Lawyer says he's not been allowed to see 5 immigrants deported by the US to a prison in Eswatini
The Eswatini lawyer also said the men from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Yemen and Vietnam sent to southern Africa under President Donald Trump's third-country deportation program have been denied access to legal representation while being held in Eswatini's main maximum-security prison.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
26 minutes ago
- Global News
Rwanda reaches deal with U.S. to take upto 250 migrants, Reuters reports
The United States and Rwanda have agreed for the African country to potentially accept hundreds of migrants deported from the U.S., the spokesperson for the Rwandan government and an official told Reuters, as President Donald Trump's administration takes a hardline approach toward immigration. The agreement, under which Rwanda would accept up to 250 migrants, was signed by U.S. and Rwandan officials in Kigali in June, said the Rwandan official, speaking on condition of anonymity, adding that Washington had already sent an initial list of 10 people to be vetted. 'Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation,' said the spokesperson for the Rwandan government, Yolande Makolo. 'Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade.' Story continues below advertisement The White House and State Department had no immediate comment. The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the State Department. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland. 2:36 Venezuela releases 10 jailed Americans in prisoner swap with El Salvador Rwanda has in recent years positioned itself as a destination country for migrants that Western countries would like to remove, despite concerns by rights groups that Kigali does not respect some of the most fundamental human rights. In May, the foreign minister said Rwanda was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the United States. The Trump administration argues that third-country deportations help swiftly remove some migrants, including those with criminal convictions. Immigration hardliners see third-country removals as a way to deal with offenders who cannot easily be deported and could pose a threat to the public. Story continues below advertisement Opponents have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language. The Trump administration has pressed countries to take migrants. It deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were jailed until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court. Rwanda signed an agreement with Britain in 2022 to take in thousands of asylum seekers, a deal that was scrapped last year by then newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer. No one was sent to Rwanda under the plan because of years of legal challenges.
Winnipeg Free Press
26 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
FACT FOCUS: Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible
Days after he sent letters instructing top pharmaceutical manufacturers to use a 'most favored nation' pricing model for prescription drugs, President Donald Trump told reporters on Sunday that he had cut costs by up to 1,500%. But Trump's grandiose claim is mathematically impossible. Here's a closer look at the facts. TRUMP: 'You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%, I mean 14 — 1,500%.' THE FACTS: This is false. Cutting drug prices by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications. The Trump administration has taken steps to lower prescription drug prices, but experts say there's no indication costs have seen such a massive drop. Geoffrey Joyce, director of health policy at the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center, called Trump's claim 'total fiction' made up by the Republican president. He agreed that it would amount to drug companies paying customers, rather than the other way around. 'I find it really difficult to translate those numbers into some actual estimates that patients would see at the pharmacy counter,' said Mariana Socal, an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University who studies the U.S. pharmaceutical market. She added that Trump's math is 'really hard to follow.' Asked what Trump was using to back up his claim, White House spokesman Kush Desai said: 'It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people.' The White House provided a chart of price differentials for drugs in the U.S. and comparable countries, but did not offer any other evidence. On Sunday, Trump also described cuts to drug prices as a future development, not that already happened. 'So we'll be dropping drug prices,' he said. 'It will start over the next two to three months by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400%.' Prices for most prescription drugs — unbranded generics are the exception — are higher in the U.S. than they are in other high-income countries. This is in large part due to the way drug prices are negotiated in the United States. Trump made his recent appeal in letters to 17 pharmaceutical manufacturers, the White House announced last week. He asked them to reduce costs in the U.S. by matching the lowest prices of prescriptions drugs in other comparably developed countries. Some drugmakers have since indicated that they are open to cutting costs. This move follows an executive order Trump signed in May setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively lower prices in the U.S. or face new limits in the future over what the government will pay. The federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid. It's unclear what — if any — impact the Trump administration's efforts will have on millions of Americans who have private health insurance. Socal pointed out that if drug manufacturers had cut costs to the extent Trump claims, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially given the heat they've taken over the years for their pricing practices. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. 'My expectation would be that they would make announcements — public announcements — and that those announcements would come way in advance of the actual effective dates when those price cuts would come into effect,' she said. Joyce agreed that there has been no indication of a substantial cut. 'Not at all, not at all, none whatsoever,' he said. 'And let alone 1,500.' ___ Find AP Fact Checks here:
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
How will Canadian consumers be affected by Trump's de minimis changes?
U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order suspending the de minimis exemption for imports could have blowback for Canadian consumers as some smaller sellers pull back from the country, larger players focus on this market and deliveries temporarily slow for everyone. The order signed on Wednesday means imports valued at or under US$800 soon will no longer be exempt from tariffs and instead be subject to the blanket fees the U.S. has imposed on trading partners. 'The de minimis rule was a golden ticket for smaller Canadian exporters,' said Markus Giesler, a marketing professor at the Schulich School of Business. 'Right now, without this, they may be forced to pay high prices, reroute logistics or walk away from the world's biggest market.' For many small Canadian businesses selling lower-value goods, such as arts and craft businesses and Etsy sellers, the suspension makes the U.S. market unviable, said David Nagy, founder of consulting firm eCommerce Canada. The paperwork and brokerage fees may not make sense for lower-value transactions, he said, adding that a $55 order could now require an additional 45 minutes spent on documentation, with no added financial benefit. Trump to suspend duty-free exemption for low-value shipments Chris Jarvis, chief operating officer at Ecom Logistics, said Canadian small e-commerce businesses he works with rely heavily on U.S. sales, and their need to maintain U.S. customers may lead them to leave the Canadian market entirely. 'Any small Canadian merchant who got traction in the Canadian market … ends up seeing 90 per cent of their sales happening in America,' he said. To maintain that customer base, some businesses will need to move inventory into the U.S. and effectively run a U.S.-based business. Options are even more limited for businesses importing some of their goods or materials from China or other tariffed countries, leaving them exposed to additional tariffs with less of a chance at becoming compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada free-trade agreement. Many up-and-coming American and Canadian creators selling niche products via Instagram, TikTok or Etsy, for example, may elect not to come to Canada or stay here. They're thinking, 'Why would I want to open up another inventory position in the country of Canada, when 90 per cent of my volume is going to come from the US anyway,' said Mr. Jarvis. How U.S. duties targeted at China are disrupting Canadian businesses If they pull away, this will limit product availability in Canada and consumers will have fewer opportunities to access unique or small-batch goods they once could easily order. On the other hand, U.S. restrictions may push larger companies such as Temu and Shein to 'aggressively look at other markets,' including Canada, said Jonathan Calof, a professor of international business and strategy at the University of Ottawa's Telfer School of Management. Data provided to The Globe and Mail by marketing-intelligence firm Sensor Tower shows Temu's Canadian ad spend jumped 61 per cent year-over-year in the second quarter of 2025 following Mr. Trump's tariff threats, while Shein's rose 34 per cent. Whether doubling down on markets outside of the U.S. would mean lower prices for Canadian consumers depends on how companies react. 'They're going to try to gain market share, and they're going to try to stay competitive … some will lower prices, some will try better quality, some will diversify,' said Prof. Calof. But when it comes to small e-commerce businesses, they don't have much runway to sustain long-term price cuts, he said. The bigger risk is that their business may disappear altogether. In addition to reduced selection, the de minimis suspension on U.S. imports could mean that Canadians ordering from the U.S. will face slightly longer waiting times because of increased border scrutiny more broadly, said Matthew Melvin, a spokesperson for Canadian shipping company Chit Chats. Shoppers trying to return something that they bought from the U.S. could also be hit with added hurdles, he said. While the effect to Canadians' wallets from the de minimis change may not be immediate, the economic ripple effects will ultimately be significant, said Steve Bozicevic, CEO of A&A Customs Brokers. 'If Americans start buying less, then you'll just have less jobs, and you'll have more inflation,' he said. 'It's more the macroeconomic impact.'
