AACSB Faces A Social Media Backlash Over Dropping Diversity Guidelines
AACSB CEO Lily Bi says the reframing of diversity and inclusion in the agency's guidelines are meant to protect member business schools
President Donald Trump's campaign to stamp out diversity, equity and inclusion policies has caused the top global accrediting body to reframe its once loudly embrace of diversity and inclusion. The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACB) has replaced 'diversity and inclusion' with 'community and connectedness' in its guiding principles for accredited schools.
The update by the AACSB follows widespread criticism of DEI efforts by Trump and his Republican allies who argue that such initiatives constitute an immense public waste and shameful discrimination.' The change reflects an about-face for the AACSB. Only six months ago, Lisa Ordóñez, Dean of the Rady School of Management at UC San Diego, expressed gratitude towards the AACSB for promoting diversity in business education, especially amid challenges to DEI programs in various states.
Just last week, the University of Virginia became the latest state to abandon a DEI initiative. The university's governing board voted on Friday to dissolve the school's office of diversity, equity and inclusion. Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, who had appointed the majority of members on UVA's Board of Visitors, praised the decision to remove the DEI office, saying the board voted for 'common sense.' 'DEI is done at the University of Virginia,' he said in a statement.
Nonetheless, the AACSB retreat has sparked immediate criticism of the agency on social media. Critics argue that the change undermines efforts to promote DEI in business education education and that the AACSB is yielding to political pressures, potentially hindering progress toward more inclusive educational environments. The backlash against the AACSB has been loudest in Europe where business schools have taken the lead on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives.
Ioannis Ioannou, an associate professor of strategy at London Business School, calls the decision 'a failure of leadership.' In a post on LinkedIn, he wrote that 'business schools are responsible for shaping the next generation of leaders. What kind of message does this send? That principles are only worth defending when they are convenient? That commitments to fairness and representation can be erased the moment they become contentious? Even more troubling is the claim that the AACSB's 'mission remains the same.' If that were true, the words wouldn't need to disappear. Words matter. Commitments matter. Leadership is about standing firm in the face of pressure—not backing down when it becomes politically uncomfortable.'
Adds Guido Palazzo, a professor of business ethics at the University of Lausanne: 'This is pre-emptive sycophant obedience. Isn't that a good opportunity to drop this accreditation system in Europe?'
He's not the only critic to question the organization's viability. 'Time for a new accreditation body,' chimed in David Jacobs, an adjunct professor at American University and a lecturer at George Washington University. 'What next?,' asked Edward O'Connor, a lecturer & researcher at the School of Business at Maynooth University in Ireland. 'An approved list of texts and books? Time to rethink being a part of an organisation such as this!'
Brian Lucey, a professor of international finance & commodities at Trinity College Dublin, was just as pointed. 'So it's back to being the AMERICAN association. Cowardly and shortsighted.'
The AACSB says it made the change to mitigate legal and political risks for member schools, particularly in the U.S. states that have imposed restrictions on DEI initiatives. Despite the updated language, the agency maintains that its mission and values remain unchanged and that it continues to support inclusive educational environments. By adopting more neutral language, the AACSB hopes to protect its member business schools from potential legal challenges.
In a memo to the AACSB's more than 1,000 members, the agency said the change in wording reflected 'the current legal and political environment surrounding higher education and accreditation and reframed terms that have become politicized in the US and around the world . . . with a goal to proactively mitigate risks for our members and strengthen the organisation's long-term stability'.
Lily Bi, chief executive of the AACSB, told the Financial Times that 'DEI has become a very complex, evolving concept and very much politicized in the U.S.' and that the accrediting body had changed its wording to mitigate the risks for business schools in 27 U.S. states which had already imposed restrictions on DEI programs. At publication time, Bi did not respond to Poets&Quants' request for an interview. The change is sure to dominate the conversation at the organization's forthcoming annual international conference and annual meeting in Vienna next month.
She added that schools 'were facing tremendous challenges with the need to comply with local laws, maintain finances and uphold AACSB accreditation. Honestly our mission doesn't change, our values don't change. We still have inclusivity and we remain committed to the substance of DEI. If somebody weaponises this concept, we don't want this weapon shooting our members. It's better than nothing. There is no future-proof solution. If you take no action, that is the worst action.'
For Bi, who became CEO of the accrediting body in June of 2023, the backlash has become her most pressing challenge. Formerly an executive vice president at the Institute of Internal Auditors, Bi had to address the organization's finances.
The AACSB reported record revenue of $25.7 million in 2023, the latest year for which figures are available. But its expenses that year totaled $25.6 million, also a record. The result: AACSB's revenue minus expenses plunged to $111,340 from more than $3 million a year earlier.
DON'T MISS:
The post AACSB Faces A Social Media Backlash Over Dropping Diversity Guidelines appeared first on Poets&Quants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

15 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: President to announce 'Trump savings accounts' for parents, guardians
The accounts are part of Trump's megabill. 1:40 As the Trump administration continues to ramp up its focus on Los Angeles and threatens to send troops to the city amid anti-ICE protests, the fallout from President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feud continues. This comes as Republicans in Congress continue to work on agreeing on language for Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill." Meanwhile, U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. President Donald Trump will host a roundtable Monday to formally announce the provision in his massive funding bill called the "Trump savings accounts," which will allow parents and guardians to invest funds in the financial markets on behalf of children, a White House official confirms to ABC News. The savings account would be applicable to children born between January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2029. The government would deposit $1,000 into a tax-deferred, low-cost index fund account that will track the overall stock market for each newborn. Additional contributions can go up to $5,000 annually. When the children reach adulthood, they are able to take out the money to cover things like college or a down payment on a home. "The passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill will literally change the lives of working, middle class families across America by delivering the largest tax cuts in history, increasing the child tax credit, AND by creating this incredible new "Trump Account" program, which will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to ABC News. Multiple CEO's from companies, such as Dell Technologies, will appear with Trump to announce billions of dollars in collective investments into "Trump Accounts" for the children of their employees, according to the official. The event comes as the White House works to highlight Trump's so-called "One, Big, Beautiful Bill," as the Senate works through attempting to pass the budget bill and amid explosive criticism from Elon Musk last week. --ABC News' Lalee Ibssa
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BlackRock calls antitrust claims "unprecedented, unsound and unsupported"
(Reuters) -An attorney for BlackRock called antitrust claims by Republican-led states "unprecedented, unsound and unsupported" on Monday and said they had failed to show how the firms' involvement with industry climate groups interfered with market competition. Gibson Dunn attorney Gregg Costa spoke as BlackRock and co-defendants Vanguard and State Street seek to dismiss the claims in the closely watched antitrust case brought by Texas and 12 other states.


CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
A break in the trade clouds lifted consumers' spirits in May
Americans felt a whole lot better about prices and the job market in May, a month that featured a détente in the trade war between the US and China. Consumers' year-ahead expectations for inflation tumbled in May by 0.4 percentage points to 3.2%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released Monday. It was the biggest monthly sinking of near-term inflation expectations since November 2022, when price hikes slowed much more than expected and the Federal Reserve delivered another heavy-handed effort to curb decades-high inflation. The May survey appeared to mark a more elated moment for consumers in the emotional roller coaster ride they've been on since President Donald Trump enacted sweeping actions, notably a frenetic domestic trade policy of escalating import taxes on many materials and products that come in to the US. Inflation expectations also declined (though not as sharply) at the three- and five-year time horizons, to 3% and 2.6%, respectively, New York Fed data showed. The Federal Reserve closely monitors gauges of near-, medium- and long-term inflation expectations as those could be self-fulfilling prophecies for consumers: If people think prices will be higher in the future, they might spend more now or even demand higher wages. In turn, businesses faced with higher costs might end up raising prices as a result. Economists wholly expect that high tariffs will result in higher prices for consumers, but how much and to what extent they become inflationary remains to be seen. The tariffs, and the fluctuating nature of Trump's negotiations, have driven uncertainty higher and sentiment to near-record lows. Consumers haven't just been anxious about higher prices, they're worried about jobs: The New York Fed's April survey, for example, showed that expectations for the unemployment rate to increase hit the highest level since the early days of the pandemic. Those fears have been quelled for now. In May, the mean perceived probability of the nation's jobless rate being higher than it is now dropped 3.3 percentage points to 40.8%. And people's own job security perceptions improved as well, with job separation expectations dropping 0.5 percentage points to 14.8%. Survey respondents also felt more optimistic about their chances of finding a job if they found themselves unemployed, and they also felt an inkling of improvement in their incomes rising (the median expected growth in household income nudged up by 0.1 percentage point to 2.7%). The May survey showed improvement across household finance expectations, including slightly better access to credit and less of a probability of a missed debt payment. Still, Monday's report showed that one pain point continues to be persistent for consumers: The grocery store run. The year-ahead expected change in food prices increased 0.4 percentage point to 5.5%, the highest rate since October 2023.