Fired assistant sues Paul Schrader, alleging sexual assault, harassment and retaliation
A former assistant to Paul Schrader has accused the Oscar-nominated writer-director of sexual assault, sexual harassment, retaliation and reneging on a confidential settlement deal.
The accusations came in a complaint filed Thursday in New York seeking a summary judgment regarding enforcement of the settlement, which the "Taxi Driver" and "Raging Bull" screenwriter allegedly agreed to in principle on Feb. 5 but never signed. The former assistant is referred to in court documents as Jane Doe to protect her privacy amid allegations of sexual impropriety.
Read more: Abcarian: How the stars of 'It Ends With Us' spawned a universe of legal and PR battles
Philip J. Kessler, Schrader's attorney, deemed the lawsuit "desperate, opportunistic and frivolous" in a comment to the Associated Press and said many of its llegations are false or materially misleading. He "absolutely" denied that Schrader ever attempted to have a sexual relationship with Doe and said that his client simply chose not to sign the proposed settlement.
According to a court document, Doe, 26, worked for Schrader, 78, from May 2021 to September 2024. The document alleges he sexually assaulted her in May 2024 during the Cannes Film Festival, where they were promoting his most recent directorial effort, the Richard Gere-Uma Thurman drama "Oh, Canada," which he also co-wrote.
Schrader forced Doe "to work in a sexually hostile, intimidating, and humiliating environment on a daily, if not hourly, basis," according to an affirmation by her attorney, Gregory S. Chiarello. "Defendant Schrader's barrage of sexual harassment included, among other things, sexual assault, forced exposure of his genitals, unwanted sexual advances, repeatedly professing his love and desire to touch Ms. Doe (both verbally and via numerous emails), and near-constant inappropriate sexual questions and lewd and misogynistic commentary."
The document further alleges that, in Cannes, Schrader at one point ordered Doe to his room where he "trapped her inside, grabbed her arms, and thrust his face into hers to kiss her against her will, and then further restrained her in an effort to keep her in the room."
Read more: 'Oh, Canada' is director Paul Schrader's wobbly salute to guilt and suffering
Three days later, after "luring" Doe to his room ostensibly to pack his bags for him, saying he was "dying" and couldn't do it himself, "Schrader opened the door to his hotel room wearing nothing but an open bathrobe with his penis fully exposed," the filing says. "As Ms. Doe attempted to pack Mr. Schrader's bags in terrified silence, he repeatedly commented, 'I am so sweaty. I sweated through the bedsheets. Feel how wet they are.' Ms. Doe packed his bags as quickly as she could, and left."
Schrader sent Doe emails around the same time, the filing alleges, saying, "I sense you recoil every time I have the impulse to touch you" and "Sometimes I get the feeling (not today) that you are afraid I might touch you ... I cringe at the thought you fear I might touch you."
The writer-director fired Doe in late September after she "refused to acquiesce" to his sexual advances, the document says. Two days later, he emailed Doe, the document says, writing, "I f— up. Big time ... If I have become a Harvey Weinstein in your mind then of course you have no choice but to put me in the rear view mirror.'
After a settlement amount was determined in early February, the filing says, attorneys went back and forth via email about non-material details. The filing says that in late March the writer-director got sick, "did some 'soul searching'" during the illness and decided he didn't want to pay the full, agreed-upon amount.
Read more: COVID shut down his set. How Paul Schrader finished shooting 'The Card Counter' in 5 days
Schrader's attorney disagreed with that assertion. "The agreement that they're trying to enforce against Mr. Schrader, in plain English, required both parties to sign it before it became legally effective,' Kessler told the AP. 'Mr. Schrader declined to sign it. It's frankly as simple as that.'
The settlement amount was redacted from documents associated with the claim. Doe is asking that Schrader pay her the allegedly agreed-upon sum plus interest, court costs, legal fees and additional damages equal to 10% of the settlement.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Sign up for Indie Focus, a weekly newsletter about movies and what's going on in the wild world of cinema.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein Defense Rests In NYC Rape Retrial; Closing Arguments Now, Then Case Goes To Jury
Harvey Weinstein is one crucial step closer to learning what his fate will be at the hands of the jury in his New York rape retrial. After a morning session in front of Judge Curtis Farber haggling over material that may or may not go to the jury (it won't), Weinstein's Arthur Aidala-led defense rested its case – without calling its client to testify for himself. Moving deftly, the proceedings are now in closing arguments, with Aidala pleading Weinstein's merits before the jurors. More from Deadline Harvey Weinstein Won't Testify In His Own Defense In NYC Sex Crimes Retrial; Jury Deliberations May Start Tuesday Patricia Clarkson Recalls Harvey Weinstein Telling Her She'd "Never Work Again" Harvey Weinstein's Move For Mistrial Fails On Second Day Of Rape Retrial - Update Closing arguments from the defense and the Manhattan District Attorney's office are expect to go on for a few hours, but the plan is the jury will have the case by the end of the day. At that point, the seven-woman, five-man panel will go behind closed doors to come to their verdict. The 73-year-old once powerful producer will likely spend the rest of his life behind bars if the jury hearing his retrial in New York convicts him on any of the three charges against him. Back in 2020, in Weinstein's now dismissed first Empire State rape case, the jury then took about five days to come to a verdict of guilty on two of five counts: third-degree rape and a first-degree criminal sexual act. In March of that year, an openly shocked Weinstein was sentenced to 23-years in state prison by now pink slipped New York Supreme Court Judge James Burke. In this retrial, while the single count of third degree rape that Weinstein is facing carries a maximum sentence of four years, each count of first-degree criminal sexual act carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. As well as the numerous cases of assaulting well-known actresses and models over the decades, prosecutors in the most benign way say Weinstein used his power and influence as an Oscar-winning producer and mini-studio boss to lure young women into his orbit. Offering what were almost always false promises of work and careers in film and television, Weinstein then often violently raped them or forced them into other unwanted sexual encounters. Fronted by the flamboyant Aidala, Weinstein's defense has sought to prove that the relationships between Weinstein and his accusers were long-running, consensual and mutually exploitive –-a 'friends with benefits' arrangement, as Aidala said in opening arguments, where sex was traded for access to Weinstein's professional network. Jurors in the rape and sexual assault retrial heard from two accusers, Jessica Mann and Miriam Haley, who also testified in graphic detail against Weinstein five years ago in his first criminal trial in New York. A third accuser testifying in the retrial, Kaja Sokola, was not part of the 2020 case: Sokola's accusation, that Weinstein assaulted her in a Manhattan hotel room in 2006, was the basis of a new charge — first-degree criminal sexual act — added to a revised grand jury indictment of the Pulp Fiction producer. Prosecutors secured the indictment last September, after Weinstein's 2020 conviction and 23-year prison sentence were overturned in April of 2024. A New York Court of Appeals ruled that the judge overseeing Weinstein's first trial, James Burke, had deprived the defendant of a fair trial by allowing uncharged testimony from other women who told jurors that Weinstein had sexually abused them. 'The court compounded that error when it ruled that defendant, who had no criminal history, could be cross examined about those allegations as well as numerous allegations of misconduct that portrayed defendant in a highly prejudicial light,' according to the 4-3 ruling. Weinstein did not testify at his first trial. The potential hazards of a wide-ranging cross examination were apparently a factor in his decision over the weekend to also not take the stand at the retrial. 'He wanted to testify, and we respect that instinct,' Weinstein's longtime spokesperson Juda Engelmayer told Deadline on Monday. 'At this stage, doing so would subject him to scrutiny far beyond the scope of the current charges — raising issues that could unfairly damage his credibility. Our position is one of caution, not evasion.' Weinstein remains in custody in New York because of his 2022 criminal conviction in Los Angeles. He s appealing that conviction and 16-year prison sentence for raping and assaulting a woman, identified only as Jane Doe, in 2013. Weinstein has denied ever committing rape or coercing anyone sexually. In a jailhouse interview last month with right-wing commentator Candace Owens, he said, 'I swear that before God and the people watching now and on my family. I'm wrongfully accused. But justice has to know the difference between what is immoral and what is illegal.' Since this retrial started in late April, the ailing Weinstein has shuttled between a downtown Manhattan courthouse and the jail wing of a nearby hospital, Bellevue. Citing his various ailments, as he has in previous trials at pivotal points, the once acclaimed producer has lobbied hard to stay out of New York's infamous Rikers Island jail, telling Judge Farber the conditions there are life-threatening. Farber decided in the first week of the retrial to allow Weinstein to stay at the historic hospital during the proceedings. On the subject of his medical needs ,Weinstein underwent emergency heart surgery in September and was diagnosed with cancer in October. Best of Deadline Everything We Know About 'Nobody Wants This' Season 2 So Far List Of Hollywood & Media Layoffs From Paramount To Warner Bros Discovery To CNN & More Everything We Know About 'Happy Gilmore 2' So Far
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress
Blake Lively is attempting to withdraw her claims against Justin Baldoni of intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The move comes after Baldoni's legal team sought discovery that included her medical records in their efforts to defend the 'It Ends With Us' director against her claim that she suffered 'severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, embarrassment, belittlement, frustration and mental anguish.' Lively's attempt to withdraw the two claims surfaced in a filing Monday by Baldoni's attorneys, who are seeking to compel the actress to sign a HIPAA release for access to therapy notes and other relevant information. 'Instead of complying with the Medical RFPs, Ms. Lively's counsel recently advised us, in writing, that Ms. Lively is withdrawing her [infliction of emotional distress] Claims,' today's filing states. 'However, Ms. Lively has refused the Wayfarer Parties' reasonable request that the withdrawal of such claims be with prejudice. She is only willing to withdraw her claims without prejudice. In other words, Ms. Lively wants to simultaneously: (a) refuse to disclose the information and documents needed to disprove that she suffered any emotional distress and/or that the Wayfarer Parties were the cause; and (b) maintain the right to re-file her IED Claims at an unknown time in this or some other court after the discovery window has closed.' More from Variety Taylor Swift Excluded From Baldoni-Lively Narrative, as Subpoena Is Withdrawn Blake Lively's Lawyers Fight Back Against Taylor Swift Blackmail Accusation: 'Unequivocally and Demonstrably False' Taylor Swift Subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni's Attorney in Blake Lively Suit The court will now need to decide whether to compel Lively to turn over the information on her mental health, which she has sought to avoid, or dismiss the two claims with or without prejudice. It is standard procedure in cases alleging physical or emotional injury for the defense to access the plaintiff's medical records that would shine a light on the root and scope of alleged distress. What is unusual is for a plaintiff to abandon the claims midstream given that it is well known heading into such a lawsuit that medical records will be an unpleasant but inevitable part of the discovery process. The filing, addressed to Judge Liman in U.S. District Court Southern District of New York and signed by Baldoni attorney Kevin Fritz, offers a window on a back and forth that appears to have played out between lawyers for the dueling sides. It continues: 'Ms. Lively cannot have it both ways. If Ms. Lively wants to withdraw her frivolous IED Claims, the Wayfarer Parties are entitled to a dismissal with prejudice to ensure they will not be re-filed. If Ms. Lively is unwilling to stipulate to the dismissal of her IED Claims with prejudice, then the Wayfarer Parties will continue to defend against them, and she must produce her medical information and documents as set forth herein.' The two emotional distress claims were key components of Lively's lawsuit against Baldoni, which she filed in federal court in December after he sued the New York Times for defamation over its story about what happened on the set and in the run-up to the release of the 2024 domestic violence drama, which became a box-office hit, earning $351 million at the box office worldwide off of a $25 million budget. Lively claims she was sexually harassed by Baldoni and producer Jamey Heath and subjected to a smear campaign by his proxies when she complained. Baldoni, who is suing Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds for $400 million, claims the 'It Ends With Us' star tried to extort him and subsequently defamed him. 'By alleging that she suffered physical and emotional injuries, Ms. Lively has placed her physical and mental condition at issue and, in turn, must produce relevant information and documents [including] psychiatric records,' today's filing states. 'In other words, Ms. Lively has waived any doctor-patient privilege.' The twists and turns in the saga, which now includes six related lawsuits, have hit the docket quickly. Baldoni is also suing and being sued by his former publicist Stephanie Jones who he claims leaked text messages that sparked the ordeal. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Other Land' Press Tour of West Bank Village Featured in Oscar-Winning Doc Halted by Israeli Army
Israeli soldiers on Monday blocked an international media tour organized by 'No Other Land' directors Basel Adra and Yuval Abraham in the occupied West Bank, preventing journalists from entering the village featured in their Oscar-winning doc. The doc depicts the Israeli government's efforts to force Palestinians to leave their homes in Masafer Yatta in the southern West Bank. The directors had invited a dozen local and international journalists to visit and witness reportedly worsening violence by Israeli settlers and demolitions at Adra's home village of At-Tuwani. But the journalists and a Palestinian Authority delegation were blocked by Israeli forces, who said they had a warrant to set up a checkpoint. More from Variety Movie Theater Owners Want to Vote for Oscars and Push to Join the Academy: 'We Watch Everything... It's a No Brainer' (EXCLUSIVE) How Hollywood Finds Its Stars: Behind the Scenes With Casting Directors, the Most Important and Least Understood Job in Movies From the Oscars Red Carpet to Open Heart Surgery: What Variety's Marc Malkin Wants You to Know About His Life-Saving Journey In a video posted by Abraham on social media, he is heard telling Israeli soldiers: 'You know that they are journalists. They're coming to see the destruction in Masafer Yatta, the way that you are destroying the community, the settler violence is dangerous.' An Israeli officer responds in the video that the ban on journalists crossing over into the West Bank is to maintain 'order' in the area. After the army destroyed a village and allowed settlers to invade it, they are now blocking our tour with dozens of international journalists saying they're not allowed to enter Masafer Yatta and visit @basel_adra home. — Yuval Abraham יובל אברהם (@yuval_abraham) June 2, 2025 In the '90s, Masafer Yatta was designated as a live-fire training zone where the Israeli military exercises full control. The West Bank is home to roughly 3 million Palestinians, but also some 500,000 Israelis living in settlements that are considered illegal under international law. In March, only a few weeks after 'No Other Land' won the best documentary Oscar, Hamdan Ballal, a co-director on the doc along with Adra, Abraham and Rachel Szor, was attacked and heavily beaten by Israeli settlers near his village and then arrested and held overnight in an army facility. 'These police officers and soldiers that are here now to prevent the international media, not only do they not come to prevent the settler violence, often they partake in it,' Abraham told French news agency AFP, which was on the premises having been invited on the media tour. Abraham added that he has been trying to cling on to hope that the Oscar success of 'No Other Land' would help raise global awareness and stop the violence in Masafer Yatta. 'Unfortunately, the world now knows, but there is no action,' he told the AFP. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
