Arkansas Dept. of Corrections outlines new budget toward Franklin County prison plan
In authorizing that spending, Budget Chairman Sen. Johnathan Dismang (R-Searcy) and Rep. Lane Jean (R-Magnolia) filed companion appropriation bills for $750 million, and another $75 million that was already approved as part of Act 95 in the General Assembly.
Legislation for $750 million new prison funding filed in Arkansas legislature
The State has already directed $405 million toward the total estimate of $825 million.
'This estimate lets us move forward quickly on the long-overdue prison project and build a safer, stronger Arkansas,' Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said. 'I look forward to working with our partners in the legislature to get this appropriation passed.'
Arkansas Department of Corrections officials voiced their excitement to see the goalpost ahead.
'This estimate allows us to move quickly toward breaking ground on the Franklin County prison and building the long-overdue, 3,000-bed facility we know our state needs,' Arkansas Department of Corrections Secretary Lindsay Wallace said.'We look forward to working with the Governor and legislature to secure the resources we need to build the prison and create a safer, stronger Arkansas,'
'Everyone knows we need a new prison to address our state's prison bed shortage, and I look forward to working with legislators to secure the funding necessary to build this facility quickly,' Chairman of the Arkansas Board of Corrections Benny Magness said.
Franklin County prison plans hit bump after appropriations request fails in committee
Once those funds are appropriated, the State can work with the Owner's Representative to move forward with drawing up in-depth plans for the prison and breaking ground as soon as possible.
Arkansas currently has a shortage of more than 3,000 prison beds, requiring the state to spend almost $30 million each year to house inmates in county jails.
Governor Sanders announced the purchase of an 815-acre plot in Franklin County to build the new prison in October of last year, at a total cost of $2,950,000.
Officials say the parcel offers the infrastructure needed for a new prison, including cell reception, water lines, electricity, and a nearby fire department, and is also close to more than 100,000 working-age adults who could staff the new facility.
Group outlines opposition to Franklin County prison plans for Arkansas
The property is large enough to offer privacy to both neighbors and inmates and is expected to employ almost 800 people at an average salary of over $46,600, based on estimates.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Colorado lawmakers tap reserve, end tax breaks to fill budget gap
Democratic leaders at the state Capitol outlined plans Tuesday to increase taxes, cut services and tap reserve funds to close a $1 billion budget hole spurred by President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." State of play: The legislation will generate fierce debate about how the state should manage its money when lawmakers return Thursday for a special legislative session. The core of the Democratic plan eliminates a handful of corporate tax breaks worth a combined $300 million to $400 million. The five-bill package will limit the business tax deduction, remove corporate tax breaks on foreign-sold goods and crack down on corporate profit shifting to tax haven countries. The intrigue: The most controversial proposal is lowering the state's 15% financial reserve by $200 million to $300 million, dropping it to 13% at a time when fiscal analysts are warning about a potential recession. Yes, but: Those moves are not enough to close a roughly $750 million gap. Instead, lawmakers will punt $300 million in spending cuts to balance the $44 billion state budget to the governor in consultation with the legislative Joint Budget Committee in the coming weeks. The governor is expected to move quickly to implement cuts by Sept. 1. What they're saying: "We're looking forward to rolling up our sleeves and making sure we can maintain strong fiscal stewardship here in Colorado," Gov. Jared Polis told Axios Denver in a recent interview. Between the lines: More than most states, Colorado is susceptible to changes in federal taxes because they affect state income taxes. The federal tax bill, known as H.R. 1, reduced the state's individual and corporate income taxes by an estimated $1.2 billion, according to the governor's office. The other side: Republican state lawmakers are touting the cuts from Trump's tax bill and pushing back against Democratic efforts to generate new tax revenue, suggesting spending cuts are what is most needed. Sen. Byron Pelton (R-Sterling) plans to introduce legislation requiring voter approval for any bill that changes state tax liability caused by federal tax law. What's next: Beyond the budget, Democratic lawmakers also plan to introduce legislation to stabilize the state's health care marketplaces amid projections that thousands of residents could lose their insurance and enable Planned Parenthood to accept Medicaid payments.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
‘Devil in the Ozarks' used Sharpie, kitchen aprons and empty food can to craft disguise for escape
A convicted murderer and rapist who broke out of an Arkansas prison over the summer had planned his escape for six months, quietly collecting items while working in the kitchen and stashing them in areas rarely checked by staff. The Arkansas Department of Corrections' critical incident review committee detailed Grant Hardin's elaborate escape in a report released two months after he was captured in the woods about 1.5 miles from the North Central Unit in Calico Rock. Hardin, a former police chief who was convicted of murder and rape, was taken into custody on June 6 by U.S. Border Patrol agents and state law enforcement officers after tracking dogs picked up his scent. He pleaded not guilty to an escape charge and is scheduled to go on trial in November. He's currently housed at Varner Supermax prison in Gould, Arkansas. Hardin told Arkansas Division of Correction Director Dexter Payne in an interview that he used black Sharpie markers he took from the kitchen and laundry to color the clothes he wore when he fled, according to the report. He told the committee in a separate interview that he left the world "POLICE" outlined on his white T-shirt before coloring the rest of it. He said he molded the top of an empty food can into the shape of a police badge and used black aprons from the kitchen to craft an officer's body armor vest, according to the report, released Friday. Officials said Hardin was wearing a makeshift law enforcement uniform and pushing a cart with wooden pallets on it when he walked out the prison gate. Hardin said that the markers had been left lying around "because staff were not keeping up with them," the report stated. Hardin said he hid the clothes and other items in the bottom of a kitchen trash can because it was never checked by staff, it said. He also said that the staff did not monitor him while he was working on the back dock near the kitchen. On May 25, the day of his escape, Hardin said he overheard a deputy warden tell a kitchen supervisor that inmates would no longer be allowed to go on the dock by themselves. Despite rainy weather, Hardin said he decided to try to escape. The report said that Hardin "gathered up everything he had been hiding, including his clothes and food from various areas around the kitchen and dock area," and made his way toward the gate. Hardin, according to the documents, walked up to the gate and directed the guard to "open the gate." Without checking for proper identification, the guard let him out. The documents allege that on the first night of the escape, Hardin stayed in one area in the woods and "dodged the K-9 team that was searching for him." The second night, he moved around some more and became separated from the bag he used to store his food. Hardin told Payne that he survived on berries, bird eggs, and ants and drank water from the creek, the documents stated. He also had some distilled water with him that he got from the infirmary for his CPAP machine, it said. During his interview with committee members, Hardin allegedly said that he was initially able to avoid capture because of the rainy weather, dense vegetation and landscape. His escape left the small Arkansas town on edge and angered the family of the man he killed in 2017. The murder, as well as the 1997 rape of an elementary school teacher, were featured in the 2023 HBO Max documentary "Devil in the Ozarks." He planned to hide in the woods for six months if he needed to and then move west out of the area. But after becoming concerned by the lack of food available to him and how close the search teams were getting, he tried to leave the area sooner. "This is what led to the search teams spotting him and capturing inmate Hardin," officials wrote in the report. The committee said that, considering the nature of Hardin's crimes, he was incorrectly classified and should have been held at a more secure prison. But several procedural issues at the facility contributed to Hardin's escape, the committee found. It issued recommendations for corrective actions the facility should take, including the removal of all black kitchen aprons, additional surveillance cameras for blind spots, and changing the electric locks at the prison gates. The committee also suggested that all side rooms and mechanical rooms need to be checked during searches. A spokesperson for the Department of Corrections said Tuesday that it has reviewed the report "and will implement the suggestions made in regards to the findings." Ultimately, the employee who worked in the gate tower and the employee who left Hardin unsupervised on the kitchen dock were fired for policy violations. Several other employees were suspended, demoted or faced disciplinary action, according to the report.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Turns Out Research Tax Breaks Alone Can't Conjure Developers
In the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), Congress revived a lapsed tax break that lets companies immediately deduct the cost of research and development (R&D). This was a big win, on its face, for innovation and U.S. job creation. At first glance, it has much promise: job postings for R&D should surge, tech startups are scrapping overseas hiring plans, and software engineers are hot again. So far, so good. But here is the catch—or at least a potential catch: what happens when you juice demand for domestic tech labor without increasing the supply? What happens if, in fact, you reduce supply by constraining immigration? Ultimately, you may find yourself not accelerating innovation—but inflating labor costs. Incentives Without Infrastructure The new version of Section 174 lets companies fully expense R&D costs in the same year they are incurred. However, expensing is limited to domestic costs. That is a huge incentive to hire within the U.S., particularly for high cost, labor-intensive tech startups. It is also a welcome return to the pre-2017 status quo, when the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act phased in a requirement that forced companies to amortize R&D costs over five years domestically, and fifteen years abroad. However, unlikel capital, labor is not instantly and infinitely scalable. You can't conjure a mid-career artificial intelligence engineer or a competent data scientist out of thin air. And, if you enact policies that curtail immigration, you can't call one from abroad either. As it turns out, we've made it harder, not easier, to bring in new talent—and now we've accelerated demand for the talent we do have. A Subsidy for Scarcity You can squint at the numbers and begin to see this shift already. Demand for U.S. based R&D roles is up 15-20% in just the past month, according to staffing firms. And some companies are now paying as much as 20-25% more to hire U.S. based engineers. The deduction, in effect, is being offset by wage inflation. The R&D shift isn't so much a tax incentive for innovation as a subsidy for talent scarcity. While immigration might normally ease that pressure, it is hardly a footnote in today's policy playbook. On the boats and on the planes, people simply aren't coming to America. If you can't import more talent, and you can't afford the rising cost of domestic labor, your only option as a startup is to scale back. This is the quiet paradox of modern innovation policy. We subsidize supply chains, enact tariffs by social media post and whim, fund domestic fabs, and now write off R&D wages – all in the interest of international competitiveness. But if the workforce can't scale with those policies, the policy just cannibalizes itself. Hiring slows, projects get delayed, marginal innovation doesn't happen, and companies we claim to support are left treading water in a labor-crunched economy, unable to fulfill the demand for domestic products that our ill-considered policies helped create. Normally, labor market imbalances can also resolve themselves through expanded domestic training pipelines: STEM programs, coding bootcamps, workforce grants, and more money flowing to education. But none of that is happening—at least not at scale. Even if the current administration reverses course and makes educational initiatives a priority, they can take years to yield results. So what happens next? If you can't import more talent, you can't train more talent, and you can't afford the rising cost of domestic labor, plans need to change. The question becomes, 'should we hire at all or wait out the current political climate and see what 2028 brings?' The Labor Market Becomes the Bottleneck In theory, Section 174 is pro-growth and innovation. In practice, it may just be another short-term sugar rush—juicing the labor market without adding any actual economic nutrients. We're frontloading cost savings, backloading the labor problem, and hoping that somewhere in there innovation still occurs. There is a better way, of course: R&D expensing is good policy. But it needs to be paired with other tools, like high-skilled visa reform, targeted immigration pipelines, and sustained and predictable domestic training investments. Otherwise, we're just creating a bidding war for a small pool of engineers and calling it progress. Turns out, tax breaks can nudge companies toward domestic hiring—they just can't conjure a developer that doesn't exist.
