Minister admits government hasn't tackled small boats crisis as crossings set to hit 50,000
Home office minister Baroness Jacqui Smith said the number of people coming to the UK after making the dangerous crossing is 'a problem that, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle' – but insisted that it was the fault of the previous government.
'The last government enabled this hideous criminal activity to really get its roots across Europe', she said, adding that there is now 'really important action being taken to tackle it.'
It comes as the government ramps up its efforts to bring down migration amid growing public anger over the issue, announcing on Friday that the new 'one in, one out' returns deal with France was up and running.
The Home Office has also expanded its 'deport now, appeal later' scheme, which sees foreign criminals deported before their appeals have been heard.
But the government is yet to get a grip on the numbers of people making the dangerous crossing, with the latest Home Office figures showing that 49,797 people have arrived on British shores by small boat since Labour won last year's general election.
It took Rishi Sunak 603 days in office to surpass the 50,000 milestone, while it took Boris Johnson 1,066 days - a figure which spanned over the Covid-19 pandemic.
When the figure was put to the home office minister on Sky News, she said: 'This is a problem that has, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle in terms of the numbers who are coming here.
'But it is a completely legitimate claim to say that is happening is the result of the last government who chose to focus on gimmicks, the Rwanda scheme which returned four volunteers.'
She added: 'We're taking responsibility. I don't believe it was our fault that it was enabled to take root in the way in which it has done by a government who failed to do what was necessary.'
But asked at what point in Labour's government the numbers of boat crossings would become their fault, Baroness Smith declined to say.
'What I'm pointing out is that we've taken our responsibility to work internationally, to change the law... the last government did none of those things and focused on gimmicks', she said.
'It's because of that that the crime behind this got embedded in the way in which it did and that won't be solved overnight. And we're absolutely clear about that responsibility.'
Labour has put a pledge to crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government.
But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, pressure which is exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls.
The government is hoping its latest measures will turn the tide on the numbers of people arriving in the UK after crossing the Channel, amid mounting tensions over the issue in recent days.
There have been protests across the UK opposing the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with a number of people arrested.
Figures from last month showed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 – the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
9 minutes ago
- The Guardian
JD Vance has met Jenrick on Cotswolds visit but not expected to see Badenoch
JD Vance has met Robert Jenrick during his holiday in the Cotswolds but is not expected to see the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch. Jenrick held an hour-long one-on-one meeting with the US vice-president on Tuesday evening, according to a source close to the shadow justice secretary. A Conservative spokesperson said that Badenoch was also speaking to Vance this week but that scheduling time for them to meet in person had proved difficult. Both Vance and Badenoch's teams played down the idea of a snub, but Vance's decision to hold a meeting with Jenrick will raise eyebrows. Jenrick was defeated by Badenoch in the Conservative leadership contest last year and is widely perceived to harbour continued ambitions for the top job. He has strayed well beyond his justice brief and repeatedly caused controversy with his incendiary language on migration. There are reports that Vance will also meet Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, on Wednesday. Farage's spokesperson did not reply to a request for comment. A Conservative source said that Jenrick was attending a drinks event with Vance on Tuesday evening alongside others, including the former chancellor George Osborne. They said Badenoch had been in contact with Vance but that they had been unable to find time for a meeting due to diary clashes. The US vice-president spent last weekend with David Lammy, the foreign secretary, while Badenoch has been in Epping and the Isle of Wight this week. Both Vance and Jenrick have expressed staunch opposition to equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and voiced concerns about the erosion of freedom of speech. In February, the vice-president claimed that a 'backslide away from conscience rights has placed the basic liberties of religious Britons' under threat, and he attacked the use of laws to enforce buffer zones around abortion clinics. Asked about his remarks before meeting Lammy last Friday, Vance claimed that his concerns related more widely to 'the entire collective west'. Vance is on holiday in the Cotswolds with his family and has been pictured visiting the Daylesford farm shop near Chipping Norton. Responding to reports that Farage was due to meet Vance, the Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, called on Farage to 'tell the White House that in Europe we stand together against Putin's aggression'. He added: 'But Farage won't do that because he's much more interested in pleasing Trump than in standing up for British values and European security.'
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pious Palestine Action activists are nothing like the suffragettes
Now I know why Palestine Action and its cheerleaders always look so smugly satisfied with themselves – they think they're the new Suffragettes. Yes, these bourgeois brats in their red boiler suits and keffiyehs fancy themselves as a 21st-century incarnation of the women who rose up for the right to vote. They really do think their violent, childish rage against the Jewish State puts them on a par with those valiant ladies who fought for the franchise for their sex. They are drunk on self-delusion. They have a serious case of bloated ego. Someone needs to tell them – where those women were the great expanders of democracy, you are its enemies. All across the radical Left, they're making this criminally ahistorical comparison. When Home Secretary Yvette Cooper ordered the proscription of Palestine Action, loopy Corbyn-bot Zarah Sultana was fuming. How hypocritical, she said, for the likes of Cooper to celebrate the 'Suffragette legacy of civil disobedience' while damning this 'non-violent [sic] direction action group' as 'terrorists'. Owen Jones, with even more teenage spleen than usual, assured his readers that just as history has decreed that the Suffragettes were the good guys of the early 20th century, so it will smile equally generously on the Palestine preeners of today. 'History will praise those who did what they could to fight one of the great crimes of our age', he wrote. Even quite sensible voices now madly speak of Palestine Action in the same breath as the Suffragettes. Labour bigwig Lord Hain says Palestine Action's stunts are 'positively moderate' in comparison with the direct action carried out by Suffagettes. And yet PA is criminalised while those radical ladies enjoy 'iconic status'. Everyone needs to stop with this nonsense. It is a grotesque insult to the Pankhursts and all the other women who helped to make Britain a freer, fairer nation to liken them with the irritants and narcissists of Palestine Action. The difference between these two movements is so glaring it shouldn't even need stating. The Suffragettes took direct action because they were brutally locked out of the democratic realm. In contrast, the plummy grads of Palestine Action and their noisy cheerleaders in the leafy suburbs enjoy every democratic right. The right to vote, to speak, to march. And yet still they choose, to the vexation of decent Brits, to carry out their dumb stunts. The Suffragettes' direct action was an agonised cry for more democracy. Palestine Action's temper tantrums are a cry of *contempt* for democracy. The Suffragettes wanted in on the democratic process. Palestine Action is so consumed by a weary, haughty disdain for the democratic process – and for us plebs who are its subjects – that they prefer wrecking RAF planes or splashing red paint on 'evil' businesses to the far harder task of free, civil engagement. Their activism is profoundly anti-democratic. It's positively imperious. It is designed precisely to circumvent the democratic realm because these snobs in keffiyehs look upon the electorate as a thicko lost cause. The Israelophobic mania of the middle-class left is not a demand for democracy – it's a demand for admiration. Witness the pro-Palestine Action gathering in Parliament Square yesterday. What an orgy of sanctimony that was. It was essentially the upper middle classes forswearing Saturday brunch to descend on London and show us oiks what perfect moral beings they are. Rarely have we seen such a brilliant snapshot of the depthless levels of middle-class entitlement that fuel the cult of Palestinianism. It was a look-at-me stunt by the bored virtue-seekers of the professional managerial classes. The aim was less to 'raise awareness' of Gaza than to raise awareness of their own ethical brilliance. The Suffragettes took direct action because they wanted a real say in the nation's law-making. Palestine Action and its fawners take action because they want the world to know how special and caring they are. Let's boil it down. The Suffragettes hit the streets to make their own country a better place. Palestine Action and the rest of the radical left obsess like crazy over a tiny country 3,000 miles which they are convinced is the embodiment of evil.
Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
Essex council asks High Court to remove migrants from hotel
An Essex council has asked the High Court to stop migrants being housed at a hotel, following weeks of protests. Epping Forest District Council applied on Tuesday for an interim High Court injunction to prevent the Bell Hotel being used to accommodate asylum seekers. The council is requesting that the ban take effect 14 days after the injunction is approved. It is citing "the clear risk of further escalating community tensions" and calls for the present situation "to be brought under control" urgently. The council is also requesting a declaration that using the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers is not the same as using it as a regular hotel, and therefore is not permitted under planning rules. "The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago," said Cllr Chris Whitbread, leader of Epping Forest District Council. "So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel." Cllr Whitbread pointed out there are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel, and that the use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers could further escalate community tensions that are "already at a high", as well as "the risk of irreparable harm to the local community". "This will only increase with the start of the new school year. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen," he said. Weeks of protests Demonstrations began on 13 July after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. An Ethiopian man, who had only recently arrived on a small boat, has been charged with three counts of sexual assault of a girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. 2:54 Essex Police recently implemented dispersal orders before some protests, allowing officers to order anyone suspected of causing anti-social behaviour to leave the area. The force said 25 people have been arrested in connection with the protests, and a total of 16 people have now been charged. 'Unprecedented' levels of disruption Epping Forest council said it has resorted to this latest action due to the "unprecedented levels of protest and disruption" in the community. The protests have placed the police "under severe pressure", as additional police officers had to be drafted in from other forces, it said. At a recent council meeting in July 2025, Epping Forest councillors voted unanimously to call on the Home Office to "immediately" close the Bell Hotel. They also called for the phased closure of the Phoenix Hotel in North Weald, which is also providing temporary accommodation for asylum seekers. "We are doing this on behalf of our local community. We are a small district council. We have tried to help the Home Office see the situation cannot go on, but central government is not listening," Cllr Whitbread said. "We should not have to take this fight to the High Court, but we are left with no choice. It is now up to the judge," he added.
