Throne speech was an 'emotional moment' for the King, Buckingham Palace says
Social Sharing
Some observant royal watchers thought King Charles looked emotional at times throughout his trip to Canada last week — and a Buckingham Palace spokesperson confirms to CBC News that the normally stoic monarch found delivering the throne speech to be a particularly poignant moment.
"His Majesty was deeply moved and touched by the enthusiastic response to his visit," the palace spokesperson said.
"On the speech, the standing ovation in particular was an unexpected and emotional moment for His Majesty. You can hear his voice go a bit crackly in the final lines."
Footage shows Charles looking pleased by the warm reception he received as the assembled dignitaries rose to applaud him and his speech.
Charles's line about Canada "indeed" being the Truth North "strong and free" was particularly well received in the Senate chamber. There was no act of protest like when an Australian Indigenous senator shouted at the King in Parliament during his visit to that realm last year.
WATCH | King Charles gets a standing ovation in Parliament:
'The True North is, indeed, strong and free,' says King Charles in throne speech
7 days ago
Duration 1:32
His voice then wavered and his eyes appeared to well up as he said the final line to the gathered parliamentarians: "May you honour the profound trust bestowed upon you by Canadians, and may God bless and guide you in all your duties."
Charles also seemed to tear up outside the Senate building as thousands of people watched him arrive in the royal landau and inspect the military honour guard while the Royal Canadian Air Force band played O Canada. After the speech, he cheerfully greeted many of the onlookers and there were no obvious signs of protest.
"It was the warmest of welcomes and the fondest of returns to a nation and a people we love," Charles and Queen Camilla themselves said in a joint statement released after they left Ottawa.
WATCH | The royal parade to Parliament:
King Charles and Queen Camilla parade to Parliament
7 days ago
Duration 2:35
The U.K. press took note of Charles's unusual display of emotion on this trip — his 20th official visit to Canada and his first as monarch.
"Royals don't normally 'do' emotion, at least they do their very best to hide whatever feeling they have. But for some reason, King Charles seemed unable to do that on this occasion at the end of a short, but highly significant, visit," ITV's royal correspondent Chris Ship wrote in his coverage of the speech.
In an interview with CBC News, Justin Vovk, a royal historian at McMaster University, said there was "more emotion than we've come to expect from members of the royal family."
"I think Charles was taken aback somewhat. The King had been itching to get here and eager to make his presence felt in Canada but no one really knew what kind of reaction he would receive," Vovk said.
"Journalists, academics, royalists, we were all watching and wondering: would there be a tepid turnout? Would there be protests? And I think once Charles saw the level of reaction from the people, it floored him; it seems he wasn't expecting it."
The emotion may also have been driven by just how high-stakes the visit was for him and the country, Vovk said.
In the face of American taunts and insults, Prime Minister Mark Carney pressed Charles into service, asking the head of state to assert Canada's sovereignty in the first throne speech delivered by a monarch in nearly 50 years.
It was a diplomatic balancing act because Charles, as the sovereign of 15 realms, had to fulfil his duties as King of Canada without torpedoing Anglo-American relations given there's a sometimes mercurial president in the Oval Office and the U.K. is also facing trade threats.
"Opening Parliament, reading the speech from the throne, these are the most significant constitutional roles that the sovereign plays in our political system," Vovk said.
"He understood the weight of it politically, personally and dynastically," he said.
Plus, Vovk said, for Charles, "Canada has deep meaning for him and deep meaning for his family."
The King's favoured relative, his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, and his own mother, Queen Elizabeth, made dozens of trips to Canada and wrote and spoke fondly about their experiences. Those sentiments have seemingly rubbed off on him, Vovk said.
The Queen Mother, writing to Princess Margaret in 1958, said: "I have a feeling that Canada gives one a boost. They are so nice and so loving and the Mounties are so beautiful and so romantic."
Looking back at her historic 1939 tour with King George VI on the eve of the Second World War — the first time a reigning monarch had been in North America — the Queen Mother said: "Canada made us."
Queen Elizabeth, who personally witnessed seminal moments in the nation's history including the repatriation of the Constitution, described Canada as "home."
"Charles is acutely aware that he and his family have had a presence in Canada at crucial moments. This is one of those moments," Vovk said.
"He delivered, very deliberately, slogan-worthy, quotable lines — the True North, strong and free, Canada seeping into his bloodstream and straight to the heart. Those will be phrases associated with the monarchy in Canada for a very long time," he said.
As for whether Charles's ongoing cancer battle may have played into his emotional reaction, Vovk said it's hard to say.
"It's impossible to speculate on what goes on behind the curtain with the sovereign," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Pipeline debate pits B.C. against other provinces
Vancouver Watch The pipeline debate is heating up again, pitting B.C. against other provinces – and newly elected Prime Minister Mark Carney.


Toronto Star
32 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Thune's first big test as Senate leader has arrived with Trump's tax bill
WASHINGTON (AP) — Only six months into the job, Senate Majority Leader John Thune faces a massive challenge as he tries to quickly push President Donald Trump's sprawling tax and spending cuts package to passage with the support of a divided GOP conference. While most Republican senators are inclined to vote for the bill, Thune can stand to lose only four votes in the face of united Democratic opposition — and many more Republicans than that are critical of the version sent over by the House.


CBC
35 minutes ago
- CBC
Canada's largest private sector union calls for retaliatory tariffs against U.S.
Social Sharing The U.S. just hit Canada with another tariff gut punch, and Canada's largest private sector union says it's time to hit back with the same force. U.S. President Donald Trump has doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, starting Wednesday. Canada, which already has a 25 per cent retaliatory tariff on U.S. steel and aluminum, hasn't yet said how it will respond. "We are in intensive negotiations with the Americans and in parallel preparing reprisals if those negotiations do not succeed," Prime Minister Mark Carney said in the House of Commons. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has urged the federal government to double its tariffs to match Trump, saying: "We can't sit back and let President Trump steamroll us." Lana Payne agrees. She's the president of Unifor, a labour union representing 320,000 Canadian workers, including in the steel and aluminum industries, as well as other adjacent sectors. Unifor is calling on Canada to enact tit-for-tat tariffs, temporarily halt exports of strategic metals to the U.S., build a national stockpile reserve of those metals, and strengthen laws that block companies from relocating Canadian jobs to the U.S. Here is part of Payne's conversation with As It Happens host Nil Köksal. Lana Payne, you are asking for immediate countermeasures against these tariffs from the U.S. What specifically would you like to see happen? I agree with Premier Ford. This is a very serious situation that we have on our hands right now. This is an outrageous size of a tariff that is risking Canadian jobs in the steel and aluminum industry, but also in industries that depend on steel and aluminum, like the auto industry, like aerospace. There's a lot at stake right now. We basically agree that we should have retaliatory tariffs. Currently, we have some, and if the U.S. is looking at 50 per cent on us, which they are, then we need to look at 50 per cent back. WATCH | Canadian Labour Congress calls for retaliatory tariffs: Advocates call for immediate action as Trump doubles metals tariffs 10 hours ago Duration 3:09 Canadian Labour Congress president Bea Bruske says she wants to see counter-tariffs right away on U.S. imports, with tens of thousands of Canadian jobs are at risk due to President Donald Trump's ongoing trade war. She spoke on Parliament Hill alongside Federation of Canadian Municipalities CEO Carole Saab and Canadian Chamber of Commerce CEO Candace Laing. Prime Minister Mark Carney is so far today saying that we're going to hold off on retaliatory tariffs because Canada is in talks with the U.S. on this right now … What do you make of that rationale? I don't envy the federal government in this moment, sitting and having negotiations back and forth with a partner that basically isn't playing by any rules whatsoever. That's what we're dealing with, which is why we have to be firm. We have to be strong, and we have to protect Canadian jobs and Canadian industries in that process. We can make sure that we're implementing new border measures that also look at preventing unfairly traded or dumped foreign steel and aluminum from entering Canada. Because you can imagine, as these tariffs are increased on most of the world, the world is going to be looking at places where they can get rid of their steel and aluminum, and we have to make sure we're protecting our Canadian industries and Canadian jobs. We can also look at things like temporarily halting exports of metals to the United States. If the United States is basically saying to us right now, "We're putting 50 per cent tariffs on you because we believe we don't need your steel and aluminum," then don't give it to them. The U.S. needs our aluminum and our steel. They can't build things without it. What would it mean, though, Lena, for your workers, if we didn't send it there? It has to go somewhere, right? We're at a place right now where, with a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum, you'd be hard pressed to think that we can export anything to the U.S. at this moment at that cost. WATCH | PM Carney calls Trump's doubled tariffs 'illogical' and 'unjustified': Carney responds to U.S. aluminum and steel tariffs doubling 13 hours ago Duration 0:45 Ahead of a Liberal caucus meeting, Prime Minister Mark Carney said the government is in 'intensive discussions' with the United States after tariffs on steel and aluminum increased from 25 to 50 per cent. Do you worry that retaliatory tariffs would inflame things even more and lead the U.S. to bring in even more punitive measures against Canada? I mean, [is] working towards a deal more beneficial? If we don't do something, we risk losing these industries potentially forever. This is the problem we're in right now. Yes, we are going to use more steel and aluminum in Canada, given the fact that we have the leaders of our country — the premiers, the prime minister — talking about nation-building projects. But they won't start overnight. And we have to deal and save these workers and these jobs today. That means we may have to do things that cause pain south of the border. Because there is no way to avoid the fact that American workers, American industries are going to be impacted by this decision by Donald Trump. The Conservatives, as you may have seen, say there needs to be an emergency debate on these 50 per cent tariffs from the U.S. to help protect workers, and they're pointing the finger at the Carney government saying that things are only getting worse. Do you agree with the Conservatives on this? The reality is that Prime Minister Carney cannot control Donald Trump. Nobody can at this point. What I think would be beneficial is that the Carney government is absolutely speaking and having a conversation with unions, with industry, around how we deal with this going forward. This is stepping up the attack on Canada. There is no doubt about it that this is a major increase in aggression from the United States when, in fact, we have not been aggressive in the last number of weeks. We have actually been working to try to have negotiations, to get a deal. We're heading into the G7 in just a couple of weeks, and here we are with this kind of attack on Canada again. So I do think it's important for the government to be speaking to stakeholders and to have a cohesive strategy going forward. And I believe some of the measures and some of the recommendations that we put forward are beneficial, and I'm sure there will be others in Canadian society who have other recommendations. I would say the government's going to have to move fairly quickly here — within days, not weeks.