Job application by women in hardware engineering industry rises 26% in 2024: Report
The
hardware engineering industry
in India witnessed a 26 per cent year-on-year rise in
job applications by women
in 2024, indicating a shift in the gender's participation in generally male-dominated domains, a report said on Monday. In 2024 calendar year, applications by men for hardware engineering jobs grew by 19 per cent as compared to 2023, according to a report by a tech-enabled recruitment platform for blue and grey-collar talent, WorkIndia.
#Operation Sindoor
The damage done at Pak bases as India strikes to avenge Pahalgam
Why Pakistan pleaded to end hostilities
Kashmir's Pahalgam sparks Karachi's nightmare
"This growth isn't just statistical, it's symbolic. The 26 per cent growth in female participation in hardware engineering roles isn't just a number, it's a testament to the changing landscape of India's tech industry. As women break into core tech fields once dominated by men, we're seeing a shift that will define the future of engineering. This is a pivotal moment for diversity and innovation," WorkIndia CEO and co-founder Nilesh Dungarwal said, quoting the report.
The report by tech-enabled recruitment platform for blue and grey-collar talent, WorkIndia, is based on an analysis of 33.46 lakh job applications on its platform during 2023 and 2024.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Design Smarter. Build Trust. Grow Loyalty.
Graphic Design
Learn More
Undo
Further, it revealed that the rise in women's engagement is complemented by broader trends such as a spike in part-time applications, expanding tech participation across tier-III cities.
However, the report found that hardware engineering roles are thriving in tier I markets with a 30 per cent job supply increase.
Live Events
While hardware engineering has long been seen as a male preserve, the recent uptick in women's participation, both in job supply and demand, signals a crucial turning point for gender diversity in core engineering roles, the report stated.
According to the platform's latest data, overall
tech job postings
rose by 11 per cent, but hardware engineering saw the most aggressive expansion, witnessing a 26 per cent surge in listings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
What went wrong with Siri: Apple's Craig Federighi and Greg Joswiak explain why the ‘new' Siri ‘just don't work' like an Apple product
Apple's software chief Craig Federighi has offered the most detailed explanation yet for why the company's highly anticipated AI-powered Siri features, first promised at WWDC 2024, have been delayed until 2026. In a series of post-keynote interviews, Federighi admitted that Apple's initial approach "just doesn't work reliably enough to be an Apple product." The delay represents a rare misstep for Apple, which typically avoids demonstrating features it cannot deliver on schedule. Federighi revealed that while Apple had working prototypes of the enhanced Siri capabilities, including personal context awareness and cross-app functionality, the features only performed correctly about two-thirds of the time. "This just doesn't work reliably enough to be an Apple product," Federighi told The Wall Street Journal, providing his most candid assessment of the situation. In the same WSJ interview, he reiterated the technical challenges: "We found that when we were developing this feature that we had, really, two phases, two versions of the ultimate architecture that we were going to create." Speaking to TechRadar and Tom's Guide in a joint podcast interview, Federighi expanded on the architectural problems: "We realized that V1 architecture, we could push and push and put in more time, but if we tried to push that out in the state it was going to be in, it would not meet our customer expectations or Apple standards." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo Apple's quality standards override deadlines The admission marks an unusual moment of transparency from Apple, which has faced mounting pressure to compete with AI-powered assistants from Google and OpenAI . Federighi stressed that the company prioritized product quality over meeting artificial deadlines, even as competitors advance their AI capabilities. "Look, we don't want to disappoint customers," said Greg Joswiak , Apple's marketing chief, in the Wall Street Journal interview. "We never do. But it would've been more disappointing to ship something that didn't hit our quality standard, that had an error rate that we felt was unacceptable. So we made what we thought was the best decision. I'd make it again." Federighi echoed this sentiment in his conversation with YouTuber iJustine , explaining: "What we said a while ago was that we were really working hard to get those [features] to come together. [We] had them working internally, but not working well enough." He emphasized the critical importance of reliability: "You know, when you have an experience like asking Siri to do something, either it becomes something you can depend on reliably, or it's something in the end you're not going to use." The delayed features were meant to transform Siri into a more capable assistant that could understand personal context, operate across multiple apps, and perform complex tasks based on on-screen content. Apple demonstrated these capabilities at WWDC 2024, showing Siri finding podcasts mentioned in messages and taking actions within apps using what Apple calls "app intents." However, Federighi revealed that Apple was simultaneously developing two different underlying architectures. While the company successfully demonstrated the "V1 architecture" at last year's conference, it became clear during development that this approach had fundamental limitations that prevented it from meeting Apple's reliability standards. "We were very focused on creating a broad platform for really integrated personal experiences into the OS," Federighi saud in the podcast, explaining Apple's original vision. But as development progressed, he noted: "We set about for months, making it work better and better across more app intents, better and better for doing search, but fundamentally, we found that the limitations of the V1 architecture weren't getting us to the quality level that we knew our customers needed and expected." In the Wall Street Journal interview, Federighi addressed why Apple, with all its resources, couldn't make the original approach work: "When it comes to automating capabilities on devices in a reliable way, no one's doing it really well right now. We wanted to be the first. We wanted to do it best." Two architectures, one solution "We set about for months, making it work better and better across more app intents, better and better for doing search," Federighi said. "But fundamentally, we found that the limitations of the V1 architecture weren't getting us to the quality level that we knew our customers needed and expected." The switch to what Federighi calls the "V2 architecture" effectively reset the development timeline. This deeper, more comprehensive approach extends across the entire Siri experience, building upon the work already completed rather than starting from scratch. "The V2 architecture is not, it wasn't a start-over," Federighi clarified in his TechRadar-Tom's Guide interview. "The V1 architecture was sort of half of the V2 architecture, and now we extend it across, sort of make it a pure architecture that extends across the entire Siri experience." During the company's spring assessment, Apple made the difficult decision to abandon the V1 approach. "As soon as we realized that, and that was during the spring, we let the world know that we weren't going to be able to put that out, and we were going to keep working on really shifting to the new architecture," Federighi told the podcast. Apple's different AI strategy Apple's approach differs significantly from competitors like OpenAI and Google, who have released chatbot-style AI assistants that users access through dedicated apps. Instead, Apple aims to integrate intelligence throughout its ecosystem, meeting users "where they are" rather than requiring them to navigate to a separate AI interface. "When we started with Apple Intelligence, we were very clear: this wasn't about just building a chatbot," Federighi emphasized in the podcast. The company's strategy remains focused on embedding AI capabilities directly into existing apps and workflows, rather than creating a standalone conversational assistant. Joswiak reinforced this philosophy in the same podcast discussion: "The features that you're seeing in Apple Intelligence isn't a destination for us. There's no app on intelligence. [It's about] making all the things you do every day better." Federighi acknowledged the appeal of conversational AI but maintained Apple's different focus: "I know a lot of people find it to be a really powerful way to gather their thoughts, brainstorm [...] So, sure, these are great things. Are they the most important thing for Apple to develop? Well, time will tell where we go there, but that's not the main thing we set out to do at this time." While Apple won't commit to a specific timeline for the enhanced Siri features, Federighi made clear the company won't repeat its premature announcement mistake. "We will announce the date when we're ready to seed it, and you're all ready to be able to experience it," he told the TechRadar-Tom's Guide podcast. Speaking with YouTuber iJustine, Federighi promised comprehensive delivery: "We really look forward to releasing everything we talked about in the past, and more. We don't really want to commit to that until we have it in hand." This suggests Apple may have additional Siri capabilities in development beyond what was originally demonstrated at WWDC 2024. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
ITR filing FY 2024-25: Several changes in Form 16! Top things salaried taxpayers shouldn't miss
ITR Filing: Under the new tax regime, standard deduction from salary has increased to Rs 75,000 from Rs 50,000. (AI image) ITR filing FY 2024-25: By June 15, 2025, employers must issue Form 16 to their salaried taxpayers for the fiscal year 2024-25. This year's Form 16 will have several modifications based on the amendments announced in the July 2024 Budget. Hence, it is important for taxpayers to take note of the changes in order to ensure error-free income tax e-filing. The last date to file Income Tax Return (ITR) for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26) has been extended this year from July 31 to September 15, 2025. Form 16 for ITR Filing : Top Changes Explained 1. Changes in Standard Deduction: This change is applicable only for individuals filing their income tax return under the new income tax regime. Under the new tax regime, standard deduction from salary has increased to Rs 75,000 from Rs 50,000, effective FY 2024-25. For employees who have selected the new tax regime in FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26), Form 16 will reflect an enhanced Standard Deduction of Rs 75,000 when employers calculate TDS on salary. This aligns with the current income tax provisions for FY2024-25 under the new tax regime. It's important to note that should an individual decide to switch from new to old tax regime whilst filing ITR for FY 2024-25 (AY 2025-26), the standard deduction allowance from salary income will be limited to Rs 50,000. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Jeśli chcesz zabić czas przy komputerze, ta gra przygodowa jest koniecznością. Gra Przygodowa Dowiedz się więcej Undo Also Read | ITR Filing FY 2024-25: Have you got an Income Tax notice? Don't ignore it! Top types of tax notices & actions required 2. Taxes deducted from other incomes: Form 16 will display tax deductions from additional income sources and Tax Collected at Source (TCS) on particular expenditures. This inclusion applies when employees have submitted Form 12BBA to their employer, according to an ET report. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman's Budget 2024 had seen revised income tax regulations, enabling salaried individuals to notify employers about TDS from other income sources and TCS from specific expenses. These amounts can be deducted from the total tax payable from the employee's salary, resulting in reduced overall TDS from wages. Suresh Surana, a practising chartered accountant, told ET, "This year, Form 16 will show not only tax deducted by the employer on the salary income, but will also show tax deducted and tax collected on other sources of income such as interest on fixed deposits or tax paid as TCS on foreign travel expenditure, etc. However, this will happen only if a salaried employee has shared the details of other taxes deducted (TDS/TCS) via Form 12BAA. " Also Read | ITR e-filing FY 2024-25: ITR-1 and ITR 4 forms enabled online for return filing on income tax e-filing portal; check details 3. NPS Benefits: Under Section 80CCD (2) in the new tax regime, employees are permitted to claim a deduction of up to 14% of their basic salary. This applies to the employer's contribution towards the employee's National Pension System (NPS) account. The enhanced deduction will be reflected in Form 16 only for those who have opted for the new tax regime for TDS from salary. However, if an employee switches from the new to old tax regime whilst filing ITR, the deduction benefits will decrease. In the old tax regime, employees can only claim a deduction of 10% of their basic salary under Section 80CCD (2) for their employer's NPS contribution. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why for-profit colleges are poised to flourish under Trump's education policies
How new federal rules could boost for-profit colleges despite quality concerns. (AI Image) President Donald Trump's recent proposal to redirect federal funding from elite universities like Harvard to trade schools signals a significant shift in the US higher education landscape. While Trump lacks the direct authority to reroute the $3 billion in research grants appropriated by Congress, his push aligns with a broader Republican agenda aimed at boosting for-profit colleges and career training programs. These institutions, which have faced controversy and regulatory scrutiny in the past, now appear set for a resurgence under Trump's policies and a supportive Republican Congress. Trump's administration is advancing legislation and regulatory changes that benefit for-profit colleges, particularly through new workforce Pell grants and relaxed accreditation standards. These shifts could open federal aid to a wider range of short-term training programs, many operated by for-profit entities, despite ongoing concerns about educational quality and student outcomes. Federal policies open doors for for-profit education The House-passed tax and budget bill, formally known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, introduces new workforce Pell grants available to students enrolled in eight to fifteen-week workforce training programs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2 BHKs starts at ₹ 72.6 Lakh | No Floor rise | Zero PLC Mahindra Happinest Tathawade Get Quote Undo While programs must be state-approved, they do not need to be accredited, a major departure from previous requirements. As reported by the Forbes, this change lowers the regulatory barrier for many for-profit institutions to access federal funds. Michelle Dimino, director of the education program at Third Way, told Forbes that the bill's quality assurance measures are weak. Eligible programs must meet a 70% completion rate and a 70% job placement rate, thresholds she describes as easily manipulated by predatory schools. "Sometimes colleges might look for students who are already employed right as a target audience because they know that they'll do good on a job placement measure," she said. Furthermore, Trump plans to overhaul the accreditation process, making it easier for for-profit schools to qualify for federal aid. Nicholas Kent, Trump's nominee for undersecretary of education and a former lobbyist for Career Education Colleges and Universities (CECU), reflects the administration's sympathetic stance toward the industry. His nomination, as reported by the Forbes, awaits a Senate floor vote after passing the committee on a party-line vote. Investors rally behind for-profit colleges The financial markets have responded positively to the Trump administration's pro-for-profit stance. According to Jeffrey Silber, a senior analyst at BMO Capital Markets Equity Research, stocks in the sector surged after Trump's election. Adtalem Global Education's shares rose 61%, while Perdoceo Education Corporation saw a 46% increase, with notable jumps occurring immediately after the election, as quoted by the Forbes. CECU praised Trump's focus on career education and his suggestion to divert Harvard's funding to trade schools. "The best way to support trade schools is to reduce the regulatory burden facing private career schools while increasing funding that allows students interested in the trades to choose the highest quality school," the association stated, according to the Forbes. Concerns over quality and student outcomes Despite these policy shifts, experts warn about the risks of expanding federal aid to for-profit colleges without sufficient oversight. Michael Itzkowitz, founder of The HEA Group, highlighted troubling data showing 59% of certificate-granting institutions leave graduates earning less than $32,000 annually—roughly the income of a typical high school graduate—even ten years after enrollment, as reported by the Forbes. The rollback of key regulations, including the gainful employment rule and the 90/10 rule, both designed to protect students from poor-performing programs, further exacerbates these concerns. The House bill would also limit borrower defense protections that allow students defrauded by schools to cancel loans, a safeguard introduced during the Obama administration after the collapse of Corinthian Colleges. Dimino warned Forbes that expanding access without proper safeguards could invite abuses seen in the past. "Every time for-profit colleges have been given access to more federal aid, abuses have followed," she said. As the US faces economic uncertainty, Silber noted that for-profit colleges may be seen as a "defensive" investment, potentially attracting more students seeking quick retraining, even as the broader economy fluctuates. In summary, the combination of relaxed regulations, new funding streams, and a politically favorable environment positions for-profit colleges to expand rapidly under President Trump's education policies. However, this growth comes amid persistent concerns about educational quality and financial risks for students. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
