Linda Reynolds targets former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in Higgins lawsuit
Linda Reynolds has turned her attention to former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in her bid to sue the Commonwealth over its compensation payment to Brittany Higgins, as the nation's anti-corruption agency revealed there was 'no corruption issue' in the payment.
The retiring former Liberal minister in May launched action in the Federal Court against the Commonwealth, with the crux of the claim over the $2.4m compensation payment to Brittany Higgins in 2022.
Senator Reynolds argued the payment was 'publicly affirming' of Ms Higgins allegations against her that she didn't support her former staffer when she alleged she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann.
The Federal Court has found Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped.
Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.
An amended version of Ms Reynolds statement of claim was filed on Wednesday, just a day before the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) said there was 'no corruption issue' in the $2.4m payment.
The NACC on Thursday announced there was 'no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official'.
Senator Reynolds' amended statement of claim was made public late on Thursday afternoon.
Among the changes is a reference to a speech by Mr Dreyfus the then Attorney-General made to parliament on March 15, 2021. Mr Dreyfus is not a party to the claim.
Mr Dreyfus recounted to the House of Representatives a speech by Ms Higgins just outside Parliament House, where she told a large crowd she was raped inside the building by a colleague, and how her story was 'a painful reminder to women that it can happen in Parliament House and can truly happen anywhere'.
'If a woman cannot feel safe from rape in Parliament House, a veritable fortress ringed with security cameras, with entrances protected by armed guards and with Federal Police officers on duty inside, where can women feel safe?' Mr Dreyfus told the House of Representatives, according to a transcript excerpt in the claim.
'How strong is the rule of law if it isn't able to protect a young woman working in the ministerial wing of Parliament House?'
The amended statement of claim argued Senator Reynolds had suffered loss and damage as a result of Mr Dreyfus' conduct, including denying her the opportunity to rebut Ms Higgins' allegation 'in the appropriate forum'.
It also argues Mr Dreyfus 'enabled and encouraged the falsity of Ms Higgins' claim to be maintained by Ms Higgins'.
HWL Ebsworth, which acted on the Commonwealth's behalf, is also being sued by Senator Reynolds for negligence.
Lawyers on behalf of Senator Reynolds argued HWLE breached its fiduciary duty to her by excluding her from the mediation conference where the $2.4m settlement was reached, and failing to conduct independent investigations to establish if there was 'at least a meaningful prospect of liability' by Ms Higgins.
However, similar alleged breaches initially put forth against the Commonwealth were withdrawn in the amended document, with it now largely focusing on allegations of Mr Dreyfus' misfeasance of public office and alleged breaches of HWLE.
Mr Dreyfus has been contacted for comment.
He earlier welcomed NACC's statement.
'The NACC has conclusively found there was no improper interference by any Commonwealth official at any stage,' Mr Dreyfus said.
'I regret the baseless allegation of corruption has been so widely publicised ahead of this finding and hope future matters can be resolved in a more timely manner.
'I also regret any further distress caused to Ms Higgins as a result of this matter.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
UK rapper Yung Filly faces two more rape charges over alleged incident in Perth
A British rapper who allegedly choked and raped a woman while on tour in Australia is facing two more charges over the alleged incident. Andres Felipe Valencia Barrientos, 29, also known as 'Yung Filly', is accused of sexually abusing a woman in her 20s inside a Perth hotel room in September last year. He was arrested in Brisbane and extradited to Perth on October 9 and charged with eight offences for assault, rape and strangulation. He pleaded not guilty to the charges in the Perth Magistrates Court in March, and the matter was moved to the higher District Court. Mr Barrientos had two additional rape charges added to his indictment that allegedly occurred on the same day as the other offences. He is yet to enter a plea. Mr Barrientos is on bail with strict conditions and a personal undertaking of $100,000. A 10-day trial has been set for July 20 next year.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
The biggest moments of Erin's Evidence: Our Friday Wrap
After eight days and hundreds of questions Erin Patterson has left the witness box, taking the jury a step closer to their deliberations In today's episode Rachael Brown and Stephen Stockwell talk through the big moments of Erin's testimony, their reflections at the end of the evidence and share a surprising moment from the Latrobe Valley Law Courts. If you've got questions about the case that you'd like Rachael and Stocky to answer in future episodes, send them through to mushroomcasedaily@ - It's the case that's captured the attention of the world. Three people died and a fourth survived an induced coma after eating beef wellington at a family lunch, hosted by Erin Patterson. Police allege the beef wellington contained poisonous mushrooms, but Erin Patterson says she's innocent. Now, the accused triple murderer is fighting the charges in a regional Victorian courthouse. Investigative reporter Rachael Brown and producer Stephen Stockwell are on the ground, bringing you all the key moments from the trial as they unravel in court. From court recaps to behind-the-scenes murder trial explainers, the Mushroom Case Daily podcast is your eyes and ears inside the courtroom. Keep up to date with new episodes of Mushroom Case Daily, now releasing every day on the ABC listen app.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Electrical Trades Union seeks to block vote on train deal that ended months of Sydney strikes
The Electrical Trades Union is seeking to halt a vote on a new enterprise agreement for tens of thousands of rail workers after months of industrial action, claiming it was unfairly left out of 11th-hour meetings. The ETU broke with the Combined Rail Unions last month after the CRU, led by the Rail, Tram, and Bus Union, reached an in-principle agreement with the state government over Sydney and NSW Trains staff. The agreement is supposed to be put to a vote of union members following an order by the Fair Work Commission but could be delayed following an application by the ETU before the commission on Friday. Lawyers representing the ETU claimed during an hours-long hearing that neither Sydney and NSW Trains nor the RTBU had engaged in legally mandated good-faith bargaining during the final days of negotiations. The union, which represents electricians, claims it was excluded from a meeting in late May between the CRU and the state government, which later held three days of meetings with the ETU in early June. The meetings centred on two differences between the ETU and the RTBU that led to the ETU objecting to the pay deal, chiefly the restructuring of competency scales for trade-related staff, known as uplifting. The uplift was granted to 'non-trade' employees under the proposed deal, with the ETU seeking to have the same measure applied to electricians – something it claims is a longstanding desire of the ETU. The rail agencies and the RTBU object to the measure that they say was put forward after negotiations had ended, with Sydney Trains executive Fatima Abbas stating it would impact about 350 workers. The commission was told it wouldn't matter if the uplift cost '$1m or $100m', the rail agencies were not seeking to 'increase the package and consider it the final offer', their lawyer told the court on Friday. 'There are 13,500 employees that will be covered by this agreement. The majority of bargaining representatives support and agree to the final package. If the applicant refuses, the package will not change,' he said. RTBU lawyer Leo Saunders told the commission that the union claimed the ETU had 'excluded themselves' from meetings, and it hadn't put the uplift as a 'formal claim' previously. The possibility of a delay comes after months of negotiations and brinkmanship between the CRU and the RTBU and the state government, including rounds of industrial action and court orders. Following a cooling-off period mandated by the commission earlier this year, a breakthrough in talks came after a fallen wire at Strathfield sparked days of chaos across Sydney's rail network in May. The Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission will deliver their judgment at 4.30pm.
