I fled persecution in Iran. ICE enforcement here today reminds me of Tehran
I experienced true religious freedom for the first time in my life in this country, of which I am now a proud, grateful citizen — and that's why I am shocked by the ways that my government is now treating my Iranian congregants, who have been detained by masked officers, separated from their families and threatened with deportation to a country that would kill them for their Christian faith. What I have witnessed gives me flashbacks to Tehran, and I believe that America must be better.
Two families who are a part of the Farsi-speaking evangelical congregation that I pastor in Los Angeles have been detained in recent weeks. First, a couple and their 3-year-old daughter, who are in the process of seeking asylum because they fear persecution if they were returned to Iran. They were detained at their court hearing in downtown Los Angeles on June 23. The entire family is now being held in South Texas.
The next day, I received a call from a woman in my church. Like me, she had been forced to flee Iran for Turkey when her involvement in Iran's underground churches was exposed.
When the woman and her husband found themselves in a desperate situation in Turkey last year, they were not offered the option to fly to the U.S. as resettled refugees as I had been in 2010. Instead, they flew to South America, made a treacherous journey north and waited in Mexico for an appointment they reserved on a U.S. government app, CBP One, to be able to explain their situation to officers of the U.S. government.
Once lawfully allowed in with provisional humanitarian status, they found our church — where they could be baptized and publicly profess their faith in Jesus — and legal help to begin their asylum request. They received their work authorization documents and found jobs. Their first asylum hearing in immigration court was scheduled for this September.
When President Trump returned to office, however, his administration both suspended all refugee resettlement and canceled humanitarian parole for those who had been allowed to enter via the CBP One app. Many parolees received menacing letters instructing them to self-deport or face prosecution, fines or deportation. But these letters also noted that these instructions did not apply to those who had 'otherwise obtained a lawful basis to remain,' such as a pending asylum application.
That's why I was so shocked to receive a call from the woman in my congregation informing me that her husband had been detained by masked immigration officers on the street, just a few blocks from our church. I rushed over and began to film the shocking scene: First he was detained by masked officers, and then she was. I asked if they had a judicial warrant, but if they did, they would not show me. The woman experienced a panic attack and was taken to a hospital but discharged into ICE custody; she is now hours away in a detention center in California. Her husband is in a detention center in Texas.
It's not just these two families who are affected. My community of Iranian Christians is terrified of being detained and deported back to Iran, where they fear being killed for their faith. Some have lost jobs because they fear leaving their homes. Others lost jobs because their work authorization, tied to humanitarian parole, was abruptly terminated.
I believe that America is better than this. This behavior reminds me disturbingly of what I fled in Iran. But I know that most Americans do not support this, nor do most fellow evangelical Christians: Many evangelicals voted for Trump because he pledged to protect persecuted Christians — not to deport them. While most evangelicals want those convicted of violent crimes detained, one-quarter or less of us say that about other immigrants, and 7 in 10 believe the U.S. has a moral responsibility to receive refugees. I have been overwhelmed by the support of English- and Spanish-speaking sister congregations of our church, by the outreach of Christians from across the country and by a recent biblically rooted statement of many California evangelical leaders.
Now, Congress has passed legislation to exponentially increase the funding for detaining and deporting immigrants. Trump's administration has been clear that anyone in the country unlawfully — including more than a million who were here lawfully until his administration abruptly canceled their status — is at risk of deportation. According to a recent study by the Center for the Study of Global Christianity, 80% of those vulnerable to deportation are Christians; some, like those in my church, would likely face death if deported to their home countries.
I hope and pray Trump will reverse course on these policies, going after those who genuinely present a public safety threat but having mercy on others, especially those who fled persecution on account of their faith. And until he does make that policy shift, I plead with Congress to pass real immigration reforms that would halt these horrifying detentions and deportations.
Ara Torosian is a pastor at Cornerstone West Los Angeles.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Justice Department files complaint against judge who blocked deportations
In a social media post, the attorney general accused District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg of making "improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration." The U.S. Department of Justice has intensified its scrutiny of the judiciary by filing a formal misconduct complaint against one of President Donald Trump's least-favorite federal judges. Attorney General Pam Bondi said on July 28 that she directed her agency to file the grievance because James Boasberg, the 62-year-old chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, made "improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration" in March. "These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that," Bondi wrote on X. Boasberg is the judge who initially blocked the deportation flights of hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members the Trump administration carried out under the Alien Enemies Act. When the administration ignored his order to bring the flights back, Boasberg began contempt proceedings, which were later halted by an appeals court. The Supreme Court eventually vacated the temporary ban on the deportations. Read more: Trump shipped them to El Salvador. Their families say their only crime was a tattoo. President Donald Trump said on social media in March that Boasberg was a "Radical Left Lunatic" and called for his impeachment. John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, intervened, issuing a rare public statement that said in part: "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision." Read more: Chief Justice John Roberts rebukes Trump after president calls for judge's impeachment In Bondi's complaint, Chad Mizelle, her chief of staff, accused Boasberg of attempting to improperly influence Roberts and other judges during a conference on March 11. Mizelle said that Boasberg expressed concerns about the Trump administration disregarding federal court rulings, and those alleged remarks violated rules that judges have to follow about not discussing pending cases in public. Then-President George W. Bush first nominated Boasberg in 2002 to serve on the primary trial court for Washington, D.C. Boasberg advanced to the federal bench in 2011 thanks to a lifetime appointment from then-President Barack Obama. An assistant to Boasberg declined to comment. Contributing: Reuters


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Press freedom group files ethics complaint against FCC chair
The Freedom of the Press Foundation has filed an ethics complaint against Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, arguing the close of ally of President Trump has 'engaged in egregious misconduct,' and calling for him to be disbarred. In the organization's complaint, filed with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals' Office of Disciplinary Counsel on Monday, cites Carr's public statements and actions in the weeks leading up to the agency's recent approval of the Paramount, Skydance merger. 'Everyone from U.S. senators to CBS employees to a dissenting FCC commissioner has said the settlement appears to have been a bribe to grease the wheels for Carr's FCC to approve the merger,' the complaint reads. 'Even putting Paramount aside, Carr has pursued numerous other frivolous and unconstitutional legal proceedings and threatened more of them in furtherance in his efforts to intimidate broadcast licensees to censor themselves and fall in line with Trump's agenda.' The organization's complaint was first reported in journalist Oliver Darcy's media newsletter Status. Carr had in the weeks leading up to the merger publicly blasted CBS News over its coverage of the Trump administration and indicated he believed the '60 Minutes' interview that sparked a lawsuit against the network from President Trump could hold up FCC approval of the $8 billion deal. Paramount, CBS's parent company, earlier this month agreed to pay Trump's foundation $16 million and its new parent company made several concessions as part of its merger agreement with Skydance. Carr praised those promises, including the appointing of an ombudsman to monitor CBS coverage for objectivity, in announcing the agency had approved the deal last week, saying 'Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly. It is time for a change.' 'Carr's actions brazenly violate legal and ethical standards that govern the practice of law and public officials, undermining the First Amendment, the FCC's credibility and the laws he is trusted to administer,' the complaint said. 'His abuse of his office to force an unwarranted settlement of a private lawsuit, is shameful and warrants disbarment.'

Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Cargo surge amid tariff turmoil drives the Port of Savannah to its 2nd busiest year
SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — Retailers scrambling to stock up ahead of anticipated stiff tariffs on imports boosted the Port of Savannah, one of the top U.S. container ports, to its second-busiest year ever, Georgia officials said Tuesday. The Savannah port moved 5.7 million container units of imports and exports across its docks in the 2025 fiscal year that ended June 30, the Georgia Ports Authority reported. That's an increase of 8.6% over the prior fiscal year and just shy of the record 5.76 million container units Savannah handled in fiscal 2022. The growth was caused in part by a surge in cargo since President Donald Trump returned to office in January promising heavy tariffs on China and other U.S. trading partners. But double-digit increases Savannah saw during the spring months were followed by a sizable drop in June container volumes as Trump's on-again, off-again tactics continued to fuel uncertainty. 'It's just going to be this very up-and-down time until things get settled,' said Georgia Ports Authority CEO Griff Lynch, who praised Trump's trade deal with the European Union as a step toward restoring stability. 'I'm sure all of it will come together. It's just a matter of timing.' The Port of Savannah is the nation's No. 4 seaport for cargo shipped in containers, giant metal boxes used to transport goods ranging from consumer electronics to frozen chickens by ship, rail and truck. Uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariff policies has resulted in gains, at least in the short term, at other major U.S. ports. A 90-day pause the Republican president placed on new tariffs announced in April gave American retailers and manufacturers a window to build up inventories ahead of new price hikes. What happens to trade volumes in the coming months may depend on a big deadline Friday, when dozens of countries face increased tariffs on goods shipped to the U.S. if they don't reach a deal with the White House. The Port of Los Angeles, the top U.S. container port, reported its busiest June ever to close out fiscal 2025 with 10.5 million container units handled — a 14% increase over the previous year. At the Port of New York and New Jersey, the biggest East Coast port, container volumes from January through May were up 6.5% compared to the same period last year. Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, told reporters earlier this month that Trump's tactics have created a 'whipsaw effect' as shipping volumes slow down with new tariff announcements, then surge suddenly to take advantage of delayed tariff start dates. The National Retail Federation is forecasting that cargo containers shipped through U.S. ports will drop by double digits from August through November. At the Port of Savannah, container volume jumped 22.5% in March to 533,995 units and remained above 500,000 container units through May. The streak ended in June, when container volumes fell 9.6% compared to a year earlier. Lynch said paused shipments of automobiles to Georgia prompted by tariffs on foreign cars contributed to a 16% drop in autos moving through the nearby Port of Brunswick in fiscal 2025. Last year, Brunswick was the top U.S. port for automobiles after passing the Port of Baltimore, which was shut down for weeks after the deadly collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. Cargo volumes appeared flat in July said Lynch, who anticipates another decline in August. But he said he's optimistic the turbulence won't be prolonged. 'If they can nail these tariffs down, we'll get back to normal trade,' Lynch said.