Patterson disputes evidence at mushroom murder trial
Samantha Donovan: Now to the murder trial of Erin Patterson, who's accused of killing three of her husband's relatives in 2023 by serving them a meal containing death cap mushrooms. She's pleaded not guilty to three charges of murder and one of attempted murder. On her sixth day of evidence, Ms Patterson has been disputing testimony from other witnesses including the surviving lunch guest, her own son and medical professionals. And reporter Kathleen O'Connor is at the court in Morwell in eastern Victoria. Kathleen, what evidence has Erin Patterson been disagreeing with as she's cross-examined by the prosecution?
Kathleen O'Connor: Sam, Erin Patterson challenged the evidence from medical experts, Ian Wilkinson, her son, the child protection employee and her husband on day six of her evidence. She began disputing testimony from the only surviving lunch guest, Ian Wilkinson, about what colour and size plates were used at the lunch. Ms Patterson told the jury today in Wilkinson's evidence about the colour of the plates that were used at the lunch was not true. There's been a few different accounts from various witnesses about the plates throughout the trial. Mr Wilkinson previously telling the jury that the four guests ate from grey plates, while their host ate from an orangey tan coloured one and that it was also smaller than the rest of her guests. Ms Patterson denied that she owns any grey plates. Crown Prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers asked Ms Patterson, do you say that Ian Wilkinson has given incorrect evidence in relation to the plates? And she responded, yes, I do. Crown Prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers then told Ms Patterson, I suggest that after you had plated the food, you carried the smaller plate over to the dining table for yourself and after you knowingly served death cat mushrooms to four of your lunch guests, to avoid any error of accidentally consuming a poisoned beef wellington, you took the extra precaution of using a smaller, different coloured plate for yourself. Ms Patterson disagreed with that. She says she wouldn't have had enough matching plates for each person at the lunch and denies that she even had a smaller plate than the rest of her guests. Erin Patterson also disputed evidence from medical professionals claiming that she was never told some things. They allege that they told Ms Patterson particularly about the health risk to her children.
Samantha Donovan: And the prosecution alleges Ms Patterson lied to medical professionals about how much of the beef wellington lunch she'd eaten. What she told the court today.
Kathleen O'Connor: We heard a lot about this today. Dr Nanette Rogers accused Ms Patterson of serving herself a non-poisonous beef wellington and lied to medical professionals about only eating a small amount in her meal in an effort to explain to authorities why her symptoms were not as serious as the symptoms for the four of the other lunch guests. Ms Patterson denied those claims. The prosecution questioned Ms Patterson for most of the day about the various testimonies from medical professionals. We've heard from over the course of the trial about when the accused first presented to hospital. Ms Patterson told the court she remembers telling nurses and doctors that she only ate around a quarter or a third of the meal, not half. Which is what a number of medical professionals say Ms Patterson told them at the time. Ms Patterson also told the court that she can't be sure of how much she ate. She didn't measure it because she didn't have a measuring tape, but says it wasn't half. Ms Patterson also told the court that she wasn't told that her life was at risk by medical professionals after they learnt that she'd eaten the beef wellington meal when she first appeared at hospital the day after the lunch. And she also says that she never refused medical treatment. Ms Patterson will return to the Witness Box again on Wednesday, Sam.
Samantha Donovan: That's our reporter Kathleen O'Connor at the Patterson murder trial in Morwell in eastern Victoria.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Daily Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
Alleged Alameddine gangster Ali Elmoubayed targeted in Merrylands shooting
Don't miss out on the headlines from Police & Courts. Followed categories will be added to My News. Remarkable video footage has emerged of the dramatic chase and arrest of three men accused of shooting up a home linked to an alleged Sydney gangland figure. The shooting happened about 9.20am, with police officers called to the Earl St home in Merrylands in the city's west. Bullets were fired at the house, but nobody was inside at the time. Ali Elmoubayed, an alleged member of the Alameddine enterprise, is linked to the address but dodged the shooting after reportedly leaving beforehand for the Parramatta Magistrates Court to request a change of bail address. A short time later, a burning Porsche was located in Beverley Crescent in Chester Hill, NSW Police said. NSW Polair captures a burning car on the streets of western Sydney. Picture: NSW Police The three men tried to escape in a blue Hyundai. Picture: NSW Police 'The group left Chester Hill in a Hyundai before being arrested on McMahon Rd in Yagoona trying to flee from police on foot,' police said in a statement. 'They remain in police custody.' Footage captured by the NSW Police chopper unit shows the Porsche burning in the street, with black smoke billowing out across the western Sydney suburb. Police officers then track the blue Hyundai as it races through the streets. The three men, aged 20, 22 and 24, abandon the vehicle and try to run away, but are quickly apprehended by officers in the backyards of homes. The shooting has been referred to Taskforce Falcon and crime scenes have been established at both locations. The men abandoned their car and tried to run away on foot. Picture: NSW Police Ali Elmoubayed visited the Parramatta Local Court on Thursday. Picture: NewsWire / Nikki Short The taskforce is being led by State Crime Command with the NSW Crime Commission to investigate and suppress violent crime in the Sydney metropolitan area. Taskforce Falcon Commander Detective Superintendent Jason Box addressed the media in the afternoon and said the shooting had the potential to be fatal. 'There's always the possibility it could be fatal, or someone seriously injured,' he said. He said he expected the men to be charged with firearms offences alongside other possible offences. Superintendent Box added the police had not yet found anything to suggest the three men were 'affiliated or part of an organised crime network'. Originally published as NSW Police chopper footage shows dramatic arrest of three men after alleged Merrylands shooting

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Man missing for nearly two weeks in Flinders Ranges found safe
South Australian police say missing man Kyle has been found safe and well after he went missing for nearly two weeks in the northern Flinders Ranges. Police issued a call for assistance on Wednesday for Kyle, 39, who was last seen at Arkaroola Village around midday on June 1. Kyle, who was driving a white rental van, said he was going to return on June 7. Police launched a ground and aerial search of the Arkaroola area after receiving a missing person report. Just before 6pm on Thursday, SA Police issued a statement advising that Kyle "has been located safe and well". "Thank you to the public for their assistance," the statement read.

News.com.au
7 hours ago
- News.com.au
Linda Reynolds targets former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in Higgins lawsuit
Linda Reynolds has turned her attention to former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in her bid to sue the Commonwealth over its compensation payment to Brittany Higgins, as the nation's anti-corruption agency revealed there was 'no corruption issue' in the payment. The retiring former Liberal minister in May launched action in the Federal Court against the Commonwealth, with the crux of the claim over the $2.4m compensation payment to Brittany Higgins in 2022. Senator Reynolds argued the payment was 'publicly affirming' of Ms Higgins allegations against her that she didn't support her former staffer when she alleged she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann. The Federal Court has found Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding. An amended version of Ms Reynolds statement of claim was filed on Wednesday, just a day before the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) said there was 'no corruption issue' in the $2.4m payment. The NACC on Thursday announced there was 'no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official'. Senator Reynolds' amended statement of claim was made public late on Thursday afternoon. Among the changes is a reference to a speech by Mr Dreyfus the then Attorney-General made to parliament on March 15, 2021. Mr Dreyfus is not a party to the claim. Mr Dreyfus recounted to the House of Representatives a speech by Ms Higgins just outside Parliament House, where she told a large crowd she was raped inside the building by a colleague, and how her story was 'a painful reminder to women that it can happen in Parliament House and can truly happen anywhere'. 'If a woman cannot feel safe from rape in Parliament House, a veritable fortress ringed with security cameras, with entrances protected by armed guards and with Federal Police officers on duty inside, where can women feel safe?' Mr Dreyfus told the House of Representatives, according to a transcript excerpt in the claim. 'How strong is the rule of law if it isn't able to protect a young woman working in the ministerial wing of Parliament House?' The amended statement of claim argued Senator Reynolds had suffered loss and damage as a result of Mr Dreyfus' conduct, including denying her the opportunity to rebut Ms Higgins' allegation 'in the appropriate forum'. It also argues Mr Dreyfus 'enabled and encouraged the falsity of Ms Higgins' claim to be maintained by Ms Higgins'. HWL Ebsworth, which acted on the Commonwealth's behalf, is also being sued by Senator Reynolds for negligence. Lawyers on behalf of Senator Reynolds argued HWLE breached its fiduciary duty to her by excluding her from the mediation conference where the $2.4m settlement was reached, and failing to conduct independent investigations to establish if there was 'at least a meaningful prospect of liability' by Ms Higgins. However, similar alleged breaches initially put forth against the Commonwealth were withdrawn in the amended document, with it now largely focusing on allegations of Mr Dreyfus' misfeasance of public office and alleged breaches of HWLE. Mr Dreyfus has been contacted for comment. He earlier welcomed NACC's statement. 'The NACC has conclusively found there was no improper interference by any Commonwealth official at any stage,' Mr Dreyfus said. 'I regret the baseless allegation of corruption has been so widely publicised ahead of this finding and hope future matters can be resolved in a more timely manner. 'I also regret any further distress caused to Ms Higgins as a result of this matter.'