logo
Opinion - All the Justice Department needed was a new attorney general

Opinion - All the Justice Department needed was a new attorney general

Yahoo17-04-2025

For four years, Democrats and the mainstream media insisted there was only one way to prevent the horrific murders of American citizens like Laken Riley and Jocelyn Nungaray at the hands of illegal immigrants: Pass new legislation.
Not only was this astoundingly tone-deaf, it was also verifiably false.
The laws we need to stem the tide of dangerous cartels and gang members like Tren De Aragua and MS-13 from entering our country have been on the books for decades. The truth is that Joe Biden and Merrick Garland always had the executive tools at their disposal to enforce our borders but shamefully refused to use them.
As President Trump said in his joint address to Congress: 'It turned out that all we really needed was a new president' to enforce the laws as written. His first two and a half months as president have made this abundantly clear.
It also turns out that all the Department of Justice needed was a new attorney general, at the president's side, fully committed to pursuing justice and prosecuting criminals over vindictive lawfare and villainizing law enforcement. All the department needed was someone committed to hunting down violent criminals, arresting them and putting them behind bars with punishments appropriately severe for their crimes. That new attorney general is my friend Pam Bondi, and she is rising to the occasion.
Since her swearing in on Feb. 5, Bondi has delivered more results in two months than Garland achieved his entire tenure as attorney general. It's a testament to what heights can be reached when the leading law enforcement officer in the country has the will and resolve to create a safer nation for the American people.
As a stalwart supporter of the president and his agenda for many years now, Bondi has a long career of defending the Constitution and putting America first, especially when it comes to standing up for America's borders.
On March 27, Bondi, along with state and federal partners, executed a pre-dawn raid that resulted in the arrest of a suspected top MS-13 leader in the country — just miles outside the nation's capital in Virginia. Last week, the Justice Department announced the charges and convictions of multiple suspected MS-13 members in a gruesome murder in South Florida. Initially opened in 2015, this investigation is finally being closed thanks to her leadership and fierce tenacity.
And earlier this year, a Colorado nightclub was successfully raided, where dozens of alleged Tren De Aragua members were arrested for trafficking drugs and weapons.
Her crusade against these cartels doesn't end there. On April 2, a suspected high-ranking leader of MS-13 was arrested in Long Island for his alleged role in a conspiracy responsible for 11 murders. In South Texas, multiple alleged Tren De Aragua members were arrested and charged with international drug distribution of over five kilograms of cocaine into the United States. And plans have been announced to extradite three additional suspected gang members to Chile where they are currently wanted for violent crimes.
Additionally, under Bondi's watch, 1,573 kilograms of fentanyl, 36,861 kilograms of cocaine, and 5,918 kilograms of methamphetamine have already been seized. Thousands of illegal firearms have been taken off the streets. Human trafficking has plummeted. Violent left-wing attacks meant to terrorize Tesla owners are being prosecuted swiftly. And those individuals terrorizing pro-life pregnancy resource centers will be and are being held accountable.
It is a breath of fresh air for the public to have an attorney general committed to eradicating terrorism on our soil. The contrast between her goals and achievements and Garland's could not be more stark.
For the past four years, under the failed leadership of Garland, the Biden Justice Department has been unjustly weaponized against its political opponents. A once respected agency, the Justice Department went after parents who exercised their First Amendment rights at school board meetings under the auspices of the Patriot Act. Not to mention, the agency has also intimidated and levied charges against Catholics for simply practicing their faith.
And of course, Garland's Justice Department and FBI directly targeted President Trump and his family. Garland gave special counsel Jack Smith free rein to harass and intimidate Trump and his family by whatever means were necessary. The American public also witnessed an FBI raid on Trump's home — signed off on at the highest levels of the Justice Department.
At a time when trust in our institutions is at a record low, these cynical and overtly political actions by the Biden administration only undermined the American people's faith in their government, a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
While Garland was preoccupied with weaponizing the justice system against the administration's political opponents, he neglected to address threats directly jeopardizing the safety and security of the American people. Our borders were overrun by millions of illegal immigrants. Violent crime and human trafficking skyrocketed. Cartels flooded our communities with dangerous drugs like fentanyl — taking far too many precious lives far too soon. Garland turned a blind eye to all of it.
America was no longer safe or secure as a result. Americans were left questioning the integrity of the Justice Department for allowing foreign terrorists to harm innocent civilians, while parents, pro-lifers and Catholics were treated like domestic terrorists.
This is why the American people chose President Trump last November, to reorient our justice system. We made a much needed pivot from vengeance to justice.
By selecting Bondi as his attorney general, Trump delivered on his promise to protect the safety and security of the American people. Like I said when I introduced her to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Trump's selection of Bondi as U.S. attorney general was a home run.
Not only has she been a crucial piece of Trump's reform agenda but also she has wasted no time delivering on that agenda. A safer America is here, and Attorney General Bondi and the Department of Justice are only getting started.
Eric Schmitt is the junior senator from Missouri.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-Trump Aide Spells Out How Elon Musk Could Gain Ultimate Revenge On The President
Ex-Trump Aide Spells Out How Elon Musk Could Gain Ultimate Revenge On The President

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ex-Trump Aide Spells Out How Elon Musk Could Gain Ultimate Revenge On The President

Former White House communications director Alyssa Farah Griffin explained Wednesday why she believes tech billionaire Elon Musk could now actually 'tank Donald Trump's entire legislative agenda.' Griffin, a co-host on ABC's 'The View,' warned that Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' spending bill could sway Republicans in Congress, especially those worried about the consequences to their seats if they cross the world's richest person. Musk recently slammed the bill as a 'disgusting abomination' for how it will hike the national debt. He had previously staked his reputation on slashing federal spending in his now-ended role running Trump's unofficial Department of Government Efficiency. Trump, for now, has remained silent on Musk's criticism. Griffin, who served in the Trump administration during his first term, noted how the bill has measures on energy, border security and extends Trump's tax cuts. 'If Republicans decide, 'Oooh, we don't want to get on the wrong side of Elon,' that is what Donald Trump is banking it all on,' she continued. 'And that is kind of devastating for his administration.' 'On the flip side, those Republicans, if you're in a House district, you're like, 'I'm afraid of Donald Trump,' but Elon Musk, because of the dark money system we live in, he can come in and primary you by just pouring millions and millions into your race.' All Musk needs to do, she suggested, is 'peel off a handful of Republicans' to tip the balance of power in the House. Watch here: Critics Cackle Over Mike Johnson's Awkward Confession About Elon Musk Phone Call 'You Wussed Out': David Mamet Reveals Trump's 20-Minute Call After He Committed A MAGA Sin Critics Gasp At Trump Official's 'The Thing That Matters' Declaration

Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US
Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US

Despite mass firings within the government, threats of tariffs and struggles to get the 'big, beautiful bill' passed, President Donald Trump's approval ratings have held steady early in his second term. DOGE leader Elon Musk is leaving the White House and Trump is threatening to tariff two high profile American companies — Apple and Mattel — despite questions by the US Court of International Trade about his authority to unilaterally impose tariffs without action by congress. Here's what the recent polls show about Trump's presidential job approval ratings as of the first week of June. According to Rasmussen Reports polling, Trump's approval has improved to a 53% approval rating and 46% that disapprove. The TrafalGarGroup poll from this weekend found that 53.7% of Americans approve of how Trump is handling his job as president, while 45.6% disapprove. The Morning Consult tracker poll taken this weekend reported a drop to 46% approval rating and a 51% that disapprove. The Economist/YouGov poll taken this week, shows Trump improving with a 45% favorability versus 53% unfavorable. Americans expressed the most important issue was overwhelmingly focused on inflation/prices, followed by jobs and the economy, health care, immigration and civil rights. In this weekend's Quantus Insights poll, Trump's job approval improved with 48.3% approval versus 47.8% that disapprove and 3.9% that had no opinion. RealClear Polling which encompasses the average of different 15 different pollsters, including all those mentioned above, shows Trump's overall favorability at 47.5% and 49.7% that disapprove. These numbers have improved since his lows at the end of April, when it reached a 52.4% disapproval rating and 45.1% favorable approval rating. According to Civiqs polls, last updated June 2, Trump's approval ratings have dropped about three points in The Keystone State compared to what Pennsylvanians thought of his performance in January. About 53% of Pennsylvanians polled currently disapprove of the president's performance, up from 50% on Jan. 20. Only 43% of the commonwealth gave Trump a thumbs up as of early June, down from 46% six months ago. These polling numbers were also broken down by age, education, gender, race and party. Age: Those between 18-34 were most unfavorable of Trump (60%), while those 50 to 64 were the most favorable (55%). Education: Postgraduate students were most unfavorable toward Trump (68%). Non-college graduates were most favorable (49%). Gender: Men and women are split on Trump, more than half of females (58%) holding an unfavorable view and more than half of males (52%) having a favorable view of the president. Party: Members of the Republican party were 87% favorable of Trump, compared to the Democratic party, who felt just 3% favorable of the president's performance. Independent voters leaned unfavorable (48%). Race: Black voters had the highest unfavorable opinion of Trump (89%), followed by other races at 59%, Hispanic/Latino at 57% and white at 46%. Note: Polls are constantly changing and different pollsters ask different varieties of the population. These numbers were reflected as of Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 10 a.m. This article originally appeared on Donald Trump presidential approval rating today in PA vs. nationally

Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.
Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.

In the few months since Donald Trump returned to the presidency, he has issued so many executive orders and pronouncements on domestic and foreign policy that he may have overwhelmed our intellectual and emotional energy to fully appreciate their impact. Whether or not you approve of the direction he wants to take the country, he took office after being duly elected. Many of his initiatives are within his authority. Generally speaking, Trump has the right to indulge his ideological obsessions and advance policies that benefit the economic class that 'brung him to the dance.' But, what of those executive orders that exceed the limited authority proscribed for the presidency — powers meant to be shared with other branches of government, or those that defy Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitution? Say goodbye to democracy — and our freedoms — if we ignore James Madison's warning in the Federalist Papers No. 47 that "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." On Jan. 20, 2025, Trump took the Presidential Oath of Office to 'faithfully execute the Office of President' and 'preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Yet just three months later, when asked if he agreed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that every person in the United States is entitled to due process, Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker that he's not so sure. 'I don't know. I'm not a lawyer.' The Constitution states that 'no person' shall be 'deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.' It says 'person,' not 'citizen.' Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court has held that everyone in this country have certain basic rights. When Welker reminded the president of this constitutionally guaranteed right, Trump complained that this only slows him down: 'I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it.' This helps explain why democracy requires an independent judiciary — to check the actions of the executive (from local police to presidents) to ensure that government allegations of wrongdoing are accurate and mistakes are not made. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the recent high-profile example, is Salvadoran, married to an American citizen with three American-born children who has lived in U.S. since 2011. He was granted protected status by an immigration judge in 2019. Nevertheless he was detained by ICE in March and deported to El Salvador without a hearing. The Trump administration originally acknowledged that he was mistakenly deported, and a federal judge ordered that he be returned to the U.S. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld this directive. As of this writing the Trump administration has done nothing to facilitate his return. The President even quipped that he could do so, but he will not. The government now asserts that Abrego Garcia's deportation wasn't a mistake, claiming he is a member of the Salvadoran gang MS-13, but declines to provide evidence supporting the claim. As if to emphasize contempt for constitutional rights, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller recently said that the Trump administration was considering suspending Habeas Corpus to block an immigrant's right to challenge their detention before being deported. There are other examples of presidential defiance of the law, such as the illegal impoundment of congressionally authorized appropriations and constitutional freedoms. So, it is time to insert the 'I' word (impeachment) into civic conversations. I am not naïve: impeachment is neither imminent nor likely — for now. The disgrace of this period, as future historians will note, is that whether the President has intimidated Congress into silence or they applaud his overly expansive use of power, the legislative branch has abandoned its oversight responsibility. For now, Congress is content to look the other way. Nevertheless, we must begin to insert 'impeachable offenses' into civic conversations. If we don't, we will be complicit in accepting that the aberrant behavior of this President is the new normal for the evaluation of future presidents. Howard L. Simon served as executive director of the ACLU of Florida from 1997-2018. He resides in Gainesville and is president of Clean Okeechobee Waters Foundation, Inc. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Talk of impeachment hasn't come up. How long can that last? | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store