Bury offer Morecambe fans free tickets as club closure looms
Morecambe were originally set to play their first game of the season in the National League this weekend against Boston United, though they were suspended from the league in July and now face the prospect of closing down due to financial difficulties.
Bury faced a similar situation in 2019, when they were expelled by the EFL in August 2019 despite winning promotion to League One that season. The club re-formed under the Bury FC and currently compete in the Northern Premier League West, the eighth tier of English football.
Bury announced that Morecambe fans can gain free entry to this weekend's game by showing their season ticket or 'wearing your Morecambe FC badge with pride'.
'We at Bury Football Club have watched with great sympathy and understanding as you navigate uncertain times. As a club that knows all too well what it feels like to face challenges off the pitch, we want you to know: you are not alone,' said a statement on the Bury website.
'As a gesture of solidarity and footballing friendship, we invite all Morecambe supporters to join us at Gigg Lane on Saturday, 9 August, for our home match.
'Whether you're in need of a temporary football fix, a place to feel connected, or simply want to enjoy a matchday with fellow fans who understand—our gates and hearts are open to you,' it added.
Morecambe owner Jason Whittingham's failure to sell the club means that Morecambe face the prospect of shutting their doors, with Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy writing an open letter urging Whittingham to 'do the right thing' and sell.
"It is the Government's firm view that owners need to act as custodians of their clubs," Nandy said. 'With so much at stake for this grand old town, the time for action is now. I call on you to effect a sale to a suitable owner, and give the club a chance for a brighter future."
The Panjab Warriors sports investment group insists it is ready to take over the club, and last week it issued a statement alongside fans' group the Shrimps Trust and local MP Liz Collinge stating that all first-team operations had stopped after insurance cover lapsed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Oliver Glasner raises concerns over his Crystal Palace future as FA Cup winners fight to stay in the Europa League ahead of Community Shield
has raised concerns over his Crystal Palace future just a matter of days out from the Premier League season. The Eagles boss has taken the club to new heights since taking over from Roy Hodgson in February 2024, winning the FA Cup last season and taking them into European football - though what competition that will be in remains to be seen. He has since been linked with a number of sides, including Tottenham and Bayern Munich, but has so far stayed put and showed loyalty to the club. But, on the eve of the new season, he has spoken out on his future and expressed his frustration at the lack of movement from the club in the transfer window and likened himself to Marc Guehi. Guehi, who is Palace's captain, has one year left on his contract and continues to be linked to a plethora of clubs, with Liverpool the latest side to express their interest on the back of heavy links to Newcastle last season. Speaking ahead of the Community Shield against Liverpool at Wembley on Sunday, Glasner raised eyebrows when he said: 'Marc and me, we have the same fate.' When asked if his decision over whether he stays at the club could be impacted by what happens in the transfer window, he added: 'We will see.' After leading Palace to Europe for the first time in their history, Glasner was reportedly promised that the club wouldn't make the same mistakes in leaving their business late and thus having a slow start to the season. This summer, though, they are yet to make a first team signing. Instead, focus has been on some of their star men potentially leaving, such as Guehi and Eberechi Eze. 'I said if we want to be better than last year, then it's my advice, "Let's sign at least two players, then we can achieve this",' Glasner said. 'To be competitive in four competitions. If somebody thinks that's nonsense, OK, let's see. 'If Crystal Palace wants to play European football, wants to climb the Premier League table and reproduce the success again, it's just what you have to do. Everybody knows this in the building. 'Of course, it helps if players are in early when you start with pre-season because here you have time to train. We are quite passive. We are short of numbers, we have to add players, especially with quality.' Palace, meanwhile, will learn their European fate on Monday – following their high-stakes hearing in Switzerland. Eagles officials, led by chairman Steve Parish, faced off with UEFA, Nottingham Forest and Lyon in a battle to overturn their bombshell demotion from the Europa League to the Conference League at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Parish has been in Lausanne, Switzerland, where Palace officials pleaded their case on Friday A panel of three senior lawyers will deliver its verdict before close of play on Monday, leaving those involved with a nervous wait over the weekend. 'It was a long day, very involved, very detailed,' Parish, who left slightly early thanks to the birth of a grandson, said. 'It's very hard to say (how it went). 'They listened to both sides but I don't know.' When asked if he was confident, Parish – who described proceedings as 'very civilised' took aim at those involved. 'Given where we are it's hard to be confident because it seems dystopian to even be in this situation,' he said. 'Hopefully good sense will prevail and we'll get to the right answer.'
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Newcastle vs Atletico Madrid on TV? Channel, kick-off time and how to watch pre-season friendly today
Eddie Howe 's beleaguered Newcastle side take on Atletico Madrid today in their final pre-season friendly before the Premier League begins. The Magpies secured Champions League football for this term with a fifth-place domestic finish and ended a 70-year trophy drought, but that all feels a long way in the rear-view mirror after a summer of discontent Tyneside. The club have missed out on a host of major transfer targets, with Benjamin Sesko snubbing them for Manchester United, and the future of star striker Alexander Isak remains up in the air. Newcastle haven't won a pre-season game, drawing with Tottenham before a 2-2 result against Espanyol at St James' Park last night, and will be hoping to rectify things quickly against Atletico Madrid, a team they have never played before. Here's everything you need to know ahead of the match: When is Newcastle vs Atletico Madrid? The match will take place on Saturday 9 August at St James' Park, with kickoff at 4pm BST. How can I watch it? The match will be shown on Newcastle's streaming service NUFC TV, available via their official website. Viewers can stream it for £6.99. Team news It feels safe to assume Isak will not be involved in today's fixture, while Joe Willock is out with a calf injury and Sven Botman remains a doubt after a groin issue put him out of the previous two friendlies. Atletico manager Diego Simeone is expected to field a strong lineup for his side's final friendly before they take on Espanyol in their La Liga opener next Sunday. New signings Alex Baena and David Hancko could feature. Newcastle's preseason fixtures and results July 19: Celtic 4-0 Newcastle - Celtic Park, Glasgow July 27: Arsenal 3-2 Newcastle - National Stadium, Singapore August 3: Newcastle 1-1 Tottenham - Seoul World Cup Stadium, Seoul
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Could latest seismic legal challenge leave Fifa wobbling on its perch?
The tectonic tensions in the world of football produced a seismic tremor this week. News emerged from the Netherlands of a class action that promised to seek compensation for players whose careers – the case claimed – had been blighted by Fifa's rules. The scale of the action, undertaken by the group Justice For Players (JFP), is potentially vast: it holds that every active professional player, male or female, since 2002 could claim against Fifa for about 8% of their career earnings. Coming as a consequence of the European court of justice (CJEU) ruling on the Lassana Diarra case last year, the class action is considered exceptional by many in football because it has the potential to hit a governing body hard in the pocket. Should enough players and former players join, and were it to be successful, Fifa could be liable for a sum in the billions. Whether that materialises is another matter. The Guardian has spoken to multiple figures within the game, including those close to the JFP action, who regard the likely outcome being one that ends in negotiation, with the hope of achieving substantial systemic changes. The Diarra judgment found that Fifa rules relating to the authorisation of transfers for players restricted freedom of movement, a key tenet of EU law, and that rules requiring buying clubs to cover the cost of compensation for a player who breaks a contract 'without just cause' are anticompetitive. One aim for the group, therefore, could be a remedy known as 'injunctive relief', whereby a defendant must carry out a certain action, in this case such as making a set of agreed changes to the transfer rules, alongside paying damages. Among the possible solutions is a stipulation that release fees are inserted into all footballers' contracts, as in Spain, although it would be tough to ascertain a universal market value. Another may be that players sign shorter deals, for example for two years with an option, rather than the standard four-plus-one; that would have the effect of reducing transfer fees but could also mean players respond by requesting higher wages. A key actor in the class action has been Dupont-Hissel, a Belgian law firm. One of its partners, Jean-Louis Dupont, represented Jean-Marc Bosman in the historic 1995 case and the firm has been a consistent thorn in the authorities' side, also representing the European Super League's backers in their recent case against Uefa, and the Belgian club RFC Seraing in their successful case against Fifa and Uefa, where they challenged the court of arbitration for sport's role in the game. Fifa faces other issues. Last year European Leagues and Fifpro, the global players' union, announced they had complained to the European Commission over Fifa's alleged lack of consultation over changes to the international match calendar. In a related action, five European player unions, including the Professional Footballers' Association, submitted a claim to the Brussels court of commerce asking for the CJEU to intervene. The legal route has been increasingly embraced by stakeholders who feel there has been a lack of constructive dialogue with the global regulator. Last month the Fifpro leadership travelled to New York expecting to meet Gianni Infantino to discuss player rest breaks before the final of the Club World Cup (a tournament that caused much consternation inside the union). They say they were guided to another meeting while Fifa's president met with union leaders unaligned with Fifpro. Two weeks later the president of Fifpro, Sergio Marchi, criticised what he called the 'autocracy' of Fifa under Infantino and in response Fifa issued a statement accusing Fifpro of 'blackmail' and demanding the union publish its financial reporting in full. If Fifpro did not do so, the statement said, Fifa would 'move forward together with players and those who really want the best for football'. Fifpro gave tentative backing to the JFP claim this week. The number of legal challenges to Fifa is rising, even if there does not appear to be a coordinated effort, and there are those within the game who regard it as the best opportunity for stakeholders to get the global governing body to listen to their concerns. Those with knowledge of the Fifpro legal action say it is conceived of in those terms, with the hope that the EU will seek to bring parties together to address their dispute. Behind it all lies not only an increasing frustration with Infantino's running of Fifa but a desire for reform of the European model of sports governance. Questions raised by the CJEU Super League ruling – over whether a regulator such as Fifa can also be a competition organiser – have not gone away and are an undercurrent in the latest debates. The Justice for Players class action is being led by serious figures, meanwhile, with Dupont and JFP recruiting the former Tottenham technical director and England assistant manager Franco Baldini to the group's board. Baldini's connections within the game remain widespread and he has form, particularly while with Roma, for taking on the status quo. The question is whether this particular challenge is the one that finally sets Fifa wobbling on its perch. Fifa has been approached for comment.
