Child care workers could get a raise under Shapiro plan to address shortage
Thousands of workers who care for children, older adults, and Pennsylvanians with disabilities would receive higher wages under the budget proposed by Gov. Josh Shapiro.
The plan seeks to address longstanding recruitment and retention problems in the caregiving industry that affect workers, businesses, and families statewide. Still, it's up to the divided legislature to negotiate the final budget deal ahead of the June 30 deadline, and there's no guarantee the pitch will be in the final product.
The proposal, introduced last week in the state Capitol, seeks to allocate $55 million to licensed child care providers and $21 million to direct care workers who deliver support services such as housekeeping and personal care assistance like dressing and eating.
The two industries have struggled with retention as workers leave the industry for better wages, departures that can make some caregiving services harder to access for households statewide.
'If we filled those jobs,' Shapiro said of vacancies in the child care workforce, '25,000 more children in Pennsylvania could have access to child care and parents could have the peace of mind that their kids are well taken care of so they can go to work.'
The Democrat also pitched universal screening for postpartum depression, a mood disorder that affects an estimated 1 in 8 women who have recently given birth.
Caregivers and advocates variously celebrated and questioned the proposed budget, which the Shapiro administration will elaborate on in the coming weeks.
Shapiro's budget would shore up child care by providing $55 million in retention and recruitment grants. The governor said this funding would boost annual pay by roughly $1,000 per employee at licensed child care centers that receive funding from a state program for low-income families.
For years, early childhood staff and teachers have left classrooms for industries offering higher wages, say advocates of early childhood education.
The Start Strong PA coalition lobbied Shapiro to budget $284 million for the child care workforce. Though the proposed $55 million is a fraction of that initial ask, Jen DeBell of the Pennsylvania Association for the Education of Young Children still sees it as a victory.
'Folks are really excited and are applauding the governor for this,' DeBell said of advocates. The proposal recognizes that Pennsylvania's anemic child care industry requires state support, she added.
Diane P. Barber, executive director of the Pennsylvania Child Care Association, agrees with DeBell. She told How We Care via email that this is the first time a governor's proposed budget has included funding specifically for early childhood teachers.
Members of the business community are celebrating too.
'We are deeply grateful to Governor Shapiro,' Robert S. Carl, the head of the Schuylkill Chamber of Commerce, said in a news release.
Carl leads a coalition of Pennsylvania business groups that advocate for increased child care funding. By addressing the workforce shortage, Carl said, high-quality child care centers in Pennsylvania can remain open, which would help employers recruit and retain staff who are parents.
When the Shapiro administration releases more details on the proposed budget, DeBell wants to know whether his administration will mandate that the $55 million be used for bonuses, wage increases, or improved benefits.
In addition to the child care funding, Shapiro proposed putting $15 million toward the staffing shortage in Pennsylvania's Pre-K Counts program. Many preschool classrooms are within child care centers, so this funding would further bolster the state's early childhood ecosystem.
Shapiro also wants to up state support for direct care workers, pitching $21 million to give them a pay bump. These caregivers are paid through the Community HealthChoices waiver, a program that helps older adults and Pennsylvanians with physical disabilities directly hire their caregivers instead of going through an agency.
The services these workers provide — which include housekeeping, grooming, dressing, and driving to medical appointments — allow people to live and receive care in their own homes, as opposed to skilled nursing facilities, which are generally more expensive and offer less independence.
Some direct care workers are relatives of the people they support, as is the case for Lynn Weidner of Allentown. She told Spotlight PA she's been her partner Brandon Kingsmore's paid caregiver for 12 years.
Weidner worked in nursing homes when she and Kingsmore started dating and could probably make a slightly higher hourly rate if she returned to that industry. But Kingsmore had difficulty finding consistent support because Medicaid sets such low wages for direct care workers.
After Kingsmore and Weidner got an apartment together, she figured it made more sense to care for him herself instead of going to a job to take care of other people.
Weidner said that she earns about $14 an hour and that she and Kingsmore live paycheck to paycheck. Weidner is a member of the union SEIU Healthcare, which said in a news release that Shapiro's budget would bump her pay to at least $15 and create benefits like paid time off.
Weider hopes the wage boost, if approved, draws more people to the home care workforce. Then Kingsmore, who has cerebral palsy, could hire additional support to back up Weidner.
Weidner initially worked for an agency when she became Kingsmore's caregiver. She told How We Care that she made less money then but figured that if she had an emergency and couldn't be there for Kingsmore, then he would be covered by another agency staffer.
But when Weidner needed surgery and requested someone to fill in, the agency told her they couldn't provide it. Shortly after, Weidner quit and Kingsmore switched to the direct care model so that she could remain his paid caregiver.
Kingsmore is one of 148,000 Pennsylvanians who receive this Medicaid-funded in-home support, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services. Weidner thinks the state should encourage more people to directly employ their caregivers instead of going through a third party. That way more money ends up in the pockets of workers.
There isn't evidence that caregivers employed by agencies make less money, said Mia Haney, CEO of the Pennsylvania Homecare Association, which represents home health, home care, and hospice providers.
Haney said Shapiro's budget should support agency workers as well as those directly employed by the people who receive services. When home health agencies are underfunded, Haney argued, the people who rely on these services have fewer options.
Shapiro's proposed budget would target some 8,500 direct care workers, but Haney pointed out that's just a fraction of this workforce, and that agency workers deliver the exact same support services.
'How could we say that direct care workers are more deserving than another? How can we say that the work you perform with this customer is more important than the work you perform with this one?' Haney said.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that as of May 2023, there were 213,000 home health and personal care aides in Pennsylvania. This number includes people who work in hospitals and nursing facilities, in addition to those who provide direct support to people living at home.
Weidner agreed that everyone in her line of work deserves higher pay and better benefits. Both also argued that expanding Pennsylvania's home care workforce would lessen the amount of people in nursing homes.
Shapiro did not attach a dollar amount to his call for Pennsylvania to offer universal postpartum depression screenings.
The mood disorder can leave parents anxious and sad, affecting their ability to care for themselves and their children. To address this, Shapiro wants to train clinicians how to quickly identify the disorder and create a 'resource hub' where families can go to find more information.
'Let's take an issue that lurks in the shadows and put it right in the middle of the conversation,' Shapiro said during his address.
Maternal health advocates have called for universal screenings for a long time, said Rosemarie Halt, a policy consultant for the Philadelphia-based nonprofit Children First.
Most of these screenings happen at doctors' appointments that are typically scheduled about a month or two after someone gives birth. But Halt would like to see screenings continue during the half-dozen pediatric visits that are recommended throughout an infant's first year.
'Babies don't go to the doctor by themselves. And you know, often what's happening with mom is affecting baby,' said Halt.
Identifying postpartum depression is just one part of addressing the issue, some advocates noted. Actually finding care is like the Wild West, said Sara Jann Heinze, senior director of policy and advocacy at the Philadelphia-based Maternity Care Coalition.
'There's a lack of providers in rural parts of Pennsylvania. And in urban parts, there's providers, but they're all full up,' she said of the disparate availability of mental health care.
Well-meaning initiatives can be redundant, warned Sarah Horvath, Pennsylvania legislative chair for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
In an emailed statement, Horvath told Spotlight PA that best practices already recommend postpartum depression screenings at various appointments following a birth. Meanwhile, receiving the care is a matter of supply, she said, noting the shortage of practitioners who can treat postpartum depression and the often six-week wait to see them.
If Shapiro wants to better support the mental health of pregnant and postpartum patients, Horvath argued, he should advocate for more funding for programs that connect OB-GYNs to perinatal psychiatrists.
Heinze contended that universal paid leave would also help families seeking mental health care. She cited a plan by a bipartisan group of lawmakers to reintroduce a bill that would provide financial support to workers who take time off for several reasons, including the birth of a child.
If you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Idiot' Trump Aide Called Out for Failed Jab at Gavin Newsom
Gavin Newsom's press office called out 'idiot' White House Communications Director Steven Cheung for his attempted online attack of the California governor. Cheung, in a profane post on X, claimed the Democrat was 'too chicken s--t to take questions from the press' after his speech Thursday about congressional redistricting to counter similar GOP moves in Texas and other red states. Except that's exactly what Newsom did. Less than 15 minutes after Cheung called Newsom a 'coward' and 'beta cuck,' the governor's press office shot back in the replies. 'Questions are streamed here you idiot,' they wrote, linking to a question-and-answer session in which the governor fielded nine questions from reporters. The Newsom account highlighted Cheung's mistake in another post—this one directed to the public. 'Steven Cheung (incompetent Trump staffer) doesn't know how to use his computer. SAD!' they wrote, adopting Donald Trump's style of posting. The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Beast asking if Cheung plans on deleting or editing his post. The recent trend by Newsom's press team of imitating Trump's tone was the topic of one of the questions Newsom responded to in the Q-and-A. 'I hope it's a wake-up call—the president of the United States, sort of following his example,' Newsom said. 'If you've got issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns about what he's putting out as president,' he continued. 'So, to the extent it's got some attention, I'm pleased, but I think the deeper question is: how have we allowed the normalization of his tweets and Truth Social posts over the last several years to go without similar scrutiny and notice.' For days, that account has been aiming to make Trump aware of the purpose of Newsom's speech Thursday: announcing a November special election to vote on proposed new maps to nullify GOP-friendly redistricting in red states. Newsom reiterated to reporters Thursday that if states like Texas, Florida, Missouri, and Indiana call off their 'unprecedented, mid-decade, hyper-partisan gerrymander to rig the upcoming midterm elections,' then California's redistricting effort won't be necessary. But there don't appear to be signs of Republicans backing down. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mark Hamill gave wife option of two countries they could move to when Trump was re-elected
Star Wars actor Mark Hamill has revealed he planned to leave the United States when Donald Trump was re-elected as president in 2024. The 73-year-old, known for his role as Luke Skywalker in the iconic sci-fi franchise, gave his wife Marilou Tork – whom he married in 1978 – the choice between relocating to 'London or Ireland'. Hamill's wife, who worked as a dental hygienist and met Hamill while cleaning his teeth, ingeniously convinced her husband not to move countries by suggesting Trump was pushing them out of the US. 'She's very clever. She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country,'' Hamill, a lifelong Democrat, told The Times. ''That son of a b****', I thought. I'm not leaving.' When asked about the political landscape in the United States, Hamill expressed exasperation over 'the bullying, the incompetence, the people in place' in the Trump administration. The actor added that the only way he could 'deal' with the his country's politics without becoming suicidal was to look at the situation 'like a thick, sprawling political novel' instead of reality. Despite his horror, Hamill added that he 'still believes' there are 'more honest, decent people' in the country than there are those in a Maga crowd. 'If I didn't, I'd move back to England,' he said. Elsewhere in the interview, Hamill revealed his dislike of US gun culture is such that he almost didn't accept his role in a forthcoming adaptation of Stephen King's horror novel The Long Walk. Hamill will play The Major, a man who runs an annual walking contest in a dystopian version of America that sees 100 young men walk continuously at a pace of four miles an hour – or they'll be shot to death. 'Francis Lawrence, the director, understood what was troubling me,' he said of his initial reluctance to take on the role. 'American society is gun violence and it's hard to get past that, but as I spoke to him I realised this is just the guy. He said he would have been surprised if I wasn't troubled by it.' The actor went on to compare the film to recent ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] arrests in the country, saying agents wearing masks, with no identification, had been 'pulling people out of their cars'. 'They were just brutalising people, kneeling on their necks,' he said. 'When I made the movie I wasn't thinking in terms of it being timely but it's proven to be just that.' Hamill led the three original Star Wars movies – Star Wars (1977), The Empire Strikes Back (1980), and Return of the Jedi (1983) – as Luke Skywalker alongside Carrie Fisher as Princess Leira and Harrison Ford as Han Solo. He reprised the role in all three films of the sequel trilogy: The Force Awakens (2015), The Last Jedi (2017), and The Rise of Skywalker (2019), as well as in numerous TV spin offs, including The Clone Wars and The Mandalorian. Solve the daily Crossword


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump Defends Putin Summit Against Media 'Major Defeat' Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump dismissed criticism of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska as "fake news" Sunday night on Truth Social, saying the war in Ukraine could be ended "almost immediately" but critics were making it harder to do so. Trump also appeared to rule out any return of the Russian-occupied Crimea region or NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) membership for Ukraine. Why It Matters Critics have slammed Trump for providing Putin with red-carpet treatment in Alaska on Friday in exchange for seemingly little in the way of concessions. The meeting ended without any agreement on a ceasefire or peace deal, but Trump officials have talked up possible concessions made by the Russians, although details have yet to surface. Trump's comments come as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due to travel to Washington, D.C. on Monday to discuss with Trump a possible settlement of the war, which Putin launched in February 2022. Several European leaders are due to participate in the meeting. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. Andrew Harnik What To Know Trump rejected any suggestion that holding the summit on U.S. soil represented a defeat. "The Fake News has been saying for 3 days that I suffered a "major defeat" by allowing President Vladimir Putin of Russia to have a major Summit in the United States. Actually, he would have loved doing the meeting anywhere else but the U.S., and the Fake News knows this. It was a major point of contention!" the president said in a post on his Truth Social platform. "If we had the Summit elsewhere, the Democrat run and controlled media would have said what a terrible thing THAT was. These people are sick!" he said. The decision to hold the summit at Anchorage's Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson surprised many observers as previous suggestions indicated a third country, such as the United Arab Emirates, would host the two leaders' first meeting in six years. Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, did not hold back on his assessment of the Trump-Putin summit, saying in a Sunday appearance on NBC News' Meet the Press that the meeting was a "disaster" that gave Russian Putin "everything he wanted." "The very unattractive (both inside and out!) Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, said "Putin got everything that he wanted." Actually, "nobody got anything," too soon, but getting close," Trump fired back in another Sunday Truth Social post. "Murphy is a lightweight who thinks it made the Russian President look good in coming to America. Actually, it was very hard for President Putin to do so. This war can be ended, NOW, but stupid people like Chris Murphy, John Bolton, and others, make it much harder to do so." In advance of his talks with Zelensky and his European allies, Trump appeared to rule out any chance that the Ukrainian leader would succeed in his long-held aims of getting back Crimea, which Russian forces occupied in 2014, or of membership of NATO. "No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" Trump said. Kyiv has repeatedly said it is against the country's constitution to give land away to Moscow. One of Putin's fears is that Ukraine would become a member of NATO, expanding the U.S. and European footprint even more along the border of Russia. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Sunday said the Russians had agreed to a "game-changing" concession, which would allow the U.S. to establish security guarantees modeled after NATO's Article 5 protections, which states that an attack against any member of NATO is an attack against all members of NATO—also known as the collective defense clause. Looking ahead to Monday's talks, Trump said: "Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!" What People Are Saying In a post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump said: "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight." Senator Chris Murphy told NBC News: "It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted…He was invited to the United States: War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America." What Happens Next? Zelensky and several European leaders are due to meet Trump in Washington on Monday.