logo
US Ambassador Calls Out Chinese Counterpart Over X Post: 'Untrained Puppy'

US Ambassador Calls Out Chinese Counterpart Over X Post: 'Untrained Puppy'

Newsweek24-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States ambassador to Japan strongly rebuked a top Chinese diplomat in Japan over a social media post comparing Israel to Nazi Germany.
Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry via email for comment.
Why It Matters
The now-deleted post was made on June 14, one day after Israel launched attacks on military and nuclear targets in Iran, sparking the ongoing conflict. Tel Aviv claimed the country was racing toward developing an atomic bomb.
While China has called for de-escalation by all parties, it has been especially critical of Israel and voiced support for Iran's right to self-defense. Chinese officials have also repeatedly criticized Israel's conduct during its campaign against Hamas in Gaza.
What To Know
In a Japanese-language post on X (formerly Twitter), Xue Jian, the Chinese Consul General in Osaka, presented a list of comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, placing each under its respective national flag.
Xue wrote that while "Jews were genocided" during the Holocaust, they are today "committing genocide." Both states had "ignored international law," "invested a lot of power into [their] military," and "encouraged settlement of occupied land," he said.
The post had drawn more than 258,000 views as of the morning of June 14. A screenshot of the archived post, along with its English translation, can be seen below.
This screenshot shows Chinese Consul General Xue Jian's now-deleted Japanese-language X post from June 14, 2025, translated into English.
This screenshot shows Chinese Consul General Xue Jian's now-deleted Japanese-language X post from June 14, 2025, translated into English.
X
On Tuesday, U.S. Ambassador to Japan George Glass criticized Xue, saying he had "displayed a shocking level of antisemitism, ignorance, and vulgarity in a now-deleted post that compared Nazi Germany with Israel."
"He's not so much a wolf warrior as an untrained puppy," Glass added.
"Wolf warrior diplomacy" is a term that emerged in the 2010s to describe the confrontational rhetoric used by some Chinese officials. The label is drawn from a popular Chinese action film series.
The Nazis murdered some 6 million European Jews between 1941 and 1945 during World War II. Modern Israel was established following a United Nations plan to partition the territory of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states.
Since Israel launched its Gaza offensive in the wake of Hamas' deadly October 2023 attack, the country has faced war crimes accusations from United Nations officials and human rights groups. Israeli officials maintain their actions target Hamas in self-defense, not civilians. Gaza's health ministry reports over 56,000 killed, including women and children.
In November, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged use of starvation as a method of warfare and crimes against humanity.
Xue Jian, Chinese Consul General in Osaka, gives a lecture in the western Japanese city on February 27, 2024.
Xue Jian, Chinese Consul General in Osaka, gives a lecture in the western Japanese city on February 27, 2024.
Kyodo via Associated Press
What People Are Saying
Gilad Cohen, Israeli ambassador to Japan, wrote on X: "The Chinese consul general in Osaka has crossed every line. His shameful incitement against Israel— invoking Nazi symbols—is not only disgraceful, it is antisemitic, dangerous, and an insult to the memory of the Holocaust."
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters Tuesday: "Facts have proven that military means cannot bring peace, and dialogue and negotiation are the right way to solve the problem."
What Happens Next
U.S. President Donald Trump claims to have brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran after almost two weeks of warfare. Tensions remain high, and it's unclear whether both parties will refrain from further strikes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel sees huge protests over Gaza war, Hamas hostages
Israel sees huge protests over Gaza war, Hamas hostages

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Israel sees huge protests over Gaza war, Hamas hostages

Nationwide protests erupted throughout Israel on Sunday as hundreds of thousands of demonstrators called for the safe return of hostages still held in Gaza after nearly two years of war. The demonstrations amounted to one of the largest the country has seen since the start of the war in October 2023. They come amid growing frustration in Israel over the government's plans to expand military operations in some of Gaza's most crowded areas. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he opposes any deal that leaves Hamas in power. But many Israelis fear a new military offensive in Gaza could endanger the 50 remaining hostages, 20 of whom are believed still to be alive. The protests on Sunday were organized by groups representing families of hostages. Demonstrations took place at dozens of locations throughout Israel, including at politicians' homes, at military headquarters and on major highways, where protesters blocked several lanes and lit bonfires. 'The only way to bring (hostages) back is through a deal, all at once, without games,' former hostage Arbel Yehoud, whose boyfriend Ariel Cunio is still held by Hamas, said at a protest in Tel Aviv. The day of action culminated in a rally in Tel Aviv on Sunday evening. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum said more than 400,000 people gathered in the rally, according to multiple reports. Israeli police said they arrested 38 people on Sunday. The Associated Press contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump gave China the AI chips it wanted. Beijing isn't saying thank you
Trump gave China the AI chips it wanted. Beijing isn't saying thank you

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

Trump gave China the AI chips it wanted. Beijing isn't saying thank you

Asia China AI Donald Trump FacebookTweetLink In a surprising reversal of the United States' years-long technology restrictions on China, President Donald Trump last month allowed Nvidia to resume sales of a key AI chip designed specifically for the Chinese market. Yet rather than celebrating, Beijing's response has been noticeably lukewarm, despite having long urged Washington to ease the stringent export controls. In the weeks since the policy U-turn, Beijing has called the chip a security risk, summoned Nvidia for explanations and discouraged its companies from using it. The less-than-welcoming sentiment reflects Beijing's drive to build a self-sufficient semiconductor supply chain – and its confidence in the progress its rapidly advancing chip industry has made. But the cold shoulder may also represent some political posturing. Despite significant advances in its semiconductor sector, China still needs America's chips and technology. Experts said China's national champion Huawei has developed chips with performance comparable to — and in some cases surpassing — the newly approved Nvidia chip. However, China still wants the more advanced AI processors that remain blocked under US export controls. In the years since Trump first imposed tech restrictions on Huawei during his first term, China's chip technology has made significant strides, spurred by the frustration that mounted as Washington piled on export controls, said Xiang Ligang, director-general of a Beijing-based technology industry group and an advisor to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. 'We have this capability, it's not as they imagine – that if China is blocked, China won't be able to function, or that China will be finished,' he said. To him, the policy about-face only reflects the importance of having a wholly homegrown chip supply chain. 'For Chinese companies, we may only have one choice if we wish to ensure a relatively secure supply of chips – that means relying on our own domestically produced chips,' Xiang said. That may be China's goal, but in the high-stakes AI race, with all its national security implications, the US remains the leader, at least for now. The chip in focus is Nvidia's H20, which was released by the AI chip leader last year to maintain access to the Chinese market following strict export controls put in place under the Biden administration that stopped the export of chips with high processing power. Last month, Trump greenlit the sales of the chip to China after banning it in April as the US trade frictions with China deepened. Trump has justified his decision by calling the chip 'obsolete,' as it lags behind the company's cutting-edge AI processors like Blackwell or H100, from which H20 is derived. He and his officials appeared to have embraced a view long promoted by Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang – that US can maintain its tech leadership only through ensuring its chips remain the global standard. 'You want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month. But the dramatic reversal has fueled questions about Trump's transactional approach to national security – once considered off-limits to bargaining. China, on the other hand, is alarmed by the alleged security risks of Nvidia's H20s like 'tracking and positioning' and 'remote shutdown' features, capabilities that some US lawmakers have called for but Nvidia denies it has placed in its chips. China's cyberspace watchdog and industry ministry have since summoned the American chip giant over the security concerns and urged firms to avoid H20 chips, a development which was previously reported by Bloomberg. One major Chinese tech company which has developed its AI models has received notice from the authorities urging it to exercise caution in the use of H20s, and advising it not to purchase them, a company insider said on the condition of anonymity. CNN has reached out to the ministry and the cyberspace authorities for comment. An Nvidia spokesperson told CNN that NVIDIA 'does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them.' 'Banning the sale of H20 in China would only harm US economic and technology leadership with zero national security benefit,' the spokesperson added. But China believes the US isn't playing fairly, Xiang said. 'What we actually want, you refuse to sell us. For the things you already consider obsolete, you still want to dump them into our market and occupy our market. Do you really think we're that naive?' he said. Despite Beijing's concerns and the H20's reduced performance, the chips remain highly sought after by Chinese companies. Equity research firm Bernstein estimated that shipment of the chips to China this year would have reached 1.5 million units, or about 23 billion in revenue, without Trump's export restrictions. Major buyers include Chinese tech giants such as TikTok owner ByteDance, Alibaba and Tencent. While Huawei's top AI chips excel in computing power – one of the key measures in evaluating processors' performance – in comparison with H20, they fall short in terms of memory bandwidth, which determines how much data can move between a chip's memory and computing unit. That bandwidth depends on a technology known as High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) used in AI chips to ensure efficient data transmission in AI model training. China's top HBM maker CXMT, or ChangXin Memory Technologies, is still about three to four years behind industry leaders like South Korea's SK Hynix and Samsung, and American Micron, according to MS Hwang, research director at Counterpoint Research, a research firm. Last year, the Biden administration further tightened export controls on China, including restrictions on HBM sales, forcing Chinese companies to rely on existing stockpiles. Beijing has requested Washington to lift restrictions on HBM as part of the trade deal negotiations, Financial Times reported this week. Key appeal of H20 for Chinese companies also lies in Huawei's limited production capacity and Nvidia's well-established ecosystem, said Qingyuan Lin, senior analyst at Bernstein focusing China's semiconductor industry. 'Even when you want to completely replace the H20 demand with the local guys, they're not able to deliver the amount of chips that's needed,' he said. The supply bottlenecks stem from constraints in scaling up production of both the manufacturing of computing units of the AI chips and the integration of various components in them, a technology known as advanced packaging in the industry, Lin said. Bernstein estimated that Huawei's shipments of its advanced AI chips in 2025 would amount to around 700,000 units, still far short of the demand in the country. CNN has reached out to Huawei for comment. Meanwhile, Nvidia's powerful ecosystem, which integrates its chips with its software platform, has created what experts call a 'moat,' making it difficult and costly for AI developers who train models on its software to switch to alternatives. 'The H20 comes with a complete ecosystem covering both hardware and software support, ensuring better compatibility and ease of integration,' said Brady Wang, associate director at Counterpoint. 'This ecosystem maturity is still a challenge for many Chinese-developed chips, making the H20 more attractive despite its cost disadvantage.' Still, experts said China's rapid progress in semiconductor technology should not be underestimated. Years of tightening export controls have injected both urgency and opportunity into Beijing's push for self-sufficiency, Lin said. While chipmaking technology appeared to stall after Huawei's 2023 flagship smartphone showcased advanced chips that American officials had deemed extremely difficult to produce, domestic chipmaking equipment companies have been steadily gaining ground, he said. 'The local guys actually had very little chance to gain share from the global players because of the technology gap, but export controls created a market that didn't exist before and accelerated the domestic substitution,' he said. Bernstein projects that the percentage of homemade AI chips in China will surge from 17% in 2023 to 55% by 2027, while American suppliers like Nvidia and AMD will shrink to 45% from 83%. In April, Huang of Nvidia met with Trump in Washington, urging the administration to loosen export controls on chips and saying that the diffusion of American AI technology around the world needs to be accelerated. 'There's no question that Huawei is one of the most formidable technology companies in the world…they made enormous progress in the last several years,' he said. 'China is right behind us. We're very, very close.' CNN's Hassan Tayir and Fred He contributed reporting.

Charter schools offer hope AND deliver excellence in NYC's toughest neighborhoods
Charter schools offer hope AND deliver excellence in NYC's toughest neighborhoods

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Charter schools offer hope AND deliver excellence in NYC's toughest neighborhoods

Charter schools deliver results for kids in the parts of New York City where 'the system' has given up: It's just obscene that supposed progressives like Zohran Mamdani keep selling out the charter sector to win the support of privileged special interests. The Post reports today on the stunning difference in The Bronx: Students at public charter schools excel on state K-8 reading and math exams, in stark contrast to the sad scores at Department of Education schools. Counting all 99 Bronx charters, 68.6% of students passed the reading exams in grades 3 to 8, vs. 43.6% in Bronx traditional public schools — a 25-point difference. Advertisement In math, it was nearly a 26-point gap: an average 69.2% of charter kids passing vs. 43.3% in regular 'district' schools. Students at the highest-performing charters were simply amazing; 95% or more passing in English and math at the four South Bronx Classical Charter schools; 90%-plus at the several Zeta Charter Schools, the five Success Academy schools and nearly as well at the Icahn network of seven schools. Advertisement Citywide, per an analysis by the New York City Charter School Center, charters led district schools by 11 points — in good measure because regular public schools aren't as terrible in the other four boroughs; indeed, a handful are nearly as high-scoring as the better charters. And no, the college-oriented approach of the Success network and others isn't right for all kids — but for a lot of lower-income families, charters offer the only access to a school culture of high expectations, academic excellence and accountability. And the sector's smaller independent schools focus on serving other kinds of kids — with some specializing in dual-language learners, children with autism or other special needs and so on. Advertisement Another key difference: A (very) few charters fail as badly as the worst Department of Education schools — but the terrible charters get shut down fast while DOE failure factories keep going year after year. The city's 285 charters enroll about 15% of all public-school students, 150,000 kids in all. Almost 90% of charter students are black or Latino; 83% come from low-income families; 19% have special needs. For these demographics, in the city's toughest neighborhoods, charters do exactly what everyone says public schools are supposed to do: offer real opportunity to all children. Teachers unions always claim to care about the kids, yet serve their own interests above all else; they relentlessly use their vast power in Albany against the charter sector. Advertisement That's why the Legislature refuses to lift the cap set in law to let more charters open in the city, why charters get far less per-pupil funding than other schools. And why Mamdani has promised to be hell on charters, looking to kick them out of their school buildings and otherwise squeeze the whole sector. With all the talk about 'affordability,' it sure seems like the mayoral race should acknowledge that charter schools make hope affordable in the city's most vulnerable communities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store