasteful spending, and aggressively pursue investment in areas like green energy, defence tech, and AI. Only by doing so can it attract the foreign capital it sorely needs.
Sooner rather than later Starmer will face a choice: Will he cling to the crumbling mythology of a 'special relationship' with the US, or will he embrace a more dynamic, forward-facing partnership with Europe and the rest of the world?
Gilberto Morishaw is an expert on international governance, innovation and systems thinking, having previously served as a youth advisor to the European Commission for International Partnerships. Morishaw is also a Senior Fellow at Humanity in action, a TILN Fellow of the German Marshall Fund and a Global Shaper at the WEF. He is a co-founder of Merge Collective, which aims to bring policy into the web3 era, and the former Head of Impact at Kolektivo, which provides micro-grants to community builders on his home Island of Curaçao.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
43 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Government makes driveway law change set to affect millions
No more planning applications are needed for EV charging point installations as the government cuts red tape. Future of Roads Minister, Lilian Greenwood, announced drivers and businesses will no longer need to submit a planning application to install public or private EV sockets. EV owners will be able to unlock savings of up to £1,100 a year compared to running a petrol or diesel car. 🇬🇧 Great to visit @astonmartin yesterday — where British engineering meets world-class innovation. 🚗 Took the DBX707 for a spin 🌍 UK trade deals with 🇺🇸 🇪🇺 🇮🇳 to safeguard 150,000 jobs in auto & steel 🔋 £2.3bn Govt boost to power the switch to EVs The planning changes also apply to workplace and public chargepoints, meaning businesses will be able to install new sockets faster and for less money, increasing the number of public chargepoints. Ms Greenwood said: "We're cutting down on paperwork to power up the EV revolution, so that drivers, businesses and those looking to make the switch will have more chargepoints to power from, and less red tape to deal with." Vicky Edmonds, chief executive of EVA England, said: "Making it easier to install both public and private charging infrastructure is essential to helping more drivers switch to electric." She warned "further action is needed" as "drivers without driveways still face barriers to affordable, convenient charging". Recommended reading: She added: "We urge the Government to increase its support of the rollout of cross-pavement charging and extend legal rights to tenants and leaseholders, so all drivers can access and benefit from cheaper and more convenient charging." Jack Cousens, head of roads policy for The AA, believes "removing the planning rules" will help "accelerate installations". He further added: "The crucial element is ensuring grid connection in a timely manner. This is especially important in rural locations and areas where there is no dedicated off-street parking." Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at consumer group Which? said it is "an important step in the right direction".


Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Shoppers happy to drive 144 miles and queue seven hours for a bargain
Shoppers happy to drive 144 miles and queue seven hours for a bargain People say they are happy to ditch work - and a date - to get a good deal We are a nation obsessed with a great deal, with almost three quarters saying bargain hunting is an essential part of British culture, according to research from Three. 98% saying they feel 'on top of the world' after securing a saving, while more than half 58% report it can 'make their whole week'. People say they are not afraid to queue for seven hours to get their hands on a bargain. With almost a third admitting they have driven to an entirely different area, an average of 144 miles, or woken up in the early hours just to get a deal. Brits also confessed to leaving work early, bailing on friends and even sneaking out of a date early to take advantage of a super saving. Article continues below For many, deal-seeking is almost a full-time job, with the nation spending on average 52 hours each week hunting for ways to save. Andrew Foy, Director of New Products and Propositions at Three UK, said: "We know our customers love a good deal. Last year our savvy customers saved up to £335 each, thanks to our Three+ app. Whether it's treating the family to a meal or getting a £1 fancy coffee to go."


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' This is how US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez summarised the fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. It would be funny if it were not two of the most powerful men in the world. Yes, their bromance has imploded in full public view, complete with snarky swipes, tantrums and accusations that could have huge legal implications. The first major cracks in their relationship showed at the end of last month on what turned out to be Musk's last day in the White House. The Tesla CEO had become bolder in expressing his dissent over Trump's budget and tax cut bill currently making its way through Congress. Asked about Musk's disapproval of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters last night: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Musk responded, lashing out further overnight, branding it a 'disgusting abomination' that will explode federal budget deficits. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he wrote on X. The criticism quickly escalated into an all-out brawl between the pair, each on their own social media sites Truth Social and X, or in press conferences. Trump threatened to pull back billions of dollars in government contracts for Musk's companies, while the billionaire bit back, suggesting that Trump would have lost the election without him. It was Musk's tweet – linking Trump with the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein – that caused the most controversy. He alleged that the Republican leader is featured in the secret government files on rich and powerful former associates of thesex offender, reigniting long-running conspiracy theories. Musk posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He later reposted a video from 1992 of Trump partying with Epstein and memes about their feud – amplifying them to his 220 million followers on X. Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, however, not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the material. Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about, and offered no actual evidence for his claim. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt on Thursday called Musk's behavior 'an unfortunate episode' adding the tycoon is 'unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' But the allegation prompted fresh demands for a release of the material – this time from Democrats keen on turning a MAGA conspiracy theory back on its proponents. The breakup could reshape both men's futures. For Musk, the stakes are potentially even higher. More Trending This was already evident minutes into the online feud as Tesla's stock price plunged 14%. The break risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardize government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might threaten his companies' profits. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences, and younger male voters – all key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also complicate fundraising ahead of next year's midterm elections. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: The Dark MAGA conspiracy about Trump, Musk and a new world order MORE: Zelensky refutes Trump's take on war and calls Putin 'murderer who came to kill the kids' MORE: Urgent recall of 1,700,000 air conditioners over fears they harbour mold