DR Congo, Rwanda agree to draft peace deal by May 2
DRC Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner and her Rwandan counterpart Olivier Nduhungirehe signed the agreement in a tense meeting in Washington, DC, on Friday, in which the two did not shake hands.
The deal, part of diplomatic efforts to end the violence in eastern DRC, came two days after Qatar brokered an unexpected truce between the African nations.
The United States brought the two countries' foreign ministers together and voiced an interest in investment in the DRC's turbulent but mineral-rich east, where fighting between DRC forces and M23 rebels has intensified since January. The M23 has captured key cities in the east in a campaign that has left thousands dead.
The US and the United Nations experts say M23 is backed by Rwanda, which has repeatedly denied the charge, saying it is defending its security against hostile militias operating in DRC, including remnants of the Hutu-led group behind the 1994 genocide.
Friday's joint declaration, signed in front of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, pledged the two sides would halt military support to non-state armed groups, though it avoided naming M23 directly.
Wagner later said the deal amounted to a commitment for Rwandan forces to withdraw, as outlined in a UN Security Council resolution.
'The good news is there is hope for peace. The real news – peace must be earned, and it will require seriousness, transparency and sincerity,' she said.
Nduhungirehe said US President Donald Trump had made a 'real change in the conversation' on DRC, including by drawing a link to efforts to expand US private-sector investment.
Rubio described the agreement as a 'win-win', suggesting it could unlock major US-backed investment in energy and mining – areas where China already has significant influence. A new US envoy to Africa, Massad Boulos, recently visited both nations and urged Kigali to stop backing M23 and pull out troops.
Since 2021, the two sides have agreed to at least six truces that later collapsed. The latest bout of violence since January has killed thousands and raised fears of a wider regional war.
Analyst Martin Ziakwau Lembisa believes the US pressure pushed both governments towards diplomacy.
'If it were up to the M23, they would have advanced further,' he told AFP news agency. 'But how far the Americans will really get involved is the whole question.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
US wants equity stake in Intel for cash grants given under Biden
United States Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said the US government wants an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved during the administration of former President Joe Biden. Separately, also on Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said any US investment in Intel would be aimed at helping the troubled chipmaker stabilise. Asked about reports that the US was considering taking a 10 percent stake in Intel, Bessent told CNBC's 'Squawk Box' programme: 'The stake would be a conversion of the grants and maybe increase the investment into Intel to help stabilise the company for chip production here in the US.' Bessent gave no details about the size or timing of any US stake in Intel, but said any investment would not be aimed at forcing US companies to buy chips from Intel. Bessent's comments were the first official response from the Trump administration after Bloomberg News reported on Monday that the US government is in talks to take a 10 percent Intel stake in exchange for $7.9bn in grants that were approved for the US chip company during the Biden administration. 'Not governance' 'We should get an equity stake for our money,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'We'll get equity in return for that … instead of just giving grants away.' Lutnick said the US does not want control of the company. 'It's not governance, we are just converting what was a grant under Biden into equity for the Trump administration for the American people.' He suggested any stake would be 'non-voting,' meaning it would not enable the US government to tell the company how to run its business. He made his comments a day after SoftBank Group agreed to invest $2bn into the chipmaker, which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders. 'The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free, and Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer,'' Lutnick said. Intel and TSMC, a Taiwan-based chipmaker, did not immediately comment. Intel helped launch Silicon Valley, but has fallen behind rivals like Nvidia Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc and is shedding thousands of workers and slashing costs under its new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan. It recorded an annual loss of $18.8bn in 2024, its first such loss since 1986. Intel plans to end the year with 75,000 'core' workers, excluding subsidiaries, through layoffs and attrition, down from 99,500 core employees at the end of 2024. The company previously announced a 15 percent workforce reduction. Trump recently said Tan, who was made CEO in March, should resign. But after meeting with him last week, Trump relented, saying Tan had an 'amazing story'.
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
M23-DR Congo peace talks in Doha stalled: What next?
The rebel group M23 and the government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have failed to sign a final peace accord scheduled for Monday after the rebels accused the Congolese army of breaking an earlier agreement intended to lead to a full peace deal. Monday's scheduled talks were part of a series of negotiations mediated by Qatar. Both sides were required to be in Doha to sign what was supposed to be a concluding peace pact. However, the M23 announced on Sunday, the eve of the signing, that its representatives were not in Doha as agreed, raising fears among analysts that the talks might be derailed altogether. On Monday, the group appeared to walk back its decision, promising to send representatives in the coming days. The DRC has been mired in conflict with the Rwanda-backed M23 for several years. In December 2023, the armed group merged with another militia, the Congo River Alliance (AFC), and is also referred to as AFC-M23. Fighting escalated significantly in January after the group seized vast swaths of territory in mineral-rich eastern DRC, including the regional capital, Goma. Despite agreeing to secure peace, violence has continued on the ground, with more than 300 people killed in an assault last week. Here's what to know about the M23, who backs them, and the Doha peace agreement: What is the Doha peace agreement? It's an agreement between the M23 and, to a lesser extent, Rwanda, on the one hand, and the DRC on the other. Rwanda is accused of backing the rebels by Kinshasa, a United Nations Expert Group, and the United States. Several peace deals have been mediated by the DRC and Rwanda's neighbours, including Angola and Kenya, but none have managed to hold. In March, Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani in Doha hosted a meeting between Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi and his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame, whereafter both leaders called for a ceasefire. Since then, subsequent talks have been held with the DRC and the M23. Separately, the US, in June, brokered a ceasefire agreement between the two countries' foreign ministers in Washington, but without the M23. In the deal, both countries agreed to work together on a joint security commission, guarantee the safe return of displaced people, and cease support of non-state armed groups. Rwandan troops, believed to have been fighting with the M23 as it escalated fighting this year, were to withdraw. Although the US-brokered deal and the Qatar-led talks are separate, they are tightly linked. Rwanda's Kagame has said they are 'both sides of the same coin'. On July 19, the M23 and the DRC signed a preliminary 'Declaration of Principles' in Doha, promising to end fighting and commit to a comprehensive peace deal. They agreed to exchange captured prisoners and restore state control in rebel-controlled areas, Qatar's minister of state, Mohammed bin Abdulaziz bin Saleh al-Khulaifi, told reporters. There's no report yet of a prisoner exchange, which is a priority of the M23. As per the declaration, negotiations were required to begin on August 8, and a final peace deal signing was set for August 18. Both sides seemed to interpret the declaration separately, however. Although the DRC government said the deal meant the M23 would withdraw, rebel leader Bertrand Bisimwa said in a statement on X that the declaration was 'not a question of withdrawal but of mechanisms for empowering the state, enabling it to assume its prerogatives and obligations'. 'We are in Goma with the population and we are not going to get out,' Lawrence Kanyuka, M23 spokesperson, told The Associated Press news agency. The DRC government, meanwhile, has insisted on the M23's withdrawal. Officials say Kinshasa wants the issue of prisoners to be negotiated as part of the final deal agreement, not as a condition for more talks. Why did the M23 stall the August 18 talks? M23 rebels accuse the Congolese government of continuing to attack rebel positions, and claim that Nzimbira and Kanyola in South Kivu province were attacked with heavy artillery and drones over the weekend. In a Sunday statement on X, Kanyuka said there could be no negotiating without the DRC fully honouring the earlier agreement, including releasing captives. 'The AFC/M23 hereby reaffirms its full commitment to the Doha Peace Process and emphasizes that only the full implementation of the Declaration of Principles will enable the next round of talks to proceed, which should be based on the root causes of the conflict,' his statement read. On Tuesday, Bisimwa, the group's head, appeared to walk back the earlier position and said in a post on X that 'a technical team from our Movement will travel to Doha to review the practical arrangements for the application of the ceasefire and the release of prisoners in accordance with said declaration.' The Reuters news agency, quoting an M23 official, said the group was sending a team due to Qatar's pressure, and did not expect much from the talks. 'Our delegation will simply reinforce the need to implement these measures before we can engage in negotiations,' the source is quoted as saying. There are no public records of the number of M23 captives held by Kinshasa, but their release appears pressing for the group. Since March, when the US brokered the first talks, Rwanda appears to have reduced military involvement in the DRC, according to a report by the US-based Institute for the Study of War. Analyst Nicodemus Minde of the Institute for Security Studies told Al Jazeera that the M23's stalling could be a strategic way of pushing its demands for Kinshasa to release captives. Ultimately, though, Minde added, 'There's a lot of pressure to honour the agreements [in Washington and Doha]', and that likely prompted the group's about turn. What is the M23, and who backs them? The M23 rebels are the most well-known militia among dozens of armed groups fighting for control in the DRC's east, which is abundant in minerals. Its fighters were originally recruited in the Congolese civil wars and were later integrated into the military. However, in 2012, some 300 of them claimed they were being poorly treated in the DRC army and formed the rebel group. They claim to be fighting for the rights of Congolese Tutsis, who are of Rwandan descent and make up a minority in the DRC. Although the M23 was considerably pushed back by a coalition of DRC military and UN forces following its offensives in 2012, the group resurfaced in 2022, seemingly more equipped. In January this year, its fighters launched lightning offensives from their position in the east, seizing several towns and cities before capturing Goma and Bukavu, the capitals of North Kivu and South Kivu provinces, respectively. Some 3,000 people were killed in the battle, and hundreds of thousands were displaced. In 2023, a UN Group of Experts report found that neighbouring Rwanda finances the group. The US also accuses Kigali of the same. Rwanda no longer denies the accusations but accuses the DRC of backing an anti-Kagame militia, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). Some 4,000 Rwandan troops reportedly fought alongside the M23 in the eastern DRC war earlier this year. Both countries have a complex rivalry that goes back to the Rwandan genocide and the Congo Wars that came after. What has the DRC said? The Congolese government did not directly respond to the M23's accusations on Sunday. In a statement on X, spokesperson Patrick Muyaya reaffirmed that Kinshasa was committed 'to the peace process and reiterates its dedication to the strict respect of the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the State in accordance with the constitution'. However, Congolese army spokesperson Sylvain Ekenge said in a statement last week that the M23 launched 'multiple attacks' on army positions in the east of the country. The attacks were 'almost daily', he said, and signified an 'intentional and clear violation' of the peace agreements signed in Doha and Washington, DC. The UN last week also accused the M23 of killing at least 319 civilians, including children, in Rutshuru, in attacks in the eastern North Kivu province. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Turk called it one of the 'largest documented death tolls' since the M23's resurgence in 2022. He condemned the violence, stating: 'All attacks against civilians must stop immediately, and all those responsible must be held to account.' On the topic of releasing M23 captives, an unnamed government source quoted by Reuters said the request was a complicated prerequisite. The DRC would rather it be hashed out in negotiations, rather than be a condition to continue the talks, the source said. How has Qatar reacted? Majed al-Ansari, a spokesperson of the Qatar foreign ministry, while speaking to journalists on Tuesday, said that although timelines had been missed, there was still hope for the peace deal. 'The good thing is that both sides are engaging very positively,' he said. 'We are engaging with them closely, and we are committed to the process, and I think the parties have shown a level of willingness to agree that was not there before.' The spokesperson did not, however, give a new date for the signing of a peace deal. Earlier, on Monday, Qatari officials revealed that they had shared a draft of the final deal with both sides to review.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Lone Star Lockup' joins growing list of huge US migrant detention centres
'Lone Star Lockup' joins growing list of huge US migrant detention centres NewsFeed The 'Lone Star Lockup' is the latest migrant detention centre in the United States as the Trump administration continues its efforts to deport millions of undocumented migrants. Video Duration 03 minutes 05 seconds 03:05 Video Duration 02 minutes 59 seconds 02:59 Video Duration 03 minutes 16 seconds 03:16 Video Duration 02 minutes 05 seconds 02:05 Video Duration 01 minutes 15 seconds 01:15 Video Duration 00 minutes 55 seconds 00:55 Video Duration 01 minutes 02 seconds 01:02
