Lebanon complains of ‘one-sided ceasefire' after Israeli air strikes on Beirut
Israel
's wave of air strikes on greater Beirut and southern
Lebanon
on Thursday night has renewed complaints in Lebanon about a 'one-sided ceasefire'. The strikes occurred more than six months after the truce between Israel and Lebanese militant group Hizbullah came into force.
Many Lebanese families had gathered to celebrate Eid al-Adha, one of the most important holidays on the Islamic calendar, when Israeli warnings about expected air strikes were announced through social media, prompting panic and displacement.
At least 10 strikes hit Beirut's southern suburbs, known as Dahiyeh, according to the Reuters news agency, while others hit the southern village of Ain Qana.
In the aftermath, Lebanese president Joseph Aoun condemned 'the Israeli aggression', calling the strikes a 'flagrant violation of an international accord' and noting they were occurring 'on the eve of a sacred religious festival'.
READ MORE
When questioned about the timing of the strikes and whether Israel is deliberately violating the ceasefire, a spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said they had struck 'underground UAV [drone] production and storage facilities ... as well as a drone manufacturing workshop'.
'Despite the understandings between Israel and Lebanon, Hizbullah's aerial unit continues to engage in terrorism and expand its capabilities. The unit is working to produce thousands of UAVs under the direction and funding of Iranian terrorists, as part of Iran's efforts to harm the State of Israel.'
The spokesperson said the alleged activity 'constitutes a blatant violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon. The IDF is prepared in defence and offence and will continue to operate to remove any threat posed to the State of Israel and its civilians, and will prevent any attempt by Hizbullah to re-establish itself.'
Israeli defence minister Israel Katz, in a post on X, said that there was 'perfect execution' of the strikes. 'We see the Lebanese government as directly responsible for preventing violations of the ceasefire and all terrorist activity against the State of Israel,' he said.
Under the ceasefire agreement, which came into force in the early hours of November 27th, 2024, Hizbullah fighters were required to move north of the Litani river, while Israel was required to withdraw completely from Lebanon, though its forces remain in five 'strategic' positions.
Between November 27th and May 6th, a spokeswoman for the UN peacekeeping force Unifil said it had documented more than 2,700 air violations and almost 70 air attacks by Israel in Lebanon, while there were 19 violations from the Lebanese side, not counting 'legacy violations' of weapons and ammunition left behind.
Those figures do not include Israeli strikes in Beirut's southern suburbs, which is outside Unifil's area of operations in southern Lebanon, the spokeswoman said.
On May 29th, Irish peacekeepers in southern Lebanon came
under fire
from Israeli forces while on a joint patrol with the Lebanese Armed Forces.
'This is the latest in a range of what I view as intimidatory behaviour by the IDF towards peacekeepers or, as we saw recently, Irish diplomats too. So this is not acceptable,' said Tánaiste Simon Harris at the time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Book review: Unravelling every wrongdoing
'The prevailing narrative is one thing. The truth is quite different.' When the evidence of nefarious wrongdoing is so ubiquitous and overwhelming — as it is in Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza — perhaps the greatest achievement for any writer is simply to be discerning. Journalist, media entrepreneur, and migration activist Fintan Drury has handled the almost impossible task of framing the unframeable in his latest book, Catastrophe: Nakba II. In the book, he eschews hyperbole and emotional outrage and speaks directly to the symptoms of Zionism and its catastrophic effects on the Palestinian people — from the original Nakba in 1948 until today. Written and impeccably researched in real time, the book provides a compelling and concise account of the contemporary history of the Middle East, the birth of an ethno-terror state, and Western complicity in its manifestation from violent philosophy to brutal protagonist. An Israeli citizen, who relocated his family from Tel Aviv to Paris, said: 'Israel is a very different now to a decade or two ago; the IDF is different to when I did my three years mandatory service 20 years ago. Truth is a casualty.' File picture: AP 'Israel is a coloniser; aided by the West,' he writes. 'It has been allowed not just to establish itself as a sovereign state with internationally accepted boundaries, but one that has methodically extended its territory in contravention of multiple UN resolutions and international law.' Such straightforward opinions might otherwise seem subjective had Drury not backed them up with unimpeachable detail. Unable to travel to Gaza, he might well have stayed at home and still produced a book of considerable merit given the evidence remotely available. Instead, he travelled to Lebanon, Jordan, the occupied West Bank, and Paris to include incredibly worthwhile testimony that — among other things — provides nuance to the oft-misunderstood complex relationship between Lebanon and Palestine. Buried within another testimony from an Israeli citizen, who relocated his family from Tel Aviv to Paris, was a nugget of truth too jarring to ignore: 'Israel is a very different now to a decade or two ago; the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] is different to when I did my three years mandatory service 20 years ago. Truth is a casualty.' Perhaps, but the 'truth' Drury lays bare repeatedly confirms that the IDF — and the state it purports to defend — was no different 20 years ago than it is today. The only difference — as Drury explains — is that the restrictions and boundaries the international community once imposed upon it no longer exist. The Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, gave them the excuse to test that theory, and the results are now visible on the faces of emaciated Palestinian children. What is perhaps most revealing is the carefully teased out confessionals from inside Israel, by Israelis. Not because they elicit sympathy, but because their indifference is so flagrant. There is also insight into an inherently racist educational system that has contributed so much to the maturation of an apartheid state, especially as it seeks to punish any voice from within who questions government policy. Parallels between the Troubles and the Palestinian cause have often proven lazy and reductive. Not so here. Few are better placed than Drury to carefully examine the strategy and consequences of internment. One Israeli non-governmental organisation quoted references the weaponisation of a scabies outbreak among Palestinian prisoners to impose even more hardship on detainees. It's a horrific image, and one that is depressingly consistent with the tone and tenor of this book. With excellent pacing and an admirable ability to make the complex comprehensible, Drury prosecutes the roles of the Israeli Knesset, international media, and UNRWA, as well as the ambivalence of modern society as they pertain to Palestine. Crucially, he neatly presents irrefutable facts regarding what Gaza and the occupied territories looked like on October 6 — the day before — as a method of framing every horror since. Some will absurdly argue this book is antisemitic. Others may say Drury does not go far enough, that the reality unfolding on the ground in Gaza and elsewhere renders the objectivity he covets obsolete. To his immense credit, he lets the facts scream from the page. This is an essential book. One that should be read and understood today, before the horror becomes history, and that history is repeated. Read More Israel has used detention and starvation to bring Palestine to heel
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Lebanon complains of ‘one-sided ceasefire' after Israeli air strikes on Beirut
Israel 's wave of air strikes on greater Beirut and southern Lebanon on Thursday night has renewed complaints in Lebanon about a 'one-sided ceasefire'. The strikes occurred more than six months after the truce between Israel and Lebanese militant group Hizbullah came into force. Many Lebanese families had gathered to celebrate Eid al-Adha, one of the most important holidays on the Islamic calendar, when Israeli warnings about expected air strikes were announced through social media, prompting panic and displacement. At least 10 strikes hit Beirut's southern suburbs, known as Dahiyeh, according to the Reuters news agency, while others hit the southern village of Ain Qana. In the aftermath, Lebanese president Joseph Aoun condemned 'the Israeli aggression', calling the strikes a 'flagrant violation of an international accord' and noting they were occurring 'on the eve of a sacred religious festival'. READ MORE When questioned about the timing of the strikes and whether Israel is deliberately violating the ceasefire, a spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said they had struck 'underground UAV [drone] production and storage facilities ... as well as a drone manufacturing workshop'. 'Despite the understandings between Israel and Lebanon, Hizbullah's aerial unit continues to engage in terrorism and expand its capabilities. The unit is working to produce thousands of UAVs under the direction and funding of Iranian terrorists, as part of Iran's efforts to harm the State of Israel.' The spokesperson said the alleged activity 'constitutes a blatant violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon. The IDF is prepared in defence and offence and will continue to operate to remove any threat posed to the State of Israel and its civilians, and will prevent any attempt by Hizbullah to re-establish itself.' Israeli defence minister Israel Katz, in a post on X, said that there was 'perfect execution' of the strikes. 'We see the Lebanese government as directly responsible for preventing violations of the ceasefire and all terrorist activity against the State of Israel,' he said. Under the ceasefire agreement, which came into force in the early hours of November 27th, 2024, Hizbullah fighters were required to move north of the Litani river, while Israel was required to withdraw completely from Lebanon, though its forces remain in five 'strategic' positions. Between November 27th and May 6th, a spokeswoman for the UN peacekeeping force Unifil said it had documented more than 2,700 air violations and almost 70 air attacks by Israel in Lebanon, while there were 19 violations from the Lebanese side, not counting 'legacy violations' of weapons and ammunition left behind. Those figures do not include Israeli strikes in Beirut's southern suburbs, which is outside Unifil's area of operations in southern Lebanon, the spokeswoman said. On May 29th, Irish peacekeepers in southern Lebanon came under fire from Israeli forces while on a joint patrol with the Lebanese Armed Forces. 'This is the latest in a range of what I view as intimidatory behaviour by the IDF towards peacekeepers or, as we saw recently, Irish diplomats too. So this is not acceptable,' said Tánaiste Simon Harris at the time.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Israel confirms it is arming ‘clans' in Gaza to combat Hamas
Israeli security officials have confirmed that 'clans' in southern Gaza are being armed as a counterweight to Hamas . Former defence minister Avigdor Lieberman, head of the opposition Yisrael Beiteinu party, criticised the development this week in an interview with Kan public radio. 'Israel gave assault rifles and small arms to crime families in Gaza on [prime minister Binyamin] Netanyahu 's orders. I doubt it went through the security cabinet. No one can guarantee these weapons won't eventually be turned against Israel,' he warned, implying that some of the criminal gangs also had links to Islamic State. Israeli officials initially refused to comment on the reports but Mr Netanyahu this week confirmed Mr Lieberman's claim, saying Israel is working to defeat Hamas through various means, as recommended by security chiefs. READ MORE 'On the advice of security officials, we are operating clans in Gaza that oppose Hamas. What is wrong with that? This is only good and it has saved the lives of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers,' he said. 'Revealing this was only good for Hamas – but Lieberman doesn't care.' Israel has accused Hamas of seizing large quantities of the humanitarian aid that enters Gaza, thus maintaining its control over the population and also providing funds to pay its fighters and recruit new gunmen. Hamas has denied the allegations. At the same time the Israeli leadership has resisted any role for the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority in controlling Gaza and, to undermine Hamas, has turned to local extended-family clans, reportedly connected to crime and drugs. It is believed that hundreds of pistols and Kalashnikov assault rifles, seized from militant groups during the 20-month conflict, were transferred from Israel to Palestinian clans in Gaza. The main clan being supported by Israel operates in the Rafah area of southern Gaza under the leadership of a local Bedouin called Yasser Abu Shabab and has erected camps for displaced war refugees in areas under its control. A number of fatal armed clashes have already occurred between Hamas and the Abu Shabab clan. Mr Abu Shabab has claimed his men operate 'under Palestinian legitimacy' and are trying to protect aid lorries and prevent looting in Rafah to enable displaced residents to return to their homes. He has denied receiving weapons from Israel and allegations that his men have seized aid supplies. Hamas has called on Palestinians to oppose the Israeli-supported militia, accusing Israel of creating chaos in Gaza. [ Gaza Strip: Aid group says all its distribution sites closed after dozens of Palestinians shot dead Opens in new window ] Israeli security officials described the move as a calculated risk, admitting there is no guarantee that the local clans will not open fire at IDF soldiers in the future. 'There is no plan or intent for them to run Rafah on the day after [the war] because they have no such ability and probably also don't want to,' security officials said. 'It's true that their main motivation is financial, but they are still part of the Arab nation, both as Bedouins and also as residents of the Gaza Strip. The decision was not unanimous, particularly because of the risk that the weapons will be used against IDF soldiers in the southern Gaza Strip.' The liberal daily newspaper Ha'aretz, in an apparent reference to past events in Lebanon, warned in an editorial on Friday that Israel does not have a good history when it comes to arming local militias in areas under its control. [ It's in Europe's interest to put sanctions on Israel Opens in new window ] 'Experience teaches that the use of gunmen who don't represent the local public as proxies for the IDF is asking for trouble. These militiamen will be seen as collaborators and will therefore have to use force to repress the population. They may even turn their weapons against the IDF.'
