Three Thai soldiers injured by landmine on border with Cambodia, army says
The incident, in which a Thai sergeant major suffered severe injuries, came two days after the countries reasserted their commitment to a ceasefire that ended a brief but intense period of fighting. Cambodia denies the accusation.
The army's statement said the incident took place in Thailand's Sisaket province and 'clearly demonstrates to both domestic and international society that the use of concealed weapons in border areas continues to exist, constituting a clear violation of the Ottawa Convention by the Cambodian side'.
The Ottawa Convention is an international treaty banning the use of landmines, signed by 164 countries, including Cambodia and Thailand.
The incident on Saturday risks enflaming tensions, which remain high despite the fragile truce agreed on 29 July to end the armed conflict.
Five days of fighting broke out last month after five Thai soldiers were wounded when one stepped on a mine in disputed territory. The clashes, which killed at least 43 people on either side of the border and displaced more than 260,000, amounted to the worst fighting between the neighbouring countries in more than a decade.
Since the truce was agreed, both sides have accused the other of breaching it. Relations remain rocky while anger is being stirred online by a mix of disinformation, threats and nationalism.
Two days after the two sides met in Malaysia to sign a 13-point agreement on implementing their ceasefire, the Thai army's statement said that Saturday's incident constituted 'a significant obstacle to the implementation of ceasefire measures and peaceful resolution of problems'.
Cambodia strongly denies laying new concealed weapons. 'We have not, and will not, plant new landmines,' the Cambodian Mine Action and Victim Assistance Authority said in a statement.
It said Cambodia had cleared more than 1m mines and nearly 3m other unexploded weapons dating back to a period of war and civil unrest that began in 1970 and lasted more than three decades.
The Thai sergeant major lost his left foot in Saturday's incident, according to the Thai army statement, while two privates suffered less serious injuries.
Associated Press contributed to this report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Putin stuns Trump as he breaks into English to make surprise Moscow offer after leaders announced 'no deal' on ending Ukraine war
Four words, spoken in English by Russian President Vladimir Putin, seemed to surprise even Donald Trump at the end of their Alaska summit Friday: 'Next time in Moscow.' Trump, who admitted peace talks in Anchorage 'didn't get there', appeared to have been caught off guard, but winged an answer that was both encouraging and non-committal. 'That's an interesting one, I'll get a little heat on that one,' Trump said with a laugh. 'But I could see it possibly happening.' The Daily Mail has reached out to the White House for further comment on Putin's invitation. No American president has visited Russia since Barack Obama attended the G20 Summit in St. Petersburg in 2013. Many were shocked by the overture from Putin to Trump in the moment. 'History is unfolding before our eyes,' one pro-Trump commenter stated. 'That must be the first time he's spoken English on camera in years,' noted journalist Saagar Enjeti. Liberals, unsurprisingly, were critical of the offer as they were of much of the entire meeting. 'Putin opened and spoke first, spoke longer and got the last word inviting his pal Trump to Moscow. Stuffed Trump in a locker. Pathetic and Weak,' wrote former Congresswoman Barbara Comstock. Trump has been to Moscow in the past, including in 2013 to stage the Miss Universe Pageant. He also went with his first wife Ivana on a trip to the then-Soviet Union in 1987, writing in The Art of the Deal that it was after a representative of the USSR suggested he could do business there, potentially building a hotel. Obama was also the last president to go to the Russian capital in Moscow, where he first met with Putin in 2009. However, relations between the United States and the Kremlin have gone downhill since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, the 'Russiagate' hoax and allegations of interfering in US elections in 2016 and the War in Ukraine that began in 2021. Joe Biden's lone meeting with Putin took place in Geneva in June 2021, just months before the war began. At the summit today, Putin claimed the conflict would not have happened had Trump been president at the time. Bill Clinton, George H.W. and George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford and Richard Nixon all went to Russia at least once. grea Franklin Delano Roosevelt attended the famous Yalta Conference to discuss the postwar reorganization of Germany and Europe with Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill just months before his death in 1945. Joe Biden's lone meeting with Putin took place in Geneva in June 2021, just months before the war began. At the summit today, Putin claimed the conflict would not have happened had Trump been president at the time. But the president left the world hanging announcing no details and answering no questions about his 'extremely productive meeting ' with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the future of Ukraine. What was clear was that there was no immediate ceasefire or peace deal to end the Ukraine war out of Friday's Anchorage, Alaska talks at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. 'We didn't get there,' the usually ebullient president acknowledged, 'but we have a very good chance of getting there.' In an extremely uncharacteristic move, Trump allowed Putin to speak first - at what had been billed as a bilateral press conference - and then didn't answer a single question before shaking hands with Putin again and sauntering offstage. Their whole appearance before the press lasted just 12 minutes following more than three hours of private conversation. 'I'm going to start making a few phone calls and tell them what happened. But we had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to, and there are just a very few that are left,' Trump said. He added, 'Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant.' In his opening statement, Putin flattered Trump by saying his assessment about the Ukraine war was true and that it never would have happened under Trump's watch. 'Today when President Trump's saying that if he was the president back then there will be no war. I'm quite sure it would indeed be so, I can confirm that,' Putin said in Russian through a translator. Putin also placed blame on former President Joe Biden for the U.S.-Russia relationship unraveling, not his February 2022 invasion of America's ally Ukraine. 'I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American colleague that the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities,' Putin said, adding it was a 'big mistake.' Putin noted that the U.S.-Russia relationship had soured 'to the lowest point since the Cold War.' 'I think that's not benefiting our countries and the world as a whole,' Putin said. 'It's apparent that sooner or later we had to amend the situation and move on from the confrontation to dialogue.' But Putin's comments were mostly backward-looking, a glaring indication that the U.S. and Russia remained apart on the crucial issues that could lead to a ceasefire in Ukraine. What was clear was that there was no immediate ceasefire or peace deal to end the Ukraine war out of Friday's Anchorage, Alaska talks at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. 'We didn't get there,' the usually ebullient president acknowledged, 'but we have a very good chance of getting there.' In an extremely uncharacteristic move, Trump allowed Putin to speak first - at what had been billed as a bilateral press conference - and then didn't answer a single question before shaking hands with Putin again and sauntering offstage. Their whole appearance before the press lasted just 12 minutes following more than three hours of private conversation. 'I'm going to start making a few phone calls and tell them what happened. But we had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to, and there are just a very few that are left,' Trump said. He added, 'Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant.' During a sit-down with Sean Hannity taped in the room the summit occurred, the Fox News host asked if the president would reveal to him what that one issue is. 'No, I'd rather not,' Trump replied. 'I guess somebody is going to go public with it, they'll figure it out, but no, I don't want to do that. I want to see if we can get it done.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump has just discovered he isn't as powerful as he thought he was
On his way to Alaska to meet Vladimir Putin, president Trump told Fox News's Brett Baier that he wouldn't be happy if he left the summit without a ceasefire in Ukraine. 'Now, I say this, and I have said it from the beginning: This is really setting the table today,' Trump said. 'We're going to have another meeting, if things work out, which will be very soon, or we're not going to have any more meetings at all, maybe ever.' In short, Trump was well aware that anything could have happened in Alaska on Friday. In the event, after nearly three hours of talks, Trump and Putin stepped up to their lecterns touting unspecified progress and calling their discussions very productive. Putin, in his typical monotone, referred to the meeting with the US president as 'long overdue', cast blame on the Biden administration for allowing US-Russia relations to deteriorate, and credited Trump for at least being willing to meet face-to-face. Putin laid it on thick, going so far as to confirm Trump's repeated assertions that the war in Ukraine would never have happened if he had still been holding court in the White House in February 2022. Trump, a man who likes to hear himself talk, was noticeably subdued at the press conference and said very little. He consistently claimed progress on the major topics of discussion without telling us what those topics were. Ever the gracious host (unless your name is Volodymyr Zelensky), Trump returned Putin's flattery; the Russian leader, he commented, wanted peace in Ukraine as much as he did. Of course, there's very little evidence supporting that statement. When all was said and done, there was no peace deal in Ukraine. Nothing on the conflict was settled. The immediate ceasefire that Trump, Zelensky and the Europeans hoped to squeeze out of the Russian strongman was nowhere to be found. On the big items, the summit failed. But none of this should have been a surprise. Anybody who has been monitoring the three-and-a-half year war will tell you that neither Putin nor Zelensky is prepared to cede their maximum negotiating positions. The differences between Moscow and Kyiv remain unbridgeable at this point in time, so much so that many foreign policy analysts in the West were wondering why Trump even bothered to fly to Alaska in the first place. Zelensky wants a ceasefire before real negotiations begin; Putin wants to fight and talk simultaneously. Zelensky doesn't want to cede any Ukrainian territory that Russia doesn't already occupy, and he most certainly won't recognise Russia's territorial gains; Putin wants Ukrainian forces to lay down their arms, withdraw and gift the entire Donbas region, as well as Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, to him on a silver platter. Zelensky wants Western security guarantees; Putin doesn't want any Western involvement in Ukraine's future defence at all. The divergences go on and on, and a single high-level meeting, particularly one to which Zelensky wasn't invited, was never going to resolve them. As we await the readouts from the White House and anticipate what agreements, if any, were actually reached, Trump will be returning to Washington with mixed feelings. On the one hand, he can talk solace in the fact that his talks with Putin didn't break down, like the top-level diplomacy he instigated with North Korea's Kim Jong-un more than six years before. He may even be able to call this entire endeavour a win if further talks are scheduled in the future. Meanwhile, the nervous nellies in Europe will be relieved that Trump didn't negotiate swaths of Ukraine away to the Russians, a concern that nagged Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz to such an extent that an emergency summit with Trump was put in the calendar last Wednesday to talk him out of any moves he may have up his sleeve. Trump, however, is probably also a bit peeved by the outcome. Although the Trump administration tried to set the bar low, the president himself also outlined his expectations for the summit: a ceasefire and, if all goes well, another meeting, this time with Zelensky in the room. Instead, he's leaving Alaska without the first item on his list and the second still up in the air. The fighting will go on as fiercely tomorrow as it did today. The bottom line here is simple: Trump may aggrandise and boast about his remarkable dealmaking abilities, but on the war in Ukraine, he isn't the most important protagonist in the story. Trump can push, pressure, cajole and sweet-talk, but it's Zelensky and Putin who will determine when the killing stops. As the US intelligence community wrote in a threat assessment earlier this year, 'both leaders for now probably still see the risks of a longer war as less than those of an unsatisfying settlement.' Plenty has changed in the months since those words were published. But Trump's big attempt at peacemaking notwithstanding, that conclusion still holds true. Daniel DePetris is a fellow at Defense Priorities
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
No Ukraine ceasefire but a PR victory for Putin: key takeaways from Trump's Alaska summit with Russian president
Donald Trump's much-hyped summit in Alaska with Vladimir Putin ended on Friday after just a few hours with few details given about what they discussed and no agreement to end the war in Ukraine, despite warm words between the two leaders. Six key takeaways from the meeting: As Donald Trump conceded during his brief press conference with Vladimir Putin, 'understanding' and 'progress' are oceans apart from an agreement. At the end of a summit more notable for its choreography than its substance – frustrated reporters were not permitted to ask questions – the leaders failed to negotiate even a pause in fighting, let alone a ceasefire. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump conceded, while Putin described their talks only as a 'reference point' for ending the conflict and, significantly, a potential launchpad for better diplomatic and economic ties between Washington and Moscow. Putin may have been the guest at a meeting held on US territory, but the Russian leader gained far more cachet than his host. Putin spoke to reporters first – a break with convention that gave him the opportunity to set the tone of a brief and, at times, quixotic press conference in Anchorage. Clearly mindful of his surroundings, Putin, who had hitched a ride from to the venue in 'the beast' – the secure US presidential limousine – reminded the world that the US and Russia were, in fact, geographical neighbours, although he stopped short of mentioning that Alaska had once been a Russian colony. Trump was effusive in his praise for the Russian leader, repeatedly thanking him for his time and later, in an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox, awarding a '10' for the Anchorage summit because 'it's good when two big powers get along'. As if to underline his dominant role in proceedings, Putin ended the briefing by suggesting that their next meeting be held in Moscow – an invitation that slightly wrongfooted Trump, who had to admit that it would generate 'a little heat' at home. But he did not rule it out. That is code for his non-negotiable demand that Russia retain the eastern Ukrainian regions it has captured during the three-and-a-half-year war, as well as other Kremlin 'red lines': no Ukrainian membership of Nato and the European Union, and an end to Volodymyr Zelenskyy's presidency. In a message to Keir Starmer and other regional leaders who made a public show of support for Zelenskyy on the eve of the summit, Putin warned 'European capitals' against 'creating obstacles' to peace in Ukraine. 'I have said more than once that for Russia, the events in Ukraine are associated with fundamental threats to our national security,' he said. The summit was notable for the absence of the man who leads the country whose fate now lies in the hands of Trump and an alleged war criminal. The contrast between the public ambushing of Zelenskyy by Trump and JD Vance in the Oval Office in February and the personal connection – some might even call it warmth – on show in Anchorage was hard to ignore. Kyiv could perhaps take solace in the fact that Trump did not appear to have accepted all of Putin's demands, but the summit did little to reassure Ukraine that it can, in Zelenskyy's words, continue to 'count on America'. As he ended his comments to the media, Trump, almost as an afterthought, said he would call the Ukrainian leader 'very soon', along with Nato leaders. Trump is not a man to let go of the long list of resentments he harbours towards his political opponents at home; not surprisingly, he used a summit called in an attempt end the bloodiest war in Europe for eight decades as a platform to revisit some of those grievances. Perhaps encouraged by Putin – who revealed he had told Trump he agreed with the US president's contention that the Ukraine war would not have started had he, and not Joe Biden, been in the White House when Russia began its full-scale invasion in February 2022 – Trump repeatedly referenced 'hoax' claims, backed by US intelligence, that Russia had interfered in the 2016 US presidential election. In his interview with Hannity, he also claimed that Putin had told him that the 2020 US presidential election 'was rigged' through the widespread use of postal voting. The Ukraine war raged on even as Trump and Putin sat in a room in front of a screen proclaiming that they were 'Pursuing Peace'. As preparations were made for their first face-to-face meeting since 2019, there were no signs that Russian forces were preparing for a possible ceasefire, with reports that small sabotage groups had pierced Ukrainian defences in the eastern Donbas. Zelenskyy also warned that Russia was planning new offensives on three parts of the frontline. On the day of the summit Ukrainian military intelligence claimed that Russia was preparing to conduct tests of a new nuclear-capable, nuclear-powered cruise missile that, if successful, would be used to bolster its negotiating position with the US and European countries. As the two leaders met, most eastern Ukrainian regions were under air raid alerts, while the governors of Russia's Rostov and Bryansk regions reported that some of their territories were under attack from Ukrainian drones. The continued fighting was proof that Putin had never been interested in negotiating a ceasefire, the Ukrainian opposition lawmaker Oleksiy Honcharenko said on Telegram: 'It seems Putin has bought himself more time. No ceasefire or de-escalation has been agreed upon.'
