Down 63%, Should You Buy the Dip on Pfizer?
Pfizer's woes range from a failed weight loss drug to tariffs and political uncertainty.
Yet, Pfizer maintains a strong financial foundation and a promising pipeline.
The stock's valuation is so low that even modest success could jumpstart the shares.
10 stocks we like better than Pfizer ›
It's been a tough go for Pfizer (NYSE: PFE). Shares of the pharmaceutical giant are down over 60% from their highs, a multi-year slide since pandemic-related sales peaked a few years ago. But that's not all. Now, new challenges are putting pressure on the stock.
Stocks aren't always on sale just because their prices went down, but Pfizer's storied history and 7.3% dividend yield make it worth checking under the hood to see if the company has what it takes to get back on track.
So, that's precisely what this Fool did. Here is why Pfizer can't seem to get off the mat and whether it's worth buying the dip on today.
I won't rehash Pfizer's pandemic journey too much. The company developed and sold a vaccine (Comirnaty) and an antiviral drug (Paxlovid) that made billions of dollars during COVID-19. Then, as those sales dried up, the company's top and bottom lines shrank, taking Pfizer's stock price down, too.
But that's old news. More recently, Pfizer has endured a barrage of additional bad news. The company ceased development of Danuglipron, an experimental weight loss pill after it potentially caused a liver injury in a patient. That was supposed to be Pfizer's entrance into one of healthcare's fastest-growing markets.
The political headaches are stacking up, too. New Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been a vocal critic of the pharmaceutical industry and is no friend of Pfizer's. Earlier this month, President Trump issued an executive order to lower drug prices in the United States.
Then, you have potential tariff policies that could make it harder for Pfizer to strategize how it develops and manufactures its drugs. Lastly, Pfizer is anticipating a $1 billion revenue hit in 2025 due to Medicare changes stemming from the Biden Administration's Inflation Reduction Act.
Phew. It's a mouthful, but these problems seem more like paper cuts than fatal wounds.
Danuglipron's failure hurts, but Pfizer still has a healthy pipeline that will heavily focus on oncology over the coming years. Then there is the political noise, which investors shouldn't rush to panic over. For example, President Trump's executive order on drug prices lacked a clear framework for what drugs might be susceptible to pricing pressure or how exactly the government would force drug companies to comply.
Acknowledging risks is fair, but try not to overreact to them. Pfizer has a solid financial foundation. The company's credit is investment-grade, and its dividend payout ratio is only 61% of the bottom end of management's 2025 earnings guidance. Pfizer is also beginning a cost-savings program that it anticipates will save it $7.7 billion by the end of 2027. So, that juicy 7.3% dividend yield is likely not a warning sign of a looming cut.
It seems the market may be assuming the worst. Pfizer trades at less than 8 times its 2025 earnings guidance, which practically values the stock like it's on death's door. For reference, the S&P 500's price-to-earnings ratio is 28. You can see below how the market's expectations for Pfizer's long-term growth have plunged since October:
The great thing about setting a low bar is that it's easy to step over. With Pfizer's 7.3% dividend, investors only need low-single-digit earnings growth to generate 10% annualized investment returns. Barring Pfizer utterly imploding, that could be a lowball scenario.
Simply meeting 5% growth estimates with no change in Pfizer's dirt-cheap valuation would produce over 12% annually -- boom, Pfizer could be a market-beating stock. The S&P 500 averages 10% returns historically, and its high valuation could drag on the market's future performance.
If Pfizer's growth winds up higher, near where analysts thought it could be last fall, then you might see the stock's valuation rise, which would only turbocharge returns. There are no guarantees, of course. That's why you diversify and own many stocks. That said, Pfizer stands out in a broader stock market that doesn't seem to have many potential home runs right now.
Before you buy stock in Pfizer, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Pfizer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $639,271!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $804,688!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 957% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 167% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Pfizer. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Down 63%, Should You Buy the Dip on Pfizer? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
‘Golden Share' in U.S. Steel Gives Trump Extraordinary Control
To save its takeover of U.S. Steel, Japan's Nippon Steel agreed to an unusual arrangement, granting the White House a 'golden share' that gives the government an extraordinary amount of influence over a U.S. company. New details of the agreement show that the structure would give President Trump and his successors a permanent stake in U.S. Steel, significant sway over its board and veto power over a wide array of company actions, an arrangement that could change the nature of foreign investment in the United States. The terms of the arrangement were hammered out in meetings that went late into the night on Wednesday and Thursday, according to two people familiar with the details. Representatives from Nippon Steel — which had been trying to acquire the struggling U.S. Steel since December 2023, but had been blocked by the Biden administration over national security concerns — came around to Mr. Trump's desire to take a stake that would give the U.S. government significant control over the company's actions. Nippon had argued that this influence should expire — perhaps after three or four years, the duration of the Trump administration. But in the meetings, which were held at the Commerce Department, Trump officials led by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick insisted that the golden share should last in perpetuity, the two people said. Under the terms of the national security pact, which the companies said they signed Friday, the U.S. government would retain a single share of preferred stock, called class G — as in gold. And U.S. Steel's charter will list nearly a dozen activities the company cannot undertake without the approval of the American president or someone he designates in his stead. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 of the Richest People in Real Estate
Real estate can become a strategic investment option if you know what you're doing and are willing to put in some work. While you might not make several million dollars, it can be another way to boost your bank account and wealth. Read Next: Find Out: Speaking of wealth, real estate has paid off extremely well for some investors and managers around the U.S. and beyond. Here's a look at five of the richest people in real estate. Also see what the 10 richest billionaires did with their first $1 million. Total net worth: $18.7 billion You may not be familiar with Kushal Pal Singh, but he's one of the richest billionaires in the real estate industry. He's the chairman emeritus of a leading real estate company in India called DLF. According to Forbes, the company is the biggest listed property firm by market cap in India. Check Out: Total net worth: $19.7 billion Harry Triguboff is the owner of Meriton, an apartment tower development company in Australia. He's a billionaire real estate developer — and one of the richest people in Australia. According to Forbes, he has built over 79,000 apartments and was a trailblazer, being one of the first developers see potential in apartments rather than single-family homes. Late last year, Medium called him 'the GOAT' of real estate in Australia. Total net worth: $18.9 billion Donald Bren is a big name in real estate in America. He's the chairman of Irvine Company, which, according to Sunrise Capital, has more than 120 million square feet of office space, apartments and malls across California. Per Forbes, he also owns the MetLife Building in New York. Total net worth: $18.4 billion Stephen Ross may have come from humble beginnings, but he's now one of the richest names in real estate. Ross is the CEO and chairman of Related Ross and the owner of the Miami Dolphins. Due to his real estate work, he's especially well known in Florida. According to the company's website, it has many types of properties, including office space, hotels and city centers. Total net worth: $13.2 billion Until 2015, Peter Woo was the chairman of Wheelock & Co., a property developer, and the subsidiary Wharf Holdings, per Forbes. In addition to real estate, the companies are involved in retailing and telecommunications. Editor's note: Net worth figures were sourced from Forbes. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Every State? This article originally appeared on 5 of the Richest People in Real Estate Sign in to access your portfolio

Wall Street Journal
40 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Leonard Lauder, Who Turned His Mother's Beauty Business Into a Global Empire, Dies at 92
Leonard Lauder, the eldest son of beauty pioneer Estée Lauder who grew up typing invoices for the family business he would later transform into a global empire, died Saturday at the age of 92, the company said. In five decades at Estée Lauder, including a 17-year tenure as chief executive, Lauder secured prime spots in every major U.S. department store and built a portfolio of beauty's biggest names, including Bobbi Brown, Aveda and MAC.