Migrants Deported From US To Salvadoran Prison Remain Under US Control, Salvadoran Officials Tell UN
The revelation was contained in court filings Monday by lawyers for more than 100 migrants who are seeking to challenge their deportations to El Salvador's mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. The case is among several challenging President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. 'In this context, the jurisdiction and legal responsibility for these persons lie exclusively with the competent foreign authorities,' Salvadoran officials wrote in response to queries from the unit of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
The UN group has been looking into the fate of the men who were sent to El Salvador from the US in mid-March, even after a US judge had ordered the planes that were carrying them to be turned around.
The Trump administration has argued that it is powerless to return the men, noting that they are beyond the reach of US courts and no longer have access to due process rights or other US constitutional guarantees. But lawyers for the migrants said the UN report shows otherwise. 'El Salvador has confirmed what we and everyone else understood: it is the US that controls what happens to the Venezuelans languishing at CECOT. Remarkably, the US government didn't provide this information to us or the court,' American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Lee Gelerent said in an email. Skye Perryman, CEO and president of Democracy Forward, said the documents show that the administration has not been honest with the court or the American people. The ACLU and Democracy Forward are both representing the migrants.
The administration in March agreed to pay $6 million for El Salvador to house 300 migrants. The deal sparked immediate controversy when Trump invoked an 18th-century wartime law–the Alien Enemies Act–to quickly remove men it has accused of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
In a related case, the administration mistakenly sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the same prison despite a judge's order prohibiting the Maryland man from being sent to El Salvador. The administration initially resisted court orders to bring him back to the US, saying he was no longer in American custody. Eventually, Abrego Garcia was returned to the US, where he now faces criminal charges of human smuggling while legal battles continue.
Last month, a coalition of immigrant rights groups sued to invalidate the prison deal with El Salvador, arguing that the arrangement to move migrant detainees outside the reach of US courts violates the Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
an hour ago
- Saudi Gazette
US sanctions UN expert Francesca Albanese, critic of Israel's Gaza offensive
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is imposing sanctions on the UN Human Rights Council special rapporteur Francesca Albanese, an outspoken critic of Israel's military offensive in Gaza. Secretary of State Marco Rubio linked the move to her support for the International Criminal Court (ICC), some of whose judges have already been sanctioned by the US. Rubio said the US was sanctioning Albanese for directly engaging with the ICC in its efforts to prosecute American or Israeli nationals, accusing her of being unfit for service as a UN Special Rapporteur. The sanctions are likely to prevent Albanese from travelling to the US and would block any assets she has in the country. In a post on X, Albanese did not directly address the sanctions, but wrote: "[O]n this day more than ever: I stand firmly and convincingly on the side of justice, as I have always done." The message, in which the Italy-born special rapporteur reposted a thread of support for ICC, said she came from the court's founding country, where lawyers and judges had "defended justice at great cost and often with their own life". "I intend to honor that tradition," she added in the post. Albanese declined to comment to the BBC, but was quoted by Al Jazeera as describing the sanctions as "mafia style intimidation techniques". It is the latest escalation by the Trump administration as it wages a campaign against the ICC, having already sanctioned four of its judges. The US took the action after the court last year issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes in Gaza, accusations they reject. Rubio also accused Albanese of having "spewed unabashed antisemitism, expressed support for terrorism, and open contempt for the United States, Israel, and the West". The move is likely to provoke a fierce backlash from those who argue for accountability over the civilian death toll from Israel's military offensive in Gaza. The special rapporteur has long argued that Western governments are not doing enough to support the rights of Palestinians in the occupied Palestinian territories. Her outspoken stance has attracted significant support among those who accuse Israeli and US leaders of weaponising accusations of antisemitism in order to silence scrutiny of their policies. Her critics have pointed to language used in the past by Albanese, including a 2014 comment when she suggested the "Jewish lobby" was influencing US government decisions when it came to Israel and the Palestinians. She is since reported to have said she regretted the remark, but rejected claims it was antisemitic. The head of Amnesty International and former UN Special Rapporteur Agnes Callamard said she was dismayed by the decision to sanction Albanese. "Governments around the world and all actors who believe in the rule-based order and international law must do everything in their power to mitigate and block the effect of the sanctions against Francesca Albanese," she said. Rubio said Albanese had shown contempt for the US by writing "threatening letters" to several US companies, making what he called unfounded accusations and recommending the ICC pursue prosecutions of the companies and their executives. "We will not tolerate these campaigns of political and economic warfare, which threaten our national interests and sovereignty," Rubio said. Earlier this month Albanese called on dozens of multinational companies to stop doing business with Israel, warning them they risked being complicit in war crimes in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. She said the companies "profited from the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid, and now genocide" in the occupied Palestinian territories. Israel rejected her report as "groundless", saying it would "join the dustbin of history". Albanese has criticised Donald Trump's plan, announced in February, to take over the Gaza Strip and displace its residents elsewhere. "It's unlawful, immoral and... completely irresponsible because it will make the regional crisis even worse," she said in February. The timing of the sanctions announcement is notable with Netanyahu currently in Washington, where he received an extended honour cordon at the Pentagon on Wednesday. Albanese has previously rejected similar claims against her, telling the BBC in October: "I don't take these remarks and the defamation they carry lightly, but at the same time, I know this is not about me, as my predecessors knew that it was not about them. "I also know these member states [making accusations of antisemitism] have done absolutely nothing to abide by international law." Her office has been approached for comment. Some 125 countries are parties to the Rome Statute that established the ICC and are protected by it, as well as bound by their membership to uphold the court's decisions. The US, like Israel, is not a member of the court. It has sided with Israel, its staunch ally, which it has armed throughout the Gaza war, against the Netanyahu arrest warrant, while many European countries have said they respect the court's independence in the case. The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. At least 57,575 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry. Most of Gaza's population has also been displaced multiple times. More than 90% of homes are estimated to be damaged or destroyed; the healthcare, water, sanitation and hygiene systems have collapsed; and there are shortages of food, fuel, medicine and shelter. — BBC
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
More than 17 million people in Yemen are going hungry, including over 1 million children, UN says
UNITED NATIONS: More than 17 million people in conflict-torn Yemen are going hungry, including over a million children under the age of 5 who are suffering from 'life-threatening acute malnutrition,' the United Nations humanitarian chief said Wednesday. Tom Fletcher told the UN Security Council that the food security crisis in the Arab world's poorest country, which is beset by civil war, has been accelerating since late 2023. The number of people going hungry could climb to over 18 million by September, he warned, and the number of children with acute malnutrition could surge to 1.2 million early next year, 'leaving many at risk of permanent physical and cognitive damage.' According to experts who produce the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a leading international authority that ranks the severity of hunger, more than 17,000 Yemenis are in the three worst categories of food insecurity — crisis stage or worse. Fletcher said the UN hasn't seen the current level of deprivation since before a UN-brokered truce in early 2022. He noted that it is unfolding as global funding for humanitarian aid is plummeting, which means reductions or cuts in food. According to the UN, as of mid-May, the UN's $2.5 billion humanitarian appeal for Yemen this year had received just $222 million, just 9 percent. Yemen has been embroiled in civil war since 2014, when Iranian-backed Houthi rebels seized the capital of Sanaa, forcing the internationally recognized government into exile in Saudi Arabia. A Saudi-led coalition intervened months later and has been battling the rebels since 2015 to try and restore the government. The war has devastated Yemen, created one of the world's worst humanitarian disasters, and turned into a stalemated proxy conflict. More than 150,000 people, including fighters and civilians, have been killed. Hans Grundberg, the UN special envoy for Yemen, told the council in a video briefing that two Houthi attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea this week – the first in over seven months – and Israeli airstrikes on the capital and key ports are escalating the conflict. The Houthis have vowed to keep targeting vessels in the key waterway until the war in Gaza ends. Grundberg said freedom of navigation in the Red Sea must be safeguarded and stressed that 'Yemen must not be drawn deeper into regional crises that threaten to unravel the already extremely fragile situation in the country.' 'The stakes for Yemen are simply too high,' he said. 'Yemen's future depends on our collective resolve to shield it from further suffering and to give its people the hope and dignity they so deeply deserve.' Grundberg warned that a military solution to the civil war 'remains a dangerous illusion that risks deepening Yemen's suffering.' Negotiations offer the best hope to address the complex conflict, he said, and the longer it is drawn out 'there is a risk that divisions could deepen further.' Grundberg said both sides must signal a willingness to explore peaceful avenues — and an important signal would be the release of all conflict-related detainees. The parties have agreed to an all-for-all release, he said, but the process has stagnated for over a year.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Former DOGE official rushed grant to Trump-backed Gaza aid group over staff objections
A top US State Department official waived nine mandatory counterterrorism and anti-fraud safeguards to rush a $30 million award last month to a Gaza aid group backed by the Trump administration and Israel, according to an internal memorandum seen by Reuters. Jeremy Lewin, a former Department of Government Efficiency associate, approved the funds despite an assessment stating that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's (GHF) proposal failed to meet 'minimum technical or budgetary standards.' The June 24 action memorandum was sent to Lewin by Kenneth Jackson, another former DOGE official now serving as acting deputy administrator of the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The two have overseen the agency's dismantling and the merger of its functions into the State Department. Lewin also overrode 58 objections from USAID staff who wanted GHF to resolve numerous issues in its application before the funds were approved, two sources told Reuters. The $30 million was cleared just five days after GHF submitted its proposal on June 19. In a June 25 email to USAID leadership, Lewin cited 'strong Admin support for this one' and urged that the money be disbursed 'ASAP.' The documents highlight how the Trump administration prioritized GHF despite its lack of experience and the deaths of more than 500 Palestinians near the group's Gaza distribution sites. GHF, which coordinates closely with the Israeli military, has acknowledged reports of violence but said they occurred outside its operational areas. Lewin noted in his email that he had discussed the award with aides to Trump's Gaza negotiator, Steve Witkoff, and with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's office. He admitted the move would be controversial, writing: 'I'm taking the bullet on this one.' The White House referred Reuters to a State Department statement, which defended the approval under emergency provisions to 'meet humanitarian needs as expeditiously as possible.' It added the award would remain under 'rigorous oversight,' with new reporting and control requirements. – Raising the risk – A GHF spokesperson said the group's model 'is specifically designed to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse,' adding that such government inquiries were routine. Addressing the waived safeguards, the spokesperson said GHF was 'addressing each question as per regulations and normal procedure.' GHF claims its operations prevent ISIS from hijacking food aid and using it to exert control over Gaza's population — an accusation denied by the group. In the action memo, Jackson called GHF 'uniquely positioned to operate in areas with restricted access' and credited it with delivering millions of meals and weakening Hamas's influence. Jackson also acknowledged GHF had not met USAID's formal eligibility criteria and listed the nine waived requirements, which are normally mandatory. These included legal vetting for ties to extremist organizations and assessments of internal controls to prevent misuse of funds. Waiving the vetting 'could increase the risk' that GHF or its subcontractors might be linked to terrorist activity, the document said. GHF's required risk management plan was also incomplete. Jackson wrote that approving the award without it 'could risk programmatic diversion, reputational harm, and potential violations of US counterterrorism laws.' Nonetheless, Jackson recommended the waivers based on the 'humanitarian and political urgency' of GHF's mission. Lewin approved each item. Two former senior USAID officials said they had never seen such a move over professional staff objections. 'I oversaw something like 1,500 grants. I never saw it happen,' said Sarah Charles, who led USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance from 2021 to 2024. 'Very occasionally, we would do the vetting after an award in a sudden-onset emergency — think earthquake — but that was at the recommendation of staff.' USAID staff had questioned whether GHF could ensure safety for Palestinians collecting food packages, whether its team had adequate humanitarian training, and its plan to distribute powdered infant formula in an area with limited access to clean water.
