California lawmaker revives effort to end forced prison labor
Introduced by Assemblymember Lori Wilson (D-Suisun City), AB 475 also calls on CDCR to develop a voluntary work program with regulations on assignments and wages.
If the bill becomes law, starting Jan. 1, 2027, it will prohibit CDCR from requiring incarcerated individuals to work, with some exceptions. It would also require local governments to establish wages for county and city jail work programs through local ordinances, creating a state-mandated local program.
Californians can receive up to $137 off their April utility bills. Here's how
So far, the bill passed out of the public safety committee with a 6-1 vote. Two lawmakers, Assemblymembers James Ramos (D-San Bernardino) and Juan Alanis (R-Modesto), didn't vote.
One lawmaker who opposed the bill, Assemblymember Tom Lackey (R-Palmdale), said during the hearing that he took issue with associating the prison workforce with slavery. He also said he couldn't support a bill the public has already voted against, according to the Sacramento Bee.
Wilson addressed those claims, saying that history would prove Lackey wrong regarding his assessment of the association between involuntary servitude in prisons and slavery.
She also said that the language around Prop. 6 was confusing and recognized that there wasn't an overwhelming response of 'no.' About 53.3% of voters voted no on Prop. 6, while 46.6% voted yes.
The bill will now face another committee review.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California Legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting plans. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblymember Tri Ta and Assemblymember Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court Tuesday seeking to effectively block the effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for a Nov. 4 election. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
California's climate alarmism has put America at risk
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) once fancied himself climate warrior-in-chief. California's governor, the would-be heir to the White House, spent the better part of his tenure demonizing the oil and gas industry, waging regulatory war on refineries, and touting apocalyptic 'just transitions' away from reliable energy. Through an array of coordinated cases, Newsom has been using climate lawfare as a way to impose his extreme energy agenda on California. In classic Sacramento fashion, he courted applause from the global climate elite while treating America's energy providers as a public nuisance and their workers as collateral damage. Now, reality has come a-knockin' — and it's bringing $5-per-gallon (and climbing) gas with it. After years of escalating hostility, capped by cascading lawsuits and piles of red tape, refineries in Southern and Northern California are shutting their doors. Phillips 66 and Valero, giants forced out not by market forces but by legislative sabotage, are just the latest casualties. The aftermath has resulted in soaring prices, dwindling supplies and a panicked political about-face, as Newsom 'reconsiders' his position to stave off voter revolt and economic pain that even blue-state consumers can't stomach. This is what happens when a government, seduced by climate catastrophism and far-left activism, trades affordable energy for Paris Accord virtue-signaling and lawsuit-driven policy. Lawfare, overregulation and the never-ending escalation of climate mandates haven't ushered in a green utopia. They have instead delivered higher prices, manufactured scarcity and a growing national security nightmare. It's not just a California problem; it's an America problem. The Newsom model: regulate to the point of collapse, sue the producers out of existence and import more oil from regimes that laugh at net zero and Environmental, Social and Governance or ESG. As the U.S. cedes energy leadership to China, the world's largest coal consumer and rare earths monopolist, we're helping Beijing tighten its grip on our supply chains for batteries, solar panels, and critical minerals. For every new regulatory stranglehold, China gets richer and the U.S. gets weaker. In short, Newsom's policies are a blueprint for how America loses the 21st century. Overregulation hammered California oil production, then shut down its refining capacity, all while the state's legal assault on energy companies, cozy with dark money activist lawyers, pursued judgment dollars for pet climate projects. The result was predictable: Golden State gas prices now dwarf the national average, and high-paying energy jobs have evaporated. Worse still, the pain inflicted on consumers and workers has done nothing to alter the climate or shift the global energy consumption, because it was never going to. Meanwhile, California families pay the price for policy-driven energy scarcity. The state's painful ' energy island ' status means Californians can't simply import their way out of shortages. Every extra dollar squeezed at the pump, every pink slip for an energy worker, is the real cost of this ideological crusade. If consumers believe the sacrifices Newsom demands of them serve some higher environmental good, they are being misled. America's oil, natural gas and coal industries are the most efficient and responsibly developed in the world, not because of bureaucratic mandates, but because of relentless private-sector innovation. Offshoring energy production to regimes with no regard for human rights or environmental protection doesn't help the planet — rather, it empowers our adversaries and weakens American security. Worse still, the cost of these policies falls squarely on working Americans. The cost of energy drives the price of every good and service, from food to housing to health care. Newsom must realize that California's climate lawfare crusade could run the U.S. economy into the ground. If he wants to lead America, he would first need to lead the charge in slamming shut the revolving door of regulatory lawfare, ending the war on affordable energy, and reasserting American energy independence. But a zebra doesn't change its stripes. The lesson of California is clear: Policies that undermine our energy producers, punish consumers and make us dependent on adversaries are not just bad economics, they're bad for the country. For California's sake, and the country's, it's time to put energy affordability and reliability back at the center of our national priorities.
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
California Legislature to Consider Redistricting on Tight Deadline
California lawmakers are returning to Sacramento to vote on a series of measures to expand Democratic control of the state's U.S. House of Representatives delegation, facing a tight deadline. Specifically, the series of bills under consideration—dubbed the Election Rigging Response Act —would establish new maps for congressional districts, give authorization for the redrawn map to replace the current one, and declare a Nov. 4 special election to seek Californians' approval of the change.
