Trump DOJ moves to dissolve Flores decree which governs detention of unaccompanied minors in the U.S.
The Flores decree has governed the detention and release of migrant children since 1997. The motion, filed by the DOJ and jointed by HHS and the Department of Homeland Security, asks a federal court in southern California to dissolve the decree.
Biden-appointed Federal Judge Keeps Blocking Trump Admin From Nixing Funding For Lawyers For Migrant Children
However, the motion to terminate the Flores decree will be heard at a July 18 hearing before US District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles. Judge Gee has presided over the case for years, and it is unlikely she will agree to get rid of the Flores decree, setting up a possible battle before the federal appeals court, and ultimately the Supreme Court.
"The outdated Flores consent decree was implemented as a stopgap measure almost 30 years ago but in recent years has directly incentivized illegal immigration at our southern border. Congress and various federal agencies have already solved the problems that Flores was designed to fix, and this consent decree is now an unacceptable restriction on our America-first immigration agenda," said Attorney General Pam Bondi in a statement to Fox News.
Federal Judge Bucks Trump Admin, Delays Dismissal Of Of Ms-13 Leader's Case
Read On The Fox News App
DOJ officials also tell Fox News the idea is to put the power back into the hands of elected officials in Washington, rather than a single federal judge in California.
In the filing the DOJ says the government is moving, "to terminate the FSA completely and with respect to all Defendants, and to dissolve the Court's injunction of DHS's regulations for apprehension, processing, care, and custody of alien minors…After 40 years of litigation and 28 years of judicial control over a critical element of U.S. immigration policy by one district court located more than 100 miles from any international border, it is time for this case to end."
More from the filing:
In light of the significant changes in circumstances since this Court entered the FSA 28 years ago, including the promulgation of regulations incorporating the goals of the FSA, and Supreme Court precedent that is inconsistent with continuing such a long-term decree, further continuation of the FSA is no longer equitable or in the public interest.
Trump Doj Drops Biden-era Legal Challenge To Texas Border Security Law
This Court entered the FSA as a consent decree in 1997 and amended it in December 2001. The FSA has governed the care and custody of unaccompanied alien children (UACs) ever since, notwithstanding intervening legislation by the U.S. Congress and agency regulations. In 2015, this Court expanded the FSA to accompanied children, see Flores v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 898, 906, 909 (9th Cir. 2016), even though it is obvious from the FSA's terms that the parties did not contemplate their inclusion. Thus, as to accompanied children, the national policy has long been set by a district court (and not the President or Congress), notwithstanding that the consent decree providing the basis for district-court supervision does not claim to regulate this class of aliens. That simply cannot be.
During the 28 years that this Court has controlled federal policy regarding the custody of alien children who are in the United States without immigration status, enormous, cardinal changes have occurred: surges of aliens have entered the U.S. in between ports of entry across the southwest border, including large groups of aliens who voluntarily surrendered to Border Patrol—surrenders orchestrated by traffickers; the demographics of aliens arriving at the border have shifted to include significantly higher numbers from countries outside the Western Hemisphere and higher numbers of children; a global pandemic necessitated the government's utilization of its expulsion authority to protect public health; and the subsequent lifting of the policy led to an upheaval in immigration policy for over two years.
The Executive has not been able to react fully and meaningfully to these changes because the FSA has ossified federal immigration policy.
Successive administrations have tried unsuccessfully to free themselves from the strictures of the consent decree and this Court's gloss on it. But detention of juvenile aliens continues to be—as it has been for more than a generation—dominated by the strictures of a 1997 agreement.Original article source: Trump DOJ moves to dissolve Flores decree which governs detention of unaccompanied minors in the U.S.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Burchett: Putin realizes we can ‘shut him down with our energy capabilities'
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) said Monday that Russian President Vladimir Putin realizes the United States can 'shut him down with our energy capabilities' amid a push from the Trump administration for an end to the war in Ukraine. 'I think Putin realizes too we could shut him down with our energy capabilities,' Burchett told NewsNation's Blake Burman on 'The Hill,' adding later that 'under this new EPA we've got, I think — I think you're going to see more — more production, and that we can fluctuate those markets.' 'And I think Putin completely realizes that he cannot do without oil. And so, I think there's a lot behind the scenes going on,' he added. On Monday, President Trump said he spoke with Putin in the wake of meetings at the White House with key European leaders and started arranging a potential bilateral meeting involving the Russian leader and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The president said the meeting between Putin and Zelensky would happen at a time and location not yet figured out. It would be the first time the two leaders had a face-to-face meeting since the start of the war in February 2022. 'After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'Again, this was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years.' Within the last week, Trump has met with both Putin and Zelensky on U.S. soil, and Trump and Zelensky had a much more even-tempered Oval Office meeting in front of TV cameras Monday than they did in February.
Boston Globe
12 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump vows to change how elections are run. The US Constitution doesn't give him that power.
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The same post also pushed falsehoods about voting. He claimed the U.S. is the only country to use mail voting, when it's actually used by dozens, including Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Advertisement Similar complaints to Trump's, when aired on conservative and conservative-leaning networks such as Newsmax and Fox News, have led to multimillion dollar defamation settlements, including one announced Monday, because they are full of false information and the outlets have not been able to present any evidence to support them. Trump's post came after the president told Fox News that Russian President Vladimir Putin, in their Friday meeting in Alaska, echoed his grievances about mail voting and the 2020 election. Trump continued his attack on mail voting and voting machines in the Oval Office on Monday, during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Advertisement The announcement signals yet another way that Trump intends to stack the cards in his favor in the 2026 midterm elections, after he already has directed his attorney general to investigate a Democratic fundraising platform and urged states to redraw their congressional districts to help the GOP maintain its majority in the House of Representatives. Here's a breakdown of Trump's latest election post and why Congress is the one entity that can implement national election rules. Trump's post Trump for years has promoted false information about voting, and Monday was no exception. He claimed there is 'MASSIVE FRAUD' due to mail voting, when in fact voting fraud in the U.S. is rare. As an example, an Associated Press review after the 2020 election found fewer than 475 cases of potential fraud in the six battleground states where he disputed his loss, far too few to tip that election to Trump. Washington and Oregon, which conduct elections entirely by mail, have sued to challenge Trump's earlier executive order — which sought to require that all ballots must be received by Election Day and not just postmarked by then. The states argue that the president has no such authority, and they are seeking a declaration from a federal judge in Seattle that their postmark deadlines do not conflict with federal law setting the date of U.S. elections. Trump also alleged that voting machines are more expensive than 'Watermark Paper.' That's a little-used system that has gained favor and investments among some voting conspiracy theorists who believe it would help prevent fraudulent ballots from being introduced into the vote count. Watermarks would not provide a way to count ballots, so they would not on their own replace vote tabulating machines. Advertisement While some jurisdictions still have voters use electronic ballot-marking devices to cast their votes, the vast majority of voters in the U.S. already vote on paper ballots, creating an auditable record of votes that provides an extra safeguard for election security. In his post, Trump also claimed that states 'are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes' and must do what the federal government 'as represented by the President of the United States' tells them to do. Election lawyers said that's a misrepresentation of the U.S. Constitution. It also flies in the face of what had been a core Republican Party value of prioritizing states' rights. Thousands of elections, none under presidential control Unlike in most countries, elections in the U.S. are run by the states. But it gets more complicated — each state then allows smaller jurisdictions, such as counties, cities or townships, to run their own elections. Election officials estimate there are as many as 10,000 different election jurisdictions across the country. A frequent complaint of Trump and other election conspiracy theorists is that the U.S. doesn't run its election like France, which hand counts presidential ballots and usually has a national result on election night. But that's because France is only running that single election, and every jurisdiction has the same ballot with no other races. A ballot in the U.S. might contain dozens of races, from president on down to city council and including state and local ballot measures. Advertisement The Constitution makes the states the entities that determine the 'time, place and manner' of elections, but does allow Congress to 'make' or 'alter' rules for federal elections. Congress can change the way states run congressional and presidential elections but has no say in the way a state runs its own elections. The president is not mentioned at all in the Constitution's list of entities with powers over elections. 'The president has very limited to zero authority over things related to the conduct of elections,' said Rick Hasen, an election law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. Courts have agreed — no presidential involvement Parts of Trump's earlier executive order on elections were swiftly blocked by the courts, on the grounds that Congress, and not the president, sets federal election rules. It's unclear what Trump plans to do now, but the only path to change federal election rules is through Congress. Although Republicans control Congress, it's unclear that even his party would want to eliminate voting machines nationwide, possibly delaying vote tallies in their own races by weeks or months. Even if they did, legislation would likely be unable to pass because Democrats could filibuster it in the U.S. Senate. Mail voting had bipartisan support before Trump turned against it during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 election, but it's still widely used in Republican-leaning states, including several he won last November — Arizona, Florida and Utah. It's also how members of the military stationed overseas cast their ballots, and fully eliminating it would disenfranchise those GOP-leaning voters. The main significance of Trump's Monday statement is that it signals his continuing obsession with trying to change how elections are run. Advertisement 'These kinds of claims could provide a kind of excuse for him to try to meddle,' Hasen said. 'Very concerned about that.' Associated Press writer Eugene Johnson in Seattle contributed to this report.
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
How Trump introduced European leaders
President Trump met with European leaders on Monday to discuss the war in Ukraine alongside the country's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, amid a push from the White House for an end to the conflict. Among those who participated in the meeting included German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. As the meeting kicked off, Trump gave his fellow world leaders colorful introductions, using descriptions such as 'great political leader,' 'my friend' and 'an inspiration.' Here's how the leaders got introduced by Trump at the meeting; NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte Trump referred to Rutte as 'a great gentleman, great — great political leader in Europe, generally, but now he's the NATO secretary-general and you're doing a fantastic job.' Ahead of Friday's meeting between Trump and Putin, Rutte said the alliance is 'making sure that Ukraine has what it needs to stay in the fight British Prime Minister Keir Starmer 'Prime Minister Starmer of the United Kingdom, our friend and my friend and doing really well,' Trump said of Starmer at the top of the meeting. 'And people like him a lot. We all like him.' After February's rocky meeting between Zelensky and Trump, Starmer offered a warm embrace of the Ukrainian President. 'You have full backing from the United Kingdom, and we stand with you with Ukraine for as long as it may take,' Starmer, said during a presser with Zelensky in March. French President Emmanuel Macron Trump especially heaped praise upon Macron when introducing him, saying he 'liked him from day one.' 'Everyone knows President Macron of France, who's been with me from the beginning, one of the first people I met as a foreign dignitary, and I liked him from day one,' Trump said. 'And I like him even more now.' 'That's pretty good, that's unusual,' the president remarked. 'That's a pretty unusual thing.' Earlier this year, Macron praised Trump after Trump called for Russia and Ukraine to agree to a 30-day ceasefire or face potential sanctions. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni Trump called Meloni 'a really great leader and an inspiration over there,' most likely referring to her country. 'She's served now, even though she's a very young person, she's served there for a long period of time relative to others. They don't — they don't last very long, you've lasted a long time. You're going to be there a long time.' As the head of a far-right party, Meloni is ideologically aligned with Trump on several political and social issues. But stark differences have emerged in Meloni's unwavering support for Ukraine after Russia's invasion in February 2022. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Merz was described by Trump as 'a very strong person and a very strong leader and very highly respected in Germany, and he's my friend and it's an honor to have him as my friend, thank you very much.' Trump also added that Merz appeared 'great with' a 'tan.' Merz's election in February gave Ukraine a strong supporter in Germany. He has joined Trump's push for a ceasefire deal in the war with Russia, while also positioning Germany to better support Ukraine without the U.S. Finnish President Alexander Stubb Trump appeared confused about where Stubb was at the table during the meeting at first, with a voice chiming in a second later saying, 'I'm right here.' 'Oh, you look better than I've ever seen you look,' Trump said. 'But you've done a great job and we wanted to have you here, because you're somebody that we all respect. And, you've had a lot to do with the success, I think and the potential success and thank you very much for being here, we appreciate it.' Stubb and Trump played golf together in March. At the time, Stubb said Trump seemed to be growing 'impatient' with Putin, who rejected a U.S. ceasefire proposal and added various conditions to a more limited deal. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen Trump noted a recent trade deal with von der Leyen, calling her 'somebody that we just made a big deal with.' 'With all of those countries, I don't know, I think you might be more powerful than all these guys at this table, I don't know,' Trump added. Von der Leyen said in a post on the social platform X on Sunday that she was joining the meeting 'at the request of President Zelenskyy.'
