logo
Ukraine allies meet with hopes of peace talks breakthrough

Ukraine allies meet with hopes of peace talks breakthrough

CNA7 hours ago
PARIS: Ukraine's allies were meeting on Tuesday (Aug 19) to discuss the outcome of fast-moving talks to end the war with Russia, after indications that Volodymyr Zelenskyy could sit down with Vladimir Putin for a peace summit.
Hopes of a breakthrough rose when the Ukrainian president and European leaders met US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday, who said he had also spoken by phone with his Russian counterpart.
The Ukraine war, which has killed tens of thousands of people, has ground to a virtual stalemate despite a few recent Russian advances, defying Trump's push to end it.
A face-to-face meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin would be their first since Russia's brutal invasion nearly three-and-a-half years ago.
French President Emmanuel Macron, who was in Washington for the talks on the key issue of long-term security guarantees for Ukraine, said France and Britain would hold a meeting on Tuesday with around 30 of Kyiv's allies.
The virtual meeting of the so-called "coalition of the willing" would "keep them up to date on what was decided", Macron told French news channel LCI. "Right after that, we'll start concrete work with the Americans."
Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer are co-hosting the meeting, which will "discuss next steps" for Ukraine, a UK government spokesperson told AFP, as Kyiv seeks backing from allies to enforce any peace deal.
Macron suggested Geneva could host peace talks, but said it was "up to Ukraine" to decide whether to make concessions on territory, including parts of the eastern Donbas region still under its control.
"Putin has rarely honoured his commitments," he added, calling the Russian leader a "predator, an ogre at our gates" - comments that underscored wider European wariness.
Putin "has constantly been a force for destabilisation. He has sought to redraw borders to increase his power", Macron said.
OPEN TO TALKS
Trump, who last week held talks with Putin in Alaska, wrote on his Truth Social network after Monday's meetings that "everyone is very happy about the possibility of PEACE for Russia/Ukraine".
"At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelenskyy," he added.
Trump said he would then hold a three-way summit with the Ukrainian and Russian leaders.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who was part of the European delegation, said Putin had agreed to the bilateral meeting within the next two weeks.
Zelenskyy said he was "ready" to meet his bitter foe Putin, while in Moscow, a Kremlin aide said that Putin was open to the "idea" of direct talks with Ukraine.
Zelenskyy then rushed to the White House to meet with Trump after the US president increasingly pushed the Ukrainian leader to make concessions to Russia.
The leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland, the European Commission and NATO then announced that they would also be attending, in a pointed show of support.
Zelenskyy also met one-on-one in the Oval Office with Trump in their first encounter there since their acrimonious blow-up in February.
The Ukrainian president said the meeting was their "best" yet, with little of the tension that erupted when Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated him in front of TV cameras for not being "grateful" for US support.
SECURITY GUARANTEES
Trump, meanwhile, said he had discussed security guarantees for Ukraine, adding that Putin had agreed to them despite ruling out Kyiv's long-held dream of joining the NATO alliance.
The guarantees "would be provided by the various European Countries, with a coordination with the United States of America", he said.
The Financial Times, citing a document seen by the newspaper, said Ukraine had undertaken to buy US$100 billion of US weapons financed by Europe in return for US guarantees for its security.
Zelenskyy later spoke to reporters about a US$90 billion package, and said Ukraine and its allies would formalise the terms of the security guarantees within 10 days.
The presence of the European leaders however also underscored continuing nervousness about whether Trump will pivot towards Putin as he has on a number of occasions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Explainer: Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in US elections?
Explainer: Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in US elections?

Straits Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Explainer: Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in US elections?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up an executive order in the South Court Auditorium on the White House campus in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 5, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the US Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. CAN TRUMP UNILATERALLY BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? Only states and the US Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the US is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. COULD TRUMP'S ALLIES BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? States are responsible for administering their votes under the US Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. WHAT OTHER POWERS DO PRESIDENTS HAVE OVER ELECTIONS? Presidents in the US have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are US citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said US District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama. REUTERS

With ‘stop the killing', EU tries Trump-pleasing lexical shift on Ukraine
With ‘stop the killing', EU tries Trump-pleasing lexical shift on Ukraine

Straits Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

With ‘stop the killing', EU tries Trump-pleasing lexical shift on Ukraine

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (centre, right) during his meeting with US President Donald Trump (centre, left) and European and Nato leaders at the White House in Washington on Aug 18. BRUSSELS - The EU has dropped its calls for a 'ceasefire' in Ukraine and is instead demanding that Russia 'stop the killing', in a semantic shift that aims to grab the ear of US President Donald Trump. Having failed to yield a breakthrough on a pause in fighting when he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week, Mr Trump has pivoted to seeking a full peace deal. Brussels, which as recently as last week insisted that a ceasefire should proceed any peace talks, has since adapted its language. 'The message for us is: stop the killing. Anything that stops the killing is welcome,' European Commission spokeswoman Arianna Podesta said at a press conference on Aug 19. Her remarks echoed the words of EU chief Ursula von der Leyen who, speaking alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Brussels on Aug 17, said the 'effect' was more important than the 'term'. 'And the effect must be stop the killing,' she said. 'That's the most important part. Whether we call it a ceasefire or a peace deal, stop the killing.' European Council president Antonio Costa used a different formulation, telling a press conference in Lisbon on Aug 19 that 'As a first step, Russia must immediately end the violence.' 'Our top priority must be to stop the killings. Whether we call it a ceasefire or a truce is secondary,' he said. European sources said Mr Trump now disliked the term 'ceasefire', and the intention was to avoid antagonising the US president on a matter of form as high-stakes negotiations on Ukraine and European security were under way. Yet at the White House summit on Aug 19, European leaders made clear their basic demands had not changed. 'I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that and let's try to put pressure on Russia,' said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. French President Emmanuel Macron summed it up by saying that 'a truce, a ceasefire or at least, to stop the killings' was 'a necessity'. AFP

More Republican governors send National Guard to Washington, backing Trump
More Republican governors send National Guard to Washington, backing Trump

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

More Republican governors send National Guard to Washington, backing Trump

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Members of the National Guard patrol after U.S. President Donald Trump deployed the force and ordered an increased presence of federal law enforcement to assist in crime prevention, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno Hundreds of additional National Guard troops are headed to Washington, D.C., from half a dozen Republican-led states, bolstering President Donald Trump's aggressive move to flood the city with soldiers and federal agents in what he says is an effort to fight violent crime. The Republican governors of Mississippi, Louisiana, and Tennessee agreed to deploy troops to Washington, days after the Republican governors of West Virginia, South Carolina, and Ohio also did so at the Trump administration's request. Trump has characterized Washington as overrun with violence and homelessness, a description local officials have rejected. Federal and city statistics show violent crime rates have dropped sharply since a spike in 2023, though the city's murder rate remains higher than most other big U.S. cities. Trump announced on August 11 he had ordered 800 Guard troops to the city and temporarily taken control of the city's police department, an extraordinary exercise of presidential power over the U.S. capital. The federal government also dispatched agents from numerous agencies, including the FBI, to patrol the city's streets. Following a legal challenge filed by the city's attorney general, the administration negotiated a deal with Mayor Muriel Bowser to keep Police Chief Pamela Smith in charge of the department's operations. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry said he had approved the deployment of about 135 Guard soldiers to Washington, while Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves said he had ordered 200 soldiers to the capital. Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has also deployed 160 Guard troops to the city, according to local media reports. "Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it," Reeves said in a statement. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore FairPrice apologises after worm found in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Married man who offered cash to 12-year-old girl for sexual acts gets 19 months' jail In total, the six Republican states have announced deployments of more than 1,100 Guard troops to Washington. TESTING LIMITS Guard soldiers, most of whom have civilian jobs and serve part-time, often respond to natural disasters and other emergencies. While the National Guard in Washington reports to the president, governors typically control the Guard in their own states. Trump tested that authority in June, when he ordered thousands of National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles as protests over his administration's immigration raids flared up. The deployment came despite opposition from California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. A federal judge in San Francisco is weighing whether Trump's actions in Los Angeles were illegal, after California sued the administration. Federal law generally forbids the use of the military in law enforcement, but there are exceptions, including for National Guard troops that are under state command, such as California's. In 2020, during Trump's first administration, the White House requested Guard troops from numerous states to help restore order in Washington in the wake of racial justice protests. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr said the National Guard remained under state command and was used to protect federal buildings and personnel. Even so, Barr said their duties would include controlling crowds, temporarily detaining people, and conducting "cursory" searches, activities usually associated with police. Critics said the 2020 experience in Washington potentially opened the way for the president to use armed troops against civilians. Trump has suggested he could target additional Democrat-led cities, though he would likely face more legal obstacles than in Washington, where the federal government still has broad oversight under the law. A White House official said on Tuesday that Guard troops in Washington may carry arms but were not making arrests. Instead, the soldiers are protecting federal property and providing "a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests." Some 465 arrests have been made in the 12 days since the Trump administration's operations began, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Tuesday, an average of 39 arrests a day. The city's Metropolitan Police Department arrested an average of 61 adults and juveniles per day in 2024, according to city statistics. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store