Mexico, under pressure from Trump, transfers 26 more cartel members to US
Authorities shipped 26 prisoners wanted in the U.S. for ties to drug-trafficking groups, Mexico's attorney general's office and security ministry said in a joint statement.
Mexico said the U.S. Department of Justice had requested their extradition and that it would not seek the death penalty for the accused cartel members.
The transfer is the second of its kind this year. In February, Mexican authorities sent 29 alleged cartel leaders to the U.S., sparking a debate about the political and legal grounds for such a move.
That Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum permitted yet another large-scale extradition of Mexican nationals underscores the balancing act she faces as she seeks to appease Trump while also avoiding unilateral U.S. military action in Mexico.
In a statement, the U.S. Embassy said among those extradited were key figures in the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel, which are Mexico's two dominant organized crime groups.
'This transfer is yet another example of what is possible when two governments unite against violence and impunity," U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ronald Johnson said in a statement. "These fugitives will now face justice in American courts, and the citizens of both our nations will be safer.'
Trump has tied tariffs on Mexico to the deadly fentanyl trade, claiming the country hasn't tackled drug cartels aggressively enough. Last week, he directed the Pentagon to prepare operations against Mexican drug gangs that have been designated global terrorist organizations.
Sheinbaum has said the U.S. and Mexico are nearing a security agreement to expand cooperation in the fight against cartels. But she has flatly rejected suggestions by the Trump administration that it could carry out unilateral military operations in Mexico.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump lashes out at people calling him a dictator then defends rewriting history
Donald Trump hit back at people calling him a dictator over his unprecedented takeover of police in Washington DC - before defending his plan to force museums to present history to align with his views Donald Trump moaned that people are calling him a dictator as he defended his unprecedented takeover of police in Washington DC. And he defended his plan to force museums to let him personally review exhibits to allow him to re-write history to reflect his views. He claimed many of his friends were "thanking" him for what he was doing in the capital. It comes after protests sprung up at random traffic stops last night, as locals branded officers "fascists". READ MORE: MIKEY SMITH: 12 wild Donald Trump moments as he floats second meeting with Putin and Zelensky Trump used emergency powers to take direct control of policing in Washington - and sent the National Guard in to bolster his response to what he claimed was an increase in crime. In reality, violent crime has decreased dramatically in DC over the last two years. "They like to say, 'Trump's a dictator!'," Trump said during a Q&A session in the Oval Office. "Well, I had calls from many, many friends - including Democrats - and they were thanking me so much for what I'm doing in DC." Asked if he was concerned the additional officers and troops patrolling the streets in Washington were being diverted from more important matters, he replied: "Like what? Like what?" The reporter replied: "Terrorism". Trump casually dismissed the suggestion, saying: "Oh terrorism, really?" He went on to say there would still be plenty of people to fight terrorism, and those deployed in DC were relatively small in number. He was also asked about his plan to "rid" Washington's world famous Smithsonian museums from what the White House has branded "left-wing spin". The White House has written to the institution, informing its Secretary Lonnie Bunch that the administration would be conducting a "comprehensive internal review of selected Smithsonian museums and exhibitions" in fulfilment of an executive order entitled: "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History." The letter said they plan to "ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." It's understood this could extend to exhibits relating to LGBTQ people, the Black Lives Matter movement and the Covid-19 pandemic. In the Oval Office today, Trump said: "We want the museums to treat our country fairly. We want the museums to talk about the history of our country in a fair manner, not in a woke manner or racist manner, which is what many of them are doing." An exhibit in the Museum of American History has already been re-written to downplay Trump's involvement in the January 6th attempted coup in 2021. The original exhibit noted - accurately - that Trump "repeated 'false statements' challenging the 2020 election results" and gave a speech that "encouraged -- and foreseeably resulted in -- imminent lawless action at the Capitol." Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. But the references to his false statements and the impact of his speech have been erased. It now reads: "On Jan. 13, 2021, Donald Trump became the first president to be impeached twice. The charge was incitement of insurrection based on his challenge of the 2020 election results and on his speech on Jan. 6. Because Trump's term ended on Jan. 20, he became the first former president tried by the Senate. He was acquitted on Feb. 13, 2021."
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Texas Democrats say they are prepared to return to state after two-week absence
Texas Democrats said on Thursday they are prepared to return to the state under certain conditions, ending a nearly two-week-long effort to block Republicans from passing a new congressional map that would add five GOP seats. The lawmakers said they would return as long as the legislature ends its first special session on Friday, which Republicans have said they plan to do. Texas's governor, Greg Abbott, has said he will immediately call another special session. The Democrats also said they would return once California introduces a new congressional map that would add five Democratic seats, offsetting the gains in Texas. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, is expected to announce what he has teased as a 'major' redistricting announcement on Thursday. Gene Wu, chair of the Texas house Democratic caucus, said in a statement that he and his colleagues 'successfully mobilized the nation against Trump's assault on minority voting rights'. 'Facing threats of arrest, lawfare, financial penalties, harassment and bomb threats, we have stood firm in our fight against a proposed Jim Crow congressional district map,' he said. 'Now, as Democrats across the nation join our fight to cause these maps to fail their political purpose, we're prepared to bring this battle back to Texas under the right conditions and to take this fight to the courts.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The lawmakers said in a statement that returning to Texas would allow them to build a strong public and legislative record that could be used in legal challenges against the map.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Social Security has existed for 90 years. Why it may be more threatened than ever
When President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law 90 years ago this week, he said it would provide economic stability to older people while giving the U.S. "an economic structure of vastly greater soundness.' Today, the program provides benefits to almost 69 million Americans each month. It's a major source of income for people older than 65 and is popular across the country and political lines. It also looks more threatened than ever. Just as it has for decades, Social Security faces a looming shortfall in money to pay full benefits. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, the program has faced more tumult. Agency staffing has been slashed. Unions and advocacy groups concerned about sharing sensitive information have sued. Administration officials, including the president, have falsely claimed that millions of dead people were receiving Social Security benefits. Former top adviser Elon Musk said the program was a potential ' Ponzi scheme." At an Oval Office event Thursday commemorating the program's anniversary, Trump said 'Social Security will be great again' under his watch and that 'you have my commitment.' But the president and Republicans who control Congress have not proposed a long-term solution to shore up the program. Social Security remains far from the sound economic system that Roosevelt envisioned, due to changes made — and not made — under both Democratic and Republican presidents. Here's a look at past and current challenges to Social Security, the proposed solutions and what it could take to shore up the program. The go-broke date has been moved up The so-called go-broke date — or the date at which Social Security will no longer have enough funds to pay full benefits — has been moved up to 2034, instead of last year's estimate of 2035. After that point, Social Security would only be able to pay 81% of benefits, according to an annual report released in June. The earlier date came as new legislation affecting Social Security benefits have contributed to earlier projected depletion dates, the report concluded. The Social Security Fairness Act, signed into law by Democratic President Joe Biden and enacted in January, had an impact. It repealed the Windfall Elimination and Government Pension Offset provisions, increasing Social Security benefit levels for former public workers. The new tax law signed by Trump in July will accelerate the insolvency of Social Security, said Brendan Duke at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 'They haven't laid out an idea to fix it yet," he said. Trump said Thursday, repeating the claim that his new tax and spending law will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. That law has a temporary tax deduction for people 65 and over that applies to all income, not just Social Security. But not all Social Security beneficiaries can claim it; among those who cannot are low-income older adults who do not pay taxes on Social Security. AARP CEO Myechia Minter-Jordan said the number of beneficiaries is set to increase to 82 million people by the time Social Security turns 100. 'As we look ahead to the next 90 years of Social Security, it's critical that it remains strong for generations to come,' she said in a statement. The privatization conversation has been revived The notion of privatizing Social Security surfaced most recently when Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent this month said new tax-deferred investment accounts dubbed ' Trump accounts ' may serve as a ' backdoor to privatization," though Treasury has walked back those comments. The public has been widely against the idea of privatizing Social Security since Republican President George W. Bush embarked on a campaign to pitch privatization of the program in 2005, through voluntary personal retirement accounts. The plan was not well-received by the public. Glenn Hubbard, a Columbia University professor and top economist in Bush's White House, told The Associated Press that Social Security needs to be reduced in size in order to maintain benefits for generations to come. He supports limiting benefits for wealthy retirees. 'We will have to make a choice," Hubbard said. 'If you want Social Security benefits to look like they are today, we're going to have to raise everyone's taxes a lot. And if that's what people want, that's a menu, and you pay the high price and you move on." Another option would be to increase minimum benefits and slow down benefit growth for everyone else, which Hubbard said would right the ship without requiring big tax increases, if it's done over time. 'It's really a political choice,' he said, adding 'Neither one of those is pain free." Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy group for the preservation of Social Security benefits, is more worried that the administration of benefits could be privatized under Trump, rather than a move toward privatized accounts. The agency cut more than 7,000 from its workforce this year as part of the Department of Government Efficiency's effort to reduce the size of the government. A Social Security Administration representative didn't respond to a request for comment. Concerns persist An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in April found that an increasing share of older Americans — particularly Democrats — support the program but aren't confident the benefit will be available to them when they retire. 'So much of what we hear is that its running out of money,' said Becky Boober, 70, from Rockport, Maine, who recently retired after decades in public service. She relies on Social Security to keep her finances afloat, is grateful for the program and thinks it should be expanded. 'In my mind there are several easy fixes that are not a political stretch,' she said. They include raising the income tax cap on high-income earners and possibly raising the retirement age, which is currently 67 for people born after 1960, though she is less inclined to support that change. Some call for shrinking the program Rachel Greszler is a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, the group behind the Project 2025 blueprint for Trump's second term. It called for an increase in the retirement age. Greszler says Social Security no longer serves its intended purpose of being a social safety net for low-income older adults and is far too large. She supports pursuing privatization, which includes allowing retirees to put their Social Security taxes into a personal investment account. She also argues for shrinking the program to a point where every retiree would receive the same Social Security benefit so long as they worked the same number of years, which she argues would increase benefits for the bottom one-third of earners. How this would impact middle-class earners is unclear.
