logo
Sausage King Starmer's bad afternoon on the grill

Sausage King Starmer's bad afternoon on the grill

Spectator2 days ago
Sir Keir Starmer has a sausage problem. Stop sniggering at the back. Not only was there his infamous slip demanding that Hamas 'return the sausages', but there is also the fact that he increasingly resembles a great British banger: pink-skinned, spitting and whistling when grilled and filled with all kinds of rubbish. Sir Keir has become the Sausage King of Westminster and today – at the House of Commons liaison committee – he was due a spell on the barbecue.
Part of the problem for the Sausage King is that he's managed to wind up a fair few of the select committee chairs who make up the grilling committee: quite an achievement given that almost all of them are his own MPs. Emily Thornberry was there, looking extraordinarily jolly for one who'd been passed over for attorney-general in favour of one of Starmer's lawyer mates. Dame Meg Hillier spearheaded the rebellion that forced his humiliating climb-down on welfare, while Florence Esholami led much of the resistance to the assisted suicide legislation, a bill which purports to be the brain-child (which in this case is unfair on both brains and children) of Kim Leadbeater but which Westminster insiders know has the Sausage King's porky fingerprints all over it. There's also the small matter of how badly things are going.
The first few minutes were relatively uneventful; not so much a grilling as a quick go on the sunbed. But soon both Dame Meg and Ms Esholami rounded on him over the housing crisis. Eshalomi pointed out that councils were currently being forced to bid for the same housing stock for multiple uses – thus pitching homeless children against asylum seekers. Did the Sausage King plan to do anything about this?
'I'm furious', he said in a voice that betrayed all the emotion of the announcement of a rail replacement bus service. Hillier tried again; 'precisely' what accommodation would the government be taking over to house asylum seekers at the expense of local residents, she asked? The PM replied that there was 'lots of housing' going spare, 'and many local authorities that can be used'. With a look of real exasperation Hillier asked whether he could provide just a single example. 'No, but I'll write in and give you details', came the inevitable reply.
Someone who actually was furious was Debbie Abrahams who launched into a remarkable broadside over the government's botched welfare reforms. 'This was poor legislation, so far removed from Labour values that I felt ashamed,' she said, and I promise this is not hyperbole, bristling with contempt. 'We must do better, Prime Minister'. The Sausage King opened his nostrils and shot Mrs Abrahams a look of genuine venom. The grilling was getting hotter. Sizzle sizzle!
Even possible allies turned on him; Liam Byrne asked about potential tax cuts. 'No Prime Minister can set a budget six months in advance', stammered the PM. The sausage turned pinker and pinker.
Dame Caroline Dinenage asked what the PM was doing to support charities forced to cut their staff due to NIC increases. The Prime Minister belched out an answer of purest word vomit; 'We are looking at what we can do on – sort of, business rates for charities and, sort of, putting in the support they need'.
'That's it?', replied Dame Caroline, raising a quizzical eyebrow. She accused him of 'balancing the books on the backs of charities like children's hospices'. By now, the Banger looked like he was actually going to go bang. Dame Caroline went one further when she asked him why his constituents were so mean when it came to charitable giving. After all, she observed, 'you and your colleagues aren't averse to being on the receiving end of a bit of philanthropic giving yourselves'.
Finally, the grilling came to its end. In everything from the economy to migration to welfare it had revealed a litany of failures. Dame Meg ended proceedings with a softer tone: 'What's been your best moment in the last 12 months?' The Sausage King said it was walking into Downing Street. On that it was very hard to take issue with him; it's certainly been downhill from there!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cabinet ministers urge Starmer to recognise Palestine
Cabinet ministers urge Starmer to recognise Palestine

Spectator

time9 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Cabinet ministers urge Starmer to recognise Palestine

Parliament may have risen for recess but that doesn't mean that Sir Keir Starmer is getting much of a break. It transpires that the Prime Minister is facing growing calls to immediately recognise Palestine as a state with a number of Cabinet minister understood to be piling pressure on the PM alongside dozens of his backbenchers. On Tuesday, just before MPs left Westminster for summer recess, Health Secretary Wes Streeting urged Sir Keir to recognise Palestine 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognise'. He went on: I deplore Israel's attacks on healthcare workers as well as other innocent civilians trying to access healthcare or vital aid. These actions go well beyond legitimate self-defence and undermine the prospects for peace. I sincerely hope that the international community can come together, as the foreign secretary has been driving towards, to make sure that we see an end of this war but also that we recognise the state of Palestine while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise. Streeting isn't the only member of the Cabinet understood to have pushed the issue in meetings. As reported by the Guardian, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn have also brought it up. The Health Secretary's intervention follows that of nearly 60 Labour MPs, who sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy at the start of the month after Israeli defence minister Israel Katz proposed plans to force Gaza's into a camp in Rafah. While Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard described the move was 'about population transfer to the southern tip of Gaza in preparation for deportation outside the strip', the MP group wrote: 'Though an accurate description, we believe there is a clearer one. The ethnic cleansing of Gaza.' Of course, it's not just Labour politicians who have been vocal on the Middle East. As Mr S wrote in May, more than a dozen senior Tory MPs and peers broke ranks to write to Starmer to urge the PM to immediately recognise Palestine as a state. The seven MPs and six House of Lords grandees have signed a letter that insists 'recognising Palestine would affirm our nation's commitment to upholding the principles of justice, self-determination and equal rights'. The letter was signed by several Tory moderates – including MPs Kit Malthouse, Simon Hoare and father of the house Sir Edward Leigh alongside peers such as Nicholas Soames and Hugo Swire. Mr S was rather interested to note that there were some more surprising signatories, however, with right-wing Conservative MP Sir John Hayes backing the call. Starmer hadn't changed the UK's stance after the Tory group or the Labour backbenchers reached out – but will he be swayed by his own Cabinet ministers? Stay tuned…

Everything you need to know about Donald Trump's four-day Scotland visit
Everything you need to know about Donald Trump's four-day Scotland visit

Scotsman

time10 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Everything you need to know about Donald Trump's four-day Scotland visit

Donald Trump will be meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Preparations are underway as Donald Trump is set to arrive in Scotland later this week. This will be the first time the US president has returned to the country of his mother's birth since 2023. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Trump is set to visit his golf resorts at Turnberry on the Ayrshire coast and Menie in Aberdeenshire. He will return to the UK for an official state visit in September. Donald Trump will visit his golf resorts during his Scotland visit. | Bloomberg via Getty Images When is Trump visiting? White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the visit would take place between July 25 and July 29. She said: 'President Trump will travel to Scotland, where he will visit both Turnberry and Aberdeen from July 25 to July 29. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "During the visit, President Trump will meet again with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the great trade deal that was brokered between the United States and the United Kingdom." Make sure you keep up to date with news from across Scotland by signing up to our free newsletter here. His schedule has not been made public but he is expected to split his time between his two Scottish bases at Turnberry and Menie. What is he doing in Scotland? Mr Trump's press secretary confirmed that he will be meeting Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Aberdeen. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad First Minister John Swinney has also confirmed he will have a meeting with Mr Trump during the visit, although no details have been released. PA Mr Trump said: 'We're going to be meeting with the British Prime Minister, very respectful, and we are going to have a meeting with him, probably in Aberdeen, and we're going to do a lot of different things. 'We're going to also refine the trade deal that we've made. So we'll be meeting mostly […] at probably one of my properties, or maybe not, depending on what happens, but we'll be in Aberdeen, in Scotland, meeting with the Prime Minister.' He will also visit both of his golf courses in Scotland - Turnberry in Ayrshire and Menie in Aberdeenshire. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is also expected Mr Trump will pay a visit to the 18-hole links New Course ahead of its expected opening in August. What will security be like? The chair of the Scottish Police Federation, David Threadgold, told Scotland on Sunday that all officers in Scotland could be affected for the duration of the trip, with some officers potentially being asked to work 12-hour shifts. He said: 'This is a huge policing event for Scotland and we will require mutual aid because of the huge demand on my colleagues. 'Very few if any cops will not be impacted by next week's visit and beyond.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added that ensuring officers can eat, drink and rest will be a 'challenge'. Police Scotland have also made a request to the Police Service of Northern Ireland seeking officers to provide additional support during the visit. Flying restrictions over the Trump International Golf Links site in Aberdeenshire are already in force and will remain in place until August 10. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Will there be protests? Coordinated anti-Trump protests are being held in Edinburgh and Aberdeen this weekend, marking the arrival of the US President in Scotland. Since the dates of the President's visit have been confirmed, a group of campaigners from across the UK have joined forces under a banner called the 'Stop Trump Coalition'. It has organised two protests in Scotland on Saturday, at Union Terrace Gardens in Aberdeen and outside the US consulate in Edinburgh, which are expected to kick off at noon. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Protesters gathered in Edinburgh when Donald Trump visited Scotland in 2018. | PA Organisers said activists, made up of trade unionists, climate campaigners and pro-Palestine groups, will respond to the President's agenda and follow him 'wherever he goes' during his trip.

Can Rachel Reeves avoid a new fiscal crisis?
Can Rachel Reeves avoid a new fiscal crisis?

New Statesman​

time40 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Can Rachel Reeves avoid a new fiscal crisis?

Photo by Jack Hill -Many British governments enter office vowing 'never again'. In Rachel Reeves' case the promise was that the country would never again endure the economic turmoil that Liz Truss subjected it to. To justify this boast, one of her first acts was to pass a bill strengthening the powers of the (now maligned) Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Yet the charge levelled at the Chancellor is precisely that Britain faces a return to Truss-style instability. This doesn't emanate only from Conservatives desperate for political revenge on Labour. 'Our finances are precarious, we've seen that in the past few weeks,' Gary Smith, the general secretary of the GMB (Reeves' own union), told me when I interviewed him for this week's NS. 'We are beholden to the bond markets; this could unravel very quickly.' Helen Thompson, the Cambridge professor of political economy, who sits on the advisory board of the Labour Together think tank, warns that 'there's a real risk there could be a crisis quite quickly because of the situation with the bond markets'. The air is thick with invocations of 1976 – the year when the plummeting value of the pound forced Jim Callaghan's Labour government to accept a £2.3bn bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Is this justified? Here are the facts: the UK, as the OBR recently warned, has the sixth-highest debt, fifth-highest deficit and third-highest borrowing costs among advanced economies. In June, the government recorded the second-highest borrowing figure since monthly records began in 1993 (exceeded only by the pandemic-afflicted month of June 2020). The markets are tolerant of indebted states that have a clear plan to reduce their borrowing. But the question that bond vigilantes are asking is whether Labour does. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe A one-year-old government with a landslide Commons majority has been forced to U-turn on relatively minor savings: £1.5bn from means-testing winter fuel payments and £5bn from cutting health and disability benefits (public spending stands at £1.3trn a year). In these circumstances tax would normally take the strain but Reeves has ruled out raising those taxes that account for two thirds of revenue: income tax, National Insurance (on employees), VAT and corporation tax. This leaves her with a much smaller menu of taxes on wealth – which investors fear will further depress economic growth. Here is the 'doom loop' that critics fear Britain is trapped in. Is there a route out? Reeves is increasingly confident in facing down those who argue that inflexibility is her greatest weakness and that she should loosen her fiscal rules. There is, she recently told the cabinet, 'nothing progressive in paying £1 in every £10 to US hedge funds' (a message she repeated yesterday during her appearance before the House of Lords' Economic Affairs Committee). Reeves' allies argue that her recent tears during Prime Minister's Questions served an inadvertent purpose. 'It was a reminder that she's trusted by the markets for a reason because people think she is sincere about keeping a grip on the finances,' one told me of the negative market reaction to speculation over the Chancellor's future. But continued trust may come at a price: the narrow fiscal headroom of £9.9bn that Reeves maintained last time, bond vigilantes warn, is not enough: they would like something closer to £20bn. Yet Labour aides insist that 'the manifesto stands' and will not be broken in pursuit of this goal. Here, then, is the question that Reeves may be forced to answer at the Budget: what happens when the irresistible force of the markets meets the immovable object of her tax pledges? [See also: Has Zarah Sultana already been sidelined from her new party?] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store