logo
Run for president? Start a podcast? Tackle AI? Kamala Harris' options are wide open

Run for president? Start a podcast? Tackle AI? Kamala Harris' options are wide open

Former Vice President Kamala Harris closed a big door when she announced Wednesday that she would not run for California governor. But she left open a heap of others.
Departing presidents, vice presidents, first ladies and failed presidential candidates have pursued a wide variety of paths in the past. Empowered with name recognition and influence but with no official role to fill, they possess the freedom to choose their next adventure.
Al Gore took up a cause in global warming, while George W. Bush took up painting. John Kerry and Hillary Clinton went on to become secretary of State, while Donald Trump fought off prosecutors, launched new business ventures and plotted his return to power. Barack and Michelle Obama grew their foundation, wrote books and started a production company — and both have done podcasts, too — while remaining prominent voices within the Democratic Party.
Of course, Harris could focus all her energy on another run for president in 2028. But how would she do that, and what would she do to remain politically relevant in the meantime? Which other paths might she choose instead?
'She just finished writing a book. She's finally decided she's not running for governor. But to be prescriptive about what role she's going to play next and how it's going to look would be premature,' said Harris senior advisor Kirsten Allen.
Experts in power and political leadership expect Harris' next move to be something in the public eye, given she is relatively young at 60 and no doubt wants her last chapter in the spotlight to be something other than her humbling loss to Trump in the 2024 presidential election.
'Even if it isn't the governorship of California, the idea of wanting something else other than the 2024 election to be the last thing Kamala Harris ever did would be very appealing,' said Gregory H. Winger, an assistant professor of public and international affairs at the University of Cincinnati who has studied former presidents' lingering influence.
Winger said his research showed those 'most active in trying to be influential' in their post-White House years were those whose time in office ended on a sour note, such as failing to win reelection.
'It's kind of a frustrated ambition that then leads into higher activity,' Winger said — and Harris has that.
In her announcement about not running for governor, Harris was careful to leave her options open — framing her hopes for the future around ideals such as 'fighting for the American people.'
She said she is a 'devout public servant' who has long believed the best way to make a difference was to 'improve the system from within.' But she also said 'our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people,' and that 'we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking — committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook.'
Harris said she looked forward talking to more Americans while helping to elect other Democrats.
Within 24 hours, she had announced a book deal for her forthcoming memoir, '107 Days,' which will chronicle her whirlwind 2024 presidential campaign, and her first interview since the election on 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' on Thursday night.
Nathanael Fast, director of the Neely Center for Ethical Leadership and Decision Making at the USC Marshall School of Business, said Harris' talk of 'getting back out and listening' is consistent with her wanting to reclaim a prominent national role. That could mean another presidential run, he said, but it could also mean something else — particularly in the short term, where she has work to do recasting people's perceptions of her.
'If she can create a compelling narrative about who she is, what she's done, what happened in the last election and where she's headed next,' Fast said, 'she'll be more likely to succeed.'
Fast said his bet is that she runs for president, but he could also see her going the route of Gore — who, after losing the presidential election, decided to move in a different direction to have worldwide impact by addressing climate change.
'I can imagine someone like Harris taking on artificial intelligence and saying, 'My whole thing is trying to influence the national conversation around what's going to happen with AI,'' Fast said.
Artificial intelligence was part of her portfolio as vice president and is a topic Harris cares deeply about, said a source familiar with her thinking who asked for anonymity to speak candidly about her next steps.
Harris also will have to tread carefully as she works to reassert her influence in the Democratic Party, which is still reeling from a second loss to Trump, experts said.
Democrats have struggled to unify the disparate elements of their party and settle on kitchen-table messaging that appeals to voters about the everyday challenges they face, said Sara Sadhwani, a politics professor at Pomona College.
After she lost to Trump, a convicted felon targeted with several other criminal investigations, 'Harris exemplifies the inability to thread that needle.'
Whatever Harris does to break through, it won't be easy in today's saturated media and political marketplace, which is so vastly different from what other former White House occupants faced.
After he declined to run for reelection in 1928, former President Coolidge wrote a nationally syndicated newspaper column. Today, Harris would be more likely to launch a podcast — but whether it will catch on nationally is anyone's guess.
Winger said Harris does have massive name recognition, and Fast said she has many of the important forms of 'capital' for a leader to continue being successful and influential — including financial and social.
Still, 'it's tough,' Winger said. 'It's a very different media ecosystem just because of how crowded and how fractured it has become.'
Kyle Lierman, who worked for more than six years in the Obama White House, is now chief executive of Civic Nation, a nonpartisan nonprofit that houses several education, gender equity and voter initiatives — including When We All Vote, the voter initiative Michelle Obama launched in 2018.
Lierman said he is excited to see what Harris does next, as it's likely to show her 'best side.'
'When you're at the White House, you are working on a dozen different topics every day, and you are trying to make as big an impact as possible before the clock runs out,' Lierman said. 'And when you leave, you have an opportunity to step back, think longer term, and go deeper on a few issues that you're particularly passionate about. And I think that's liberating in some ways.'
Former Sen. Laphonza Butler, a longtime friend of Harris', said the former vice president might draw from the blueprints laid out by her recent predecessors.
'Whether you're talking about the Clinton Global Initiative or When We All Vote ... or the work that's happening at the Obama Foundation, I think there's plenty of examples,' Butler said.
Many former presidents have leveraged their experience in foreign affairs — and existing relationships with foreign leaders — to continue holding sway in international relations, particularly when members of their own party return to power. President Clinton, for instance, used President Carter in that way.
Andra Gillespie, a political scientist at Emory University, said Harris could be 'really effective' in bolstering organizations that work for racial justice and to elect women, but said 'that's not what she was organizing her political career around' before the 2024 election and it may not be the path she chooses now.
Gillespie said she read Harris' statement as indicating that she was most interested in finding a way to force change outside of government. She said she could see Harris — who is already in California, and whose husband Doug Emhoff is an entertainment lawyer — moving into production and podcasts like the Obamas.
Gillespie said she also could see Harris working closely with Howard University, her alma mater in Washington, D.C., on fundraising or building out a new center of study, as Joe Biden did at the University of Delaware.
'She's still relatively young, and still could have a good 15 to 20 years of active engagement ahead of her,' Gillespie said, 'in whatever form she wants that to take.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military
GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military

New York Post

time15 minutes ago

  • New York Post

GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military

A top Republican senator demanded new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan reveal if he has any ties to China's Communist Party and military – citing national security concerns. In a letter sent Wednesday to Intel Chairman Frank Leary, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) wrote that he is concerned 'about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on US national security,' according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Post. Tan replaced ousted Intel chief Pat Gelsinger in March — a year after the struggling company was awarded a whopping $8 billion in Biden-era CHIPs Act funding. Advertisement 3 Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan speaking on stage in Taiwan in May. REUTERS Cotton's missive came after a report earlier this year claimed Tan invested at least $200 million across hundreds of Chinese firms between March 2012 and December 2024. Some of these advanced manufacturing and semiconductor firms have been linked to the Chinese Communist Party and military, Reuters reported in April. Advertisement In his letter, Cotton questioned whether the board had required Tan to divest from these stakes before assuming the CEO role. The senator asked whether Tan had disclosed his remaining investments to the US government, since Intel has a responsibility as a major recipient of federal funding. He also demanded to know whether the board was aware of subpoenas targeting Cadence Design – which Tan ran from 2008 to 2021 – before it hired him. 'Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the US defense ecosystem,' an Intel spokesperson told The Post. Advertisement Intel added that it will address the matter with Cotton, who asked for responses by Aug. 15. 3 Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's chairman with concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's reported ties to China. 'Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations,' Cotton wrote in the letter. 'Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations.' Advertisement In 2024, Intel was awarded $8.5 billion in CHIPs funding under the Secure Enclave program, a national security initiative to make secure microchips for defense and intelligence applications. Later that year, the government slashed that figure by more than $600 million to about $7.85 billion. Intel still ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. 3 Intel ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. Getty Images A source familiar with the matter told Reuters in April that Tan had divested from his positions in Chinese firms. The outlet reported at the time that Chinese databases still listed many of his investments as current. While it is not illegal for US citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, there is a US Treasury list of banned Chinese firms. Reuters reported earlier this year that Tan was not invested directly in any company on that list. Meanwhile, Cadence Design last week agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to settle charges that it sold its chips to a Chinese military university, according to a Reuters report. Advertisement The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, according to the report. Those sales took place under Tan's leadership at Cadence. After stepping down as CEO in 2021, Tan stayed on at Cadence as executive chairman through May 2023.

‘Debanking' is an obscene abuse of government power
‘Debanking' is an obscene abuse of government power

New York Post

time15 minutes ago

  • New York Post

‘Debanking' is an obscene abuse of government power

'Debanking' seems like something out of paranoid dystopian fiction, but this horrific abuse of government power is already all too real. We're almost glad the Biden crew deployed it against then-former-President Donald Trump in 2021: That not only ensures he's aware of this outrage; it points to how even the powerful are vulnerable. It's as simple as it is scary: Government regulators give a quiet nod to financial institutions that certain people or industries are to be 'unpersoned,' and pretty soon they get the same treatment as North Korean tyrants, terrorists or drug kingpins: locked out of the financial system, which means social death. The victim gets turned away at other banks, all with no way to appeal what's blandly painted as a 'business decision.' Just try life without any ready way to cash checks or pay bills, not even a debit card — nor, if you run a business, a line of credit to pay suppliers and meet payroll. The abuse apparently began under President Barack Obama, deployed against disfavored businesses such as gun manufacturers on the laughable ground that they posed a 'reputational risk'; it expanded under President Joe Biden to hit crypto and tech startups, as well as individuals whose opinions or political activity got labeled 'dangerous.' Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen calls it a 'privatized sanctions regime'; American victims apparently number in the thousands. In the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, Trump was first personally dropped by Chase, then refused service by Bank of America. And First Lady Melania Trump reports that she and her son Barron were dropped by their bank. The good news is that Donald Trump is signing executive orders to crack down on the abuse and will surely sign legislation to prevent it. Banks have a duty to watch out for criminal abuse of their services, but forcing them to secretly enforce political insiders' ideological agenda is frighteningly totalitarian.

4 Ways Trump's Policies Harm Americans, Per Buttigieg
4 Ways Trump's Policies Harm Americans, Per Buttigieg

Buzz Feed

time15 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

4 Ways Trump's Policies Harm Americans, Per Buttigieg

Former secretary of transportation Pete Buttigieg is being applauded online for his recent, simple breakdown on all the ways Donald Trump's chosen cabinet is negatively impacting Americans' lives. While sitting down for NPR's Morning Edition, Pete insisted that Democrats need to change their approach if they want to reach voters. "We do have to look at what we're doing that makes it hard to hear what we have to say," he told host Steve Inskeep. "Too often we talk in terms that are academic. When we're talking about deeply important things, like freedom and democracy, we still have to have a way of talking about it that relates to how everyday life is different." As an example, Pete shared ways our "everyday life is different and worse" under Trump's presidency, because, as he said, "When you have an autocrat in power, he can get away with appointing incompetent people over very important things in our lives." To start, he said, "Right now we have the secretary of defense — in charge of defending the American people — who was accidentally texting military strike information to journalists." "We have the person in charge of American public health, who is a quack who doesn't believe in medicine, and now measles is on the rise in America," he continued. "We have a secretary of education — in charge of your kid's educational well-being — who has spoken about the importance of 'A1,' which means she does not understand that the acronym is AI, which means she does not understand the most important development affecting education in our lifetimes." Pete continued, "We have a secretary of homeland security who sat on funding and did not allow it to go to Texas during the floods for at least two days for no good reason." "So these things do affect you," Pete concluded. "Not for academic reasons, but because of what happens when you have a loss of accountability. Those are the kinds of things I think we need to talk about before anybody can hear us." A clip of Pete's simple yet effective explanation was shared to X, formerly known as Twitter, where it garnered over 1.7 million views and over 1,000 comments. By and large, people are calling Pete's breakdown "brilliant." One person said, "This breakdown of the incompetence of the administration is simple yet brilliant. And the reality of how they're affecting peoples' REAL lives is heartbreaking and infuriating." "Last thirty seconds should be mandatory listening," another agreed. "The loss of accountability over trumps horrible yes men stooge picks for cabinet undeniably makes your life worse as an American. It isn't up for debate." Others called Pete "the best communicator in US politics"... ...and insisted, "This is who We The People employ!!!" Talks like this have made Pete a favorite amongst voters looking to the future of the Democratic Party. And even some abroad. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store