Fired-up crowd jeers Ohio senators, representative for not standing up to Trump and Musk
The event, staged by Indivisible Central Ohio, was facetiously called a town hall.
Chairs were placed on the stage for U.S. Sens. Bernie Moreno and Jon Husted, both Republicans. They sat empty, and organizers said the senators' offices didn't even bother to say they wouldn't be coming.
Instead, organizers asked the questions they would have put to the senators to the AI program Chat GPT. The program said that the massive layoffs and cuts to federal programs would cost Ohio jobs, harm university research and stunt the biomedical sector.
Mia Lewis, an organizer, urged the crowd to turn out regularly to protest what's happening.
'This is an unprecedented moment in our country. This shit is not normal,' she said of an administration that regularly attacks the judiciary, and allows an unelected, unconfirmed Elon Musk hack wildly at the federal government. 'Just two people standing on a highway is not the same thing as 50 people being there every day.'
Members of the audience held signs that said things like 'Nobody elected Putin,' 'Nobody elected Musk,' and other things that aren't publishable by a general-audiences news organization.
Moreno and Husted weren't the only ones to be mocked for their absence. Joyce Beatty, a Democrat and longtime congresswoman from Columbus, begged off, citing a 'prior commitment.' An unfortunate constituent was regularly heckled as she tried to read in first person a letter Beatty had sent.
When the constituent read a passage implying Beatty was present, a man yelled out, 'You're not here!' The crowd laughed.
Arnold Scott summed up the general tenor.
'As an ex-federal employee and a union member, I'm mad as hell,' he said. 'How about these billionaires pay their taxes? When they cut employees at the various agencies, actually what they're doing is cutting the services that the taxpayers are paying for. When they cut the VA, they're cutting veterans. You stand there and say you support the veterans, but then you cut the veterans. When you cut them, that translates into it taking longer for them to receive the services that they're entitled to.'
Scott said an Ohio federal worker lost her job and complained to one of the Ohio senators. 'What do you want me to do?' Scott claimed the senator responded.
Then Scott turned to the two empty chairs and said, 'Mr. Senator, what we want you to do… we want you to do your job.'
That brought the crowd to its feet to chant 'Do your job!'
Musk's 'Department of Government Efficiency' is cutting resources the VA, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Social Security Administration, the Park Service and much more.
Catherine Duffy told the crowd that buried in that list is a cut that is deeply damaging to Ohio's poor and its farmers. Musk's supposed agency axed $1 billion nationally for overstressed food banks to buy directly from farmers.
'Every dollar we don't have is produce we don't grow,' Duffy said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Harvard Business Review
8 minutes ago
- Harvard Business Review
How AI Can Help Tackle Collective Decision-Making
Collective decision-making is hardly a perfect science. Broken processes, data overload, information asymmetry, and other inequities only compound the challenges that come from large, disparate factions with different goals trying to work together. And the tools that often help with decision-making—data analysis, scenario planning, decision trees, and so on—can falter in the face of the scale and complexity of the biggest problems that groups and leaders face. This is where AI can help, and is helping. With its ability to analyze vast troves of data about the status quo, understand group preferences, run sophisticated simulations to evaluate hundreds of future possibilities against those preferences, and facilitate consensus-building among participants, AI can be a powerful tool for all leaders facing complex decisions, especially those that must be made collaboratively. One field already taking advantage of AI's collective decision-making support is city planning. Three years ago, we started working with the United States Conference of Mayors to understand how AI is helping cities solve their most pressing challenges. Along the way, we studied the story of the German city of Hamburg, which has addressed a housing crisis exacerbated by an influx of refugees. In 2016, Hamburg partnered with MIT Media Lab, the creator of an AI platform called CityScope. The platform allows urban planners to collect and digest the needs and preferences of swaths of residents, simulate hundreds of building scenarios, identify hidden opportunities, and find common ground among conflicting factions. By demonstrating how CityScope is working in Hamburg, we hope to show leaders across governments, nonprofits, universities, and corporations how they can harness data and AI to democratize and improve their decision-making processes and outcomes. The Crisis in Hamburg In 2016, Germany decided to welcome 1 million refugees from the Middle East, and Hamburg was tasked with finding housing for an anticipated 80,000 families in a city of under 2 million people. At the time, the city had been stuck in unproductive conversations about zoning laws for decades, struggling to build enough houses for its own residents. Three challenges tend to come to the fore in situations of collective decision-making, and Hamburg was no exception: Processes and incentives are broken. The traditional process to get things done (in this case, to get new housing built) involves dozens of steps and institutions, each with its own procedural logic and internal culture. A single technical impropriety can delay a project by months, if not years. Stakeholders have no incentive to come together. In Hamburg, the city struggled to get anything built because each project required the approval of a dozen bureaucracies, often sclerotic and opaque. Information is increasingly abundant and isn't equally distributed. Every decision (in this case, about specific developments or zoning laws) involves vast amounts of information across domains—from resident preferences and technical documents to traffic and usage metrics. Furthermore, processes are often expressed in long, detailed, technical documents that the average person cannot be expected to understand. Those with more resources have the time, money, and expertise to get the information they need to form an educated opinion while other community members do not. Other inequities. Dominant players possess a wide array of tools to block transformations. In this case, property owners can stop urban developments with historic preservation regulations, minimum lot size requirements, height restrictions, etc. In Hamburg, the only people who participated in decision-making about housing and zoning were wealthier, older homeowners. Successive mayors had launched a few outreach campaigns to get other parts of the community engaged in zoning debates, but none had gained traction. How CityScope Helped AI can help to solve these challenges and improve the way that groups make decisions together. Ariel Noyman, one of the key engineers behind CityScope, told us that his team designed the platform to fulfill four key functions: Insight: Building a dynamic model of social, economic, and environmental conditions through comprehensive data collection, an environmental scan, transaction analytics, and sentiment analysis; visualization with feedback. Prediction: Identifying needs and simulating the impact of alternative interventions by evaluating thousands of 'what-if' scenarios. Transformation: Iterating possible interventions into validated paths of action. Consensus: Engaging stakeholders in a shared, facilitated decision-making process to reach a unified vision of the future. Here's how these functions played out in the process of working with residents and planners in Hamburg to move the needle forward. The first step involved gathering as much data as possible. CityScope drew on data about housing and zoning laws, but also economic development, purchasing patterns, city-wide events and amenities, transportation and infrastructure, employment opportunities, demographic diversity, environmental impact, safety, and more. It also administered surveys to residents to gather their preferences. To deliver the first function, insight, the platform then correlated the core dimensions of housing—density and diversity of people—with performance indicators such as energy use, safety, resident preferences, and so on. With that data, the platform analyzed the relationship between housing and quality of life in the status quo. Then the platform went on to make predictions about current trends and hypothetical transformations, identifying constraints that might be valuable to alter along the way. CityScope highlighted the systematic underuse of commercial properties, for instance. It also highlighted the areas where public services were most likely to be strained and those with the most capacity to welcome new residents. Once the analysis was done, CityScope displayed the results in a simple, easy-to-understand diagram to help citizens and other participants to easily see how potential changes would affect key performance indicators that reflect the common priorities of the city's residents. The labels on the vertical bars indicate that the community cared about environmental impact, energy performance, infrastructure, innovation, and overall livability (each of these indicators aggregated hundreds of metrics). The height of the fill of each bar indicates the city's current performance on each priority (higher is better), and the horizontal lines on each bar indicate the performance for each of these priorities for a given future scenario. The bars with red fill indicate areas that would change for the better; those that are green show the city has already met the targets. Through this chart, CityScope helps residents understand their situation (insight again), extrapolate current trends (prediction again), evaluate possible alternatives (transformation), and find common ground (consensus). In Figure 2, these metrics are aggregated by street into a 3D map of the city. Positive changes are in green, negative ones in red, and alternatives can be modeled at the scale of the individual street, neighborhood, or the city as a whole. In Hamburg, these representations allowed users to understand trade-offs and find ways to overcome them. For example, the visualization made starkly clear the differences between the preferences of affluent communities, where proposals that threatened lower-density zoning received the worst ratings, and the city as a whole, where building more houses in underdeveloped areas to welcome refugees scored well. CityScope then helped the residents find the best way to accommodate these conflicting preferences. By evaluating competing proposals, it demonstrated that wealthier neighborhoods could benefit from more houses provided that a new metro line were also built in the process, thereby paving the way to consensus. The vizualizations also allow CityScope to yet again collect people's preferences, this time on the trade-offs and competing proposals. In Hamburg, the team administered surveys and organized workshops across the city with an augmented reality (AR) version of the platform (see Figure 3). The AR interface allowed participants to collaborate with CityScope to see the implications of their choices. Hamburg residents would come into the room and rearrange the LEGO-like bricks representing residential units, office buildings, parks, and other urban amenities in a specific zone, redesigning the city one brick at a time (Figure 3). When participants made these changes, the digital projection updated in real time to show how the proposed changes would affect quality of life. The platform also connected these changes with the zoning laws that would make them possible, bridging the gap between the LEGO game and policymaking. The interface also allowed participants to collaborate with each other in workshops across the city. That way, CityScope became a platform of direct community engagement, where technical and non-technical people, with different levels of understanding, gathered around the table to understand the impact that their common decisions would have on their city (the consensus function again). In Hamburg, 5,000 residents participated in CityScope workshops in 2016, considerably more than at any conventional town hall. What's more, by targeting diverse communities across the city, the CityScope team has managed to attract a representative sample of the population, rather than just the older, wealthier citizens who have historically participated in the city's urban planning. Making Decision-Making More Democratic Through its use of AI, CityScope addresses the key challenges we identified in city planning, and in group decision-making more generally: First, they circumvent slow bureaucratic processes. By aggregating all the relevant data into a dynamic model, CityScope analyzes trade-offs better than city officials ever could on their own because it integrates all perspectives and tests thousands of alternatives. The result is a considerably streamlined process, and also one that takes more perspectives into account more accurately. Second, they solve the problem of information overload and asymmetry. By intaking and processing vast troves of data and then providing clear visuals and methods for interacting with and sharing them, CityScope removes the informational barriers that favor those with more resources over those who lack money, time, or expertise, giving anyone the opportunity to understand and propose changes. Third, CityScope enables the full community to find a path to consensus, not just the elite. Residents may not agree on this or that housing project, but they can find common ground around shared priorities. By shifting the focus of deliberation from specific projects or laws to broader priorities for the city, CityScope reframes the discussion towards the bigger picture. Larson calls the platform a 'consensus machine' for a reason. Eighteen months after the partnership with CityScope began, Hamburg had not just housed thousands of refugees: It had strategically distributed them across the city to maximize social cohesion, economic opportunity, and community resilience. Since then, the city has been integrating CityScope into its decision-making processes more broadly, for transportation, energy use, and environmental regulation. When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Hamburg had the tools to welcome tens of thousands of refugees in a fraction of the usual time And the United Nations now funds a project exporting CityScope to other cities that face an unexpected influx of refugees. Beyond CityScope Humans are not especially good at processing immense amounts of information and translating it into policy. They struggle to understand complexity and, left to their own devices, seldom find common ground on contentious issues. CityScope shows that AI can help. However, by themselves, platforms like CityScope cannot solve contentious problems. Most group decisions remain inescapably prone to conflict and while AI can help us understand and navigate tradeoffs, it cannot make tradeoffs disappear. No algorithm, however sophisticated, can replace a culture of healthy disagreement and mutual respect. In Hamburg, it was the residents and their leaders who made this conversation productive, not just the platform itself. Further, these tools only matter if they are integrated into the right ecosystem. In Hamburg, the city could not take advantage of CityScope without also reforming bureaucratic hurdles that prevented certain spaces from being repurposed or built upon. CityScope helped identify and prioritize those reforms, but without them, the remainder of its functions would have been futile. While AI can streamline processes and help us make better decisions together, only with the right leadership can these tools translate into collective action. Nevertheless, tools which combine sophisticated simulations with direct engagement can change how we make decisions in all kinds of institutions—cities, but also corporations, universities, or non-profits. Platforms like AnyLogic, FlexSim, and Visual Components are already developing similar tools for corporations, a trend that is likely to accelerate in the years to come. Far from a substitute for human decision-making, these platforms will offer a powerful complement to it: a way to harness data at the service of common goals.
Fox News
36 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's earliest supporter announces bid for Alabama Senate seat
FIRST ON FOX: Another House Republican has their eyes set on a Senate seat in the 2026 midterms. Rep. Barry Moore, R-Ala., told Fox News Digital in an interview that he plans to run for Sen. Tommy Tuberville's seat in the upper chamber. Moore, who has represented the southern Alabama 1st congressional district since 2021, styled himself as a fiscal hawk with a longstanding history of supporting President Donald Trump. Indeed, he was the first elected official in the country to endorse Trump during his first run for office in 2015. "I think my number one job is to protect the people's liberty and to support the president in that process," Moore said. "And so, for us, it's an opportunity to continue to fight for the America First agenda, and also make sure we have conservatives in the Senate from Alabama that are truly the voice of the people." And one of his top concerns in Washington is the ever-increasing national debt, which has neared $37 trillion and counting, according to the Fox Business National Debt Tracker. One of his top priorities when helping to craft Trump's "big, beautiful bill" was to apply downward pressure on Congress' spending habits to achieve roughly $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade. "I think that we'll have to hold the line on spending," Moore said. "But again, this didn't get this way overnight. You're not going to fix it overnight. So you have to do it gradually." Moore, 58, is not alone in the race to replace Tuberville, who earlier this year announced that he would make a bid for the governor's mansion after serving only one term in the upper chamber. He joins Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall and former Navy SEAL Jared Hudson in the Republican primary. There are also a trio of candidates running on the Democratic side, including Kyle Sweetser, Dakarai Larriett and Mark Wheeler II. And despite his conservative bona fides — he is a member of the House Freedom Caucus and touted his deeply conservative voting record — Moore believed that the number one issue in the Senate, and Congress in general, is the growing partisan divide. He noted that when he came to Washington in 2021, he was disappointed that Republicans and Democrats didn't work together more in the lower chamber under former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "I think most people in D.C. are principled," he said. "They're trying to do the right thing. There's perfect, and that's sometimes the enemy of practical. And so we try to make sure that even on the 'big, beautiful bill,' it wasn't perfect. There were 435 versions of perfect in the House, but having principled people come to the table and say, 'Let's get a practical solution so we can get wins for this administration and for our country' – I think that's what we have to do in the Senate." "I don't think we have to look at the opposing side as the enemy always," he said. "And I think we have to keep in mind, too, that they represent areas, and they have a different experience in life." Still, despite his desire to create bipartisan inroads in the upper chamber, which is a must in most legislative fights, given the 60-vote filibuster threshold, Moore supports a change to Senate rules for confirmations to blast through Senate Democrats' blockade of Trump's nominees. He's in support of shortening the debate time on nominees, one of the options on the table for when lawmakers return from their August break, and argued that Democrats "are playing the obstructionist" despite Trump winning big in the 2024 election. "The American people are fed up with that, so I say we change the rules and allow these nominees to get the jobs and start doing the job so they can help the president achieve his agenda," he said.
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Doug LaMalfa faces hostile crowd at town hall meeting in his own congressional district
Even though he was deep inside his bright red congressional district, U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa faced a mostly hostile crowd Monday during his first North State town hall meeting in several years. Residents at LaMalfa's town hall meeting in Red Bluff peppered him with a wide range of questions and comments on such topics as immigration, redistricting, the Epstein files, support for Israel, tariffs, wildfires, climate change, forest management and changes to Medicaid. Many times he was shouted down by members of the audience, who held up green cards to show approval or red pieces of paper for disapproval. "You just embarrass yourself when you act like that," LaMalfa said after several people yelled out "You're a liar," and "Tell the truth!" It was the second rowdy crowd the Republican lawmaker faced Monday. He held a similar town hall earlier in the day in Chico, where members of the audience shouted obscenities at him. Jill Smith, a lifelong Red Bluff resident, said the crowd of about 350 people was upset because it had been years since LaMalfa had held a public meeting in Tehama County. "All these people are angry. They have concerns. I have concerns. I could vote Democrat or Republican as long as I think they're doing something good for our country. But right now I don't see that happening with this, and that's why everybody's angry," Smith said. LaMalfa was criticized for many of his votes in Congress, including his support in 2021 not to certify the 2020 election that ushered in Joe Biden as president and this year for backing President Trump and his many executive orders, which some on Monday said usurped power from Congress. "You made a choice to violate your oath to the Constitution," Max Walter of Redding said, referring to LaMalfa's vote not to certify the 2020 presidential election. "And every day since then, you have violated your oath. But you have loyalty, you have loyalty to a felon (Trump), to somebody who mocks people in wheelchairs, to someone who mocks women." On questions about tariffs, LaMalfa said he supported them, claiming they would bring jobs back to the U.S. He also said he supported release of the Epstein files, but wanted to make sure the names of victims aren't released. Roy Reddin asked if LaMalfa supported the type of congressional redistricting that is proposed in Texas. "Currently the Texas legislature is very close to to an epic gerrymandering where they are going to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Democratic voters by realigning their districts. So my question to you, is in two parts: Do you support what the Texas legislature is doing and why should California not do the same thing for five seats, one of which could be yours," Reddin said. Although redistricting congressional districts happen at the state level, LaMalfa said he opposed attempts at redistricting such as what is happening in Texas, where the state legislature has proposed redrawing congressional district maps. The redistricting plan in Texas could lead to the state picking up an additional five Republican seats in Congress, helping the GOP retain a majority in the House next year. But other states, including California, have vowed to re-draw congressional district boundaries, if Texas goes through with its plan. Not everyone was critical of LaMalfa. One woman said she was an immigrant and she supports LaMalfa because he backs the Trump administration's actions against undocumented immigrants. "He's an honest Christian man and he's fighting for us," one woman said. One woman who spoke out said many of the issues that came up Monday were moral issues that transcended a political climate that has become too divisive. "I'm afraid to stand up for my rights because I might get shot," she told LaMalfa, citing the shootings of state legislators in Minnesota this summer.
