logo
Brits' terrifying WW3 survival guide - rations, nuke hotspots and 'Armageddon'

Brits' terrifying WW3 survival guide - rations, nuke hotspots and 'Armageddon'

Daily Mirror5 hours ago

Countries including Sweden, Finland and Norway are handing out pamphlets advising citizens on how to survive a potential nuclear attack - and now an expert has urged Keir Starmer to do the same
The UK government ought to release a manual warning the public how to survive to World War III, an expert has urged.
It comes as the French public is set to receive a booklet, which contains 63 measures among its 20 pages, telling them how to protect themselves and their loved ones in a number of terrifying situations, including armed conflict, a nuclear leak, and natural disasters.

Last year, countries including Sweden, Finland and Norway began distributing pamphlets advising citizens to stockpile food and water in preparation for a potential nuclear attack amid rising fears of World War III.

A total of five million copies of the 32-page Swedish booklet, titled If Crisis or War Comes, were sent to households across the country. It provided detailed instructions on how to gather supplies and find shelter in the event of war.
It told households to store food and water so they're ready if conflict comes knocking. Meanwhile, Finland put up a government website explaining how people should prepare for a number of catastrophes.
"An insecure world requires preparedness. The military threat to Sweden has increased and we must prepare for the worst - an armed attack," the Swedish book states in its introduction.
Professor Anthony Glees, an academic in security and defence and a lecturer at the University of Buckingham, feels strongly that the British government should follow suit and produce "a short, decently written booklet" about what might happen in order for the public to prepare for war.
He said: "It should stress at the outset, of course, that the whole of our national defence strategy is about deterrence, that our foreign policy is defensive not offensive and that if we become as strong as we now want to be, thanks to Starmer and his European colleagues and thanks (yes!) to the goading from president Trump, then WW3 can surely be averted."

The Professor highlighted that the booklet should include details of how events could unfold, what might happen, including cyber attacks, drone attacks and possibly missile strikes.
"The government would have to admit that we are woefully lacking in 'Iron Dome' systems round our key cities, as I understand we have five warships that could intercept incoming missiles but one or two are in the Gulf and one or two are being repaired.... We have no fixed systems at all," he claimed.

"Everything to date depends on our Vanguard subs (in a decade to be Dreadnought subs) and their Trident nukes. If they are fired it will be Armageddon day so no survivors.
"But if, more likely, there's a conventional attack that's something we can prepare for — a week's supply of food, bottled water, paracetamol and loads of emergency Snickers bars as well as battery operated devices and a couple of charging units, loaded for a few days from the electricity supply which will probably be turned off.
Recalling survival tactics of his youth, Professor Glees said: "When I was a school boy, 70 years ago, we school kids were told to take cover under our desks, having painted the windows with sour milk to keep out the radiation. I think we were far more afraid of the headmaster than the Russians - it'll be different today.
"More like the hippies used to say in the 1960s you needed to do when 'the bomb' dropped: 'Bend over, and then kiss your ass goodbye.'"

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration slaps down UK after MPs pass assisted dying bill
Trump administration slaps down UK after MPs pass assisted dying bill

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump administration slaps down UK after MPs pass assisted dying bill

The Trump administration has lashed out at the UK after MPs passed Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill - accusing Britain of 'standing for surrender and death'. The president's State Department said the US 'reaffirms the sanctity of life' in an attack on the Labour MP's Terminally Ill Adults Bill. 'The western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death,' it said in a social media post from its Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour. It said the bill is 'euphemistically' said to be for terminally ill adults, but described it instead as 'state-subsidised suicide'. The attack comes a week after the bill, which would legalise assisted dying for those diagnosed with a terminal illness, passed with a slim majority of just 23 votes. Those with fewer than six months to live would be able to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. The bill is now heading to the House of Lords for further scrutiny, where it is set to face more opposition. The US intervention came after Sir Keir Starmer slapped down Wes Streeting for raising concerns over how assisted dying would be funded if it becomes law. The prime minister said he was 'confident we've done that preparation' and that it is his job to 'make sure the bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects'. Last week's crunch assisted dying vote, which saw the bill narrowly pass by just 23 votes, came after months of impassioned debate, culminating in a tense third reading debate on Friday. Ms Leadbeater described the passing of the assisted dying bill at third reading as a 'result that so many people need'. The Spen Valley MP added: 'When you've spent as much time as I have with people who have got experience of losing loved ones in very difficult circumstances, and you've spent time with terminally ill people who are just asking for choice at the end of their days, then this is absolutely the right thing to do.' Among the MPs who backed the bill were the prime minister and his predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, health secretary Mr Streeting and deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, meanwhile, voted against. The passage of the bill in parliament has put the UK at odds with the US, and marks the second time the State Department has criticised Britain under Sir Keir. The department's human rights arm previously warned of its 'concerns about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom' after the prosecution of anti-abortion campaigner Livia Tossici-Bolt.

UK PM Starmer's authority tested as domestic struggles overshadow summit diplomacy
UK PM Starmer's authority tested as domestic struggles overshadow summit diplomacy

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK PM Starmer's authority tested as domestic struggles overshadow summit diplomacy

LONDON, June 26 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked in parliament on Thursday why he had not appeared in front of lawmakers for the past two weeks. His answer was simple - he had been busy with international affairs. The question underlines Starmer's awkward position - just a year after winning one of the biggest election victories in British history, his audience abroad is much less hostile than the one at home, where his party is divided over welfare reforms. With Starmer's Labour Party lagging behind Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK in opinion polls and the prime minister's own popularity tumbling, more than 100 of his lawmakers are threatening the biggest parliamentary rebellion of his premiership to kill off the government's plans to reform the welfare system at a vote due next week. On a trip to the NATO summit in The Hague this week, Starmer, 62, sat alongside U.S. President Donald Trump for talks and shared hugs and handshakes with other world leaders but was noticeably tetchy when asked if the rebellion brewing at home showed a lack of political judgment on his part. "I am comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs," he said as he vowed to lead his party into the next national election, which is not due until 2029. Downing Street officials say the vote is shaping up to be the biggest test of Starmer's authority to date. Were he to suffer his first parliamentary defeat, or were the government to pull the vote or make big compromises, his leadership would be undermined. More fundamentally, the officials say the reforms to save money and encourage more people back into work are an essential part of what Starmer sees as a decade-long project to fix Britain's problems. Annual spending on incapacity and disability benefits already exceeds the country's defence budget and is set to top 100 billion pounds ($137 billion) by 2030, according to official forecasts, up from 65 billion pounds now. Ministers are in talks with lawmakers to offer compromises to ensure the legislation is passed next Tuesday. One key area under discussion concerns the number of people who would lose access to benefits designed to cover disability-related costs. One of Starmer's ministers, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters he thought a deal to see off the rebellion would eventually be reached. But a Labour lawmaker, who also asked not to be named, said the government's best option would be to pause the legislation and rework it, adding that he would not vote for changes that could push tens of thousands of people into poverty. "People are very, very upset at the way the government has handled this," the lawmaker said. The decision to cut payments to some of the most vulnerable in society is particularly painful for politicians in the centre-left Labour Party, which founded the state-run National Health Service and traditionally sees itself as the protector of the country's welfare state built after World War Two. Rebels may have been encouraged after the government reversed another unpopular policy - cutting payments to millions of pensioners to help them pay energy bills each winter. Starmer told parliament on Thursday he wanted the "values of fairness" to be at the heart of his reforms and attempts to reach a consensus would continue over the coming days. ($1 = 0.7277 pounds)

Starmer says ‘fairness' will anchor welfare cuts in bid to cool Labour rebellion
Starmer says ‘fairness' will anchor welfare cuts in bid to cool Labour rebellion

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer says ‘fairness' will anchor welfare cuts in bid to cool Labour rebellion

Keir Starmer is in talks with Labour rebels to gain support for the government's welfare reform package, the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, ahead of its Commons vote. The proposed legislation aims to restrict access to sickness and incapacity benefits, with the government arguing it wants to get more people into work and save billions of pounds annually. Over 126 Labour MPs, alongside other parties, publicly oppose the bill, arguing it will cause significant harm to disabled people and that no concessions can make it acceptable. Analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) projects that the reforms will lead to 800,000 fewer working-age people receiving Personal Independence Payment (PIP) by 2029–30, with most losing £3,850 annually. Public polling indicates low support for the reforms, with only 27 per cent in favour.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store