
Long-promised Brooklyn-Queens rail link is finally moving forward — but won't be complete till the 2030s
The long-awaited light rail connection between Brooklyn and Queens has now moved into active development, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Friday — but the project won't be complete until at least the 2030s.
Hochul, during an event along the abandoned rail line that will become the Interborough Express, or IBX, celebrated the MTA's board this week advancing the expected $5.5 billion project into its design phase.
'We're turning these old tracks into something remarkable,' she crowed. 'A clean, fast, 14-mile light rail line – a connection between Brooklyn and Queens like never before.'
5 Gov. Kathy Hochul announced Friday that a long-promised Brooklyn-Queens rail link is now in its design phase.
James Messerschmidt
She also highlighted estimates that an end-to-end trip along the line will only be 32 minutes.
'Riders will save 30 minutes each way. If you're a round-trip commuter, guess what? That's an hour back in your life.'
Proposals to build a Brooklyn-Queens rail service have percolated for nearly three decades, but only seriously advanced when Hochul announced in 2022 that an underused freight line would be converted into the Interborough Express.
The planned line would create 19 stations, connect 17 subway lines, 50 bus routes and two Long Island Rail Road hubs along its track from Sunset Park, Brooklyn to Jackson Heights, Queens, officials envision.
The IBX would also be the Big Apple's first light rail line, as well the first end-to-end rapid transit built entirely in the city since the line that became the G train opened in 1937, officials said.
5 The Interborough Express will run from Sunset Park to Jackson Heights.
MTA/ Governor Hochul
5 The IBX will run from Brooklyn Army Terminal to Roosevelt Avenue.
MTA
5 The project is expected to cost $5.5 billion and be the city's first light rail line.
MTA
Drone footage and photos released by MTA officials Friday give a bird's-eye view of the proposed route, including the LIRR-owned Bay Ridge Branch and the CSX-owned rail line Fremont Secondary.
The route winds through tree-lined, largely forgotten rail beds in both boroughs, with several bridges and tunnels that could present design difficulties, officials said.
But beyond broad strokes and a $2.75 billion commitment so far by Hochul, no serious engineering and design work had been done on the project – until MTA board members Wednesday selected Jacobs and HDR to be design and engineering team, with a $166 million contract.
'Thanks to $166 million dollar state investment, that means a lot of planning is going to occur – looking at the stations, tracks, vehicles signals – so we can get shovels in the ground and make this become a reality,' Hochul said.
5 The route follows an existing, although largely forgotten rail line.
MTA / Trent Reeves
The design phase will be the last before construction begins, officials said.
The project is expected to be completed in the 2030s.
Hochul promised that whenever it's finished that New Yorkers will have fewer travel hassles flitting between Brooklyn and Queens.
'The outer boroughs are now joined so that there's not a requirement that if you want to go see your mother in Queens from Brooklyn that you won't have to go into Manhattan first,' she said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Her Dispensary Was Set to Open. Then New York Got in the Way.
After trying to open a legal cannabis dispensary in New York for three years, Nubia Ashley was close to achieving her goal, possibly as soon as this month. Then on Monday, she got an email from the state's cannabis agency admitting that it had made a significant error. The agency, which had approved her store's location in March, said the address was closer to a nearby school than the 500 feet allowed by state law. It was the agency's fault that the distance had been measured incorrectly, the email said, but Ms. Ashley would need to move. 'I'm trying to remain as positive as I possibly can because I was like this close to open, just so close,' Ms. Ashley, 37, said. 'And then I get hit with this letter.' The jarring message was a result of a sudden policy shift that threw the future of more than 150 existing and planned dispensaries into question. Regulators had previously measured the 500-foot distance from a dispensary's entrance to a school's. But on Monday, officials said the distance should have been measured from the school's property line. An intense backlash from some license-holders, lawmakers and former regulators followed. They questioned why Gov. Kathy Hochul's administration had made such an abrupt change that could hurt people who followed the state's rules. Several lawsuits are in the works that could ultimately cost New York taxpayers millions of dollars in damages. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CSX on the Hot Seat from Activist Ancora Following UP-NSC Takeover
CSX may be at a crossroads in the wake of the merger announcement of two of its Class I railroad rivals. Activist investor Ancora Holdings, which launched a proxy fight against Norfolk Southern that sparked a board overhaul and resulted in the ousting of its then-chair, could use its sway to push CSX in a new direction. One such option may be a potential merger. More from Sourcing Journal Why Investors Are Rooting for 'Clean' Fashion Union Pacific Hopes to Win Back Volume in Proposed $85B Norfolk Southern Deal UP-Norfolk Southern Merger Would Control Nearly Half of US Rail Container Traffic In a Wednesday interview with CNBC, Ancora Alternatives president James Chadwick said that the hedge fund has been a 'growing shareholder' in CSX, although the asset management firm has not disclosed its stake. '[CSX] has to make a decision of whether it wants to find a merger partner or whether it's going to have to go retool management,' Chadwick said. When asked if Ancora would consider a campaign against CSX management, Chadwick said 'I think that'll be up to CSX, ultimately.' Chadwick denied that there had been contact with CSX regarding a possible activist push yet, but said 'Whatever actions they make from here will dictate what we do.' In a late July earnings call, CSX CEO Joseph Hinrichs did not rule out the possibility of a merger or acquisition, saying the company was 'always open to anything' to deliver shareholder value. Ancora's potential move could be summed up by Chadwick's criticism that the company is 'underperforming,' particularly in operating ratio. Operating ratio is a top performance metric monitored by analysts, representing operating costs divided by total revenue. The data point typically reflects a railroad's ability to manage its expenses and drive profits, and is expressed as a percentage. The lower the percentage, the better the railroad is at generating profits. Currently, CSX has the worst operating ratio of the Class I railroads at 64.1 percent. In the quarter prior to Hinrichs' start as CEO and president in September 2022, the railroad had a 55.4 percent operating ratio. The conclusion of Ancora's proxy fight with Norfolk Southern last year also involved the operating ratio metric. At the time, the railroad said it planned to reach a sub-60 percent operating ratio within three to four years. Whether Ancora's overtures have gotten to CSX or not, it appears there may be more movement on the railroad's part to enact some level of change. On Thursday, a Bloomberg report said CSX is working with Goldman Sachs as the railroad potentially explores its options. The railroad spoke with the bank about the possibilities of a merger, the report said. CSX did not have additional comment on the report. Before the $85 billion Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern acquisition, reports had surfaced that BNSF Railway was seeking to acquire a rival railroad, and that it tapped Goldman Sachs to get such a deal in motion. However, Warren Buffett, the investing icon who chairs BNSF parent Berkshire Hathaway, had swatted away the Goldman connection, indicating that no one from the investment bank had spoken to him about a possible deal. Given the national implications of a UP-NSC merger, a combination of their respective rivals in the Western and Eastern U.S. would make sense. BNSF Railway covers 32,500 route miles in 28 states and three Canadian provinces, while CSX reaches more than 20,000 route miles across 26 states, Washington, D.C. and two provinces. Like Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, there is minimal overlap between BNSF and CSX, with the only common areas being Midwestern cities like Chicago, St. Louis, Memphis and New Orleans. With the chatter about the future of CSX and BNSF likely going to linger, the Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern takeover has caught attention of a top U.S. lawmaker railing against the deal. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer cited the acquisition as one that pushes the industry 'further down the road of dangerous consolidation and monopoly power.' 'The last four decades of railroad mergers have led to worse service, worse safety, worse working conditions, higher costs for shippers—which ultimately means higher prices for consumers,' Schumer argued. 'They also promise no union jobs will be cut. But we've heard that before, from the same executives who've laid off thousands of workers while raking in record profits.' Schumer pointed to union opposition to the deal, including that from the SMART Transportation Division, which is the largest railroad union in America. The Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern acquisition is expected to close by early 2027, if it passes the regulatory approval process of the Surface Transportation Board (STB). The deal would cut the number of U.S.-headquartered Class I railroads from four to three, while a possible BNSF-CSX merger would cut that number to two. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
CSX Corporation (CSX) Might Be Bought Too, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX)'s shares have gained 9.8% year-to-date, and like other railroads, it has also been a frequent feature of Cramer's morning show. The CNBC TV host has discussed the firm in the context of the emerging trend of mergers in the railroad industry. His previous comments about CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) have hinted at hesitance at the firm's management for the deal. This time, after railroad giant Union Pacific announced that it would acquire Norfolk Southern, Cramer wondered whether Burlington North would buy CSX: 'But the fact is, they were never going to go against each other. That's not, the rails, stop doing that years ago. So, I look at this and I say, Vena makes sense. The only issue is, okay, so, does Burlington North have to go buy CSX? And they do.' Copyright: meinzahn / 123RF Stock Photo Previously, the CNBC TV host discussed CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) and the dynamics of the railroad industry: 'Well look they have a direct corridor, CSX, direct corridor connects South East Mexico, Texas, US Southeast. That's Union Pacific. Why would you let that happen? Why would you make it so that you have two railroads that have that area and not make it so that there's one. And I think Joe Hinrichs, the CEO of CSX, might not want this deal. He's young. He took over the railroad. He just got there.' While we acknowledge the potential of CSX as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data