Israel Defence Minister Clashes With Military Chief Over Appointments
A statement from the defence minister Israel Katz's ministry said that deliberations conducted by chief of staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir on military appointments "took place... without prior coordination or agreement" with the minister.
The statement added that this was "in violation of accepted procedure" and that Katz therefore "does not intend to discuss or approve any of the appointments or names that were published."
In an army statement published shortly afterwards, Zamir responded that he was "the sole authority authorised to appoint officers from the rank of colonel upwards".
"The chief of staff makes the appointment decisions -- after which the appointment is brought to the minister for approval," the statement added.
Tensions have been simmering for two weeks between the chief of staff and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government over the next steps in the military operation in Gaza, aimed at freeing the remaining hostages and defeating Hamas.
Israeli media reported that Zamir was opposed to a plan approved by the security cabinet on Friday to take control of all of densely populated Gaza City.
Israeli media reported that Zamir favoured encircling Gaza's largest city, rather than conquering it.
The Israeli army controls around 75 percent of the Palestinian territory which has been devastated by 22 months of war.
Zamir, who was appointed in March after his predecessor was dismissed, said last week that he would continue expressing the military's position "without fear, in a pragmatic, independent, and professional manner".
Katz meanwhile said that the army chief could "express his views", but that the military would ultimately have to "execute" any government decisions on Gaza.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tehran true story: John Abraham's film inspired by 2012 attacks on Israeli diplomats; explosions and their impact explained
Tehran true story: John Abraham's upcoming film Tehran is based on the 2012 attacks on Israeli diplomats in New Delhi. These coordinated blasts, which stunned the nation and drew international attention, from the intense backdrop of the movie. Blending real events with high-octane drama, the film promises a gripping take on one of India's most shocking incidents in recent history. Tehran true story - What were the 2012 attacks on Israeli diplomats? The 2012 attacks on Israeli diplomats involved a series of coordinated bombings targeting Israeli diplomatic staff in New Delhi, India; Tbilisi, Georgia; and Bangkok, Thailand, on February 13 and 14, 2012. In New Delhi, a magnetic bomb attached to the car of an Israeli diplomat's wife exploded, injuring her, the driver, and two bystanders. In Tbilisi, a similar device was discovered and safely defused, while in Bangkok, a failed bombing attempt left several people injured. Bombings and their impact Israel accused Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps of orchestrating the attacks as part of a broader retaliation for the 2008 assassination of Hezbollah commander Imad Mughniyeh. The bombings were seen as an extension of the Iran–Israel proxy conflict, with Iran allegedly seeking to avenge the killing of its ally. The attacks heightened tensions between Israel and Iran, with both countries accusing each other of state-sponsored terrorism. Increased security measures were implemented at Israeli diplomatic missions worldwide. The incidents intensified international scrutiny of Iran's activities. Who all star in Tehran? Alongside John Abraham, Tehran features Manushi Chhillar in action-packed roles. The cast also includes Neeru Bajwa, Hadi Khanjanpour, Madhurima Tuli, Adam Karst, Allon Sylvain, and Ido Samuel. Where to watch Tehran on OTT? Tehran is now streaming on Zee5.
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Israel's Smotrich approves settlement splitting East Jerusalem from West Bank
Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich approved plans overnight for a settlement that would split East Jerusalem from the occupied West Bank, a move his office said would bury the idea of a Palestinian state. It was not immediately clear if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu backed the plan to revive the long-frozen E1 scheme, which Palestinians and world powers have said would effectively lop the West Bank in two and will likely draw international ire. Israel had frozen construction plans there since 2012 because of objections from the United States, European allies and other world powers who considered the project a threat to any future peace deal with the Palestinians. There was no immediate statement from Netanyahu or the broader government. Smotrich's popularity has fallen in recent months with polls showing his party would not win a single seat if parliamentary elections were held today. The E1 project would connect the Maale Adumin settlement in the West Bank with Jerusalem. Most of the international community views Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and its military occupation over the region since 1967, as illegal. Peace Now, which tracks settlement activity in the West Bank, said that the housing ministry had approved the construction of 3,300 homes in Maale Adumin. 'The E1 plan is deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution. We are standing at the edge of an abyss, and the government is driving us forward at full speed,' Peace Now said in a statement. The group said there were still steps needed before construction, including the approval of Israel's High Planning Council. But if all went through, infrastructure work could begin within a few months, and house building in about a year, it added. Critics of the E1 project say it would split the West Bank, cut off East Jerusalem, which Palestinians want to be their future capital, and make a contiguous Palestinian state impossible. Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand imposed sanctions in June on Smotrich and another far-right minister who advocates for settlement expansion, accusing both of them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Britain and other states have said that Israel must stop expanding settlements in the West Bank. Over the past 22 months, as Israel has waged war in Gaza, rights groups have said settler attacks and settlement expansion in the West Bank has risen sharply.
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Obtain rights from terrorists first': Hamas massacre documentary pulled from TIFF over legal clearance, director slams move as ‘cowardly'
The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) has dropped a new documentary about the October 7 Hamas massacre from its lineup, claiming the filmmakers didn't secure the 'legal rights' to use footage the terrorists shot themselves while carrying brutal attacks, according to the New York Post. Multiple sources also told the outlet TIFF feared anti-Israel protests could disrupt the September 4–14 festival, an annual event that draws a heavy lineup of Hollywood A-listers. The film, The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue, directed by Canadian filmmaker Barry Avrich, follows the story of retired IDF Major General Noam Tibon. Using real footage, it shows Tibon on the morning of October 7 driving straight into the battlefield to save his son, journalist Amir Tibon, his daughter-in-law, and two granddaughters trapped in their home at Kibbutz Nahal Oz. That day, he also saved survivors from the Nova music festival and helped wounded Israeli soldiers. Hamas killed or kidnapped more than a quarter of the kibbutz's 400 residents in the attack. In total, 1,200 people were murdered and 251 taken hostage. Also read: Jimmy Fallon mocks Donald Trump's tariffs on India; jokes about Putin meeting POTUS: 'Building a ballroom to meet Sydney Sweeney' TIFF says the film 'did not meet certain requirements' to screen at the prestigious annual festival, specifically, legal clearance for all clips used. The problem is that some of those clips came straight from body cameras Hamas terrorists wore while brutally killing 1,200 people, abducting over 250, raping women, and mutilating bodies. Festival organisers say the decision was made keeping in mind the 'risk management' and avoiding lawsuits tied to 'sensitive subject matter.' Filmmakers who were left stunned over the decision, including Barry Avrich, slammed the move and TIFF. In a statement to Deadline, Avrich said TIFF 'defied its mission and censored its own programming by refusing this film.' The filmmakers say they bent to meet TIFF's demands and even changed the film's title (from Out of Nowhere to The Road Between Us). Later, they even got errors and omissions insurance naming TIFF as the insured and submitted security plans. Still, the organisers kept asking for more: proof of indemnification, extra documents, and specific permission to use Hamas-shot footage. On August 6, TIFF's lawyer told them to submit final proof. On August 8, the festival scheduled another review screening. Then, on August 11, EO Cameron Bailey requested the filmmakers to withdraw. When they refused, the festival officially removed the movie the next day. Also read: Who is Hamas's best friend? The answer will surprise you Barry Avrich's team called the move censorship: 'A film festival lays out the feast, and the audience decides what they will or won't see. We remain defiant, we will release the film.' Noam Tibon called TIFF's reasoning 'absurd and bizarre,' accusing them of backing out over fear of threats and protests. The Canadian Centre for Jewish and Israeli Affairs slammed the move as letting 'a small mob of extremists' dictate what films Canadians can watch, saying it makes Toronto's Jewish community feel unwelcome. Line producer Talia Harris Ram claims that since the videos were broadcast live by Hamas on October 7, they are in public domain and free to use. The film even had insurance to protect TIFF from lawsuits. The story has already been featured on 60 Minutes, and Fauda creators Avi Issacharoff and Lior Raz are working on a dramatised version. Critics of TIFF's move say it's outrageous to demand permission from a terrorist group to use evidence of its own crimes. They argue it gives Hamas power over how history is told, risks erasing victims' stories, and hands propaganda points to those who want the truth buried.
