Trump says Musk has ‘lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Friday that Elon Musk had 'lost his mind' but insisted he wanted to move on from the fiery split with his billionaire former ally.
The blistering public break-up between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful is fraught with political and economic risks all round.
Trump had scrapped the idea of a call with Musk and was even thinking of ditching the red Tesla he bought at the height of their bromance, White House officials told AFP.
But Trump told US broadcasters that he now wanted to focus instead on passing his 'big, beautiful' mega-bill -- Musk's harsh criticism of which had sparked their break-up.
But the 78-year-old Republican could not stop himself from taking aim at his South African-born friend-turned-enemy.
'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump said in a call with ABC when asked about Musk, adding that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to the tycoon.
Trump later told Fox News that Musk had 'lost it,' while CNN quoted the president as saying: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon....The poor guy's got a problem.'
Just a week ago Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after four months working there.
- 'Very disappointed' -
But while there had been reports of tensions, the sheer speed at which their relationship imploded stunned Washington.
After Musk called Trump's spending bill an 'abomination' on Tuesday, Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe on Thursday in which he said he was 'very disappointed' by the tycoon.
Trump's spending bill faces a difficult path through Congress as it will raise the US deficit, while critics say it will cut health care for millions of the poorest Americans.
The row then went nuclear, with Musk slinging insults at Trump and accusing him without evidence of being in government files on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump hit back with the power of the US government behind him, saying he could cancel the Space X boss's multi-billion-dollar rocket and satellite contracts.
The right-wing tech baron apparently tried to deescalate.
Musk rowed back on a threat to scrap his company's Dragon spacecraft -- vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station.
And on Friday the usually garrulous poster kept a low social media profile on his X social network.
But the White House denied reports that they would talk.
'The president does not intend to speak to Musk today,' a senior White House official told AFP. A second official said Musk had requested a call.
- Tesla giveaway? -
Tesla stocks tanked more than 14 percent on Thursday amid the row, losing some $100 billion of the company's market value, but recovering partly Friday.
Trump is now considering either selling or giving away the cherry red Tesla S that he announced he had bought from Musk's firm in March.
The electric vehicle was still parked on the White House grounds on Friday. 'He's thinking about it, yes,' a senior White House official told AFP when asked if Trump would sell or give it away.
Trump and Musk had posed inside the car at a bizarre event in March, when the president turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom after viral protests against Musk's DOGE role.
But while Trump appeared to have many of the cards in their row, Musk also has some to play.
His wealth allowed him to be Trump's biggest donor to his 2024 campaign, to the tune of nearly $300 million. Any further support for the 2026 midterms now appears in doubt -- while Musk could also use his money to undermine Trump's support on the right.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
With Marines, Guard deployment up, protests against U.S. ICE spread to other cities
NEW YORK, June 10 (Xinhua) -- The standoff between the White House and California Governor Gavin Newsom seemed to escalate on Tuesday, even as protests in downtown Los Angeles appeared to quiet overnight. Newsom responded to the Trump administration's order to deploy 700 active-duty Marines and 2,000 additional National Guard troops by pledging to file a second lawsuit and "surging" 800 additional state and local law enforcement officers to the region. President Donald Trump ordered the mobilization of 2,000 more California National Guard troops on Monday night, in addition to the 2,100 already activated over the weekend. Hours earlier, the Pentagon mobilized 700 active-duty Marines for deployment to the Los Angeles area. Newsom said Monday he would challenge the legality of the Marines' deployment, criticizing it on social media as a "blatant abuse of power." Trump on Tuesday continued to defend his decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles, reviving attacks on Democratic leaders in California and invoking the wildfires that devastated the city earlier this year. "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," Trump wrote on his Truth Social network. As the federal response to the protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles escalates, demonstrators in San Francisco, New York, Philadelphia, Austin and other cities across the United States are also rallying against immigration raids. In San Francisco, police said they detained "multiple" people around midnight after two small groups of demonstrators splintered off from "overwhelmingly peaceful" protests and committed acts of vandalism, said The Washington Post. Thousands of people marched for miles Monday night before police declared an unlawful assembly around 10 p.m. A contingent that refused to disperse appeared to resist arrest, and were met with force by San Francisco police. Meanwhile, people gathered near the Independence Hall in Philadelphia on Monday to protest the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles and the detainment of union leader David Huerta. In New York City, an anti-ICE protest was staged outside the Ted Weiss Federal Building with police officers maintaining their presence at the scene on Monday. A protest took place at the Texas State Capitol in downtown Austin on Monday, with organizers saying this was in solidarity with the protests taking place in Los Angeles. "Activists are calling for an end to the Trump administration's crackdowns on illegal immigration," reported FOX7 about the developments. "The protests against the Trump administration's immigration policies that started in Los Angeles have spread to at least two dozen cities, including San Francisco, Dallas, Austin and New York City," said The New York Times. These solidarity demonstrations on Monday were largely contained and peaceful, although some skirmishes broke out between protesters and law enforcement officers as night fell, it noted. In Dallas, about 400 protesters gathered on the edge of downtown. The demonstration began peacefully but brief skirmishes later occurred between protesters and the police, it added.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
US Justice Department 'weaponization' reviews spark calls to drop prosecutions
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -As the federal public corruption prosecution of former Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada neared trial this spring, his lawyers made one last effort to kill the case, by petitioning senior Justice Department officials that it was "weaponization," according to three people familiar with the matter. Under President Donald Trump, the department in February created a "Weaponization Working Group" meant to identify improper politically motivated cases, a response to what the Republican says without evidence was the misuse of prosecutorial resources against him under his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden. In court filings, prosecutors said that Casada's lawyers met with a senior Justice Department official on March 24, where they alleged the "Deep State" had initiated a "weaponized" prosecution and they sought dismissal of the charges. The plan almost worked, according to three people familiar with the matter. With the Deputy Attorney General's office poised to kill the case, prosecutors in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section pushed back, reviewing their evidence with the higher-ups, the sources said, adding that the Nashville U.S. Attorney's office and the Criminal Division also supported the case. The request was rejected the next week, according to court filings. Both Casada and the DOJ declined to comment. The case is among at least seven Reuters identified where defense attorneys or Justice Department officials have sought to have prosecutions reviewed for possible dismissal, citing Trump's "weaponization" argument or making other arguments about weaknesses in the cases. In a Tuesday speech, Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti urged defense attorneys to be "conscientious about what, when and how" they appeal prosecutors' decisions. "Seeking premature relief, mischaracterizing prosecutorial conduct, or otherwise failing to be an honest broker actively undermines our system," Galeotti said. The increase in lobbying started not long after the Weaponization Working Group was created, and after the department's February decision to dismiss criminal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, six sources familiar with the dynamic told Reuters. To date, the Adams case is the only one to be dismissed over 'weaponization,' three of those sources told Reuters. The lobbying wave comes as the Trump administration has dramatically scaled back the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, reduced the size of its foreign bribery unit and advised department attorneys that tax enforcement is "not a priority," two of the people familiar with the matter said. A department spokesman said the DOJ will "continue to enforce our nation's tax laws." Trump has said the changes are necessary to root out Justice Department lawyers he derides as 'hacks and radicals' for prosecuting him and some supporters while he was out of power. NEW GROUP HAS BROAD REMIT The working group is empowered to review any 'civil or criminal enforcement authority of the United States' exercised under Biden. A lawyer for Robert Burke, a former Navy admiral who was convicted in May on bribery charges, wrote to the department ahead of trial raising concerns about witness credibility, which failed to convince prosecutors to drop the case. Now the lawyer, Tim Parlatore -- a former Trump defense lawyer -- plans to seek a pardon. "I would be crazy not to at least inquire about a pardon," Parlatore said. Another example is a case involving billionaire Britannia Financial Group founder Julio Martín Herrera-Velutini, who is facing an August trial alongside Puerto Rico's former governor on bribery charges. Herrera-Velutini is represented by former Trump defense attorney Chris Kise, who has sought to convince the Justice Department to dismiss or reduce the charges, though the outcome of such efforts is unclear, three people familiar with the case told Reuters. Kise did not return requests for comment, and Reuters could not determine what arguments he has made to the department about the case. WEAPONIZATION REVIEW While many of the reviews of cases are spurred by aggressive lobbying, some requests are coming from within the DOJ. In early February, prosecutors in the department's Tax Division were ordered by senior Justice Department officials to write a memo explaining why the prosecution of Paul Walczak was not an example of "weaponization," two of the people familiar with the matter told Reuters. Walczak, of Florida, pleaded guilty in November to not paying employment taxes and not filing his individual income tax returns, and the trial team was preparing for his sentencing. Prosecutors were baffled, the people said, and only discovered after a few Google searches that Walczak's mother Elizabeth Fago was a Trump donor who, according to a New York Times report, hosted a political fundraiser where portions of a diary written by Biden's daughter Ashley were circulated. The department let the case proceed, and Walczak was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Trump in April spared him any prison with a pardon, which according to the New York Times, was handed down shortly after Fago attended a $1 million fundraising dinner for Trump. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the pardon. An attorney for Walczak said he was unaware of any interactions by the defense team with the Weaponization Working Group. In a statement, the Fago and Walczak families said media reports have painted an "incomplete and inaccurate" picture of the pardon application, and that Trump had "ample grounds to grant the pardon on the merits." Although no criminal prosecutions have been dismissed, prosecutors are bracing for impact since Trump in May named Ed Martin, a supporter of Trump's false claims that his 2020 election defeat was the result of fraud, to lead the working group and serve as pardon attorney. Martin has already successfully encouraged Trump to approve pardons for some of the president's supporters, according to his social media posts. Casada, who was convicted at trial in May on multiple counts of fraud, money laundering and bribery, is now expected to seek a pardon, a person familiar with the matter said. "We've also been getting more folks coming forward within the government as well as outside, saying, 'Can you look at this? Can you look at that?'" Martin recently told reporters. "It's a problem that seems to be growing faster than we can capture it." (Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Peter Eisler in Washington and Ned Parker in New York, additional reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by Scott Malone and Deepa Babington)
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Foreign students prepare Plan B as US closes door
OVER the last few weeks, 28-year-old Raj Iyer and his family have been scrambling to figure out ways to fund his Master's programme at Columbia University in the United States. Iyer, who used a pseudonym to avoid potential reprisals, received a partial scholarship but still needed to come up with nearly US$110,000 to cover tuition and living expenses, for which his family took out a loan and used their savings. Now Iyer fears it is all for naught. Less than three months before classes start, Iyer has been left stranded after the US government announced it is pausing student visa interviews. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio last month instructed embassies to stop scheduling new visa appointments, saying the Trump administration would review the process and expand vetting of students' social media profiles. Officials have not said when student interviews will resume, plunging the education of students from abroad into doubt, including those in India, the biggest contributor of international students to US schools of higher learning. According to the US Embassy in India, more than 331,000 students went there in 2024. Students hoping to attend university in the US are now deleting their social media posts, writing emails to their universities and laying out hastily crafted backup plans. Even before the decision to pause student visas, the Trump administration had revoked visas or terminated visa records belonging to 1,600 international students by May 7, according to data from the US-based National Association of Foreign Student Advisors. Indian students have borne the biggest brunt of these actions, the data showed, with 309 visas revoked, following closely by Chinese students. In March, the Trump administration cancelled the visa of Indian PhD student Ranjini Srinivasan and called her a "terrorist sympathiser" for her pro-Palestine activism on campus. Vibha Kagzi, founder and chief executive officer of ReachIvy, a Mumbai-based education consultancy that helps Indian students seek admission at foreign universities, said she was seeing "anxiety and a flurry of queries" from both students and parents. "There's a deep sense of uncertainty, ranging from fear of deferral to questions around return on investment," Kagzi told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Iyer, a filmmaker, is especially concerned about the introduction of stringent social media vetting and is unfollowing pages and undoing previous "likes" on political posts on his accounts. "I have always been a person with strong convictions, and I don't walk back on them. I am going to a place where I know my freedom of speech is going to be curtailed," he said. "This is making me feel like a hypocrite." Some of the students interviewed for this story said their universities had not reached out about potential next steps. Kagzi said she was advising students to "keep calm" and wait for updates from their schools, including possible alternatives, like online classes. The uncertainty has prompted some Indian students to consider enrolling at universities outside of the US. Lakshmi and her partner had been looking at a half-dozen American universities for the PhDs they both want to pursue. But a crackdown on political activism on US campuses, the deportation of students and earlier changes in visa rules has prompted them to look elsewhere. "In February, we decided that we won't go to the US at all and are now looking entirely at European universities," said Lakshmi, using a pseudonym. Lakshmi said the decision to turn to Europe comes with reduced funding options, shorter PhD programmes and fewer work opportunities after earning her degree. For those still hoping to study in the US, the delay in visa appointments may force them to put off the start of their studies. Even without the pause, the online State Department calendar shows the average wait time for a student visa is as long as two months in Mumbai, where Iyer is applying. Unless the embassy restarts visa interviews soon, Iyer fears it will be too late. "I feel like I am running out of time," he said.
