logo
NYU may have ignored its own protocols to allow anti-Israel grad speech: insider

NYU may have ignored its own protocols to allow anti-Israel grad speech: insider

Yahoo17-05-2025
New York University may have ignored its own protocols for commencement speakers, allowing a student speaker to complete a divisive anti-Israel speech at its Gallatin School graduation — as some faculty members applauded, a school insider told The Post.
'As I search my my heart . . . the only thing that is appropriate to say in this time and to a group this large is a recognition of the atrocities currently happening in Palestine,' student Logan Rozos said Wednesday in the opening of his three-minute speech laced with a one-sided narrative about the Israel-Gaza war.
'I want to say that I condemn this genocide and condemn the complicity in this genocide,' he said claiming the US was 'militarily and politically' complicit, as faculty on the dais were seen applauding and nodding emphatically.
An NYU insider who's been at the school decades told The Post Rozos should have never been allowed to finish his speech.
Students have to 'submit a copy of the speech and agree to read that speech and none other,' the insider said.
'There's definitely a breakdown in protocol. When someone goes off script, the mic is supposed to be cut. These events are produced to the syllable because they need to be.
'It's supposed to be zero surprises – 100 percent by design.'
The insider added that 'the real question is if there were faculty on the inside who put him up to this.'
'My mind, seeing all the faculty on the stage clapping, caused me to question whether they were in some way involved or not,' said the source, noting their robust record of anti-Israel sentiment according to the Canary Mission, which tracks antisemitism.
Fellow grads were aghast NYU allowed Rozos to finish the 'inflammatory' and 'incredibly narcissistic' diatribe at the Beacon Theatre ceremony.
'They absolutely should have cut it off and not applauded him,' fumed Sabrina Maslavi, a Gallatin grad who settled a federal antimsemitism lawsuit with NYU last year.
Maslavi told the Post that the 'inappropriate' speech 'definitely ruined my graduation for me and my family,' estimating about half of faculty on the dais openly supported the screed. 'They applauded him and let him finish. And after he sat down, the faculty still applauded him.'
She claimed she was shunned when she didn't follow fellow grads in giving him a standing ovation.
'I got the death stare.'
Another grad groused about the 'horrible' and 'embarrassing' spectacle for the institution.
'It took any prestige they had and squashed it,' the grad said, adding that Rozos 'should have been pulled off the stage.'
Gallatin dean Victoria Rosner took the stage directly after Rozos, ignoring the divisive rant.
Hours after the speech, an NYU spokesperson announced it would be withholding Rozos's diploma while it 'pursues disciplinary actions.'
The school said Rozos 'abused' his 'privilege,' 'denounc[ing]' Rozos's speech and accusing him of 'misus[ing] his role as student speaker to express his personal and one-sided political views.'
The rep did not address any breach in protocol but said the student 'lied about the speech he was going to deliver and violated the commitment he made to comply with our rules.'
The 24-year-old Rozos, who wrote in a student online platform that he was raised in Washington Heights and the Bronx, was honored in 2020 for his 'groundbreaking' role in the series 'David Makes Men' on the Oprah Winfrey Network. 'At the time, Rozos was one of very few trans men on television,' read the 2024 Glaad writeup.
The Post reached out to Rozos multiple times for comment.
Students think that the punishment will only boost Rozos's notoriety, transforming him into a hero.
'There's nothing that NYU could do to make him regret what he said,' said a Jewish male grad who was appalled at the ceremony. 'I wouldn't be surprised if Logan turns into a victim from this— a victim of Israel and the Jewish people. People are going to feel bad for him.'
Jeff Rabhan, father of a Gallatin grad, ripped NYU, where he was chair of the Clive Davis Institute of Recorded Music for 11 years.
'You can't tell me they didn't discuss the possibility of this happening,' he said. 'There was plenty of opportunity to right the wrong,' seethed the dad about not cutting off the student. 'It's offensive for families who spend $250,000' for the NYU degree.
Watchdog groups condemned the message sent by NYU's slap in the wrist.
'We fail to see how New York University has made any positive changes to deter – or impose consequences on – Jew-hatred when this is the speech given at commencement to rounding applause but no condemnation,' said Michelle Ahdoot of End Jewish Hatred, which first published the graduation video.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Africa dismisses U.S. human rights report as 'deeply flawed'
South Africa dismisses U.S. human rights report as 'deeply flawed'

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea minute ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

South Africa dismisses U.S. human rights report as 'deeply flawed'

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — The South African government on Wednesday dismissed the U.S. State Department's latest assessment of the country's human rights conditions as 'inaccurate and deeply flawed.' The Trump administration this week released human rights reports for countries worldwide, including South Africa, asserting that the state of human rights in South Africa had 'significantly worsened' in 2024. It cited the unjust treatment of white Afrikaners after the signing of significant land reforms, which the Trump administration has claimed discriminate against the group that ruled the nation during the apartheid era. South Africa's Foreign Ministry expressed 'profound disappointment' with the report, saying its reliance on out of context information and discredited accounts was highly concerning.f The ministry highlighted that the United Nations had hailed the country's Land Expropriation Act as an important step in resolving racially unequal land ownership, underscoring the integrity of constitutional and human rights-based legislative processes. It added that the report was 'ironic' given the U.S exit from the U.N. Human Rights Council. 'This is particularly striking given the significant and documented concerns about human rights within the United States, including the treatment of refugees and breaches in due process by its own agencies, such as ICE,' the ministry said. South Africa's government also dismissed as inaccurate the report's claims that it 'did not take credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, including inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities, or violence against racial minorities.' The U.S. criticism of South Africa's domestic affairs is the latest in a series of tense diplomatic exchanges between the two countries since President Donald Trump was elected to a second term. During a state visit to the White House in May, Trump confronted President Cyril Ramaphosa with false claims that South Africa had been illegally occupying the farms of white Afrikaner farmers. The administration even speeded up the visa application processes for Afrikaners who wanted to relocate to the U.S as refugees. Along with suspending financial aid and imposing 30% tariffs on South Africa's exports to the U.S., Trump has denounced the country's stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict. South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool was expelled by the U.S. for his criticism of Trump, who has hinted that he may not attend the G20 summit of world leaders scheduled to take place in Johannesburg in November. The Afrikaans trade union Solidarieit, which was criticized by Ramaphosa over a recent visit to Washington, has announced new plans to visit the U.S. in September to meet with the Department of State and other parties to discuss abolishing racial-redress laws, reestablishing diplomatic ties, and creating a fair trade agreement between the two countries.

Far-right populists top polls in Germany, France and Britain for the first time
Far-right populists top polls in Germany, France and Britain for the first time

NBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Far-right populists top polls in Germany, France and Britain for the first time

LONDON — For the first time in modern history, far-right and populist parties are simultaneously topping the polls in Europe's three main economies of Germany, France and Britain. A poll Tuesday showed Alternative for Germany — which is under surveillance by the country's intelligence services over suspected extremism — is now the most favored by voters. The survey by broadcaster RTL put the AfD at 26%, ahead of the ruling Christian Democrats at 24%. This is a high watermark for the European far right, a once fringe movement whose virulently anti-immigration, anti-Islam and culture-war politics were shunned by the mainstream just a decade ago. Today, these parties have developed deep ties with President Donald Trump and his Republican allies, who openly cite nationalists such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán as inspirations on policy and tactics. For years, France's National Rally has consistently led polls ahead of the country's next presidential election in 2027. And Britain's Reform U.K., led by Trump ally and friend Nigel Farage, has since April topped most polls there. Far-right parties have been elected over the past few years into the governments of Italy, Hungary and elsewhere. The center right and the center left have hemorrhaged votes amid high inflation, fears over immigration and collapsing faith in institutions — all familiar issues in America, too. Tuesday's polling milestone is 'a sign of the power of populism, disinformation and the failure of established parties to understand what is happening,' said Nic Cheeseman, a professor of democracy and international development at England's University of Birmingham. Though the far right has been making gains for the past decade, Cheeseman believes the polls showing the far right leading Europe's top three economies is 'a first — at least in modern times.' There is no guarantee that London, Berlin and Paris will be ruled by far-right parties; these countries' next elections are not until 2029, 2029 and 2027 respectively. These groups are all polling in the 20s and 30s percentage-wise, enough to lead polls in Europe's multiparty systems but not enough to govern alone outside of a coalition. Most of Europe's politicians on this former fringe reject the 'far right' label, with its historical connotations of the Nazism that marauded the continent 80 years ago. Many scholars say these parties nevertheless fit the academic model, defined by nativism — the idea that perceived 'non-native' groups threaten their social fabric — and harsh punishments for criminality. The roots of the far-right surge lie in the world financial crisis of 2008, which prompted government to cut budgets for public services and lowered living standards, some experts say, compounded by the Arab Spring of 2011 that birthed civil war in Syria and a mass refugee crisis in Europe four years later. More recent societal stressors such as the coronavirus pandemic and war in Ukraine have further increased the allure of populism, according to Hans-Jakob Schindler, the senior director of the Counter Extremism Project, a nonprofit international group. But populist parties in Europe have also harnessed social media more powerfully than their more centrist opponents, he said. 'They are masters of using social media much better than any of the more established parties,' he said. 'When you have easy solutions to complex problems' — as he says populist parties do — 'it's easier to communicate than complex political issues that the actual parties, who do politics rather than just doing populism, will have to deal with.'

Israel's Military Chief Under Fire From Netanyahu Government
Israel's Military Chief Under Fire From Netanyahu Government

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Israel's Military Chief Under Fire From Netanyahu Government

TEL AVIV—Tension is growing between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin's government and the head of the country's military, whom some ministers see as out of step with a plan to expand the war in Gaza after 22 months of fighting. Israeli lawmakers in recent days have stepped up public criticism of the military's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, who pushed back against a plan to take over Gaza in a security cabinet meeting last week, a person familiar with the matter said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store