City official apologizes for voting delays in Vancouver byelection
Vancouver's city manager is apologizing for the voting delays in Saturday's byelection, after residents faced up to hours-long waits to cast their ballots.
The long cues backlogged polling stations across the city, leaving hundreds of people still in line after polls closed at 8 p.m. PT, and delaying results past midnight.
The issue was likely largely driven by a January council decision, brought forward by staff, to cut the number of polling stations in half and the number of people staffing them by nearly two-thirds.
Paul Mochrie, Vancouver's city manager, on Sunday apologized to voters impacted by what he called unacceptable voting delays in the byelection, especially after a record turnout for advance voting and mail-in ballots."We made a number of assumptions in planning for this election, around vote turnout, distribution, capacity to process votes," he told CBC News on Sunday.
"Clearly, from what we saw yesterday, those assumptions were flawed, and we did not have sufficient resources to process the turnout that we received."
In total, 67,962 ballots were cast in the byelection, for a voter turnout of about 15 per cent — a 40 per cent increase from 2017, when the turnout was around 11 per cent.
The byelection reported around a 15 per cent turnout. (Courtney Dickson/CBC News)
Following an inquiry by CBC News, the City of Vancouver said there were 25 polling stations staffed by 265 workers Saturday, down from 50 stations and 631 workers in 2017.
Overall, the city's budget for the byelection increased from $1.5 million in 2017 to $2 million for 2025.
Mochrie said the election planning fell entirely on civil servants, and not to elected officials, and acknowledged that the turnout was higher than what officials had planned for.
He said the next step is to get the councillors-elect sworn in, which he estimated will happen later this month or early in May.
Councillors-elect look ahead
The byelection was a chastening result for the city's ruling ABC Party, which still maintains a majority on council but whose candidates finished a distant sixth and seventh in the preliminary count.
Progressive candidates Sean Orr, of the Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE), and Lucy Maloney, of OneCity Vancouver, instead took the top spots.
Orr, a housing activist, landscaper and dishwasher, had previously run with VOTE Socialist in the 2022 election.
Sean Orr, a councillor-elect with COPE in Vancouver, is seen on Sunday. (Sohrab Sandhu/CBC)
He told CBC News he was blown away by having received the most votes in the byelection, and called it a humbling experience.
"It just confirmed what I thought about Vancouverites — that they care about the city, we care about the city, we care about integrity and we care about each other," he said.
Lucy Maloney, a councillor-elect with OneCity Vancouver, is seen on Sunday. (Shawn Foss/CBC)
Orr and fellow councillor-elect Maloney said they would push back on Mayor Ken Sim and ABC's agenda.
In particular, the two mentioned a recent move to freeze construction of new supportive housing in the city, as well as a motion to bring back the option of natural gas heating in new homes in the city, which ultimately failed.
"It just shows how dissatisfied people are with Ken Sim and ABC, and the direction they're taking in our city, that people were prepared to go to so much trouble to stand in line and participate in our democracy yesterday," Maloney said on Sunday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Some P.E.I. lobster fishers want 'moderate livelihood' defined, after DFO seizes more traps
Lennox Island First Nation says more lobster traps belonging to its moderate-livelihood fishery were removed from the waters along P.E.I.'s North Shore over the weekend. Chief Darlene Bernard said one fisherman had 58 traps seized by federal Fisheries and Oceans Canada enforcement officers on Sunday. The move comes after DFO removed what it said were 100 unauthorized traps from Malpeque Bay back in late May. Bernard is once again calling the removal illegal, though some non-Indigenous fishers in the area told CBC News they were pleased that DFO is taking action. Timothy Wall, a third-generation fisherman in the area, said there's too much pressure on Malpeque Bay's lobster stocks. "It's nice to see DFO… taking a stance in the name of conservation," Wall told CBC News. "There's been a lot of extra pressure on the resource, and you can only split the pie so many ways sometimes before your slices start to get smaller and smaller and smaller." The Mi'kmaq have a right to fish for a "moderate livelihood" outside of the commercial fishery that's rigorously regulated by the federal government, a right that was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada's Marshall decision in 1999. Bernard said the traps seized Sunday belong to Lennox Island's self-governed, treaty-protected fishery that began in 2022. The First Nation set 1,500 moderate-livelihood lobster traps this year — 100 traps each for 15 fishermen from the community — but DFO has said it approved only up to 1,000. Calling DFO's latest seizure "extremely disappointing" and "despicable," Bernard said 58 traps have been placed back in the water. "If there's an issue with these traps, then give me the reason other than 'we didn't authorize them,'" she told CBC News on Tuesday. "Well, guess what? [DFO doesn't] have the ability or the authority to authorize anything when it comes to the treaty-protected fishery. It's a self-regulated fishery that is protected by the Constitution." As well as that fishery, the Lennox Island First Nation also operates a communal commercial fishery. Down the road, the community to hopes to expand that fishery by using a new program, the Community Based Access Acquisition Fund, to buy existing commercial licences from people from outside the First Nation who are getting out of the business. If that approach works, Bernard said Lennox Island will not have to expand its moderate-livelihood fishery. Fishers like Wall say part of the problem is that DFO hasn't defined what a "moderate livelihood" means. He said non-Indigenous fishers should have some kind of say in the future of the treaty-protected fishery, given that their own livelihood is at stake. "It's impossible to have real, true reconciliation 'til we can all move forward, and this is one of the biggest things that's stopping everybody from moving forward," Wall said. "Everybody would be better off and happier if we could just figure out what moderate livelihood means. It is time to define it." WATCH | Lennox Island First Nation says it will replace hundreds of lobster traps removed by DFO officials: DFO said it has no plans to do that in the near future. Connor Robinson, the department's acting director-general of Indigenous affairs, said DFO is "committed to reconciliation and working with partners to implement their rights in the fishery in a sustainable way that's mindful of conservation and pressure on fish stocks" About defining the moderate-livelihood fishery, he added: "While I understand the desire from many to define it and put parameters around it, what the court basically said is what's required to implement moderate livelihood will vary over time as fish stocks and communities change and grow and evolve." We are going to continue to fish 1,500 traps in this community. — Chief Darlene Bernard, Lennox Island First Nation In the meantime, Lennox Island is considering legal action over the traps seized Sunday. Bernard said the 15 moderate-livelihood fishers from her community are only taking what they need — and it's far less than what the commercial fishery is hauling in. "We are going to continue to protect that right, and we are going to continue to fish 1,500 traps in this community," she said. "We've done our due diligence on it, we've done our engagements with the community, we've looked to see if there was any issues with regards to the stocks…. Right now, we are less than one per cent of the total allowable catch."
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Launch of mandatory Ontario Greenbelt review months overdue: internal docs
Ontario appears to be months behind launching a mandatory review of the Greenbelt, and opposition politicians and environmentalists are asking for a wide-ranging and transparent study of the protected lands to preserve their future. A mandatory 10-year-review of the Greenbelt Plan, which created the protected zone from development, was to have started earlier this year. As of late March that review had not formally begun, according to documents obtained by CBC News through a freedom of information request. Civil servants warned new Municipal Affairs Minister Rob Flack that the process should have started on Feb. 28, the day after Ontario elected the Ford government to a third term. "To date, (the Ministry) has initiated internal policy research and analysis, including developing possible approaches to consultation and Indigenous engagement," civil servants told the new minister in a March briefing note. The Greenbelt was created in 2005 to protect farm land and some of the most ecologically sensitive areas of the Golden Horseshoe region. The law provides environmental protection and specifies where development should not occur. The Greenbelt has been the subject of scandal for the Ford government since 2022, when it announced it would swap 15 pieces of land from the protected area and open them up for development. Reports from the auditor general and integrity commissioner found that the process to select lands was rushed and favoured certain developers. The property owners with land removed from the Greenbelt stood to see their land value rise by $8.3 billion, the auditor general found in her own Greenbelt investigation. Ford reversed course after heated public outcry and the RCMP continues to investigate the matter. WATCH | Ontario's 4 major parties say they would not build housing on the Greenbelt: The legislation that created the Greenbelt requires a review every decade. That involves consultations with municipalities within the protected area and members of the public. It also requires the government hear from its own Greenbelt Council, a body of 10 representatives it appoints to meet regularly and provide advice to the minister on land use planning related to the protected area. But the civil servants say that as of March, the council only had one member and no chairperson. According to the Greenbelt council's website Monday, the sole remaining appointee's term expires on June 24. Seven members of that body, including former Toronto mayor and PC cabinet minister David Crombie, resigned in 2020 in protest over changes the Ford government made to the powers of conservation authorities. But the civil servants are also clear about the parameters of the review — it's not meant to shrink the protected zone. "Amendments shall not have the effect of reducing the total land area of the Greenbelt Plan," the briefing note says. Minister Flack's office did not respond to questions from CBC News on the status of the review or the Greenbelt Council. The briefing note puts the Greenbelt review at the top of a list of early priority decisions for the minister, labelling it a "medium" operational and reputational risk for the government. Given the political trouble the government has had with the Greenbelt, NDP environment critic Peter Tabuns said he's not surprised work on the review has been slow to progress. "The fewer times the word Greenbelt is uttered in public the better for them," he said. "Having a really minimal review push through quickly would probably be politically the easiest thing for them." While the review may seem like a simple formality, it's needed to help strengthen the protected zone, Tabuns said. He urged the government to consult widely on how to strengthen the law. "Every 10 years you've got to look at it to make sure it's in good shape," he said. "To make sure it's protected in the hope that any future attack will be blunted." Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said he's concerned the province has nearly reached the halfway point of the year and hasn't made any meaningful progress on the review. "I think it is critically important for public confidence that this review take place, that it be rigorous, and it be designed in a way to ask questions about what we can do to strengthen the Greenbelt," he said. In light of the scandal, the government should use the review as a way to bolster public confidence in its management of the Greenbelt, Schreiner said. "I would say to the government, this is an opportunity to help you move forward in terms of the Greenbelt scandal and the public opposition that flowed from that, to say, 'We learned a lesson, and we're going to conduct a Greenbelt review, and we're going to do it in a way that talks about how to strengthen the Greenbelt,'" he said. The review must be expansive and the government must consult widely, said Tim Gray, the executive director of Environmental Defence. The last study, done a decade ago, took years and was substantive, he said."It is important that we do a check in and upgrade it where necessary, expand it where necessary, and address threats to it where it's necessary," Gray said. Tony Morris, conservation policy and campaigns director at Ontario Nature, said he's concerned the government will want to perform a quick review that "tinkers at the edges." "It's critical that the process be transparent and it be science-based," he said. "It must be open to Indigenous communities and all stakeholders to actually be involved and feel like they're being heard, which means that it has to be a well thought out process with appropriate timelines."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Saudi Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman invited to G7 summit in Alberta: sources
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has been invited to attend the upcoming Group of Seven (G7) summit in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies, two government sources told CBC News. Bin Salman, known as MBS, is a powerful figure in the Middle East and his oil-rich country is seen as a key player in hopes of brokering peace as the deadly war in Gaza drags on. Sources with knowledge of the invite spoke to CBC News on the condition they not be named. The Saudi embassy has not confirmed whether bin Salman will make the trip to Alberta next week. Saudi Arabia is not a G7 member, but other world leaders are often invited for discussions at the annual summit. The Gulf kingdom has been a vocal supporter of the need for a Gaza ceasefire and the recognition of a Palestinian state. The U.S. has pushed for Saudi Arabia to normalize ties with Israel amid the ongoing war in the region, but the prospect of formal ties still appears far away. Bin Salman was also invited to last year's G7 summit in Italy, but did not attend. Still, the crown prince's invite will likely anger human rights activists. Bin Salman has denied involvement in journalist Jamal Khashoggi's 2018 murder and has pointed to recent measures expanding women's rights as evidence his country is becoming more progressive and tolerant. However, human rights watchers push back on that argument, highlighting the ongoing suppression of dissidents and the country's treatment of migrant workers. Canada sanctioned 17 Saudi nationals linked to the murder of Khashoggi in 2018. Mexico's Sheinbaum joining summit Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed Monday she will make the trip and says she hopes to have a pull-aside conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump. Her trip north comes as both Canada and Mexico grapple with Trump's persistent tariffs and economic threats, which have also stressed the Canada-Mexico relationship; Ontario Premier Doug Ford has suggested Canada go it alone with the U.S. on trade. "I have decided that I will attend the G7," Sheinbaum said in a statement Monday. "The foreign affairs minister is working on setting up bilateral meetings — it is likely that we will have one with Trump." Prime Minister Mark Carney's office has signalled he is hoping to reach a deal on tariffs and trade around the G7 meetings, taking place in Kananaskis, Alta., from June 15 to 17. The prime minister has also said he wants to make progress on bilateral issues with the U.S. before talks take place on the trilateral Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). A review of that deal is officially slated to start in 2026, although Mexican officials have suggested they expect a review to start earlier than that. Aside from leaders of G7 countries — Canada, the U.S., the U.K., France, Italy, Germany and Japan plus the European Union — the guest list is growing. The full list hasn't been made available by Carney's office, but last week the prime minister confirmed he had also invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa (this year's G20 chair), South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte have said they will attend.
