logo
Court clears way for raise of Mount Polley tailings dam despite Indigenous opposition

Court clears way for raise of Mount Polley tailings dam despite Indigenous opposition

The BC Supreme Court has rejected a First Nation's legal challenge against the government's approval for Imperial Metals to raise the Mount Polley Mine tailings dam by four metres, a ruling delivered during the anniversary week of the catastrophic 2014 breach.
The 2014 disaster — BC's largest environmental disaster from mining — released over 24 million cubic metres of toxic mine waste into Xatśūll territory in the Cariboo region near Williams Lake. The community continues to face lasting impacts on their rights, culture, environment and way of life more than a decade later.
Justice Michael Tammen ruled that consultation with the Xatśūll Nation was legally sufficient and described the proposed four-metre raise as 'comparatively modest,' unlikely to increase the mine's overall footprint or environmental impact. He said the court's focus was on the current project, not the earlier disaster, and described the risk of another dam failure as 'remote.'
'This is the same unstable soil condition that caused the catastrophic failure more than a decade ago,' said Nikki Spruce, director of the Northern Confluence and co-chair of the BC Mining Law Reform Network, a coalition advocating for stronger mining laws and environmental protections. 'Raising the dam height again on this foundation without a thorough, modern environmental assessment is deeply troubling.'
The Xatśūll First Nation said it was deeply disappointed and will review the decision and consider next steps.
Indigenous leaders condemned the decision.
Stewart Phillip, grand chief of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, said the ruling 'is a profound blow to Indigenous rights and environmental justice.'
'This is the same unstable soil condition that caused the catastrophic failure more than a decade ago,' said Nikki Spruce, director of the Northern Confluence and co-chair of the BC Mining Law Reform Network.
The decision 'sadly advances a 'business as usual' approach to consultation, an approach that BC First Nations have long asserted that it is fundamentally broken and does not uphold our inherent and constitutionally protected title and rights,' he said.
UBCIC called on the province to explain what meaningful consultation and consent look like for Indigenous peoples under the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, especially after the recent passage of Bills 14 and 15.
'Bills 14 and 15 send exactly the wrong message to those living downstream of risky mines: it's about making it easier for big projects to get permits, not about making Indigenous consent real or prioritizing environmental protection,' Spruce said.
Bills 14 and 15, passed earlier this year, give the provincial cabinet broad authority to fast-track renewable energy and infrastructure projects by streamlining regulatory approvals, exempting certain projects from environmental assessment.
Spruce said that the Mount Polley dam expansion 'represents all the worst parts of BC's current mining rules,' from loopholes that let companies avoid new environmental assessments to a system that overlooks the combined effects of small project expansions and shuts out the affected communities from decisions about their lands.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blocked from Bolivia's election, ex-leader Morales not sure how to respond to threats of arrest
Blocked from Bolivia's election, ex-leader Morales not sure how to respond to threats of arrest

Winnipeg Free Press

time13 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Blocked from Bolivia's election, ex-leader Morales not sure how to respond to threats of arrest

LAUCA Ñ, Bolivia (AP) — Bolivia's charismatic, long-serving ex-President Evo Morales told The Associated Press on Saturday that he didn't know what to do about threats by the right-wing presidential candidates to arrest him if they came to power. From his stronghold in Bolivia's tropics of Chapare, where he has been holed up for months under the protection of die-hard supporters, he repeated his call for voters to deface their ballots in Sunday's high-stakes elections in defiance of the race from which he is barred due to a contentious constitutional court ruling. 'What are we going to do? Not even I know,' he said in response to questions about how he would respond if either of the right-wing front-runners, multimillionaire businessman Samuel Doria Medina and former president Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga, wins the presidential election and fulfills their threats to arrest him. 'I am in the crosshairs of of the right-wing empire.' Morales, 65, was charged last year with human trafficking and accused of impregnating a 15-year-old girl when he was president. While he has not outright denied having sexual relations with the underage girl, he has described the charges as politically motivated. A judge issued the arrest order as he and his former finance minister, President Luis Arce, bickered over the control of their long-dominant Movement Toward Socialism Party. As a result of their bitter power struggle, the party splintered. With the Bolivian economy undergoing its worst crisis in around four decades, the implosion of the MAS party has given the right-wing opposition its best shot at winning at the ballot box since Morales first came to power in 2006. 'Look, it's an election without legality, without legitimacy …. without the Indigenous movement, without the popular movement,' Morales, Bolivia's first Indigenous president, contended in his interview with the AP at his political organization's headquarters, where he broadcasts a weekly radio show. The null-and-void vote, he said, 'isn't just a vote for our political movement.' 'It's a protest vote, a vote of anger.' He insulted Doria Medina and Quiroga, who have both run for president three times before, losing at least twice to Morales, as 'eternal losers.' Citing widespread voter disillusionment with the options, he expressed confidence that the election outcome would reveal an unusually high proportion of invalid votes. 'No one is going to win. It will be the spoiled vote, which is Evo's vote,' he said, speaking in third person.

Decades after a PM got pied, the threat landscape in Canadian politics has changed
Decades after a PM got pied, the threat landscape in Canadian politics has changed

Global News

timea day ago

  • Global News

Decades after a PM got pied, the threat landscape in Canadian politics has changed

When Prime Minister Jean Chrétien got hit in the face with a pie 25 years ago, the only thing hurt was his pride. A quarter-century later, Canada's security landscape has changed radically. Threats of violence against politicians have become far more common. What seemed like a harmless prank then looks more like a warning now. 'There is this view that you're a politician, it's all fair game,' said Catherine McKenna — who was herself the target of multiple threats of violence while she served as a federal minister. 'We need people to go into politics and not feel threatened. It's literally about the health of our democracy because if you want people to go into politics, you can't expect that they're going to put up with this and their families are going to put up with it.' Documents released by the Privy Council Office show that the volume of threats made against the prime minister and cabinet ministers has exploded in recent years. Story continues below advertisement A chart shows that there 40 threats against the prime minister and his cabinet were recorded in 2021. That number rose to 91 in 2022, 236 in 2023 and 311 in 2024. The PCO document reports that 11 threats specifically targeting then-prime minister Justin Trudeau were recorded in 2021. The following year saw 25 threats against the PM reported. In 2024, Trudeau was the target of 212 threats, the document shows. Between 2021 and 2024, the Privy Council document shows that Trudeau was the subject of 90 threats of death. The document says the 2024 statistics cover the period between January 1 and July 17. While McKenna said most of the threats against her emerged online, she was famously singled out for very public abuse during her 2015 to 2021 cabinet career — once while walking with her children outside a movie theatre. 'It's just happening all the time and at all levels,' she said. 'I can't talk to a politician without them giving me a story about what has happened, and often women, especially racialized, Indigenous members of the LGBTQ2+ community. 'You just don't know … probably 99 per cent of (threats) are nothing. It just only takes one person … I don't think you can fool around with this.' The P.E.I. pie incident happened on Aug. 16, 2000, while Chrétien was visiting an agricultural exhibition in Charlottetown. Story continues below advertisement As the prime minister entered the building and began shaking hands with people, a man in the crowd went up to him and pushed what appeared to be a cream-topped pie into his face. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy As a shocked-looking Chrétien peeled off the pie plate and wiped his face, the man — who had attempted to flee — was stopped by police. While the RCMP acknowledged that the incident shouldn't have happened, it wasn't the first such security breach during Chrétien's time as prime minister. In 1996, Chrétien grabbed a protester by the chin and neck and pushed him aside during a National Flag of Canada Day event — the incident that later became known as the 'Shawinigan Handshake.' A year before, Chrétien's wife Aline came face-to-face with an intruder who had managed to break into the prime minister's official residence in Ottawa armed with a knife. Michele Paradis, the RCMP assistant commissioner in charge of protective policing, said police have to strike a 'difficult balance' between keeping officials safe and allowing them access to the public. 'Because, really, if MPs, ministers of the Crown are not going out to meet with their constituents, that has an impact on our very democracy,' she said. 'My role is to make sure that our members and our principals are equipped with not only the physical tools to stop that, but also the mental acuity to be able to say something is not right,' Paradis said, adding that Mounties were quick to bring down someone who got too close to Trudeau at a parade in Montreal in 2019. Story continues below advertisement Paradis said the threat landscape has calmed down somewhat since the recent change of government. If an official is threatened online, she said, Mounties will pay the person levying the threat a visit to determine whether they have the capacity to act on it, or if there is a mental health issue at play. Paradis said the RCMP works with government officials, the House of Commons, constituency offices and security officers for various ministers to complete risk assessments. 'I think we've got a better sense of the picture of what's going on,' Paradis said. There have been several recent efforts to boost security measures for elected officials. In 2024, RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme asked the government to consider drafting a new law that would make it easier for police to pursue charges against people who threaten elected officials. Around the same time, former public safety minister Marco Mendicino called for the creation of 'protective zones' around political constituency offices to shield members of Parliament and their staff. McKenna said she'd like to see an independent protective service created specifically to protect the prime minister and other federal officials. She said she'd like to see the government pass online harms legislation and hold social media companies accountable for the threats posted on their platforms. Story continues below advertisement McKenna said politicians also need to stop launching personal attacks on each other in order to generate social media clips. 'The problem is when they get personal, then it's easy for people to basically dehumanize people,' she said. 'It means that it's OK to say terrible things about people and … it's OK to go up to them and shout at them in the street and threaten them.' When asked if more security measures are needed, Paradis said she and most police officers 'work within what we have now' and adapt when things change. Rob Huebert, a professor in the department of political science at the University of Calgary and director of the Centre for Military, Security and Strategic Studies, said the 'near assassination' of U.S. President Donald Trump last year demonstrates that, even today, a determined assassin can still get close to a politician. 'On so many of these events, you can try to have metal detectors, you can try to have pre-screening, but it's impossible to ever try to achieve 100 per cent security … the threat of an assault on a political leader is one of those constants,' he said. 'The threat is always there.' Huebert cited the example of the so-called 'Toronto 18' terrorism plot, exposed in 2006, which was to involve a series of public attacks to convince the federal government to withdraw troops from Afghanistan. Story continues below advertisement He said the fact that there have been no successful attacks on Canadian government officials could be the result of improved security — or it could be because no one else has tried. Chris Mathers, a retired RCMP officer and president of a consulting and investigative firm, said the 2000 pie incident shows how Chrétien 'didn't stay in the box' — meaning he often strayed from the protective perimeter provided by his security detail. Trudeau, he said, 'always stayed in the box,' perhaps because, as the son of a prime minister, he grew up aware of threats against politicians. 'If you stay in the box, there's a lot less chance that you're going to be confronted by somebody with a pie or a knife or a gun or a bomb,' Mathers said. Mathers said 'the world is changing' and that people are now 'a lot more aggressive and will do and say things that they wouldn't in the past.' 'The problem is that we've started to degrade into a very permissive society and inappropriate behaviours are almost considered to be courageous in some areas,' he said. 'So yes, security around public figures has increased, just as a result of the changing social environment.' — With files from Jim Bronskill

Opinion: Independence at what cost to Alberta taxpayers?
Opinion: Independence at what cost to Alberta taxpayers?

Calgary Herald

timea day ago

  • Calgary Herald

Opinion: Independence at what cost to Alberta taxpayers?

Independence is one of those words that we all think we know the definition of. Most of us really don't, just like teenagers who embrace the idea of expanded freedom without understanding the responsibility that goes along with it. Article content To become independent, Alberta would have to quickly recreate agencies and infrastructure that took dozens of decades for the federal government to establish. People would have to decide if they wanted to stay in an independent Alberta or move elsewhere. Some Canadians might choose to move to Alberta. Alberta might have to decide whether it will allow the 'immigration' of such Canadians. Article content Article content Article content Article content Federal criminal codes will need to be first. Prisoners will have to be relocated. Incarcerated Albertans will have to be brought home. Article content Military bases will need to be emptied of personnel and equipment. If Alberta intends to have its own military, it will have to recruit and find somewhere to purchase equipment, from mess kits to airplanes. Article content The provincial police force will need to be augmented. Alberta will need its own air traffic controllers, customs and border guards, immigration officers, produce inspectors and the support staff that makes everything possible. Article content Becoming an independent nation is going to be expensive. Just the signs on all the buildings and new stationery and currency will cost more than a fighter jet. How would all this get paid for? Article content Article content Proponents assume the oilsands can sign the cheque. There's the notion that those lands belong to our sovereign First Nations, who have publicly said they will not follow Alberta into independence. Article content Alberta will have lots of expenses and no treasure chest to pay for them. Article content Its only choice might be to join the United States as that 51st state that U.S. President Donald Trump keeps mentioning. So much for independence. Article content Alberta leadership has wanted American-style health care for some time. But we should be careful what we wish for. My wife fractured her back while living in the United States. She received virtually no treatment or rehab, as she didn't have the right insurance. After eight years in a wheelchair, she taught herself to walk again. Article content What would independence mean for Alberta? Not what most people believe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store