
Zelensky in Washington, US allies to plead with Trump to stand behind Ukraine
Trump will host Zelensky and several European leaders to set out terms for a potential peace deal he discussed with Putin at last Friday's meeting in Alaska. While the US is expected to focus on territorial concessions demanded by Russia, Kyiv will seek to pin down possible security guarantees, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Unease hangs over the allies, which have few options for pushing back on demands from Trump that Ukraine may oppose, and are skeptical that Putin really wants peace. Another challenge is Trump himself: he wants a quick peace deal but has offered little clarity on how to get there.
Trump told leaders in a weekend call that he's open to US involvement in guarantees of Ukraine's security, other people familiar with the matter said. All asked not to be identified to discuss private deliberations.
He also told allies he wanted to reach a deal quickly and would urge Ukraine to agree to one, with the goal of holding a Putin-Zelenskiy meeting within a week. That's a timeline that many of the Europeans regard as too aggressive, given how many issues remain unresolved.
The people said Trump revealed elements of his conversations with Putin in calls with allied leaders, though without much detail. Senior European diplomats privately vented frustration at the outcome, noting Putin appeared to have gained most from the summit.
Zelenskiy 'can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. He suggested that the Crimean peninsula wouldn't be returned and said Ukraine wouldn't be allowed to join NATO, without providing further details.
Leaders were also weighing the fact that Trump's own team sought to tamp down expectations for a quick solution.
'We're still a long ways off,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who took part in the summit, told Fox News on Sunday. 'We are not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We are not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made.'
Over the weekend, Trump golfed and steered clear of further insight on his meeting with the Russian president. In posts on Truth Social, he said the media 'distorts the TRUTH when it comes to me.'
'There is NOTHING I can say or do that would lead them to write or report honestly about me,' he said. 'I had a great meeting in Alaska on Biden's stupid War, a war that should have never happened!!!'
In a series of television interviews, Rubio said Monday's meeting would focus on security guarantees for Ukraine, including what the US would contribute. He also said the US has little to lose if talks collapse — and that continuation of the war would have little impact on daily American life — suggesting that Trump might be willing to distance himself from the conflict entirely.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Russia continues to make slow but steady advances in eastern Ukraine and Europe may struggle to fill the gap in weapons and ammunition now that Trump has scaled back US support.
In his calls, Trump also said Putin wants Ukraine to cede control of its entire eastern Donbas region of the Donetsk and Luhansk provinces, renewing earlier demands, Bloomberg previously reported. That would hand Russia a victory it has been unable to achieve militarily since fighting first erupted in 2014, and in an area where Ukraine retains heavily-fortified defenses.
Russia would also halt advancing its claims over the parts of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions that it doesn't now control, effectively freezing the battle lines at current positions. The Kremlin could also potentially withdraw troops from areas of northeastern Ukraine near the Russian border where its forces control only small pockets of land.
That raises the prospect that the 'land-swapping' Trump has teased as part of any deal will be lopsided in Putin's favor by giving him control of areas beyond what he's seized, offset by modest concessions of land that had been Ukraine's anyhow.
'If we're weak today with Russia, we're preparing the conflicts of tomorrow, and they will affect the Ukrainians,' said French President Emmanuel Macron, who will be among the leaders joining Zelenskiy in Washington. 'And let's not fool ourselves, they also can affect us, at a time when our country continues to regularly face cyberattacks.'
Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff, who was also at Friday's summit, told CNN's State of the Union on Sunday that 'We got to an agreement that the US and other nations could effectively offer Article 5-like language to Ukraine.'
That's a reference to NATO's mutual-defense clause committing member states to respond if any one of them is attacked. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni floated a similar proposal in March, though Witkoff didn't elaborate on what sort of security guarantee may be offered to Ukraine. The US has ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine.
Something similar to Article 5 would be significant, but it would require American involvement, said John Herbst, a former US ambassador to Ukraine who is now senior director of the Atlantic Council's Eurasia Center. 'European troops, at an absolute minimum, are going to need American intelligence and American logistics,' he said in an interview.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump administration to vet immgration applications for anti-Americanism
Anti-Americanism will be 'overwhelmingly negative' factor Trump has used label on museums and protesters Immigration advocate likens move to McCarthyism WASHINGTON, - President Donald Trump's administration has said it will assess applicants for U.S. work, study and immigration visas for "anti-Americanism" and count any such finding against them, sparking concern about implications for free speech. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a "policy alert" dated Tuesday that it gave immigration officers new guidance on how to exercise discretion in cases where foreign applicants "support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities" as well as "antisemitic terrorism." Trump has labeled a range of voices as anti-American, including historians and museums documenting U.S. slavery and pro-Palestinian protesters opposing U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. "Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," USCIS said. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies." The announcement did not define anti-Americanism. But the policy manual refers to a section of federal law about prohibiting naturalization of people "opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government." The full text mentions supporters of communism or totalitarian regimes and people who advocate overthrow of the U.S. government and violence against government officers, among other factors. USCIS said it expanded the types of applications that have social media vetting, and reviews for "anti-American activity" will be added to that vetting. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said the step hearkened to the 1950s when Senator Joseph McCarthy hunted alleged communists in a campaign that became synonymous with political persecution. "McCarthyism returns to immigration law," he said. Anti-Americanism "has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin." In April, the U.S. government said it would begin screening the social media of immigrants and visa applicants for what it called antisemitic activity. Rights advocates raised free speech and surveillance concerns. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


India Today
29 minutes ago
- India Today
Losing India would be a strategic disaster in face of China: Nikki Haley to Trump
Former United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, warned that US-India relations are at a breaking point and must be repaired quickly if Washington hopes to contain China's global a Newsweek op-ed published Wednesday, Haley said the Trump administration cannot afford to let tariffs and disputes over Russian oil drive a wedge between the world's two largest United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals," she wrote. "To face China, the United States must have a friend in India."WASHINGTON, NEW DELHI AT ODDS OVER RUSSIA OIL Tensions escalated after President Donald Trump imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs and an additional 25 per cent levy on New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil. The move followed months of friction, including claims over America's role in India-Pakistan ceasefire backed Trump's pressure campaign, saying India's energy purchases "are helping to fund Vladimir Putin's brutal war against Ukraine."But she cautioned against treating India like an adversary. "Scuttling 25 years of momentum with the only country that can serve as a counterweight to Chinese dominance in Asia would be a strategic disaster," she argued that India is essential to Washington's economic and security goals. As the United States seeks to shift supply chains away from China, India offers manufacturing capacity "at China-like scale" for industries like textiles, phones and solar pointed at India's increasing defence ties with the United States and allies like Israel make it a "crucial asset to the free world's security."INDIA'S RISE COULD SURPASS CHINA'S IMPACTIn the long run, she added, India's rise may be the most significant geopolitical development since China's economic ascent. "Simply put, China's ambitions will have to shrink as India's power grows," Haley former South Carolina governor urged direct talks between Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi to end what she called a "downward spiral."Without action, she warned, Beijing would exploit the rift. "It would be a massive -- and preventable -- mistake to balloon a trade spat into an enduring rupture."Haley concluded by echoing Ronald Reagan's words to Indira Gandhi at the White House in 1982: although Washington and New Delhi may at times "travel separate paths," their destination should remain the same."The United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals. To face China, the United States must have a friend in India," she wrote.- EndsWith inputs from agenciesMust Watch


India Today
29 minutes ago
- India Today
Why Putin's delegation used cash to refuel jets during Trump summit
Russian President Vladimir Putin's delegation had to pay nearly USD 250,000 (about Rs 2.2 crore) in cash to refuel three aircraft during a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump in Alaska on August 15, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC News that the unusual payment was a direct consequence of US banking sanctions against Moscow, which prevent Russian officials from using the American financial system. 'When the Russians landed in Alaska, they were there to refuel. They had to offer to pay in cash to refuel their aeroplanes because they can't use our banking system,' he face consequences every single day, but the bottom line is that it has not altered the direction of this war. That doesn't mean those sanctions were inappropriate; it means it hasn't altered the outcome of it," he added. Putin and his team remained in Alaska for nearly five hours, attending a nearly three-hour meeting with Trump. While Trump later stated that 'no deal' or ceasefire agreement had been reached, reports indicate Russia presented a proposal that Trump encouraged Ukraine to meeting Putin, Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders in Washington on Monday to discuss lasting security guarantees for Kyiv. Zelenskyy said he was willing to hold direct talks with Putin but rejected any deal involving territorial defended the existing sanctions' regime, saying all measures imposed before Trump took office remain intact and continue to exert daily pressure on Russia. However, he acknowledged that these penalties have not significantly altered the course of the conflict. 'Sanctions take months and sometimes years to bite,' he said, arguing that additional sanctions could jeopardize ongoing diplomatic efforts to bring both sides to the negotiating table.- EndsTune InMust Watch