logo
Gov. Beshear weighing 2028 Democratic bid for presidency

Gov. Beshear weighing 2028 Democratic bid for presidency

Yahoo07-07-2025
Democratic Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear told CNN on Sunday that he was weighing a Democratic presidential bid in 2028.
"Your name frequently comes up as a contender for the 2028 Democratic primary for president. You said you'll think about it after next year," CNN host Dana Bash told Beshar. "What will make you decide that that's going to be a yes, you'll run for president?"
"My primary obligation and what I'm putting all my energy towards is to be the best governor of Kentucky that I can be. Next year, I'll also be the head of the Democratic Governors Association, and I think especially in these rural states where Republican governors have not spoken up whatsoever to stop this devastating bill, we're going to have strong candidates. We're going to win a lot of elections," Beshear said.
Beshear also criticized the GOP's "Big, Beautiful Bill" during the interview, calling it a Republican "attack on rural America."
Game On: Republicans, Democrats, Trade Fire Over Big, Beautiful Bill
Beshear said he hoped the list of potential Democratic leaders would grow.
Read On The Fox News App
"If you asked me this question a couple of years ago, I would have said no. My family's been through a lot, but I do not want to leave a broken country to my kids or anyone else's. So, what I think is most important for 2028 is a candidate that can heal this country, that can bring people back together. So, when I sit down, I'm going to think about whether I'm that candidate or whether someone else is that candidate," Beshear added.
The Democratic governor said he was going to make sure to put the country first.
Dem Governor Says Newsom Shouldn't Have Hosted Bannon On Podcast
These Are The Democrats Who May Run For The White House In 2028
"I'm going to make sure we're putting the country first, because my kids deserve to grow up in a country where they don't have to turn on the news every morning, even when they're on vacation and say, what the heck happened last night?" he said.
Other Democrats, including Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, JB Pritzker and Gavin Newsom, are also seen as potential 2028 nominees.
Some senators are wary of a potential Harris run, according to a May report from The Hill.
A Democratic senator who remained anonymous bluntly told The Hill, "No," when asked if Harris should run again in 2028. The senator told the outlet that Harris had her chance in 2024 before losing to President Donald Trump in November.Original article source: Gov. Beshear weighing 2028 Democratic bid for presidency
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Administration Suspends UCLA Grants After Rights Probe
Trump Administration Suspends UCLA Grants After Rights Probe

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Administration Suspends UCLA Grants After Rights Probe

(Bloomberg) -- The federal government is suspending certain research funding to the University of California at Los Angeles over concerns about antisemitism and bias on campus, hitting one of the most prestigious public higher-education systems in the US. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus In a message to students and staff, UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk said the suspension could affect hundreds of grants from agencies including the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. He called the decision a blow to researchers and the broader public who benefit from their work in areas such as medical innovation and space exploration. The Associated Press reported that the Trump administration is freezing grants to UCLA that are valued at $339 million, citing a person familiar with the matter. 'This far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination,' Frenk said in the message on Thursday. The move comes as the federal government steps up civil rights enforcement at universities in response to campus unrest over the war in Gaza. While the administration's efforts have focused largely on some of the nation's most elite private universities — including Harvard, Cornell and Northwestern — they have also extended to the public sphere, with the 10-campus University of California system, including Berkeley, facing heightened scrutiny. Since last week, Columbia University and Brown University have reached agreements with the federal government to restore previously announced funding cuts, agreeing to years of new oversight and compliance measures. The UCLA funding freeze follows a federal investigation that found the school violated federal civil rights laws by failing to address antisemitic harassment on campus. This week, the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division said the university acted with 'deliberate indifference' to reports of abuse targeting Jewish and Israeli students since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the ensuing conflict. The department cited UCLA for failing to meet its legal obligations under the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The decision adds pressure to a university already facing financial strains. Looming state budget cuts prompted a UC system-wide hiring freeze and broader cost-cutting, with officials warning of potentially deeper shortfalls ahead. Frenk said UCLA has taken steps to address antisemitism, including forming a new Office of Campus and Community Safety and launching an Initiative to Combat Antisemitism. He said the university is reviewing its options and has contingency plans in place to protect students, faculty and staff. --With assistance from John Gittelsohn and Janet Lorin. (Updates with value of grants in third paragraph.) How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What a weaker dollar means for inflation
What a weaker dollar means for inflation

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What a weaker dollar means for inflation

The US dollar ( has fallen this year, and that can have big implications for inflation. RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas talks about that connection and when the impact of tariffs may start to show in the US economy. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. turning out to the dollar index, it's seen many swings we know amid economic uncertainty. Joe, you highlight what the moves in the currency mean for inflation? Walk us through that. All right. When you get a sustained 10% decline in the value of the dollar, typically, you should expect to see a 1/2 of 1% increase in inflation over the next 6 to 12 months. We clearly are at that point, even though we had a nice rebound. I think it was 3.3% for the month of July, strongest month for the greenback this year, but nevertheless, the policy mix out of the administration, all points towards a weaker dollar, and I think that's what we're going to get. Moreover, when you take a look at import prices, especially import prices ex petroleum, it tells the tale. We're going to see more inflation and a weaker dollar going forward. Does Trump want a strong dollar? I would think he does, and I think, well, I think like all politicians, he wants to have his cake and eat it, too. He doesn't want de-dollarization, clearly, but he wants a weaker dollar because A, it really tends to juice the tech sector, and B, it will provide relief to the beleaguered manufacturing sector that's been in an effective recession for the past couple of years. Is it too soon to say the kind of impact the softer dollars had during this earnings season, particularly what it's meant for the multinationals? It's way too early to jump on that bandwagon. I think we're really going to be talking in the fourth quarter earnings, and then next year. Moreover, a lot of those firms that he wants to help are actually having real problems with the tariff issue because, you know, 45% of everything we import goes into domestic manufacturing. So policies at a cross purposes, a good portion of the time this year, which is why that economy slowed to 1.2% growth in the first half of the year, and we think it's not going to do much better. Our forecast for this year is 1.1%. Can I ask you when we talk about these tariff policies? We've been talking about them all show. There's the near to intermediate impact, but how long do we have to wait to see what the long-term impact is? Meaning, do I have to wait till does it have to be August 2026, and Joe and Josh are back on set for me to really know, okay, it's really boosted manufacturing job. It's really opened up all these new markets for American business. It's really raised this much revenue. It's a little worse, actually. So as of midnight last night, on once we get to October 5th, we're going to have an effective 18.3% tariff. The real problem is we won't really understand what any of this means, not till October 5th, 2026, but more like October 5th, 2027. Why? Why do you say that, Joe? Because it takes so long to pass through the tariff costs. You know, there are four points along the chain. You've got your retail, you've got your consumers, you've got your importers, and you've got your exporters. At each point of the supply chain, you're going to see a bit of it absorbed, a bit of it eaten. When we went through this in 2018, for example, we didn't see the full price of the increase in the price of washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers caused by tariffs show up on consumers' balance sheets until about two years later. Turned out 90% of that cost was eaten entirely by consumers. So when we talk about whether where the cost falls falls on the value chain, and there was this big debate, maybe it's really the key debate inside the Fed. Tell me if I'm wrong, but this debate about whether the the the tariff induced inflation is one time or transitory persistent. Even if it's one time, it could go on for some time. Is that part of the point? Well, that's right, and that's why they've been counseling patients because you just don't know. Right now, for all of the noise, right? The tariff rate that's showing up, which is causing revenues to rise, right? And from the Trump administration's point of view, that's an absolutely good thing. It's about 8.85%. It's not 30, it's not 50, it's not 15. But as we get into mid-October, it'll be closer to 20 is my sense because we're still not done with Mexico, and we're still not done with China, and then USMCA has to be renegotiated next year. So this is going to be a variable target. It's going to be a moving target, but nevertheless, if you cause the average price of goods imported in the United States to rise by 18.3%, that's going to be eaten. And here's why we say that. There's a lot of talk that, well, foreign exporters are just eating the price. You know, they're going to engage in invoice pricing. If that was the case, import prices would be falling significantly. They're not. They're actually rising. So that's just not happening. So that means it's not the exporter, it's going to be the importer, the retail, or the consumer. Those points on the chain where those are going to be eaten. Joe, I can honestly say that given the news flow today, you were the perfect guy to be sitting in that chair. That's very kind of you to say. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much, Joe.

Two unaffiliated candidates run for Charlotte City Council
Two unaffiliated candidates run for Charlotte City Council

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Two unaffiliated candidates run for Charlotte City Council

Two candidates who are running to serve Charlotte on the city council have their work cut out for them just to get on the ballot. Lia White and Robin Emmons want to run for Charlotte City Council as unaffiliated candidates. But the process isn't easy. An unaffiliated voter who wants to run for the city council has to collect signatures of registered voters to qualify for the ballot. White wants to run in District 2 against Malcolm Graham. READ: Councilwoman Tiawana Brown files for reelection Emmons wants to run in District 3 against Tiawana Brown. They each need about 1,400 signatures to get on the ballot. And they told Channel 9's Joe Bruno that the challenge of canvassing and asking for help has been a rewarding experience. 'I work at Camp 7:00 to 6:00, and so I get off from 6:30 to 8:00, or I'll say, by time the sun goes down, I'll knock on doors,' White said. 'I've been doing community events. I've been reaching out to local businesses to see if I can leave petitions there.' And Emmons said she can see the benefits to the process. 'I want to say that the bar is obviously higher, but I think maybe the outcome is better,' she said. 'It has really been so gratifying to talk with people and to earn the respect and the credibility of getting on the ballot rather than putting a sign in the yard and giving a political pitch.' To learn more about the candidates, watch their full interviews with Channel 9's Joe Bruno on The Political Beat on Sunday at 11:30 a.m. and 11:30 p.m. WATCH: Councilwoman Tiawana Brown files for reelection Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store