logo
F1 chiefs make decision on repeating F1 75 O2 Arena season launch show in 2026

F1 chiefs make decision on repeating F1 75 O2 Arena season launch show in 2026

Daily Mirrora day ago

London's O2 Arena hosted F1 75 Live in February as all 10 teams on the Formula 1 grid showed off their new liveries in style with an audience of millions watching on
Formula 1 cars will not return to the O2 Arena stage for another season launch event next year. The current campaign kicked off in February with a star-studded event in London to mark the occasion of the World Championship's 75th anniversary.
And while it drew some criticism, the event was deemed to be a success. The arena was sold out and millions more watched live streams online as all 10 teams pulled the covers off their 2025 liveries and drivers and team principals previewed the season ahead.

The idea was formed as a way for the sport to begin its year-long celebrations as F1 marks 75 years since the first World Championship season, held in 1950. As such, it was never clear whether the event was a one-off or something that could be repeated.

It's understood that the latter option has been under considering, given the commercial success that the event proved to be. However, it appears that the prospects of it becoming an annual curtain-raiser for the F1 season have faded.
Autosport reports that F1 chiefs have decided against holding another launch event ahead of the 2026 campaign. That's despite it also being a milestone year for the sport, with a massive regulations change taking place that will see new car designs and engines used.
But those new car rules mean there will be a lot more testing than usual in pre-season next year. Instead of the three days of testing that has become the norm in modern F1, teams are set to get nine days on track across three separate spells to work out any kinks in their designs.
READ MORE: Lando Norris makes honest Oscar Piastri admission as McLaren outsiders surprised
That means it would be difficult for teams to find the time to take part in a season launch event, particularly as the first set of testing days is likely to take place in Barcelona at the end of January. That would mean a launch would need to take place before then, when teams are unlikely to have all their sponsors in place for the new season.

That would limit the commercial opportunities presented, reducing the value of hosting a pre-season launch. But just because it won't happen in 2026, it does not mean the idea of such an event has been permanently scrapped.
F1 chiefs felt the 75th anniversary of the World Championship was an appropriate time to celebrate the start of a new season in this fashion. And the concept could be revived for future milestones, though this has not yet been confirmed.
And there is no guarantee that, if such an event is held again in the future, that it would take place at the O2 Arena or even in London. There are many other key markets for the sport around the globe including in the USA and Asia which could prove to be more lucrative options, despite the added logistical challenge given most teams are based in the UK.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Controversial FIA statute voted through to make Mohammed Ben Sulayem's re-election bid ‘harder to challenge'
Controversial FIA statute voted through to make Mohammed Ben Sulayem's re-election bid ‘harder to challenge'

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Controversial FIA statute voted through to make Mohammed Ben Sulayem's re-election bid ‘harder to challenge'

The FIA have approved statute changes that critics say will make it harder to challenge FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem's bid for re-election. A spokesman for Formula 1 's governing body, whose world championships also include rallying and Formula E, said a "resounding majority" voted in favour at the General Assembly meeting in Macau. He gave no figures and there was no immediate reaction from Ben Sulayem, an Emirati who will be standing for a second four-year term in December and is currently unopposed. The Paris-based FIA also groups national motoring associations and campaigns for road safety. Austria's Automobile Association (OAMTC) earlier urged FIA members to vote against the proposed changes in a letter seen by Reuters ahead of the Canadian Grand Prix in Montreal. The unsigned letter emailed to the mobility section of the FIA's world council said the FIA risked lasting damage to its reputation. "There is no urgency regarding these proposed changes,' it added. 'They risk further contributing to the erosion of the FIA's reputation for competent and transparent governance. "It cannot be - and is not - a coincidence that changes relevant to the FIA's elections have been promoted by the FIA's leadership at the same time as the FIA's incumbent president has announced an intention to run in those elections. "Where there is even a risk of these changes appearing to benefit the current FIA administration, and not the FIA itself, the changes should not be adopted." Ben Sulayem told Reuters last month, when he confirmed he was standing, that he welcomed competition in the name of democracy. Ben Sulayem recognised he had enemies but said he was confident of the support of a majority of FIA members. "I only have to answer to my members. And they are happy. Actually, they are very happy. They are extremely happy," he said. The former rally driver has been involved in several controversies since being elected in 2021 as the first FIA president from the Middle East. He has been at loggerheads with drivers as well as drawing criticism from FIA insiders, while some senior employees have left the organisation. Briton Robert Reid, a former close ally who quit as an FIA deputy president in April, wrote in his resignation statement of a "fundamental breakdown in governance standards" at the governing body. Reid and Motorsport UK head David Richards had opposed other statute changes approved by the General Assembly last December that they said limited the powers of audit and ethics committees.

Abandoned F1 track lies overgrown and covered in rubbish 13 years after last race as £255m of debt is racked up
Abandoned F1 track lies overgrown and covered in rubbish 13 years after last race as £255m of debt is racked up

Scottish Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Abandoned F1 track lies overgrown and covered in rubbish 13 years after last race as £255m of debt is racked up

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FORMULA ONE will have two Grand Prix events in Spain next year following the announcement of the 2026 calendar. The last time the country did this was between 2008 and 2012. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 8 Fernando Alonso was the last winner of a race at the Valencia Street Circuit Credit: Getty Images - Getty 8 The track hosted five Grand Prix between 2008 and 2012 but ate up huge running costs Credit: Action Images - Reuters 8 It has now laid abandoned for 13 years with rubbish seen across the track 8 Weeds are now seen growing through the kerbs 8 Running costs totalled up to a staggering £255m in debts 8 The once picturesque harbour-view track still holds some scars of its past 8 Old sponsors and paint markings can be seen on the site The first was in Barcelona which remains a host for next year, while the second host - rather than Madrid - was Valencia for the European Grand Prix was the Valencia Street Circuit. Located near the port of Valencia, the F1 track record at the 3.4-mile circuit was set by Timo Glock in 2009 with a time of 1:38.683, though Fernando Alonso was the last race winner at the circuit. However, the track was far from popular with drivers for its mundane layout and eventually a lack of interest and funding saw F1 move away. The deal to bring it to F1 had allegedly been part of an election promise between former F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone and Valmor Sport group, led by former motorcycle racer Jorge "Aspar" Martínez and Villarreal CF's president Fernando Roig. READ MORE IN F1 FAST TRACK Legendary F1 race to be renamed after 113 years with controversial new title But when Valmor went bankrupt through taking care of all the costs involved in running the races, the tracks seven-year deal was cut down to five and dug a financial hole worth £255million in debt. An estimated £87m is said to have been paid to Ecclestone, while there were also considerable costs for the construction of the circuit, television broadcasting and various invoices related to the organisation. All told, the Generalitat Valenciana had to fork out a bill of more than £85m to cover the losses. And the circuit itself has been left in a state of disrepair after being closed in 2013. BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK Some of it was converted back to walkways for the public. But the majority of the track looks like something out of an urban jungle. One of F1's most recognisable voices reveals Leclerc and Hamilton moments that will live with him forever Weeds have overtaken the slip roads on the site, rust has taken root on old safety barriers, and access tunnels have been flooded. Buildings on the site look every hour of their age, with a repurposed 19th-century warehouse showing signs of needing a major paint job. The track itself has not fared much better, with heaps of rubbish seen lying across it while weeds and plants grow out from under the kerbs of the circuit. Pit markings and tyre burns can also be seen over what was not cleared away, while there is even still some evidence of race sponsors from never-removed hoardings to painted pavement which has faded over time. Thieves have also had their way with what was left at the site. Anything valuable that might have been left over from the days of F1 has been gutted out. There was hope for the site in 2022 when an investment group was in talks with the City Council to reclaim the space, turning it into housing and flats for residents.

Controversial FIA statute changes voted through
Controversial FIA statute changes voted through

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

Controversial FIA statute changes voted through

Controversial changes to the statutes of Formula 1's governing body the FIA have been passed by members despite a warning the organisation is in a "dark period of democratic backsliding".Austria's national motoring club, the OAMTC, criticised the statute changes in a letter to the FIA World Council for Automobile Mobility and Tourism (WCAMT) sent on Wednesday before Thursday's vote at the FIA's General Assembly in letter criticised FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem's leadership and urged members not to vote for changes proposed by Ben Sulayem - and revealed by BBC Sport last month - on the basis that they "risk further contributing to the erosion of the FIA's reputation for competent and transparent governance".However, members voted for the amendments by 83.35% to 16.65%.Amendments to the ethics code were voted through even more comprehensively, with an 88.83% result came despite support from the UK, Belgian, Portuguese and Swiss representatives for Austria's suggestion of a postponement so the FIA could conduct a "proper review and analysis" before making a decision on whether the changes were FIA spokesperson described the result as a "resounding majority" however it has not yet responded to a request for comment on the OAMTC OAMTC letter adds that recent actions of Ben Sulayem "are inviting comparisons with the excesses of political leaders intent on deconstructing the checks and balances that come with responsible governance".And it hints at the prospect of a legal challenge, on the basis that the changes were "endorsed by (FIA) world council meetings that were not properly constituted, having intentionally excluded elected members from participating and voting".David Richards, the MotorsportUK representative on the world council, was among those members barred from a meeting in March in a dispute with Ben Sulayem over refusing to sign a revised confidentially agreement. The OAMTC is led by Oliver Schmerold, who last year voiced his opposition to previous statute changes passed at the last General Assembly in December, describing them as "not good governance" and "not good in terms of checks and balances". The letter says of the proposed changes:Extending the deadline for potential candidates to declare "is intended to discourage opposition".Removing the rule requiring 21 of the 28 members of the world motorsport council to be different nationalities "is intended to stack the WMSC with supporters rather than encourage diversity of opinion"Aligning the terms of office of the audit, ethics and nominations committees with that of the president "would blatantly reduce the independence of oversight bodies"Removing the right to approve or dismiss up to four senate members from the senate and giving it to the president "self-evidently weakens the ability of the senate to perform its oversight functions, including and especially oversight of the president Sulayem's first term of office ends this December and he is so far the only candidate to have confirmed he is standing for election. Rally legend Carlos Sainz has said he is considering running but has not made a final letter accuses Ben Sulayem of reneging on his promises during his election campaign in 2021 to ensure "governance structures are compliant with best practices".And it says he has implemented none of the "critical changes" that were recommended by a review and audit of the FIA's governance structure commissioned from McKinsey in highlights a series of changes that have eroded accountability at the FIA, including:Limiting the power of the ethics committee, saying "ethical enquiries can - in effect - be suppressed" because of the concentration of oversight into the hands of the FIA president and president of the eradication of the post of compliance office following the sacking of Paolo Basarri from that position last yearCentralising decision-making power with the FIA president and president of the senateThe imposition of contracts that require FIA personnel to pay a €50,000 fine if they breach confidentiality terms, and the power of the leadership on its own to determine whether this should be paid and why "without having a hearing, time frame, right of appeal or any definition of what confidentiality means".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store