logo
The road ahead after NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings

The road ahead after NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings

Fox Sports12-06-2025
Two days after the approval of a groundbreaking $2.8 billion antitrust settlement, thousands of athletic directors and department personnel traveled to Orlando, Florida, for the annual National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics convention.
The hot topic, of course, was the influx of changes both threatening and beneficial for schools across the country. According to NCAA President Charlie Baker, approval of the settlement may be the biggest change in college sports history. On July 1, schools that opt in to the settlement will embark on a new era of revenue sharing, changing the game both on and off the field. Rewards
A handful of convention attendees breathed a sigh of relief on Friday night when U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken announced her decision. It's a quick turnaround and a period of trial and error is anticipated, but Division I athletic directors welcomed the news.
"The best thing is clarity," UCLA athletic director Martin Jarmond said. "The best thing about July 1 is we now have clarity on the rules of engagement, what we're allowed to do, how we can move forward. Does it solve everything? No, it doesn't. But when you have clarity, you can operate more efficiently and effectively."
Kentucky athletic director Mitch Barnhart was relieved to get the agreement in hand.
"We've been trying for so long to be part of this," Barnhart said. "Maybe, just maybe, on July 1, we'll sort of all know where we are on this one."
Barnhart added that the College Sports Commission, an entity that will enforce compliance and set market value for NIL deals, will be a major positive.
"The College Sports Commission and the way that is coming around gives us guardrails and enforcement in a way that we can move forward collectively, together, for college sports," Barnhart said. Risks
In a settlement where high-revenue sport athletes have the most to gain, Title IX has emerged as a topic to watch.
The 75-15-5-5 formula has emerged as a popular revenue-sharing formula, meaning that schools are likely to allocate 75% of revenue-sharing funds to football, 15% to men's basketball, 5% to women's basketball and the remaining 5% dispersed to other programs. If a school spent the full $20.5 million allowed this coming year, that would mean a breakdown of $15.4 million for football, $3.1 million for men's hoops and about $1 million each for women's hoops and everyone else.
Montoya Ho-Song, an attorney for Ackerman LLP who specializes in higher education issues, expects Title IX lawsuits to come, just like one filed this week by eight female athletes. The area has shifted again under President Donald Trump, with guidance suggesting the federal government won't hold schools to rigid requirements to distribute proceeds equitably between men and women.
"There are definitely going to be legal challenges related to this revenue-sharing model," Ho-Song said. "I always tell my clients, look, your student athletes' perceptions are their reality. If they think that they are not being treated equally, they will raise those concerns."
She warned that the 75-15-5-5 formula shouldn't be a one-size fits all and suggested dividing revenue based on how it comes in isn't a valid argument. The majority of rev-share funds going to football and basketball programs, especially when coupled with losing records, will inevitably stir the pot.
"Just because there is a 75-15-5-5 budget breakdown, that does not mean that that's going to work on all campuses," she said. "The analysis under Title IX is making sure that it is available and everyone has the same type of access to non-grant funds. So, you do have to figure out a way to creatively divvy up those funds, but always keep in mind, if someone feels as if they're not being treated correctly, then that is always a legal risk."
Attorney Mit Winter, a college sports law specialist with Kennyhertz Perry, said it is paramount that athletic departments present an organized, united front.
Since the launch of name, image, and likeness (NIL) compensation four years ago, Winter said, he has encountered several instances where athletic departments are giving conflicting statements and numbers to current and prospective athletes. That can lead to legal headaches, too.
"You need to have a plan that everyone is on board with and that everyone knows," Winter said. "As a school, you don't want to have a situation where five different people are talking to an athlete about how much they're going to pay him or her. I think that needs to be much more formalized. The coach, assistant coaches, [general managers], everybody needs to be on the same page."
St. Bonaventure men's basketball general manager Adrian Wojnarowski and coach Mark Schmidt know exactly what their roles are — and aren't.
"I will never talk to a player or a parent or an agent about playing time, their role," Wojnarowski said. "During the season, if someone is disappointed in playing time and they call, the only conversation I'm having with a family member is supporting the head coach, supporting the coaching staff. And in the end, that's a conversation for their son to have with the head coach. Then economically, we have to have one clear message in negotiations and finances." Impacts
There are concerns that the revenue-sharing era will have multiple impacts on college rosters.
Few athletic directors were willing to talk in any detail about plans for their campuses, but some of the moves have already begun in the search for more money to fulfill the details of the NCAA settlement: UTEP dropped women's tennis, Cal Poly discontinued swimming and diving, Marquette added women's swimming and Grand Canyon shuttered its men's volleyball program. The athletic director at Cal noted the school expects to lose about 100 athletes.
Just how many of the so-called non-revenue sports — the ones that often feed U.S. Olympic teams — will be affected is also a concern. And many programs will need to find a niche that works for them, even if that means not consistently contending for national championships.
Reporting by The Associated Press.
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily !
recommended
Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NCAA is set to rule on Connor Stalions sign-stealing scandal: Here's what to expect
NCAA is set to rule on Connor Stalions sign-stealing scandal: Here's what to expect

New York Times

time3 hours ago

  • New York Times

NCAA is set to rule on Connor Stalions sign-stealing scandal: Here's what to expect

Resolution is coming in the sign-stealing investigation that enveloped Michigan's national championship season, spawned a Netflix documentary and made Connor Stalions a household name. The NCAA's Committee on Infractions is expected to issue its ruling Friday, concluding a process that began nearly two years ago. The Michigan sign-stealing scandal, like the New England Patriots 'Spygate' scandal or the Houston Astros cheating scandal, became a flashpoint for the entire sport when news broke in 2023 that Stalions, then a low-level staffer at Michigan, had allegedly coordinated a scheme to collect video footage of opposing teams' signals. Advertisement The scandal has faded from the headlines since then, but the NCAA's lengthy infractions process means Michigan is only now learning its fate. The NCAA's ruling is expected to include penalties for Stalions, former coach Jim Harbaugh and current coach Sherrone Moore, as well as additional penalties for the program, which was already under NCAA probation from a previous infractions case. There is little precedent for how the Committee on Infractions will rule, given the unusual nature of the allegations. Penalties could range from fines, show-cause orders and suspensions to, in the most extreme scenario, vacated wins or a postseason ban. Moore, who was Michigan's offensive coordinator in 2023, faces a Level II charge for deleting text messages he exchanged with Stalions before the scandal became public. Michigan has proposed suspending Moore for Michigan's Sept. 13 game against Central Michigan and its Sept. 20 game at Nebraska, which would allow him to coach Sept. 6 against Oklahoma, his alma mater. The NCAA could accept that suspension or suspend Moore for additional games. Harbaugh and Stalions face Level I charges, the most severe under the NCAA's penalty structure. Stalions resigned from Michigan's staff in 2023 and Harbaugh is now the coach of the Los Angeles Chargers, which limits the NCAA's jurisdiction to levy punishments against either. The NCAA could issue a show-cause order that discourages college programs from hiring Stalions and add to the punishments it issued to Harbaugh last year, which included a four-year show-cause order that effectively prohibits him from returning to college football. The NCAA could, in theory, order Michigan to vacate regular-season wins from the 2023 season and before, though that punishment is typically reserved for teams that use ineligible players. However, the NCAA doesn't have oversight of the College Football Playoff, and president Charlie Baker is on record as saying Michigan won its 2023 national championship 'fair and square.' Advertisement A postseason ban would be the worst-case scenario for a Michigan team that is ranked No. 14 in the preseason polls. Such punishments have become increasingly rare as the NCAA has moved away from sanctions that disproportionately affect players who had no role in committing the violations. Stalions is accused of collecting video footage of opposing teams' signals shot from the stands by people he recruited to participate in the scheme. The allegations span dozens of games involving other Big Ten teams and potential postseason opponents in 2021, 2022 and 2023. Other teams saw the scheme as a clear-cut violation of a rule that bans in-person scouting of future opponents. However, Stalions' lawyer has argued he didn't violate the letter of the law because he wasn't personally scouting the games. The allegations came to light in October 2023, with Michigan undefeated and aiming for a national championship. Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti, acting on information from the NCAA, suspended Harbaugh for three games, citing violations of the league's sportsmanship policy. Harbaugh returned to coach Michigan to victories in the Big Ten Championship Game and the College Football Playoff before leaving to coach the Chargers. Petitti provided a letter to the Committee on Infractions in support of Michigan and reportedly argued that no further sanctions were needed. The sign-stealing scandal left many loose threads and unanswered questions. The Washington Post reported in 2023 that the NCAA investigation began when an 'outside investigative firm' approached the NCAA with evidence of the scheme, including schedules and budgets obtained from computer drives used by Michigan coaches. The identity of that firm has not been revealed. Michigan has also raised concerns with the NCAA about the use of an anonymous source to substantiate the NCAA's allegations. In addition to the Michigan case, the NCAA is investigating how Stalions gained access to the Central Michigan sideline for a game against Michigan State in 2023. Central Michigan said in a statement it is 'working with the NCAA toward a negotiated resolution' and hopes to 'bring our matter to a fair conclusion soon.' Advertisement Stalions, a native of Lake Orion, Mich., was a Michigan superfan who followed the Wolverines around the country and dreamed of landing a job on the coaching staff. He attended the U.S. Naval Academy, where he volunteered with the football program, and was hired at Michigan in 2022 after a stint in the Marines. Stalions specialized in decoding signals, a practice that is not against the rules. He recently posted on social media that he knew 'almost every signal' in seven games during his time at Michigan, including College Football Playoff losses to Georgia in 2021 and TCU in 2022. Stalions became a minor celebrity as a result of the scandal, appearing in a Netflix documentary called 'Sign Stealer' that premiered in 2024. His attempts to land a high school coaching job culminated with a brief stint calling plays for Belleville High School and star quarterback Bryce Underwood, who signed with Michigan as the No. 1 prospect in the Class of 2025. According to a source briefed on the hearing, Stalions was 'very contrite' when he appeared in front of the NCAA Committee on Infractions in June. His lawyer, Brad Beckworth, struck a more defiant tone in 2024, describing the investigation as a 'witch hunt' and calling Stalions a 'scapegoat in the NCAA's ongoing quest to show that it has a purpose in today's sports world.' Friday's ruling from the NCAA will close an unprecedented two-year saga that blossomed while a defiant Harbaugh led his Wolverines on a national championship run, capturing the attention of the college football world along the way. (Photo of Connor Stalions standing on the sideline next to Jim Harbaugh: Columbus Dispatch / USA Today Network via Imagn Images) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store